|Why aren’t “We the People” Striking and Boycotting with our Brothers & Sisters in Greece?
While we sit and watch from the comfort of our homes, not only in Greece, but all around us: America, Egypt, Pakistan, Yemen, Syria, Turkey, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc, etc, etc, “We the People” are being oppressed by the same ruthless banking and political agenda’s, led by soul-less people who’ve been bought off, seduced by power and lies, and taught to be traitors of entire civilizations.If its not government sanctioned wars, “accidental”, or purposeful neglect of nuclear reactors through”natural” or man-made earthquakes, “mismanaged” flood preparations, (which just happen to be soros buying opportunites), mortgage fraud, “ForeclosureGate”, Free Trade Zones in exchange for American banking debt,planned food shortages …… WHAT IS IT?
WHY DIDN’T THE BANKERS PAY OFF OUR COUNTRIES DEBTS INSTEAD OF GRANT THEMSELVES HUGE BONUSES???……..
THIS IS PLANNED FOR US, AND WE’VE BEEN TRAINED TO PAY FOR IT!
This whole agenda is driven by Fear and Poverty Consciousness, all of it, ALLOWED by the SILENT MAJORITY, who do not want to become involved, forgetting that WE OUTNUMBER THEM!
So we sit and watch, programmed into believing that this out and out theft of homes, property, lives, and cruel beatings by men in uniforms, who have been brainwashed into working against their own best interests and that of their families, by enforcing and implementing policies that will be perpetrated upon their own descendant’s, are vaccinated and roided up in order to continue these cycles of abuse.
Ask yourself: “What have I got to lose?”
When WE STOP FIGHTING EACH OTHER, WE CAN UNITE & UTILIZE OUR GREATER NUMBERS THROUGH MASSIVE, PEACEFUL, NON-COMPLIANCE! MOMEMTUM IS ON OUR SIDE
DON’T BUY, DON’T COMPLY, ASK WHY??
“WE the PEOPLE” STRIKE AND SUPPORT GREECE, EGYPT, ICELAND, IRELAND………….BY REFUSING TO WORK, GO TO SCHOOL, BANK, TRAVEL OR PARTICIPATE …… TURNING OFF OUR TV’s and TURNING ON OUR MINDS!
We CAN FREE OURSELVES FROM BANKING FRAUD AND DEBT!!!
If “WE the People” are NOT running their sytems, or murdering each other, while destroying our planet by dumping endless toxins on OURSELVES…….
WE will be able to begin healing, eliminating government’s gone wild, and recreating our world, by abolishing the current banking enslavement new world order, which is actually a return to fuedalism, and real tryanny.
If you are not in a position to stay home, you can bring your lunch and only shop at your LOCAL Mom & Pop, turn off your tv, and research online whatever subject you feel drawn too, you’ll find the same criminals in the bankground………
INDIVIDUAL, STATE, AND NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY, CAN BE OURS!
Prepare yourselves. WE OUTNUMBER THEM! GET THE BULLIES OUT!
POWER TO THE PEOPLE THROUGH PEACEFUL UNITY!
| On July 14 1933 a sterilization law was passed in Nazi Germany, known as Gesetz zur Verhütung erbkranken Nachwuchses(Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring). Any German was a target if they were found to be suffering from a range of perceived hereditary ailments, such as congenital mental deficiency, schizophrenia, manic-depressive insanity, epilepsy, Huntington’s chorea, blindness, deafness, any severe hereditary deformity or even severe alcoholism. Official pronouncements insisted that these individuals were a drain on the German people, both biologically and financially (see right). The law passed on this day ultimately led to an estimated 400,000 people being involuntarily sterilized in pursuit of this national goal of “racial hygiene,” to eliminate handicapped descendants.Creationists are fond of laying the blame for Nazi eugenics on Charles Darwin. They insist that his materialist argument that humans evolved from animals and his conception of natural selection inspired the Nazis to implement a widespread policy of artificial selection within the Fatherland. However, these claims are as baseless as was the so-called “science” that the Nazis employed.For example, William Dembski, intelligent design creationist and co-author of Moral Darwinism, claims:
In nearly identical form Jonathan Wells, devotee of Unification Church founder Sun Myung
Islamic creationist Harun Yahya (whom I recently interviewed from his home in Istanbul) similarly insists:
Taken together this would be a damning indictment, if there were actually any truth to their claims. The main connections that all three authors make between Darwinism and eugenics is that Francis Galton, an early proponent of eugenics, was Darwin’s cousin and that Ernst Haeckel, a German biologist who championed evolution and maintained a long correspondence with the English naturalist, was a primary source for Nazi eugenic policies.
The strength of their arguments quickly fall apart, however, once they are given a few moments thought. The Galton connection is quite obviously baseless, for surely no one can be held responsible for something their cousin promotes (especially since Galton didn’t even invent the term eugenics until a year after Darwin’s death). Furthermore, not that it matters, but Galton was merely Darwin’s half-cousin since they shared the same grandfather, Erasmus Darwin, but had different grandmothers. The second claim, about Haeckel’s foundation for Nazi race biology, is simply wrong. However, for this they can only be faulted for shoddy research, since the connection they were exploiting came from a highly regarded scientific source: Stephen Jay Gould.
In Gould’s 1977 book Ontology and Phylogeny the esteemed Harvard paleontologist wrote:
While, in his book, Gould sought to separate Darwin from his German contemporary, his creationist quote-miners were looking to do the opposite. Unfortunately for both, the connection they were drawing doesn’t actually exist.
According to University of Chicago historian Robert J. Richards, in a recent anthology:
Gould was drawing from the research of Daniel Gasman whose 1971 book Scientific Origins of National Socialism placed Haeckel at the center of the philosophical foundation of Nazi ideology. Richards has excoriated this research (see, for example, his paper Ernst Haeckel’s Alleged Anti-Semitism and Contributions to Nazi Biology in the journal Biological Theory) and demonstrated that, not only was Haeckel not a proponent of a pre-Nazi racist biology, but the Nazi’s rejected his work totally.
The reality is that, while one German academic named Heinz Brücher did argue that Haeckel’s Darwinism meshed with Hitler’s racial attitudes, this view was immediately quashed by the guardians of party doctrine. Günther Hecht, official representative for the National Socialist Party’s Department of Race-Politics (Rassenpolitischen Amt der NSDAP), insisted in the Reich’s official scientific journal:
The reason for this rejection may have been the fact that Haeckel stood out among his contemporaries for his expression of Judenfreundschaft (friendliness toward Jews) or because of his criticisms of the military during the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-1871. A more important reason is probably the fact that Nazi racial views had no connection with specific evolutionary concepts like transmutation of species or the animal origins of human beings. As Richards concludes:
The Nazi policies enacted three-quarters of a century ago today were certainly bad enough, we don’t need to spread the blame onto those who had no connection with them. Given the long history of creationist scholarship based on principles rather than propaganda, I’m certain we will no longer see attempts to smear Darwin’s legacy with the taint of Nazi ideology once these facts become more generally well-known. But, of course, I’m being sarcastic.
New documents acquired through the Freedom of Information Act reveal that Janet Napolitano LIED about the safety of the TSA’s naked body scanners
|New documents acquired through the Freedom of Information Act reveal that Janet Napolitano LIED about the safety of the TSA’s naked body scanners. Now the truth comes out:
|Breaking:Firefighters beat back flames on plutonium lab property 27 Jun 2011 A raging wildfire in Los Alamos on Monday briefly entered the property of the nation’s preeminent nuclear facility, Los Alamos National Laboratory, a vast complex that houses research laboratories and a plutonium facility. A mandatory evacuation has been ordered for the town of Los Alamos, which has a population of about 12,000. Firefighters were able to douse the flames on the one-acre “spot fire” just inside the southwestern boundary of the lab site, about 25 miles outside Santa Fe, authorities said.
Los Alamos National Laboratory moving to protect radioactive material from fire –Up to 2,500 evacuated as blaze nears site where world’s first atomic bomb was built 27 Jun 2011 A raging wildfire spread to within one mile of the nation’s preeminent nuclear weapons facility on Monday, as officials at Los Alamos National Laboratory scrambled to make sure that radioactive and hazardous material were protected from the wind-driven fire that has forced the installation to close. The number one priority at the moment is to make sure all the radioactive and hazardous material is protected, Janet Bettinger, deputy manager of finance, told NBC News. She said she couldn’t confirm that it is protected at this point. The fire has burned around 44,000 acres and was threatening buildings, power lines and natural gas lines, Bettinger said.
Although the U.S. government’s wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have taken center stage for the better part of the last ten years, there is another failed war that has been waged by the federal government for the past forty years.
The war on drugs was declared by President Richard Nixon on June 17, 1971.
Speaking at a press conference in the Briefing Room at the White House, Nixon announced his plan:
Nixon left no doubt as to the scope of his offensive:
He went on to say how “essential it was for the American people to be alerted to this danger.”
In a special message to the Congress on Drug Abuse Prevention and Control on the same day, Nixon declared drug use to be a “menace,” an “increasing grave threat,” and a “national emergency.”
He also continued his military rhetoric:
Nixon then issued Executive Order No. 11599 establishing the Special Action Office of Drug Abuse Prevention (SAODAP) in the Executive Office of the President. He also appointed the first drug czar, Dr. Jerome H. Jaffe, as Special Consultant to the President for Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs.
Nixon’s war on drugs really took off after the formation of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) in 1973 and the declaration of an “all-out global war on the drug menace.”
This does not mean that the federal government didn’t fight against drugs before Nixon declared his war. To the contrary, the feds have waged war on personal freedom via the drug war since the passage in 1905 of the first federal anti-narcotics law aimed at ending the opium trade in the Philippines.
This was followed by the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, the Opium Exclusion Act of 1909, the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act of 1914, the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937, the Narcotic Control Act of 1956, and the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970.
And since the beginning of Nixon’s war, we have had the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, the Chemical Diversion and Trafficking Act of 1988, the Illicit Drug Anti-Proliferation Act of 2003, and the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005.
And who can forget the D.A.R.E. school-lecture program, “Just Say No” clubs, and the Partnership for a Drug-Free America’s television ad featuring a hot skillet, an egg, and the phrase, “This is your brain on drugs.”
The case against the drug war has been made so many times that, at the risk of sounding like a broken record, I will limit myself to ten key points:
But as true and important as these things are, the drug-warrior statists are right about dismissing them for in the end they really don’t matter. And there are many other things that don’t matter as well.
It doesn’t matter if the drug war can or can’t be “won.” It doesn’t matter if drug addiction destroys or doesn’t destroy lives and families. It doesn’t matter if marijuana is or isn’t a gateway drug. It doesn’t matter if the majority of Americans support or don’t support the drug war. It doesn’t matter if marijuana is or isn’t beneficial for pain management. It doesn’t matter if fighting the drug war is or isn’t a bipartisan issue. It doesn’t matter if cocaine and heroin are or aren’t addictive. It doesn’t matter if drug use would or wouldn’t increase if drugs were legalized. It doesn’t matter if advocates for drug decriminalization want or don’t want to get high. It doesn’t matter if smoking crack is or isn’t dangerous. It doesn’t matter if drug use is or isn’t immoral. It doesn’t matter if the war on drugs is or isn’t “worth it.”
What matters is personal freedom, private property, personal responsibility, individual liberty, personal and financial privacy, free markets, limited government, and the natural right to be left alone if one is not aggressing against his someone and is doing “anything that’s peaceful.”
Ending the war on drugs is not an esoteric issue of libertarians or a pet issue of those who want to get high. Once the government claims control over what a man smokes, snorts, sniffs, inhales, or otherwise ingests into his body, there is no limit to its power. As the economist Ludwig von Mises so eloquently said: “As soon as we surrender the principle that the state should not interfere in any questions touching on the individual’s mode of life, we end by regulating and restricting the latter down to the smallest detail.” The war on drugs is incompatible with a free society.
Laurence M. Vance [send him mail] writes from Pensacola, FL. He is the author of Christianity and War and Other Essays Against the Warfare State and The Revolution that Wasn’t. His newest book is Rethinking the Good War. Visit his website.
© 2011 The Future of Freedom Foundation.
Cops “ask” for a man’s camera and he gives them a strong NO and tells them to get off his property! They then threaten to arrest his friend for some made up charges out of spite. The men stand up for themselves and assert their rights and the cops eventually drop it and walk away. I guess they didn’t want to file the paperwork and go through the trouble of fabricating a false police report. Pretty funny video.
Source: – Chris, InfoLib
|Economist Michael Hudson calls it “Replacing Economic Democracy with Financial Oligarchy” in a June 5 article by that title, saying:After being debt entrapped, or perhaps acquiescing to entrapment, the Papandreou government needs bailout help to pay bankers that entrapped them. Doing so, however, requires “initiat(ing) a class war by raising its taxes (harming working households most), lowering its standard of living – and even private-sector pensions – and sell off public land, tourist sites, islands, ports, water and sewer facilities” – in fact, all the country’s crown jewels, lock, stock and barrel, strip-mining it of everything of worth at fire sale prices.
Why? Because the US-dominated IMF, EU and European Central Bank (ECB), the so-called “Troika,” demand it as the price for bailout help that wouldn’t be needed if Greece wasn’t trapped in the euro straightjacket. Membership means foregoing the right to devalue its currency to make exports more competitive, maintain sovereignty over its money to monetize its debt freely, and be able to legislate fiscal policies to stimulate growth.
Instead they’re entrapped by foreign banker diktats demanding tribute. They call it a “rescue.” In May 2010, the Papandreou government agreed to earlier austerity in return for loans. Now they’re at it again, demanding more or they’ll collapse the entire economy, or so they say. And the same scheme is replicated in Ireland and Portugal. Moreover, it’s heading for Spain, and potentially most of Europe and America as representative governments head closer to “financial oligarchy.”
In other words, it amounts to financial coup d’etat authority over sovereign governments unless popular anger prevents it, involving more than street protests or short-term strikes accomplishing nothing.
Former Wall Street broker, financial analyst, radio/TV host, and consummate critic Max Keiser calls it “banker occupation” for good reason. They:
|Since flooding began on June 6th, there has been a disturbingly low level of media attention given to the crisis at the Fort Calhoun Nuclear Facility near Omaha, Nebraska. But available evidence strongly suggests that something very serious could have happened there.Unfortunately for members of the public, there is no shortage of proof that serious nuclear incidents and radiation releases have happened in America, and have been covered up each and every time.Most Americans are completely unaware that dangerous radiation has leaked from some three-quarters of all U.S. nuclear power stations and should naturally raise concerns that much of the the country’s water supplies may be contaminated. For this reason, it is paramount that the media and the public demand every bit of information available on this latest event.
First accounts tell us that on June 7th, there was a fire reported at Fort Calhoun. The official story is that the fire was in an electrical switchgear room at the plant. The apparently facility lost power to a pump that cools the spent fuel rod pool, allegedly for a duration of approximately 90 minutes.
Here is a video regarding the extent of flooding experienced along the Missouri River in Nebraska:
RISK: Levees in and around Omaha were not designed for 3 months of continuous flood water.
The following sequence of events is documented on the Omaha Public Power District’s own
Who can keep count anymore? Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, and all of our smaller wars. Come election time, will we shout “four more years!” or “four more wars!”?
Let’s do something about it.
1. Call congress members and senators now at (202) 224-3121 to tell them to vote No on any authorizatio n of war in Libya (as if the President cares what they authorize!).
Also tell the House to vote Yes for the Kucinich-Amash amendment to the FY 2012 Department of Defense Appropriations bill to end all involvement in the war by October 1, 2011.
Also tell the Senate to join Senator Webb in demanding that no treaty or “Status of Forces Agreement” be unconstitutionally made for Afghanistan without Congress.
The majority of Americans want the war in Afghanistan ended. President Obama promised a “significant” withdrawal this July. But what he announced on Wednesday amounted to withdrawing about 1 percent of U.S. personnel in July (10,000 withdrawn over six months from a total of 200,000 troops and contractors). A White House spokesperson told a conference call of reporters on Wednesday that public opinion plays no role in such decisions.
Can public opinion play any role in Congressional decisions? Obama cannot keep so many troops in Afghanistan so long if Congress refuses to pay for it. In recent weeks, the House has twice passed measures barring the use of funds for U.S. warmaking in Libya. Now before both houses is the 2012 “Defense Appropriations” bill which would dump over $100 billion into wars including Afghanistan.
Enough is enough, and Obama’s “drawdown” is not enough!
Fifty years ago, freedom riders traveled by bus into the U.S. South. Now American freedom riders are joining their allies from around the world on a flotilla bound for Gaza. The U.S. ship is called The Audacity of Hope.
The heroes on this ship have pledged to sail unarmed and to refuse to use violence. The Israeli military, which continues to illegally blockade Gaza, causing endless suffering to the Gazan people, has pledged to use violent force to prevent the ships getting through.
The Fre edom Riders of 1961 asked the U.S. government to protect them. Its efforts to do so were too little too late. The Freedom Riders of 2011 have also asked the U.S. government to protect them, and thus far received no such commitment. We can ask the U.S. State Department to ask Israel (recipient of billions of dollars in U.S. weaponry every year) not to assault this flotilla, and to allow those transporting aid and letters of good will to reach the suffering people of Gaza unharmed.
4. Pledge to Stop the Machine in DC in October
October 2011 is the 10th anniversary of the invasion of Afghanistan and the beginning of t he 2012 federal austerity budget. It is time to light the spark that sets off a true democratic, nonviolent transition to a world in which people are freed to create just and sustainable solutions.
“I pledge that if any U.S. troops, contractors, or mercenaries remain in Afghanistan on Thursday, October 6, 2011, as that occupation goes into its 11th year, I will commit to being in Freedom Plaza in Washington, D.C., with others on that day with the intention of making it our Tahrir Square, Cairo, our Madison, Wisconsin, where we will NONVIOLENTLY resist the corporate machine until our resources are invested in human needs and environmental protection instead of war and exploitation. We can do this together. We will be the beginning.”
Peace and counter-recruitment groups, libraries, coffee houses, and schools are distributing copies of War Is A Lie where they can do the most good.
And an admirer of the book is sending copies to every member of Congress and other decision makers. You can fund this project!
|How Bankers use the Debt Crisis to Roll Back the Progressive Era
By: Prof. Michael Hudson
Financial strategists do not intend to let today’s debt crisis go to waste. Foreclosure time has arrived. That means revolution – or more accurately, a counter-revolution to roll back the 20th century’s gains made by social democracy: pensions and social security, public health care and other infrastructure providing essential services at subsidized prices or for free. The basic model follows the former Soviet Union’s post-1991 neoliberal reforms: privatization of public enterprises, a high flat tax on labor but only nominal taxes on real estate and finance, and deregulation of the economy’s prices, working conditions and credit terms.What is to be reversed is the “modern” agenda. The aim a century ago was to mobilize the Industrial Revolution’s soaring productivity and technology to raise living standards and use progressive taxation, public regulation, central banking and financial reform to distribute wealth fairly and make societies more equal. Today’s financial aim is the
| The propagandists were at it again over the weekend. This time they were trying to convince the sheep that Greece was even more insolvent than the U.S. Naturally, to do so they simply made-up some numbers.
To begin with there is the ludicrous fiction that the U.S.’s debt-to-GDP is merely approaching 75%.
Here are the REAL numbers. (Continues below the video)
Current U.S. national debt: $14.3 trillion