HERE WE GO: WHO Recommends Masks and Social Distancing For Everyone – Vaccinated and Unvaccinated – Due to Covid “Delta” Variant
The China-funded World Health Organization (WHO) is recommending masks and social distancing for everyone – vaccinated and unvaccinated – due to the Covid “Delta” variant.
“Vaccine alone won’t stop community transmission,” Dr. Mariangela Simao, WHO’s assistant director-general for access to medicines and health products, said. “People need to continue to use masks consistently, be in ventilated spaces, hand hygiene … the physical distance, avoid crowding. This still continues to be extremely important, even if you’re vaccinated when you have a community transmission ongoing.”
Fox News reported:
As the highly contagious delta variant of the coronavirus gained traction around the world, the World Health Organization urged vaccinated people to continue to wear masks and social distance, according to reports.
The recommendation comes weeks after the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said vaccinated people can go most places without masks. However, federal mandates remain on airplanes, for example.
The vaccines are considered “highly effective” against the delta variant, according to a recent study by the British government, although slightly less than the original strain.
But the WHO urged those vaccinated to “play it safe” and wear a mask because so many remain unvaccinated globally and the variant has become the main spreader in several countries, CNBC reported.
Authoritarians are already using the “Delta” variant to justify a new round of lockdowns and mandates.
The Australian city of Sydney just went into a two-week hard lockdown after more than 80 new cases of the “Delta” variant of Covid-19 were confirmed.
Israel reinstated its mask mandate because of the “Delta” variant.
Source: GatewayPundit.com
The Hydroxy-chloroquine Scandal
by IAIN DAVIS Thursday, 18th June 2020
From the outset of the Coronavirus pandemic, and the lockdown regimes that followed, we have been repeatedly told, by all the usual suspects, institutions and the mainstream media, that the only way to get back to normal is with a vaccine; precisely echoing the calls of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Certainly, the UK government was quick to invest in vaccine development. In their Coronavirus Action Plan, published on 3 March, the focus was overwhelmingly on vaccines. The Action Plan noted that a vaccine may not prevent infection from SARS-Cov-2 but could rather manage symptoms of the potentially resultant syndrome, COVID-19:
Given that there is currently neither a vaccine against COVID-19 nor any specific, proven, antiviral medication, most treatment will therefore be towards managing symptoms … innovate responses including diagnostics, drugs and vaccines …
This notion that a proposed vaccine may not actually stop SARS-CoV-2 infections, but rather manage symptoms of COVID-19, was clearly signalled by Pascal Soriot (CEO of AstraZeneca), who are partnering with Oxford University to develop a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Speaking on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show on 24 May, Soriot stated:
We are quite confident the vaccine will work, actually. The question is, will it completely clear the virus or stop people being sick … This is what happens with the flu vaccine, for instance … It simply stops people from being sick … Being protected against being sick would already be a big plus.
UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has, so far, held a number of discussions with Bill and Melinda Gates about the COVID-19 crisis. On 4 June, the UK government hosted the GAVI vaccine alliance Replenishment Summit in London. The Gates Foundation gave GAVI $1.2 billion in 2019 and was among its founding partners. It has contributed more than $4.1Bn to GAVI during its two-decade-long mission to create “healthy markets for vaccines.”
Bill Gates and Boris Johnson were the keynote speakers at the summit. In his address, Johnson stated:
I want to say a particular thank you to Bill and Melinda Gates for their generosity, their philanthropy, yet again, and their continued leadership in humanity’s battle against disease … Just as we have great military alliances like NATO … so we now need that same spirit of collaboration and collective defence against the common enemy of disease … It will require a new international effort to co-operate on the surveillance and sharing of information that can underpin a global alert system … it will need a radical scaling-up of our global capacity to respond, exactly as Bill [Gates] has set out.
As Johnson’s comments reveal, there is much more than just healthcare riding on the back of Coronavirus vaccine development. The vaccine itself sits at the centre of a web of surveillance, restricted freedom of movement and restricted access to employment and services based upon your allocated immunity status.
A whole new tech industry, combining global corporations and intelligence agencies, is springing up to monitor, control and surveil populations. Perhaps we could call this the “disease intelligence industrial complex.”
A Vaccine That Doesn’t Need To Work
Johnson’s Coronavirus Action Plan announcement followed the World Health Organisation’s February summit with the Global Research Collaboration for Infectious Disease Preparedness and Response (GLOPID-R).
GLOPID-R’s list of funding organisations, with significant financial interests in vaccine sales, is notable. For example, there is the Gates Foundation, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation (CEPI), the Wellcome Trust, and the French medical research agency Inserm (Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale).
The two-day WHO / GLOPID-R summit took place on 11-12 February. One month later, on 11 March, the WHO declared a global coronavirus pandemic. The summit produced the Target Product Profile (TPP) which needs to be met in order for the WHO to approve any proposed COVID-19 vaccine.
The WHO would prefer that the vaccine prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections, but it doesn’t have to, so long as it reduces the worst effects of COVID-19. It doesn’t need to be 100% effective either; 70% is fine.
Since, at the time of writing, COVID-19 is said to have impacted 0.1% of the global population, allegedly killing less than 0.006%, the WHO’s measure of success for a global vaccine being that it protect 70% of the global population from a disease that doesn’t affect 99.9% of the population, the chances of WHO approval for anything look pretty good — an inert saline solution should do the job. It is not surprising, then, that vaccine developers are so confidently looking forward to a global market and global profits.
A cheap, widely available off-patent drug that achieves exactly the same thing as the vaccine must, therefore, be seen as a problem.
Why Not Hydroxychloroquine?
When the world is presented with a virus which is claimed to cause a potentially fatal disease for which there is no known treatment, and if our only claimed wish is to “save lives,” trialling any and all potential treatments makes obvious sense.
Resistance to trials would suggest that saving life may not be the priority. If the evidence shows that powerful public health bodies and foundations have apparently colluded to stop trials, there can be little doubt another agenda has taken precedence over saving lives.
When the WHO declared a global pandemic, chloroquine, and its modern form hydroxychloroquine, were the most obvious candidates for investigative clinical trials. Its possible effectiveness had, after all, been noted since at least 2005.
Scientists and doctors around the world took note of early promising clinical trials in China. In France, Prof. Didier Raoult, one of the world’s most published microbiologists, announced his own trials. He stated that he thought it would be foolish not to trial chloroquine more widely.
Prof. Didier Raoult
Scientists at Stanford University agreed, reporting apparent treatment success in both China and South Korea. The Stanford team also advocated more thorough clinical trials of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine.
Yet resistance to trialling hydroxychloroquine was immediately evident. Raoult was attacked in France for suggesting hydroxychloroquine could work to prevent the most severe, life-threatening, symptoms of COVID-19. These attacks, which we would characterise as a disinformation campaign, came from the mainstream media, other scientists who worked for Inserm, and politicians.
The persistent claim, repeated ad nauseam by the mainstream media, that hydroxychloroquine presents some sort of severe heart risk, simply isn’t true.
The cardiovascular risks for hydroxychloroquine are overwhelmingly associated with acute poisoning, often intentional, when used in combination with other antiviral drugs, or with prolonged high-dosage use.
There is virtually no cardiovascular risk at all to taking it, as recommended, for short-course treatments — as you would if you took it as a prophylaxis for COVID-19.
The case fatality rate (CFR) for the oldest COVID-19 patients has been reported to rise to more than 14%. Raoult’s largest field study, of more than one thousand patients treated with hydroxychloroquine, showed that the CFR for the oldest patients dropped to 0.5%.
Raoult is by no means the only scientist or doctor to have seemingly proven the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine for treating COVID-19; especially as a prophylactic.
Doctors in New York found that hydroxychloroquine treatment increased survival rates; Brazilian doctors discovered that treating patients with hydroxychloroquine reduced their chances of requiring hospital treatment by nearly 300%, with no notable adverse events; Chinese doctors reduced fever duration and improved the clinical outcomes for patients treated with chloroquine; doctors in Spain used hydroxychloroquine to increase patient survival rates; researchers in the U.S. found that the addition of zinc further improved outcomes; doctors treating Chinese patients with hydroxychloroquine found no increase in adverse events for their patients; and a systemic review of the available evidence by Indian researchers concluded:
There is theoretical, experimental, preclinical and clinical evidence of the effectiveness of chloroquine in patients affected with COVID-19. There is adequate evidence of drug safety from the long-time clinical use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine.
However, if we were to rely on the MSM for our information, we would not know any of this. Why are they apparently so eager to convince us that hydroxychloroquine is harmful? Why are the WHO, Inserm and the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) determined that hydroxychloroquine trials won’t proceed?
The Problem With Hydroxychloroquine
The leading scientific advocates of hydroxychloroquine recommend that it should primarily be used in the early stages of COVID-19, or even prior to developing the syndrome, as a prophylactic. Should the person develop the symptoms of COVID-19, they could, for example, begin a course of what has become known as the Marseilles Treatment: hydroxychloroquine with the antibiotic azithromycin (HCQ+AZ) plus zinc to aid absorption.
Struggling to comprehend the seemingly inexplicable resistance to trialling HCQ+AZ, Prof. Harvey Risch, MD, from Yale University, argued that HCQ+AZ should immediately be used as an early therapy for COVID-19 patients. He wrote:
Hydroxychloroquine+azithromycin has been widely misrepresented in both clinical reports and public media…..Five studies, including two controlled clinical trials, have demonstrated significant major outpatient treatment efficacy……These medications need to be widely available and promoted immediately for physicians to prescribe.
His is far from the only eminently qualified opinion questioning the irrational blocking of treatment with hydroxychloroquine. In Michigan, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) have launched an appeal against an FDA injunction to allow them to prescribe hydroxychloroquine for their COVID-19 patients.
The WHO’s Solidarity Trials to test hydroxychloroquine were launched on 18 March. The WHO stated that four hundred hospitals in thirty-five countries had recruited 3,500 patients to take part. At the same time, the WHO launched its Solidarity Trial for potential vaccines.
The UK government did not take part in the WHO’s Solidarity trials, instead running their own Recovery Trial and separate COPCOV and PRINCIPLE trials.
The Recovery Trial’s core funding comes from the Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust and Oxford University, among others. Oxford University is running vaccine trials, in partnership with AstraZeneca. The Recovery Trial was not investigating the prophylactic potential of hydroxychloroquine.
The COPCOV trial was due to assess hydroxychloroquine’s prophylactic efficacy in protecting healthcare workers against contracting COVID-19.
The PRINCIPLE trial was perhaps the most relevant of all. Vulnerable over-fifties, and people over 65, were to be offered hydroxychloroquine in a large-cohort study of patients in primary care (GP practices and community care settings).
In France, Inserm ran its own Discovery Trials in parallel with the WHO’s Solidarity Trials. Again, they were only assessing hydroxychloroquine in isolation, for the most ill patients. Only the UK’s COPCOV and PRINCIPLE trials were assessing potential preventive efficacy. COPCOV also had an international arm.
However, none was trialling the recommended Marseilles Treatment.
Initially Inserm refused point-blank to trial hydroxychloroquine at all. Four days before the launch of the WHO’s Solidarity Trials, Prof. Yazdan Yazdanpanah, head of France’s health emergency rapid response committee (REACTing — REsearch and ACTion targeting emerging infectious diseases) stated that the Discovery Trials would exclude chloroquine (hydroxychloroquine) and would only trial patented drugs:
We have not retained it [hydroxychloroquine] for the moment, in particular because of its undesirable effects. It also has frequent interactions with other drugs. However, intensive care patients are often treated with multiple drugs.
This followed a decision on 15 January, made by the then French Minister of Solidarity and Health, Agnès Buzyn, to reclassify hydroxychloroquine in all its forms as a poisonous substance.
Prior to this decision, for more than fifty years, the French had been able to buy hydroxychloroquine over the counter. Once demand shot through the roof, as the COVID-19 crisis unfolded, they suddenly could no longer get it without a prescription.
With the WHO initially including hydroxychloroquine in their Solidarity Trials, Inserm had little option but to reluctantly include it in their Discovery Trials on Solidarity launch day, 22 March. Inserm stated in its press release:
We analyzed the data from the scientific literature concerning the SARS and MERS coronaviruses as well as the first publications on SARS-COV2 from China to arrive at a list of antiviral molecules to be tested: remdesivir, lopinavir in combination with ritonavir…….and hydroxychloroquine. The list of these potential drugs is also based on the list of experimental treatments classified as priorities by the World Health Organization.
This can be seen as little more than disingenuous back-peddling. The data from the scientific literature hadn’t changed in the space of a few days. If REACTing previously considered the hydroxychloroquine risks too high, no new evidence had emerged to alter that assessment.
Hydroxychloroquine Trials Abandoned for No Reason At All
Within days of the hydroxychloroquine trials starting, on 22 May The Lancet published a study by a team of four U.S. researchers from Brigham and Women’s Hospital Center for Advanced Heart Disease. The paper alleged that hydroxychloroquine presented too high a risk of ventricular arrhythmia and potentially increased mortality for COVID-19 patients.
The WHO suspended hydroxychloroquine Solidarity Trials on 25 May. U.S. researchers did the same, as did German public health authorities, Inserm and many others. The WHO effectively triggered all the suspensions.
The study published in The Lancet was not just a scientific fraud, it was a glaringly obvious scientific fraud. All the data for the Brigham study came from a single source, Surgisphere, which promotes itself as a medical data mining company and which was founded by one of the study’s authors, Dr. Sapan S. Desai.
Scientists around the world immediately noticed significant problems with the Surgisphere data. The data were too homogeneous for a global study; it seemed impossible that four researchers could collate such a massive hoard of data. Claims that this had all been achieved in a matter of weeks were laughed at by many genuine scientific researchers.
Surgisphere claimed it had a global network of participating hospitals, which would have required global ethics and data protection approval from every individual hospital. These claims were widely considered literally unbelievable.
Medical researchers and scientists from around the world wrote an open letter to The Lancet expressing their deep concerns about the study. The Lancet initially offered a minor correction, attempting, but failing, to account for the erroneous data.
Consequently The Lancet issued a statement saying “serious scientific concerns” had been brought to their attention. When The Lancet requested that Surgisphere participate in a data audit, it seems Dr. Desai declined. At this point, the other three authors of the study requested that The Lancet withdraw the paper, which it did on 3 June. Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, said:
This is a shocking example of research misconduct in the middle of a global health emergency.
Yet, despite the fact that scientists from across the globe were able to spot the fake paper with ease, neither The Lancet nor the world’s leading experts in public health, the World Health Organisation, could. Instead, it suspended trials of a potentially life-saving medication, that had only just begun, in the middle of a supposed global pandemic.
When the WHO made its suspension, on 26 May, the UK MHRA did the same. They suspended all trials initially, but then reinstated the Recovery trial: the only trial of the three which is not investigating hydroxychloroquine’s potential as a prophylactic.
Like the WHO, the MHRA either didn’t exercise any due diligence — or don’t care about saving lives.
The same day, despite there being no UK completed trials of Gilead Science’s remdesivir, the MHRA approved it for hospital treatment of COVID-19 patients anyway. They based this on the expert recommendation of the Commission on Human Medicines (CHM).
According to the CHM’s declaration of interests (p. 141–p. 247), there doesn’t seem to be a single pharmaceutical corporation which isn’t well represented among its members. Gilead Sciences has strong ties with the CHM.
The MHRA decision, and the CHM recommendation, followed the release of remdisivir trial data from the U.S. which suggested the drug could aid recovery of seriously ill patients by up to 31%.
That U.S. National Institute of Health (NIH) study was funded by the Gates Foundation-backed NIAID, headed by Dr Anthony Fauci. NIAID made a $37.5 million grant in February for the research.
Unlike hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir is patented. With 25 years left to run, Gilead Sciences can charge whatever they like for their drug until 2037 at the earliest.
A number of other studies have not been able to find any significant benefit from remdisivir. The WHO withdrew some of these unfavourable remdesivir studies from their trial database, as it had accidentally uploaded them. Other remdisivir trials were stopped when adverse effects were observed.
Following exposure of the Surgisphere fake science, the WHO initially claimed it would reinstate their hydroxychloroquine Solidarity Trials. However, this didn’t happen.
On 5 June, the Recovery Trial team announced that it had found no benefit from hydroxychloroquine. Prof. Peter Horby, Chief Investigator for the trial, said:
Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine have received a lot of attention and have been used very widely to treat COVID patients despite the absence of any good evidence. The RECOVERY Trial has shown that hydroxychloroquine is not an effective treatment in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 …
This was immediately reported by the mainstream media and the WHO announced it had terminated their hydroxychloroquine arm of the Solidarity trials. Citing data from its own trials and Inserm’s Discovery trials, yet to be released, the WHO stated:
This decision applies only to the conduct of the Solidarity trial and does not apply to the use or evaluation of hydroxychloroquine in pre- or post-exposure prophylaxis in patients exposed to COVID-19.
The only released data has come from the Recovery Trial, also referenced by the WHO. Yet the Recovery Trial has also been exposed as scientific nonsense. The Deputy Chief Investigator of the Recovery Trial, Prof. Martin Landray, gave an interview to France-Soir. What he revealed was quite remarkable.
Firstly, the mortality rate of the hydroxychloroquine patients was a staggering 25.7%.
The recommended hydroxychloroquine dose for an adult in the UK is no more than 200 — 400 mg per day. In France, 1800 mg per day is considered to be lethal poisoning.
Yet, across 175 UK hospitals, 1542 patient participants in the Recovery Trial were given 2400 mg (six times the recommended maximum dose), in the first twenty-four hours. This was followed up by ten days at twice the recommended maximum dose at 800 mg.
It isn’t really clear what the objective was. This wasn’t so much a trial of effectiveness; it looked more like an experiment in toxic poisoning. That would seem to account for the atrocious mortality rate.
Explaining that the dose was chosen by using computer-generated mathematical models, Prof Landry stated:
The doses were chosen on the basis of pharmacokinetic modelling, and these are in line with the sort of doses that you use for other diseases such as amoebic dysentery…..For a new disease such as Covid, there is no approved dosing protocol. But the HCQ dosage used [is] not dissimilar to that used, as I said, in for example amoebic dysentery.
Hydroxyquinoline — not hydroxychloroquine — is used for the treatment of amoebic dysentery. Perhaps it is not without good reason that Prof. Didier Raoult described the Recovery Trial as “the Marx Brothers doing science,” though given the terrible death toll, it doesn’t really seem like much of a laughing matter.
What can we conclude from all this? It seems the WHO, the MHRA, Inserm, and public health bodies around the world have used fake science, fake data, deliberately destructive studies and what appears to be wilful ignorance to make sure hydroxychloroquine is never trialled as a preventive COVID-19 treatment.
The repeated statements, from numerous sources, that there is no scientific evidence to justify the use of the Marseilles Treatment as a prophylactic treatment for COVID-19 are risible. Should it ever be widely acknowledged as effective, the already spurious argument for a COVID-19 vaccine would be wholly untenable.
Only the most naive could imagine there aren’t many powerful individuals, foundations and institutions, including governments, who wish to stop the preventive treatment efficacy of HCQ+AZ with zinc ever being proven.
The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) has stated that it will continue to advocate the use of hydroxychloroquine for front-line health workers, as no notable adverse reactions were evident. Dr Samiran Panda, director of the ICMR-National AIDS Research Institute, reported the results of Indian trials into its use as a prophylactic treatment for health professionals:
The main conclusion that can be drawn after analysing the data is that hydroxychloroquine has beneficial effects in infection risk reduction from the fourth dose onwards…….[hydoxychloroquine] will help cut the risk of infection by 80% in healthcare workers who are not already sick.
Reposed from UKColumn.org
Iain Davis writes at In This Together.
15,472 DEAD 1.5 Million Injured (50% SERIOUS) Reported in European Union’s Database of Adverse Drug Reactions for COVID-19 Shots
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
The European database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, which also tracks reports of injuries and deaths following the experimental COVID-19 “vaccines.”
A subscriber from Europe recently emailed us and reminded us that this database maintained at EudraVigilance is only for countries in Europe who are part of the European Union (EU), which comprises 27 countries.
The total number of countries in Europe is much higher, almost twice as many, numbering around 50, although there are some differences of opinion as to which countries are technically part of Europe.
So as high as these numbers are, they do NOT reflect all of Europe. The actual number in Europe who are reported dead or injured due to COVID-19 shots would be much higher than what we are reporting here.
The EudraVigilance database reports that through June 19, 2021 there are 15,472 deaths and 1,509,266 injuries reported following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots:
- COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE MODERNA (CX-024414)
- COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PFIZER-BIONTECH
- COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENECA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19)
- COVID-19 VACCINE JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S)
From the total of injuries recorded, half of them (753,657) are serious injuries.
“Seriousness provides information on the suspected undesirable effect; it can be classified as ‘serious’ if it corresponds to a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.”
A Health Impact News subscriber in Europe ran the reports for each of the four COVID-19 shots we are including here. This subscriber has volunteered to do this, and it is a lot of work to tabulate each reaction with injuries and fatalities, since there is no place on the EudraVigilance system we have found that tabulates all the results.
Since we have started publishing this, others from Europe have also calculated the numbers and confirmed the totals.*
Here is the summary data through June 19, 2021.
Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccine Tozinameran (code BNT162b2,Comirnaty) from BioNTech/ Pfizer: 7,420 deaths and 560,256 injuries to 19/06/2021
- 16,133 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 81 deaths
- 12,637 Cardiac disorders incl. 964 deaths
- 101 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 6 deaths
- 7000 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 4 deaths
- 265 Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
- 8,122 Eye disorders incl. 17 deaths
- 51,030 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 348 deaths
- 155,486 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 2,290 deaths
- 468 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 31 deaths
- 6,110 Immune system disorders incl. 32 deaths
- 17,549 Infections and infestations incl. 762 deaths
- 6,275 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 104 deaths
- 13,249 Investigations incl. 285 deaths
- 4,162 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 139 deaths
- 79,125 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 88 deaths
- 325 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl. cysts and polyps) incl. 23 deaths
- 100,895 Nervous system disorders incl. 780 deaths
- 384 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 10 deaths
- 107 Product issues
- 9,928 Psychiatric disorders incl. 105 deaths
- 1,765 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 115 deaths
- 2,696 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 23,689 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 848 deaths
- 26,641 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 66 deaths
- 846 Social circumstances incl. 10 deaths
- 281 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 19 deaths
- 14,987 Vascular disorders incl. 289 deaths
Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273(CX-024414) from Moderna: 4,147 deaths and 122,643 injuries to 19/06/2021
- 2,239 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 29 deaths
- 3,315 Cardiac disorders incl. 446 deaths
- 39 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 1,454 Ear and labyrinth disorders
- 82 Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
- 1,883 Eye disorders incl. 7 deaths
- 10,655 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 142 deaths
- 33,936 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1,759 deaths
- 209 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 11 deaths
- 1,117 Immune system disorders incl. 5 deaths
- 3,835 Infections and infestations incl. 234 deaths
- 2,480 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 77 deaths
- 2,670 Investigations incl. 89 deaths
- 1,297 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 85 deaths
- 15,131 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 77 deaths
- 128 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl. cysts and polyps) incl. 15 deaths
- 21,684 Nervous system disorders incl. 424 deaths
- 255 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 2 death
- 20 Product issues
- 2,437 Psychiatric disorders incl. 69 deaths
- 807 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 52 deaths
- 459 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 1 death
- 5,640 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 399 deaths
- 6,538 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 28 deaths
- 504 Social circumstances incl. 13 deaths
- 397 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 38 deaths
- 3,432 Vascular disorders incl. 141 deaths
Total reactions for the experimental vaccine AZD1222/VAXZEVRIA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) from Oxford/ AstraZeneca: 3,364 deaths and 793,036 injuries to 19/06/2021
- 9,136 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 132 deaths
- 12,135 Cardiac disorders incl. 396 deaths
- 95 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 2 deaths
- 8,797 Ear and labyrinth disorders
- 309 Endocrine disorders incl. 2 deaths
- 13,459 Eye disorders incl. 12 deaths
- 81,806 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 161 deaths
- 212,663 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 891 deaths
- 525 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 25 deaths
- 3,085 Immune system disorders incl. 11 deaths
- 17,791 Infections and infestations incl. 217 deaths
- 7,854 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 77 deaths
- 16,731 Investigations incl. 79 deaths
- 9,765 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 50 deaths
- 123,637 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 45 deaths
- 332 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl. cysts and polyps) incl. 8 deaths
- 169,286 Nervous system disorders incl. 532 deaths
- 223 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 4 deaths
- 103 Product issues
- 14,931 Psychiatric disorders incl. 27 deaths
- 2,809 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 29 deaths
- 5,967 Reproductive system and breast disorders
- 26,631 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 387 deaths
- 36,457 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 22 deaths
- 772 Social circumstances incl. 4 deaths
- 671 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 16 deaths
- 17,066 Vascular disorders incl. 235 deaths
Total reactions for the experimental COVID-19 vaccine JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) from Johnson & Johnson: 541 deaths and 33, 331 injuries to 19/06/2021
- 306 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 16 deaths
- 496 Cardiac disorders incl. 56 deaths
- 14 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
- 177 Ear and labyrinth disorders
- 8 Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
- 383 Eye disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 3,086 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 23 deaths
- 8,761 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 137 deaths
- 52 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 4 deaths
- 85 Immune system disorders
- 392 Infections and infestations incl. 13 deaths
- 320 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 8 deaths
- 2,003 Investigations incl. 37 deaths
- 184 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 10 deaths
- 5,718 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 17 deaths
- 16 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl. cysts and polyps)
- 7,093 Nervous system disorders incl. 68 deaths
- 9 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 1 death
- 9 Product issues
- 355 Psychiatric disorders incl. 5 deaths
- 119 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 8 deaths
- 114 Reproductive system and breast disorders
- 1,130 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 43 deaths
- 804 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 2 deaths
- 72 Social circumstances incl. 3 deaths
- 336 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 26 deaths
- 1,289 Vascular disorders incl. 60 deaths
*These totals are estimates based on reports submitted to EudraVigilance. Totals may be much higher based on percentage of adverse reactions that are reported. Some of these reports may also be reported to the individual country’s adverse reaction databases, such as the U.S. VAERS database and the UK Yellow Card system. The fatalities are grouped by symptoms, and some fatalities may have resulted from multiple symptoms.
Comment on this article at HealthImpactNews.com
SOTN:Worldwide Genocide Continues: 13,867 Dead and 1,354,336 Injuries in European Database of Adverse Drug Reactions for COVID-19 Shots
The European database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, which also tracks reports of injuries and deaths following the experimental COVID-19 “vaccines.”
Here is what EudraVigilance states about their database:
This website was launched by the European Medicines Agency in 2012 to provide public access to reports of suspected side effects (also known as suspected adverse drug reactions). These reports are submitted electronically to EudraVigilance by national medicines regulatory authorities and by pharmaceutical companies that hold marketing authorisations (licences) for the medicines.
EudraVigilance is a system designed for collecting reports of suspected side effects. These reports are used for evaluating the benefits and risks of medicines during their development and monitoring their safety following their authorisation in the European Economic Area (EEA). EudraVigilance has been in use since December 2001.
This website was launched to comply with the EudraVigilance Access Policy, which was developed to improve public health by supporting the monitoring of the safety of medicines and to increase transparency for stakeholders, including the general public.
The Management Board of the European Medicines Agency first approved the EudraVigilance Access Policy in December 2010. A revision was adopted by the Board in December 2015 based on the 2010 pharmacovigilance legislation. The policy aims to provide stakeholders such as national medicines regulatory authorities in the EEA, the European Commission, healthcare professionals, patients and consumers, as well as the pharmaceutical industry and research organisations, with access to reports on suspected side effects.
Transparency is a key guiding principle of the Agency, and is pivotal to building trust and confidence in the regulatory process. By increasing transparency, the Agency is better able to address the growing need among stakeholders, including the general public, for access to information. (Source.)
Their report through June 5, 2021 lists 13,867 deaths and 1,354,336 injuries following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots:
- COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE MODERNA (CX-024414)
- COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PFIZER-BIONTECH
- COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENECA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19)
- COVID-19 VACCINE JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S)
From the total of injuries recorded, there are 683,688 serious injuries which equals over 50%.
“Seriousness provides information on the suspected undesirable effect; it can be classified as ‘serious’ if it corresponds to a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.”
A Health Impact News subscriber in Europe ran the reports for each of the four COVID-19 shots we are including here. This subscriber has volunteered to do this, and it is a lot of work to tabulate each reaction with injuries and fatalities, since there is no place on the EudraVigilance system we have found that tabulates all the results.
Since we have started publishing this, others from Europe have also calculated the numbers and confirmed the totals.[1]
Here is the summary data through June 5, 2021.
Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccine Tozinameran (code BNT162b2,Comirnaty) from BioNTech/ Pfizer: 6,732 deaths and 502,162 injuries to 05/06/2021
- 14,819 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 74 deaths
- 11,018 Cardiac disorders incl. 843 deaths
- 90 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 5 deaths
- 6,146 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 216 Endocrine disorders
- 7,119 Eye disorders incl. 17 deaths
- 45,616 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 332 deaths
- 140,516 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 2,079 deaths
- 387 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 28 deaths
- 5,436 Immune system disorders incl. 32 deaths
- 15,632 Infections and infestations incl. 711 deaths
- 5,552 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 94 deaths
- 11,782 Investigations incl. 260 deaths
- 3,730 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 129 deaths
- 71,816 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 84 deaths
- 295 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 21 deaths
- 90,427 Nervous system disorders incl. 692 deaths
- 330 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 11 deaths
- 100 Product issues
- 8,902 Psychiatric disorders incl. 99 deaths
- 1,547 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 103 deaths
- 2,052 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 21,055 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 777 deaths
- 23,678 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 60 deaths
- 750 Social circumstances incl. 9 deaths
- 222 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 15 deaths
- 12,929 Vascular disorders incl. 251 deaths
Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273(CX-024414) from Moderna: 3,821 deaths and 101,767 injuries to 05/06/2021
- 1,826 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 27 deaths
- 2,822 Cardiac disorders incl. 409 deaths
- 31 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 2 deaths
- 1,171 Ear and labyrinth disorders
- 64 Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
- 1,575 Eye disorders incl. 5 deaths
- 8,770 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 124 deaths
- 28,047 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1,646 deaths
- 180 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 10 deaths
- 936 Immune system disorders incl. 5 deaths
- 3,333 Infections and infestations incl. 219 deaths
- 2,013 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 71 deaths
- 2,292 Investigations incl. 85 deaths
- 1,137 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 77 deaths
- 12,483 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 69 deaths
- 113 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 14 deaths
- 17,861 Nervous system disorders incl. 382 deaths
- 171 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 1 death
- 18 Product issues
- 2,071 Psychiatric disorders incl. 61 deaths
- 670 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 46 deaths
- 352 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 1 death
- 4,831 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 365 deaths
- 5,412 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 25 deaths
- 427 Social circumstances incl. 12 deaths
- 311 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 33 deaths
- 2,850 Vascular disorders incl. 131 deaths
Total reactions for the experimental vaccine AZD1222/VAXZEVRIA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) from Oxford/ AstraZeneca: 2,848 deaths and 724,457 injuries to 05/06/2021
- 8,125 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 117 deaths
- 10,935 Cardiac disorders incl. 351 deaths
- 97 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 2 deaths
- 7,746 Ear and labyrinth disorders
- 263 Endocrine disorders incl. 2 deaths
- 11,998 Eye disorders incl. 10 deaths
- 75,897 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 129 deaths
- 195,671 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 769 deaths
- 450 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 24 deaths
- 2,765 Immune system disorders incl. 11 deaths
- 15,657 Infections and infestations incl. 188 deaths
- 6,783 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 57 deaths
- 15,030 Investigations incl. 62 deaths
- 9,083 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 42 deaths
- 113,983 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 30 deaths
- 275 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 8 deaths
- 155,571 Nervous system disorders incl. 438 deaths
- 190 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 3 deaths
- 88 Product issues
- 13,563 Psychiatric disorders incl. 25 deaths
- 2,518 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 23 deaths
- 4,578 Reproductive system and breast disorders
- 23,942 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 322 deaths
- 33,090 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 18 deaths
- 678 Social circumstances incl. 4 deaths
- 571 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 16 deaths
- 14,910 Vascular disorders incl. 197 deaths
Total reactions for the experimental COVID-19 vaccine JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) from Johnson & Johnson: 466 deaths and 25,950 injuries to 05/06/2021
- 240 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 13 deaths
- 392 Cardiac disorders incl. 48 deaths
- 12 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
- 125 Ear and labyrinth disorders
- 6 Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
- 305 Eye disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 2,389 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 18 deaths
- 6,643 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 120 deaths
- 44 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 66 Immune system disorders
- 322 Infections and infestations incl. 11 deaths
- 267 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 7 deaths
- 1,683 Investigations incl. 32 deaths
- 140 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 10 deaths
- 4,429 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 14 deaths
- 14 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
- 5,457 Nervous system disorders incl. 57 deaths
- 9 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 1 death
- 8 Product issues
- 275 Psychiatric disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 102 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 7 deaths
- 85 Reproductive system and breast disorders
- 907 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 37 deaths
- 556 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 1 death
- 62 Social circumstances incl. 3 deaths
- 293 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 23 deaths
- 1,119 Vascular disorders incl. 54 deaths
*
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Notes
[1] These totals are estimates based on reports submitted to EudraVigilance. Totals may be much higher based on percentage of adverse reactions that are reported. Some of these reports may also be reported to the individual country’s adverse reaction databases, such as the U.S. VAERS database, and the UK Yellow Card system. The fatalities are grouped by symptoms, and some fatalities may have resulted from multiple symptoms.
Featured image is from Health Impact News
___
https://stateofthenation.co/?p=69398
Source: http://fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/health/vaccinations/news.php?q=1623866588
The Killer in the Bloodstream: the “Spike Protein”
Has there ever been a greater threat to humanity than the Covid vaccine?
By Mike Whitney
“From the beginning Covid has been a conspiracy against health and life. Covid is a profit-making agenda and an agenda for increasing arbitrary government power over people. There should be massive law suits and massive arrests of those who block effective Covid cures and impose a deadly vaccine.” Paul Craig Roberts, Former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Ronald Reagan
***
The Spike Protein is a “uniquely dangerous” transmembrane fusion protein that is an integral part of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. “The S protein plays a crucial role in penetrating host cells and initiating infection.” It also damages the cells in the lining of the blood vessel walls which leads to blood clots, bleeding, massive inflammation and death.
To say that the spike protein is merely “dangerous”, is a vast understatement. It is a potentially-lethal pathogen that has already killed tens of thousands of people.
So, why did the vaccine manufacturers settle on the spike protein as an antigen that would induce an immune response in the body?
That’s the million-dollar question, after all, for all practical purposes, the spike protein is a poison. We know that now due to research that was conducted at the Salk Institute. Here’s a summary of what they found:
“Salk researchers and collaborators show how the protein damages cells, confirming COVID-19 as a primarily vascular disease…. SARS-CoV-2 virus damages and attacks the vascular system (aka–The circulatory system) on a cellular level… scientists studying other coronaviruses have long suspected that the spike protein contributed to damaging vascular endothelial cells, but this is the first time the process has been documented….
… the spike protein alone was enough to cause disease. Tissue samples showed inflammation in endothelial cells lining the pulmonary artery walls. The team then replicated this process in the lab, exposing healthy endothelial cells (which line arteries) to the spike protein. They showed that the spike protein damaged the cells by binding ACE2…“If you remove the replicating capabilities of the virus, it still has a major damaging effect on the vascular cells, simply by virtue of its ability to bind to this ACE2 receptor, the S protein receptor, now famous thanks to COVID.” (“COVID-19 Is a Vascular Disease: Coronavirus’ Spike Protein Attacks Vascular System on a Cellular Level”, scitechdaily.com
Remember how everyone laughed at Trump when he said injecting household bleach would cure Covid? How is this any different?
It’s not different, and whatever modest protection the vaccines provide as far as immunity, it pales in comparison to the risks they pose to personal health and survival.
And did you notice what the author said about stripping-out the virus and leaving the spike protein alone?’
He said “it still has a major damaging effect” implying ‘blood clots, bleeding and severe inflammation.’ In other words, the spike protein is deadly even absent the virus. Here’s how Dr. Byram Bridle (who is a viral immunologist and associate professor at University of Guelph, Ontario) summed it up:
“We made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now… We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So, by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.” (“Vaccine scientist: ‘We’ve made a big mistake’”, Conservative Woman)
Think about that for a minute. This is a very big deal, in fact, this is the critical piece of the puzzle that has been missing for the last 15 months. Just as the respiratory virus concealed the real killing-agent in Covid, (the spike protein) so too, the relentless hype surrounding mass-vaccination has concealed the glaring problem with the vaccines themselves, which is, they generate a substance that is “capable of causing disease.”
That is the literal definition of pathogenic. The spike protein is a disease-producing toxin that poses a serious and identifiable threat to the health of anyone who chooses to get vaccinated. Could it be any clearer?It’s worth noting, that Bridle is a vaccine researcher who was awarded a $230,000 government grant last year for research on COVID vaccine development. He understands the science and chooses his words carefully. The term “pathogenic” is not meant to whip people into a frenzy, but to accurately describe how vaccine-generated proteins interact in the bloodstream. And the way they interact, is by inflicting serious damage to cells in the lining of the blood vessels which can result in illness or death. Here’s more from the same article:
“As many will know by now, the problem lies within a structure that enables the virus, originally from bats, not only to enter human cells but to deliver a toxin called the spike protein. Most Covid vaccines instruct our body cells to produce the same protein. This is in the hope that antibodies developed against it will prevent the most damaging effects of the actual virus. There is evidence that this is the case for some.
But there’s also a problem, spelled out most recently by Canadian researcher Dr Byram Bridle, who was awarded a $230,000 Ontario government grant last year for research on Covid vaccine development. This is that the spike protein produced by the vaccine does not just act locally, at the site of the jab (the shoulder muscle), but gets into the bloodstream and is carried through the circulation to many other sites in the body.
Previously confidential animal studies using radioactive tracing show it to go just about everywhere, including the adrenal glands, heart, liver, kidneys, lungs, ovaries, pancreas, pituitary gland, prostate, salivary glands, intestines, spinal cord, spleen, stomach, testes, thymus, and uterus.
The quantities are small and usually disappear within days. But the questions arise, is this mechanism involved in the thousands of deaths and injuries reported soon after Covid vaccination, and might it set some people up for the same long-term consequences as in severe cases of the disease itself?” (‘We’ve made a big mistake’“, Conservative Woman)
This is the most important question: What will the long-term impact of these vaccines be on the population at large? Here’s more from the same article:
“Some researchers say the risk from the vaccine may be greater than that from the actual virus in healthy people. This would be especially true for the young, whose immune systems deal with the virus successfully. In contrast, the vaccine has a device that protects the spike protein mechanism against immediate destruction by the body, in order to promote the immune response.”(Conservative Woman)
Repeat: ” the vaccine has a device that protects the spike protein mechanism against immediate destruction by the body, in order to promote the immune response.”
What does that mean? Does it mean that the spike protein created by the vaccine lingers on indefinitely risking a potential flare-up sometime in the future if another virus emerges or if the immune system is compromised? Will the people who have been vaccinated have the Sword of Damocles hanging over their heads until the day they die?
Dr Judy Mikovits thinks so. “Mikovits thinks the COVID-19 vaccine is a bioweapon designed to destroy your innate immunity and set you up for rapid onset of debilitating illness and premature death. She too suspects many will die rather rapidly. “It’s not going to be ‘live and suffer forever,” she says. “It’s going to be suffer five years and die.” (Mercola.com)
Is that possible? Could we see an unprecedented surge in fatalities in the next few years directly linked to these experimental vaccines?
Let’s hope not, but without any long-term safety data, there’s no way to know for sure. It’s all a big guessing game, which is one of the reasons that so many people are refusing to get vaccinated. Here’s more from Bridle:
‘I’m very much pro-vaccine, (said Dr Bridle) but … the story I’m about to tell is a bit of a scary one. This is cutting edge science. There’s a couple of key pieces of scientific information that we’ve been privy to, in the past few days, that has made the final link, so we understand now – myself and some key international collaborators – we understand exactly why these problems [with the vaccine] are happening.’
One of these ‘is that the spike protein, on its own, is almost entirely responsible for the damage to the cardiovascular system, if it gets into circulation. Indeed, if you inject the purified spike protein into the blood of research animals they get all kinds of damage to the cardiovascular system, and it can cross the blood-brain barrier and cause damage to the brain.
‘At first glance that doesn’t seem too concerning because we’re injecting these vaccines into the shoulder muscle. The assumption, up until now, has been that these vaccines behave like all of our traditional vaccines: they don’t go anywhere other than the injection site, so they stay in our shoulder. Some of the protein will go to the local draining lymph node in order to activate the immune system.
‘However – this is where the cutting edge science has come in, and this is where it gets scary – through a request for information from the Japanese regulatory agency, myself and several international collaborators have been able to get access to what’s called the biodistribution study. It’s the first time ever that scientists have been privy to seeing where the messenger RNA vaccines go after vaccination; in other words, is it a safe assumption that it stays in the shoulder muscle? The short answer is, absolutely not. It’s very disconcerting. The spike protein gets into the blood and circulates over several days post-vaccination.’”(Vaccine scientist: ‘We’ve made a big mistake’“, Conservative Woman)
They got the biodistribution study from the Japanese? Are you kidding me? You mean, the FDA waved these experimental “new technology” vaccines into service before they had the slightest inkling of where the substance in the vaccine would end up in the body. If that isn’t criminal negligence, then what is? Do you want proof that our regulators are controlled by the industries they are supposed to monitor? Here it is!
Here’s more from an article at Children’s Health Defense on the same topic:
“… in key studies — called biodistribution studies, which are designed to test where an injected compound travels in the body, and which tissues or organs it accumulates in — Pfizer did not use the commercial vaccine (BNT162b2) but instead relied on a “surrogate” mRNA that produced the luciferase protein….
Regulatory documents also show Pfizer did not follow industry-standard quality management practices during preclinical toxicology studies of its vaccine, as key studies did not meet good laboratory practice (GLP)….
“The implications of these findings are that Pfizer was trying to accelerate the vaccine development timeline based on the pressures of the pandemic,” said TrialSite founder and CEO Daniel O’Connor. “The challenge is that the processes, such as Good Laboratory Practices, are of paramount importance for quality and ultimately for patient safety. If such important steps are skipped, the risk-benefit analysis would need to be compelling.”….(“Pfizer Skipped Critical Testing and Cut Corners on Quality Standards, Documents Reveal“, Children’s Health Defense)
Let’s see if I got this right: The Covid vaccine was approved even though “Pfizer did not follow industry-standard quality management practices” and even though “key studies did not meet good laboratory practice?”
Do you still think these vaccines are safe? And, it gets worse, too. Check it out:
“... documents obtained by scientists through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) revealed pre-clinical studies showing the active part of the vaccine (mRNA-lipid nanoparticles) — which produce the spike protein — did not stay at the injection site and surrounding lymphoid tissue as scientists originally theorized, but spread widely throughout the body and accumulated in various organs, including the ovaries and spleen.” (“Pfizer Skipped Critical Testing and Cut Corners on Quality Standards, Documents Reveal”, Children’s Health Defense)
Like we said earlier, the vaccine was supposed to be “localized”, that is, remain in the area where it was injected. But that theory proved to be wrong, just like the theory that the spike protein would be a good antigen was wrong. There are literally thousands of fatalities and other injuries that attest to the “wrongness” of that theory, and there will be many more before this campaign is terminated. Here’s more:
“Research suggests this could lead to the production of spike protein in unintended places, including the brain, ovaries and spleen, which may cause the immune system to attack organs and tissues resulting in damage, and raises serious questions about genotoxicity and reproductive toxicity risks associated with the vaccine.” (“Pfizer Skipped Critical Testing and Cut Corners on Quality Standards, Documents Reveal“, Children’s Health Defense)
So, it goes everywhere. Wherever blood flows, there too goes the spike proteins. Do young women really want these lethal proteins in their ovaries? Do you think that will improve their prospects for getting pregnant or safely delivering their babies? This is madness on a scale that is, frankly, unimaginable. Here’s more:
“Studies indicate that the protein is able to gain access to cells in the testicles, and may disrupt male reproduction…..
Furthermore, the genetic code the virus carries contains inserts that make it ‘extremely plausible’ that the protein could misfold into a prion (such as held responsible for mad cow disease in the 1980s), causing widespread damage to brain cells and increasing the risk of conditions including Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease….” (“Covid vaccines: Concerns that make more research essential“, The Conservative Woman
We hope that readers are beginning to understand how risky these vaccines really are. It’s literally a matter of life and death. As Bridle opines:
“‘We have known for a long time that the spike protein is pathogenic…. It is a toxin. It can cause damage in our body if it’s in circulation. Now, we have clear-cut evidence that . . . the vaccine itself, plus the protein, gets into blood circulation.’”
Once that happens, the spike protein can combine with receptors on blood platelets and with cells that line our blood vessels. This is why, paradoxically, it can cause both blood clotting and bleeding.‘And of course the heart is involved, as part of the cardiovascular system,’ Bridle said. ‘That’s why we’re seeing heart problems. The protein can also cross the blood-brain barrier and cause neurological damage.…
‘In short,… we made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now. We didn’t realize that by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.” (Conservative Woman)
“Mistake?” He calls it a “mistake”? That’s got to be the understatement of the century!
Let’s cut to the chase: These aren’t vaccines; they’re a spike-protein delivery-system. Regrettably, 140 million Americans have already been injected with them which means we can expect a dramatic uptick in debilitating medical conditions including blood clotting, bleeding, autoimmune disease, thrombosis in the brain, stroke and heart attack. The vast human wreckage we are now facing is incalculable.
Has there ever been a greater threat to humanity than the Covid vaccine?
Michael Whitney, renowned geopolitical and social analyst based in Washington State. He initiated his career as an independent citizen-journalist in 2002 with a commitment to honest journalism, social justice and World peace.
He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization
Source: Global Research
Worldwide Genocide Continues: 13,867 Dead and 1,354,336 Injuries in European Database of Adverse Drug Reactions for COVID-19 Shots
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).
Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.
***
The European database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, which also tracks reports of injuries and deaths following the experimental COVID-19 “vaccines.”
Here is what EudraVigilance states about their database:
This website was launched by the European Medicines Agency in 2012 to provide public access to reports of suspected side effects (also known as suspected adverse drug reactions). These reports are submitted electronically to EudraVigilance by national medicines regulatory authorities and by pharmaceutical companies that hold marketing authorisations (licences) for the medicines.
EudraVigilance is a system designed for collecting reports of suspected side effects. These reports are used for evaluating the benefits and risks of medicines during their development and monitoring their safety following their authorisation in the European Economic Area (EEA). EudraVigilance has been in use since December 2001.
This website was launched to comply with the EudraVigilance Access Policy, which was developed to improve public health by supporting the monitoring of the safety of medicines and to increase transparency for stakeholders, including the general public.
The Management Board of the European Medicines Agency first approved the EudraVigilance Access Policy in December 2010. A revision was adopted by the Board in December 2015 based on the 2010 pharmacovigilance legislation. The policy aims to provide stakeholders such as national medicines regulatory authorities in the EEA, the European Commission, healthcare professionals, patients and consumers, as well as the pharmaceutical industry and research organisations, with access to reports on suspected side effects.
Transparency is a key guiding principle of the Agency, and is pivotal to building trust and confidence in the regulatory process. By increasing transparency, the Agency is better able to address the growing need among stakeholders, including the general public, for access to information. (Source.)
Their report through June 5, 2021 lists 13,867 deaths and 1,354,336 injuries following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots:
- COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE MODERNA (CX-024414)
- COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PFIZER-BIONTECH
- COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENECA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19)
- COVID-19 VACCINE JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S)
From the total of injuries recorded, there are 683,688 serious injuries which equals over 50%.
“Seriousness provides information on the suspected undesirable effect; it can be classified as ‘serious’ if it corresponds to a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.”
A Health Impact News subscriber in Europe ran the reports for each of the four COVID-19 shots we are including here. This subscriber has volunteered to do this, and it is a lot of work to tabulate each reaction with injuries and fatalities, since there is no place on the EudraVigilance system we have found that tabulates all the results.
Since we have started publishing this, others from Europe have also calculated the numbers and confirmed the totals.[1]
Here is the summary data through June 5, 2021.
Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccine Tozinameran (code BNT162b2,Comirnaty) from
BioNTech
/ Pfizer: 6,732 deaths and 502,162 injuries to 05/06/2021
- 14,819 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 74 deaths
- 11,018 Cardiac disorders incl. 843 deaths
- 90 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 5 deaths
- 6,146 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 216 Endocrine disorders
- 7,119 Eye disorders incl. 17 deaths
- 45,616 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 332 deaths
- 140,516 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 2,079 deaths
- 387 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 28 deaths
- 5,436 Immune system disorders incl. 32 deaths
- 15,632 Infections and infestations incl. 711 deaths
- 5,552 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 94 deaths
- 11,782 Investigations incl. 260 deaths
- 3,730 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 129 deaths
- 71,816 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 84 deaths
- 295 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 21 deaths
- 90,427 Nervous system disorders incl. 692 deaths
- 330 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 11 deaths
- 100 Product issues
- 8,902 Psychiatric disorders incl. 99 deaths
- 1,547 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 103 deaths
- 2,052 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 21,055 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 777 deaths
- 23,678 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 60 deaths
- 750 Social circumstances incl. 9 deaths
- 222 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 15 deaths
- 12,929 Vascular disorders incl. 251 deaths
Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273(CX-024414) from Moderna: 3,821 deaths and 101,767 injuries to 05/06/2021
- 1,826 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 27 deaths
- 2,822 Cardiac disorders incl. 409 deaths
- 31 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 2 deaths
- 1,171 Ear and labyrinth disorders
- 64 Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
- 1,575 Eye disorders incl. 5 deaths
- 8,770 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 124 deaths
- 28,047 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1,646 deaths
- 180 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 10 deaths
- 936 Immune system disorders incl. 5 deaths
- 3,333 Infections and infestations incl. 219 deaths
- 2,013 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 71 deaths
- 2,292 Investigations incl. 85 deaths
- 1,137 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 77 deaths
- 12,483 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 69 deaths
- 113 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 14 deaths
- 17,861 Nervous system disorders incl. 382 deaths
- 171 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 1 death
- 18 Product issues
- 2,071 Psychiatric disorders incl. 61 deaths
- 670 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 46 deaths
- 352 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 1 death
- 4,831 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 365 deaths
- 5,412 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 25 deaths
- 427 Social circumstances incl. 12 deaths
- 311 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 33 deaths
- 2,850 Vascular disorders incl. 131 deaths
Total reactions for the experimental vaccine AZD1222/VAXZEVRIA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) from Oxford/ AstraZeneca: 2,848 deaths and 724,457 injuries to 05/06/2021
- 8,125 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 117 deaths
- 10,935 Cardiac disorders incl. 351 deaths
- 97 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 2 deaths
- 7,746 Ear and labyrinth disorders
- 263 Endocrine disorders incl. 2 deaths
- 11,998 Eye disorders incl. 10 deaths
- 75,897 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 129 deaths
- 195,671 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 769 deaths
- 450 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 24 deaths
- 2,765 Immune system disorders incl. 11 deaths
- 15,657 Infections and infestations incl. 188 deaths
- 6,783 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 57 deaths
- 15,030 Investigations incl. 62 deaths
- 9,083 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 42 deaths
- 113,983 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 30 deaths
- 275 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 8 deaths
- 155,571 Nervous system disorders incl. 438 deaths
- 190 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 3 deaths
- 88 Product issues
- 13,563 Psychiatric disorders incl. 25 deaths
- 2,518 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 23 deaths
- 4,578 Reproductive system and breast disorders
- 23,942 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 322 deaths
- 33,090 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 18 deaths
- 678 Social circumstances incl. 4 deaths
- 571 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 16 deaths
- 14,910 Vascular disorders incl. 197 deaths
Total reactions for the experimental COVID-19 vaccine JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) from
Johnson & Johnson: 466 deaths and 25,950 injuries to 05/06/2021
- 240 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 13 deaths
- 392 Cardiac disorders incl. 48 deaths
- 12 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
- 125 Ear and labyrinth disorders
- 6 Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
- 305 Eye disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 2,389 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 18 deaths
- 6,643 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 120 deaths
- 44 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 66 Immune system disorders
- 322 Infections and infestations incl. 11 deaths
- 267 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 7 deaths
- 1,683 Investigations incl. 32 deaths
- 140 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 10 deaths
- 4,429 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 14 deaths
- 14 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
- 5,457 Nervous system disorders incl. 57 deaths
- 9 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 1 death
- 8 Product issues
- 275 Psychiatric disorders incl. 3 deaths
- 102 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 7 deaths
- 85 Reproductive system and breast disorders
- 907 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 37 deaths
- 556 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 1 death
- 62 Social circumstances incl. 3 deaths
- 293 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 23 deaths
- 1,119 Vascular disorders incl. 54 deaths
*
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Notes
[1] These totals are estimates based on reports submitted to EudraVigilance. Totals may be much higher based on percentage of adverse reactions that are reported. Some of these reports may also be reported to the individual country’s adverse reaction databases, such as the U.S. VAERS database, and the UK Yellow Card system. The fatalities are grouped by symptoms, and some fatalities may have resulted from multiple symptoms.
Featured image is from Health Impact News
Anti Oligarch 