Monthly Archives: July, 2021

The Zelenko protocol

If you are in a hurry

Given the extensive amount of information of this website, a quick way to get started is as follows:

  1. Read the Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment prepared by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, and watch Dr. McCullough’s brief video presentation.
  2. Read the treatment protocol and prophylaxis protocol documents by Dr. Zelenko.
  3. Read Dr. Zelenko’s statement to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security

For a more technical briefing:

  1. Watch the interviews of Dr. ZelenkoDr. Risch, and Dr. Marik.
  2. Read the papers by Dr. ZelenkoDr. RischDr. McCullough, and Dr. Marik.

For early outpatient care: Read this article by Dr. Vliet, and try the telemd program organized by Dr. Jerome Corsi or the telemd program by Dr. Stella Immanuel, or the telemd program by Dr. Ben Marble. You can also make a telemd appointment with Dr. Zelenko himself. A doctor directory and other information has been put together by and AAPS. Immune support nutraceutical supplements are available from Dr. Zelenko and Dr. Immanuel.

In the local RGV region, doctors that support early treatment protocols include, but are not limited to, Dr. Hiram GarciaDr. Allison Garza, and Dr. April Lopez.

On general public health policy concerns, absolute must watch is Dr. McCulough’s interview on early outpatient treatment and this news report. Kathy Dopp has also made an excellent website with covid-related resources.

To understand the disinformation campaign against early treatment, read this article.


This webpage curates content related to the early outpatient treatment protocol that has been proposed by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko for the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Dr. Zelenko originally risk-stratified patients and treated high-risk patients with hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin. He has since evolved his protocols to include a quercetin protocol for low-risk patients as well as guidelines for prophylaxis. Dr. Zelenko shared the details of his protocol on March and April 2020 in open letters to the medical community and also shared updated treatment and prophylaxis protocols on August 2020. He has also published his first research paper on his treatment protocol. See the press release. Dr. Zelenko’s paper establishes, with statistical significance, that his early outpatient protocol reduces hospitalizations by 84%. Dr. Zelenko’s statement to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Secutity indicates no deaths from amongst the group of patients that initiated treatment during the first 4 days, and took medications for at least 5 days. Dr. Zelenko is now investigating the use of nebulized hydroxychloroquine, which could very well prove to be the final nail in the coffin for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. If you are interested in the inside story of how Dr. Zelenko discovered the Zelenko protocol, it is best told in his interview with Dr. Breggin [backup]. Dr. Zelenko has been banned from twitter, but you can keep up with him on Telegram.

The Eastern Virginia Medical School maintains an interesting website with current information for medical practitioners. They recommend the I-MASK+ and MATH+ treatment protocols for hospitalized patients. They are currently strongly advocating in favor of ivermectin instead of hydroxychloroquine, and they also recommend using quercetin combined with vitamin C as a zinc ionophore.

Papers from Dr. Zelenko and Dr. McCullough

Documents from Dr. Zelenko

  1. 03/23/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s open letter to the medical professional community.
    [pdf] || [original link] || [tinyurl]
  2. 04/28/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s second open letter to the medical professional community.
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored) || [tinyurl] (censored)
  3. 06/14/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s letter to the Israeli government
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored) || [tinyurl] (censored)
  4. 07/15/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s open letter to the White House
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored)
  5. 08/23/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s updated treatment protocol.
    [pdf] || [original link] || [tinyurl] || (presentation: ) || (another presentation: [bitchute link])
  6. 08/23/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s prophylactic protocol. (updated 02/08/2021)
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored) || [tinyurl] (censored)
  7. 10/27/2020: Press Release: Data Based On Zelenko Protocol Passes Peer Review
    [pdf] || [original link]
  8. 11/22/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s Protocol Plus chart.
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored)
  9. 11/26/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s updated treatment protocol. (2nd update); (3rd update: 02/08/2021)
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored) || [tinyurl] (censored)
  10. 11/23/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s second open letter to the White House
    [pdf] || [original link]
  11. 12/02/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s statement to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security
    [pdf] || [original link]
  12. 12/23/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s third open letter to the White House
    [pdf] || [original link]
  13. 01/20/2021: Choose Truth and Choose Life
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored)
  14. 01/22/2021: Nebulized Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 Treatment: 80x Improvement in Breathing
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored) || [alt link]
  15. 02/23/2021: Plan to Reopen Israel
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored)
  16. 02/23/2021: Dr. Zelenko’s updated treatment protocol.
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored) || [new link]
  17. 02/23/2021: Dr. Zelenko’s prophylactic protocol.
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored) || [new link]
  18. 04/20/2021: A Plan to Reopen an American State
    [pdf] || [original link]
  19. 05/27/2021: Advice to Medical Professionals
    [pdf] || [original link]
  20. 06/03/2021: Zinc Ionophores: Optimism for the Immune System
    [pdf] || [original link]
  21. 06/15/2021: Death Sentence
    [pdf] || [original link] || [vid excerpt]

Immune support nutraceutical supplements

Research databases

The following websites have dynamically updated databases on the current research studies on several therapeutic options

  1. Research studies on hydroxychloroquine
  2. Research studies on Ivermectin
  3. Research studies on Vitsmin D
  4. Research studies on Zinc
  5. Research studies on REGN-COV2
  6. Research studies on LY-COV
  7. Research studies on Remdesivir

Senate Hearing on Early Outpatient Treatment

November 19, 2020 hearing by the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs on Early Outpatient Treatments

  1. Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of a COVID-19 Solution, U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs
  2. CSPAN: Senate Hearing on COVID-19 Outpatient Treatment
  3. Download Full Senate Hearing
  4. Backup of Senate Hearing on Bitchute
  5. Senate Hearing about Early Outpatient Treatment: Highlights
     || [bitchute]
  6. Refuting Dr. Ashish Jha’s “Dangerous” and Deceptive Testimony
  7. The Assault Against Early Treatment for COVID-19: How One Congressional Hearing Speaks Volumes about America’s Failed Response to the Pandemic
  8. Dr. Zelenko’s statement to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security

December 08, 2020 hearing by the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs on Early Outpatient Treatments

  1. Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of a COVID-19 Solution, Part II
  2. Backup of Senate Hearing on Bitchute

Testimony submitted to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs on Early Outpatient Treatments

  1. Peter A. McCullough, M.D., M.P.H., Vice Chief of Internal Medicine, Baylor University Medical Center
    [pdf] || [original link]
  2. Harvey Risch, M.D., PH.D., Professor of Epidemiology, Yale University
    [pdf] || [original link]
  3. George C. Fareed, M.D., Medical Director and Family Medicine Specialist, Pioneers Medical Center
    [pdf] || [original link]
  4. Ashish K. Jha, M.D., M.P.H., Dean of the School of Public Health, Brown University
    [pdf] || [original link]
  5. Ramin Oskoui, M.D., Vice President of Medica Staff, Sibley Memorial Hospital and Chief Executive Officer, Foxhall Cardiology
    [pdf] || [original link]
  6. Jean-Jacques Rajter, M.D., Pulmonologist, Broward Health Medical Center
    [pdf] || [original link]
  7. Pierre Kory, M.D., Associate Professor of Medicine, St. Luke’s Aurora Medical Center
    [pdf] || [original link]
  8. Armand Balboni, M.D., PH.D., Chief Executive Officer, Appili Therapeutics Inc.
    [pdf] || [original link]
  9. Jane M. Orient, M.D., Executive Director, Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
    [pdf] || [original link]
  10. Jayanta Bhattacharya, M.D., PH.D., Professor of Medicine Stanford University and Senior Fellow Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University
    [pdf] || [original link]

Also see the expert testimony in the Adamson Skelly vs ROA case in Canada.

On April 24, 2021, Senator Ron Johnson gave an imterview on early treatment and vaccine passports thst was censored by Youtube. For this reason, it is linked below:

  1. Senator Ron Johnson’s interview on early treatment and vaccine passports

June 12, 2021 update on censorship and early treatment from US Senators.

On June 28 2021, Senator Ron Johnson hosted a news conference where fellow Americans that have been injured by the experimental mRNA injections had a chance to tell the world what happened to them. Social media has censored the event.

Texas Senate hearing testimony on early treatments

Testimony submitted to the Texas State Senate Health and Human Services Committee on March 10, 2021 by Dr. Peter McCulough and Dr. Richardo Urso:

Also interesting are the following follow-up interviews of Dr. Peter McCullough with The Whistleblower Newsroom:

  • 04/09/2021: Dr. Peter McCullough says highly effective early treatment for covid has been censored
     || [bitchute]
  • 04/16/2021: Dr. Peter McCullough rebuts AFP “factchecker” Remi Banet’s assertion that he made false claims
     || [bitchute]

Other selected research publications on HCQ protocol

Other selected research publications

Dynamic white papers by the anonymous CovidAnalysis group

The CovidAnalysis group maintain the website They also have prepared the following dynamically updated white papers:

  1. CovidAnalysis group, “Early treatment with hydroxychloroquine: a country-based analysis”, initial release on August 5, 2020
  2. CovidAnalysis group, “HCQ is effective for COVID-19 when used early: analysis of 121 studies”, initial release on October 20, 2020
  3. CovidAnalysis group, “The estimated number of human lives lost from incorrect HCQ advice”, initial release on November 3, 2020
  4. CovidAnalysis group, “Ivermectin is effective for COVID-19: meta analysis of 26 studies”, initial release on November 26, 2020
  5. CovidAnalysis group, “Vitamin D is effective for COVID-19: meta analysis of 35 studies”, initial release on December 17, 2020

White Papers and other documents

  1. J.M Todaro, J. Krug, M.E. Praver, and V. Zelenko, “A two-step strategy to reopen America”, April 2020, white paper
    [pdf] || [original link]
  2. S. Gold, “White Paper on Hydroxychloroquine”, July 2020, white paper
    [pdf] || [original link]
  3. The Economic Standard, “Hydroxychloroquine and the burden of proof: An Urgent Call to Depoliticize Medicine in the COVID-19 Pandemic”, September 2020, white paper
    [pdf] || [original link] || [IHU link]
  4. Open letter to authors of COVID-19 trials, medical journals and scientific community
    [pdf] || [original link]
  5. Lee D. Merritt, “The Treatment of Viral Diseases: Has the Truth Been Suppressed For Decades?”, Journal of the American Physicians and Surgeons 25 (3) (2020), 79-82
    [original link]
  6. America’s Frontline Doctors, “White Paper On COVID-19 Experimental Vaccines”, December 2020, white paper
    [pdf] || [original link] || [petition]
  7. COVID-19: Restoring Public Trust During A Global Health Crisis, February 2021
    [original link] || [original pdf] || [backup pdf]
  8. Open Letter by U.S. Doctors: JAMA Ivermectin Study Is Fatally Flawed, April 2021
    [original link]
  9. Open letter by Dr Charles D. Hoffe, April 2021
  10. Steven Hatfill, “How a Single Point Failure Destroyed the National Pandemic Plan”, April 2021
    [pdf] || [original link]
  11. CHD, “Citizen Petition from Scientific Advisory Board on behalf of Children’s Health Defense”, May 16, 2021
    [original link]
  12. Indian Bar Association, Legal notice to Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, the Chief Scientist, WHO, May 2021
    [pdf] || [original link]
  13. Aaron Siri, Petition for administrative action regarding further data to be submitted to the FDA before approval of any COVID-19 vaccine, May 2021
    [original link] || [pdf]
  14. Linda Wastila, Citizen petition on vaccine BLA approvsl, June 2021
    [original link] || [pdf]
  15. Andrew Bostom, “Why Collegiate Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates Are Lysenkoist Anti-Science”, June 2021
    [pdf] || [original link]
  16. Penelope Sullivan, “Myocarditis and COVID Vaccine: A Risk Benefit Analysis”, June 2021
    [original link]
  17. Peter A. McCullough, “9 Reasons to Drop Support or Mandates for Investigational COVID-19 Vaccines”, July 2021
    [linkedin] (censored) || [backup] || [kathy dopp site]
  18. R. Lazarus and M. Klompas, “Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System”, Grant Final Report, Grant ID: R18 HS 017045, 2011
  19. [pdf] || [original link]

Other links and organizations

  1. Truth for Health Foundation
  2. Dr. Corsi’s telemd program
  3. Dr. Stella Immanuel’s telemd program
  4. American Association of Physicians and Surgeons
  5. Eastern Virginia Medical School.Covid Care protocol
  6. Frontline Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance.
  7. American Frontline Doctors — first website — second website
  8. The Internet Protocol
  9. Alliance for Natural Health
  10. The Complete Guide To Health website
  11. Coronavirus Resource Center, by Peter R. Breggin M.D.
  12. Articles by Paul E. Alexander
  13. PANDA Pandemics ~ Data & Analytics
  14. Health Freedom Advocacy Center
  15. Informed Consent Action Network
  16. Zelenko Protocol Telegram channel
  17. America’s Frontline Doctors Telegram channel
  18. Google Scholar: Peter A McCullough, MD, MPH
  19. Google Scholar: Harvey A. Risch, MD, PhD‬
  20. The Covid Blog
  21. Jennifer Margulis — Censorship-Free Zone
  22. Dr. Peter Breggin brighteon channel
  23. Doctor Talks Series
  24. Hydroxychloroquine Studies Confirming The Therapeutic Efficiency In Treating Covid-19
  25. National Vaccine Information Center VAERS search engine
  26. NVIC Advocacy Portal
  27. Texans for Vaccine Choice
  28. The Healthy American
  29. Adrew Saul’s Doctor yourself website
  30. Comment from J. Patrick Whelan MD PhD, submitted to FDA
  31. Statistical data on covid 19 pandemic
  32. Mortality in the United States, 2018
  33. Risk for COVID-19 Infection, Hospitalization, and Death By Age Group
  34. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network (COVID-NET)
  35. Predict Hospitalization Risk for COVID-19 Positive
  36. NIH Guidelines

Quercetin protocol

Quercetin is an over-the-counter alternative zinc ionophore to the prescription drug hydroxychloroquine, that has been recommended by Dr. Seheult, from, as part of a prophylactic regimen. For more information see the video below.

  • 04/21/2020: Coronavirus Pandemic Update 59: Dr. Seheult’s Daily Regimen (Vitamin D, C, Zinc, Quercetin, NAC)

A similar Quercetin protocol has also been recommended by the Eastern Virginia Medical School. Also see the research paper by Dr. Marik posted above for more details about quercetin, the importance of combining it with Vitamin C, and its safety profile. Dr. Zelenko has also recommended a quercetin protocol for low-risk patients and for high-risk patients while hydroxychloroquine is unavailable. Although quercetin is available over-the-counter, you should consult with a doctor about drug interactions with your prescription medications.

Video updates from Dr. Vladimir Zelenko with Rabbi Katzin

Dr. Zelenko provides video updates on the Rabbi Aryeh Katzin youtube channel. As a precaution against social media censorship, the video updates have been backed up on bitchute, an alternate video platform that supports freedom of speech. Videos labeled (censored by YouTube) were deleted/censored by YouTube. Videos labeled (censored) were set to private mode by Rabbi Katzin, as a result of the chilling effect of social media censorship, to prevent deletion of his youtube channel.

  1. 04/19/2020: Dr. Zelenko on the latest statistical clinical outcomes of his treatment.
     (censored) ||[bitchute]
  2. 04/30/2020: Dr. Zelenko responds to the VA study and his plans to publish his data in observational peer-reviewed research papers.
     (censored) ||[bitchute]
  3. 05/03/2020: Updates on the adoption of Dr. Zelenko’s treatment protocol by Honduras, Brazil, Ukraine, Israel, Italy, Turkey, Iran, as well as ongoing current research efforts. He also.explains the mechanism of action underlying his treatment regimen.
  4. 05/12/2020: Update focuses on policy recommendations for dealing with a likely second wave of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
     (censored) ||[bitchute]
  5. 05/17/2020: Update on the efficacy of adding zinc to the hydroxychloroquine treatment. Dr. Zelenko explains his prophylactic protocol using hydroxychloroquine and zinc at a reduced dosage. Also some autobiographical notes about the importance of thinking outside the box when facing an unusual challenge.
     (censored) ||  ||[bitchute — part 1]||[bitchute — part 2]
  6. 05/24/2020: Latest updates on collaboration with Brazil, comments on Lancet study,, opening the economy safely, availability of medications, quercetin, dosage of elemental zinc, and the clinical trial at St. Francis hospital.
     (censored) ||[bitchute]
  7. 05/28/2020: Latest updates on research publication, the politics of censorship, and the meaning of life.
     (censored) ||[bitchute]
  8. 06/09/2020: Dr. Zelenko on the Lancet, NEJM Retracted Studies on the hydroxychloroquine treatment protocol. Also other updates and commentary.
     (censored) ||[bitchute]
  9. 06/21/2020: Dr. Zelenko comments on the revocation of the Emergency Use Authorization of hydroxychloroquine by the FDA. Announces that his research paper has been submitted for publication and a preprint will be published soon. Also some very interesting comments on the spititual basis of what motivates him.
     (censored) ||[bitchute]
  10. 07/03/2020: Dr. Zelenko shares the good news that his first paper is now publicly available in preptint form.
     (censored) || [bitchute]
  11. 07/10/2020: Dr. Zelenko communicates some optimism amongst all the fearmongering. World leaders are aware of his research paper. Dr. Zelenko announces his website and encourages that we reach out to our political leaders.
     (censored) || [bitchute]
  12. 07/10/2020: This video has no new medical information but is still very interesting. Defeating this pandemic now comes down to making moral choices: service to self vs service to others.
     || [bitchute]
  13. 07/21/2020: Dr. Zelenko speaks about the purpose of life while in anticipation of open heart surgery. This is a very heartfelt and deep video about both the current pandemic, and more broadly about living on a razor’s edge between chaos and order.
     || [bitchute]
  14. 08/06/2020: Dr. Zelenko gives his latest update about the FDA rules on EUA, research studies on HCQ, and social media censorship.
     (censored) || [bitchute]
  15. 08/09/2020: Dr. Zelenko updates us on his White House petition, gives the dosage recommendation for prophylactic and treatment quercetin protocols, and suggests possible RCT studies to determine whether his HCQ protocol can be used against the influenza virus.
     (censored) || [bitchute]
  16. 08/10/2020: Dr. Zelenko updates us about several topics, including the current political situation with HCQ, the quercetin protocol, his use of ivermectin and anti-coagulants as adds-on to the Zelenko protocol, the socond SARS-CoV-2 wave, vaccine safety and effectiveness, and the telemed program by Dr. Jerome Corsi.
     (censored by YouTube) || [bitchute]
  17. 08/12/2020: Dr. Zelenko comments on the FDA decision to deny the Henry Ford Health System request to use hydroxychloroquine
     || [bitchute]
  18. 08/16/2020: Dr. Zelenko presents his updated treatment protocol, incorporating the quercetin protocol for low-risk patients, and additional medications to the baseline Zelenko protocol for select patients.
     (censored) || [bitchute]
  19. 08/19/2020: Dr. Zelenko updates us on a possible EUA process violation by the FDA and on his updated treatment protocol
     || [bitchute]
  20. 08/19/2020: Dr. Zelenko shares his thoughts about death and the meaning of life.
     || [bitchute]
  21. 08/26/2020: Dr. Zelenko comments on the new Italian study that reported 30% reduction of mortality. Also makes some political comments on the suppression of the Zelenko protocol that seem to have prompted YouTube to censor the video.
     (censored by YouTube) || [bitchute]
  22. 08/26/2020: Dr. Zelenko: Communism vs Capitalism. What is definition of success?
     || [bitchute]
  23. 09/03/2020: Latest updates on how to respond to the second wave, the importance of beginning treatment immediately, reinfections, youtube censorship, freedom vs tyranny, the safety profile of remdesivir and hydroxychloroquine.
  24. 09/03/2020: Dr. Zelenko makes interesting comments on the Rosh Hashanah and spirituality. Not medically related, but very interesting nonetheless.
  25. 09/11/2020: Dr. Zelenko comments on prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 and facemasks. He notes that mortality rates have decreased not necessarily because the virus has weakened, but because people seek early treatment and because some doctors prescribe the appropriate therapeutics. Also mentions receiving an email from a village in Pakistan where the Zelenko protocol is being used. Finally comments on the anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attack, and the underlying philosophical conflicting worldviews.
     || [bitchute]
  26. 09/29/2020: Dr. Vladimir Zelenko Shared His Concerns About People Still Getting COVID-19 Symptoms
     || [bitchute]
  27. 10/06/2020: Discussion of censorship of both Rabbi Katzin’s YouTube channel and Dr. Zelenko’s twitter account and how it should be addressed. Comments on the treatment protocol used by POTUS. Also discussion of how to protect yourself from the virus (considerations include prophylaxis, immunity, facemask, vaccine safety and efficacy, standard of care).
     || [bitchute]
  28. 10/16/2020: Dr. Zelenko updates us about his upcoming invited oped to the Jerusalem Post. Also comments on the latest study concerning remdesivir. Finally comments on the Zelenko protocol, the art of medicine, and how to custom-tailor treatment for each patient.
     || [bitchute]
  29. 10/30/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s research paper published on 26 October 2020 in the The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. Fight the second wave of SARS-CoV-2 by being prepared.
     || [bitchute]
  30. 10/30/2020: Faith or Knowledge? Finding strength in the midst of adversity.
     || [bitchute]
  31. 11/15/2020: Dr. Zelenko provides an update on the current political situation and also on an upcoming Senate hearing by Senator Ron Johnson on early treatment. Also comments on the necessary general public health policy, mask mandates, antibofy and t-cell immunity testing, quarantine policies, the importance of adapting treatment protocols to individual patients, and the vaccine. This is a must-watch interview.
     || [bitchute]
  32. 12/30/2020: Dr. Zelenko announces his new website, in response to censorship by twitter. Also comments on the vaccine, reinfections, and the new mutation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and t-cell immunity. Note that the youtube version is abbreviated, to avoid censorship.
     ||  || [bitchute]
  33. 01/24/2021: Say No to Covid-19 Anxiety.
     || [bitchute]
  34. 02/01/2021: Dr. Zelenko’s brief statement on the covid vaccines
     || [bitchute]
  35. 02/01/2021: Dr. Zelenko’s statement on the Israeli vaccine policy
     || [bitchute]

Other video updates from Dr. Zelenko

  1. 03/28/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s first bombshell interview with Rudy Giuliani.
     || [bitchute]
  2. 07/01/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s second interview with Rudy Giuliani.
  3. 07/11/2020: Highwire – interview with Dr. Vladimir Zelenko
  4. 08/04/2020: Dr. Zelenko interviewed by Debbie Aldrich on the war against hydroxychloroquine.
     || [bitchute]
  5. 08/14/2020: A Case for HCQ: Doctors Harvey Risch, Vladimir Zelenko, Li Meng Yan
  6. 09/03/2020: Dr. Zelenko Discusses COVID-19 Outpatient Management with Dr. Been
     || [bitchute]
  7. 09/30/2020: Dr. Zelenko interview by Simone Smith of the Toronto Carribean News.
    [brighteon] || [bitchute] || Brighteon is blocked by social media. Share this article to bypass censorship
  8. 10/11/2020: Barry Shaw of “The View from Israel” interviews Professor Harvey Risch and Dr. Vladimir Zelenko who challenge the assumptions of health officials with science, facts, and evidence of fraud.
     || [bitchute]
  9. 11/03/2020: Dr. Vladimir Zelenko talks with John Mappin about his success with Hydroxychloroquine
     || [bitchute]
  10. 11/17/2020: The Zelenko Early Treatment Study, the Role of Zinc, the Therapeutic Approach to COVID-19 in Germany
    [covexit] ||  || [bitchute]
  11. 12/09/2020: Dr. Zelenko curing Covid19 patients without fanfare! (interview by Dr. Carole Lieberman)
  12. 12/09/2020: Explosive Interview with Dr Zelenko A WARRIOR BRINGING THE LIGHT
  13. 12/14/2020: Dr. Zelenko interview by Patriot Transition
     || [bitchute]
  14. 12/16/2020: Dr. Zelenko interview by Patriots in Tune
     (censored) || [bitchute]
  15. 12/16/2020: Dr. Zelenko interview by Del Bigtree
  16. 12/16/2020: Dr. Zelenko interview by John Mappin
     || [bitchute]
  17. 12/23/2020: Red Dawn News interview w/ Dr. Zelenko Pt 1 of 2
     || [rumble] || [bitchute]
  18. 12/25/2020: Talkline With Zev Brenner Interviews Dr. Zev Zelenko
  19. 12/26/2020: Dr. Zev Zelenko on Covid-19 Vaccination Tyranny and Dangers
  20. 12/27/2020: Red Dawn News interview w/ Dr. Zelenko Pt 2 of 2
     || [bitchute]
  21. 01/04/2021: New Book of Daniel #52: Some don’t want us to know about safe pre-hospital treatments for Covid
  22. 01/08/2021: Dr. Zelenko: Steps can be taken to reduce deadliness of COVID-19
  23. 01/08/2021: Dr. Zelenko 2nd interview with the TCN TV Network
  24. 01/28/2021: Dr. Zelenko: Interview with Dr. Peter Breggin. This is a very profound interview and should be watched more than once.
     || [bitchute] || [newtube]
  25. 02/06/2021: Dr. Zelenko’s interview with Laura Eisenhower
  26. 02/26/2021: ASIA PACIFIC TODAY. Early treatment of Covid-19 saves lives with Dr Vladimir Zelenko.
  27. 03/04/2021: Dr. Zelenko with Dr. Peter Breggin: Physical and Spiritual Survival During COVID-19
     || [bitchute]
  28. 03/10/2021: Dr. Zelenko Successfully Treated 1,000 High Risk COVID Patients
  29. 04/22/2021: Dr. Zev Zelenko speaks with Rabbi Avi Schwartz about Covid, the Vaccines, and the Great Reset
  30. 04/23/2021: Dr. Vladimir “Zev” Zelenko, MD Recovering from COVID-19
     || [bitchute]
  31. 04/29/2021: Exclusive – Dr. Zelenko Live on Lindell TV
  32. 05/10/2021: Interview with Dr. Zelenko and his protocol for curing corona patients that was silenced
     || [bitchute]
  33. 05/13/2021: Freedom, Great Reset and Democracy. Interview with Rabbi Avi Schwartz
     (censored by Youtube) || [bitchute]
  34. 06/03/2021: Dr. Zev Zelenko: “What is called ‘gain-of-function’ is a very deliberate term to mislead the public”
     || [bitchute]
  35. 06/09/2021: Dr. Vladimir Zelenko & Steve Kirsch Discuss COVID-19 on Ask Dr. Drew
     || [bitchute]
  36. 06/16/2021: Dr. Zev Zelenko: Jab Death Count, Death by Government Tyranny, Censored Real Solutions (1of2)
    [bitchute] || [rumble]
  37. 06/16/2021: Dr. Zev Zelenko: Jab Death Count, Death by Government Tyranny, Censored Real Solutions (2of2)
    [bitchute] || [rumble]
  38. 06/30/2021: Dr. Zev Zelenko – Full Interview | The Awakening 3
  39. 07/07/2021: LifeSite’s Claire Chretien interviews Dr. Vladimir Zelenko
  40. 07/07/2021: Dr. Vladimir Zelenko Interview with John Leake
  41. 07/13/2021: R&B Monthly Seminar: “Medical War Crimes” (Episode 2) with Rabbi C. Weissman & Dr. Vladimir Zelenko

Other interesting interviews

  1. 04/25/2020: Dr. Dave Janda speaks with Michigan Rep. Karen Whitsett about her recent experiences with surviving the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
     || [bitchute]
  2. 08/18/2020: Covid. “Better illegally alive than legally dead!” Barry Shaw (IISS) speaks to a doctor and a patient who tell of their harrowing experiences with Covid. Also included. Mark Levin interviews Professor Harvey Risch.
     || [bitchute]
  3. 08/23/2020: Mark Levin Interviews Dr. Harvey A. Risch about HCQ, FDA, and Dr. Fauci.
     || [bitchute]
  4. 08/23/2020: See the Dr. Scott Atlas interview censored by youtube.
    (censored by YouTube) || [] || [bitchute]
  5. 09/15/2020: COVID-19 Management With Dr. Paul Marik – Author Of MATH+ Protocol
     || [bitchute]
  6. 09/15/2020: Dr. Stella Immanuel interview by Simone Smith of the Toronto Carribean News.
    [brighteon] || Brighteon is blocked by social media. Share this article to bypass censorship
  7. 08/17/2020: SARS-CoV2 and the Rise of Medical Technocracy. Lee Merritt, M.D.
  8. 10/11/2020: 20min presentation: Ambulatory Treatment of COVID-19. Peter McCullough, MD
     || [bitchute] || [rumble]
  9. 10/14/2020: Interview with Dr George Fareed, MD Part I
     || [link] || [minds] || [bitchute]
  10. 10/16/2020: Interview with Dr George Fareed, MD Part II
    (censored on YouTube) || [link] || [minds] || [bitchute]
  11. 11/15/2020: Dr. Stella Immanuel interview by Candance Owens.
     || [bitchute]
  12. 11/28/2021: Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet with Dr. Peter Breggin: Treating Covid-19 @ Home with Elizabeth Lee Vliet, MD
  13. 12/04/2020: The FLCCC Alliance press conference from Houston, Texas
  14. 12/10/2020: Dr. Peter McCullough interview with Dr. Peter Breggin: Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH–Save Yourself, Your Family, the World From COVID-19
     || [bitchute]
  15. 12/22/2020: Dr. Peter McCullough interview with Dr. Peter Breggin
     || [bitchute]
  16. 01/16/2021: Dr. Lee Merrit Interview on SARS-CoV-2<
     || [bitchute]
  17. 02/03/2021: Panel of medical doctors and researchers discuss Covid-19 protection, treatments, cures, and the vaccines.
    [rumble] || [bitchute]
  18. 02/11/2021: Dr. Simone Gold interview on experimental mRNA vaccines and their safety
  19. 02/13/2021: ASIA PACIFIC TODAY. Early treatment for Covid-19 reduces deaths with Dr Peter Mccullough
  20. 02/25/2021: An amazing interview with Leah Wilson by Dr. Peter Breggin: Finding the Courage to be True to Yourself and America
     || [bitchute]
  21. 04/01/2021: Dr. Lee Merritt On The Virus, The Jab, and the Data
    [original link] || [rumble]
  22. 04/08/2021: Presentation – Awaken, by Dr. Gold
    [original link]
  23. 04/27/2021: COVID Shot Killing Large Numbers, Warns Top COVID Doc Peter McCullough
  24. 05/04/2021: Dr. Lee Merritt interviewed by the Health Ranger
  25. 05/08/2021: Latest COVID-19 Science News. Peter McCullough, MD, MPH interviewed by Dr. Peter Breggin
     || [bitchute]
  26. 05/08/2021: Tucker Carlson interviews Peter McCullough, MD, MPH
  27. 05/14/2021: Dr Stella Immanuel interview with Mike Adams
  28. 05/18/2021: COVID Vaccine Shedding Hurting Unvaxed? Dr. Lee Merritt Explains
  29. 05/19/2021: Dr. Peter McCullough Interview with John Leake
     || [bitchute] || [brandnewtube]
  30. 05/26/2021: Dr. Peter McCullough | ACWT Interview
     || [bitchute]
  31. 06/01/2021: Real America – Dan W/ Cardiologist, Dr. Peter McCullough
  32. 06/12/2021: Dr. Peter McCullough on with Reiner Fuelmich June 11, 2021
  33. 06/14/2021: Worse than the disease- jab content being delivered to spleen, glands & ovaries
  34. 06/19/2021: Joseph Arthur interviews COVID early treatment expert and advocate Peter McCullough, MD, MPH
  35. 06/25/2021: How and why has early treatment been supressed and censored? Dr. Peter McCullough
  36. 06/26/2021: 3 Leading scientists discuss “rona” & the jab
  37. 06/30/2021: Dr. Peter A. McCullough interviewed by Australian propaganda media
  38. 06/30/2021: Interview of Dr. Harvey Risch with John Leake
     || [bitchute]
  39. 06/30/2021: Dr. Peter A. McCullough interviewed by Mike Adams
  40. 07/01/2021: COVID 19 Treatment and Vaccines – A Discussion with Dr. Peter McCullough on Daystar Television
  41. 07/03/2021: Panel discussion on forcing hospitals to use ivermectin by court orders.
  42. 07/04/2021: EXPOSED – The Persecution of Canadian Physicians by Organized Medicine During the Pandemic

Other news



The information on this website is provided only for educational purposes and to promote scientific research and policy making. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. I STRONGLY SUGGEST THAT YOU SEEK ADVICE FROM A COMPETENT AND QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL REGARDING ISSUES IN ANY PROFESSIONAL FIELD.

This web page is maintained by Eleftherios Gkioulekas, who is solely responsible for the content of this page. Eleftherios Gkioulekas has a Ph.D in Applied Mathematics from University of Washington in 2006. He is not a medical doctor and does not give medical advice. The contents of this page do not represent the opinions or policies of the University of Texas — Rio Grande Valley, but they are presumed to be protected under the principles of Academic Freedom and the 1st Amendmend of the United States Constitution.

Eleftherios Gkioulekas does not make and expressly disclaims all representations and warranties, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, whatsoever, including, but not limited to: (i) warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, suitability, usage, title or noninfringement; (ii) that the contents are free from error; and (iii) that such contents will not infringe third-party rights. The parties shall have no liability for damages of any kind arising out of the use, reference to, or reliance on this page or any of the content contained herein, even if advised of the possibility of such damages. In no event will Eleftherios Gkioulekas be liable to any person or entity for any damages, losses, liabilities, costs or expenses of any kind, whether direct or indirect, consequential, compensatory, incidental, actual, exemplary, punitive or special for the use of, reference to, or reliance on this website or any of the content contained herein, including, without limitation, any loss of business, revenues, profits, data, use, goodwill or other intangible losses.

If anyone backs vaccine for children, tell them to read this compelling scientific rebuttal

By Kathy Gyngell July 14, 2021

THIS week we’ve been making a concerted plea to parents and all adults to resist or counter any suggestion by the Government or schools or any other institutions that children need to be, or should be, vaccinated for Covid. 

On Monday we published a tour de force by Belinda Brown, a researcher, writer and mother, concerned that mothers and families were in ignorance of the facts. She set out the key reasons why child vaccination should not even be mooted.  

Yesterday we featured a film made by doctors who are mothers, explaining why they, with their medical knowledge, would not let their own children be vaccinated. 

Today I want to share with you a report entitled Covid-19 Vaccines and Children: A Scientist’s Guide for Parents. It is authored by Dr Byram Bridle of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance – a group of doctors, scientists and health practitioners committed to providing independent, evidence-based information about Covid.  

Dr Bridle’s paper consists of more than 40 pages with appendices and it is worth reading thoroughly. 

He starts with the key point that ‘authorisation under interim order’ – the basis on which the vaccines have been rushed out – means that ‘additional information is needed on the safety, efficacy, and quality of the vaccine, including in children and adolescents, to support the future full market approval and licensing of the vaccine’.  

This in itself really should be sufficient to dissuade any moral and rational adult from dreaming of imposing a vaccine on a child for an infection from which they are at no risk or negligible risk. 

Dr Bridle goes on to explain that key safety studies appear to have been missed in the clamour to roll out the vaccines and that, as reported in TCW by Neville Hodgkinson, more is being learned about the vaccines every day.  

The most important aspect of this is that the spike protein generated by the vaccine is not just an antigen that is recognised by the immune system as being foreign. In addition, it ‘can interact with receptors throughout the body, called ACE2 receptors, potentially causing undesirable effects such as damage to the heart and cardiovascular system, blood clots, bleeding, and neurological effects’.  

Dr Bridle concludes that ‘the current scientific uncertainties demand that the administration of Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine to children, adolescents, and young adults of child-bearing age be paused until proper scientific studies that focus on the safety and pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of the vaccines and the vaccine encoded spike protein can be conducted’.  

He explains furthermore that there is no safety issue with this course of action, because:  

• The risk of severe and potentially lethal Covid-19 in these specific populations is so low that we need to be very certain that risks associated with mass vaccination are not higher.  

• Asymptomatic members of this population are not a substantial risk for passing Covid-19 to others. 

• There are effective early-treatment strategies for the very few children, adolescents, and young adults of childbearing age who may be at risk of developing severe Covid-19, such as ivermectin, fluvoxamine, and budesonide. 

This is the most authoritative ‘science’ guide I have found. It is what I forward to people who say they trust the Government and who think scientists are agreed.  

This is the document I forward to friends and relations who question young adults for refusing vaccination or add to the pressure on them to do so. Since they make this their business, I make it mine to send them this fully referenced piece of dispassionate scientific analysis! 

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.

Source: The Conservative Woman

Scandal Of The Suppressed Case For Ivermectin

Published on July 2, 2021 Written by

‘We don’t doubt this is an important paper,’ wrote the senior editor of Lancet Respiratory Medicineon March 9 in response to our paper ‘Ivermectin for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, the brainchild of Dr Tess Lawrie and the world’s first Cochrane-standards ‘meta-analysis’ of clinical trials of the long-established anti-parasitic drug ivermectin, for treating, and preventing, Covid-19.

Four expert reviewers were satisfied by revisions already made. ‘The effort of the authors is praiseworthy in this pandemic situation,’ one said. Their critiques had been technical: some of the statistical methods break down when there are no ‘events’ (in this case, deaths) in both ‘arms’ of a clinical trial. Our lead statistician ran more checks; we fixed the criticisms. This is what ‘peer review’ is supposed to do. It’s normal.

One might take such a comment from the senior editor as the preamble to acceptance for publication. But no, this was the editors’ reason for not publishing the paper. This isn’t normal. What was the problem?

We don’t doubt this is an important paper, and would likely be widely taken up.

Hang on, Lancet Respiratory Medicine wants to avoid printing something it recognises as an important paper, that four of their own experts have passed, because it might be ‘widely taken up’? This is what they usually want.

Of course, the Lancet has a lot to live down, having moved into the business of publishing fake news, as with the notorious hydroxychloroquine fraud which I reported on forTCW last year. Not only did the Lancet publish an obvious fake, it did so with hostile editorial commentary and briefing to BBC Radio 4 Today for maximum impact.

So media briefing for planted fake news, but a Lancet specialist title won’t touch an ‘important paper’.

I was told in January, by a senior clinical researcher who knows him personally, that Richard Horton, editor in chief of the Lancet, was ‘very ashamed’ at having let through the fake news. Horton, whose Twitter bio reads ‘welcome to a permanent attack on the present’, wrote in 2015:

Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness . . . Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours . . . Our love of “significance” pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale. We reject important confirmations . . . And individual scientists, including their most senior leaders, do little to alter a research culture that occasionally veers close to misconduct.

Horton was right. The only aspect that the fake news had going for it was the huge sample size: 96,000 patients. Except that the true number was actually zero, since the paper was fake. The Lancet was certainly seduced by a ‘fashionable trend of dubious importance’, namely ‘Big Data’, a flavour-of-the-month set fair to corrupt many other sciences as well as medicine.

The Lancet ‘aided and abetted the worst behaviours’, not just those ‘veering close to misconduct’, but those clearly crossing the line.

Has anything changed? In 2015 Horton bemoaned journals that ‘reject important confirmations’, but in March 2021, ‘after lengthy discussions with the editorial team’, Lancet Respiratory Medicine did it again, rejecting our ‘important confirmation’ (passed by four of their own experts, remember) that yes, ivermectin works for Covid-19.

So there we have it. Horton’s 2015 editorial remains true, but he doesn’t seem to have done anything about it. He’s only the man in charge, after all.

I had feared as much, but we were all keen to give our findings maximum visibility. But Lancet Respiratory Medicine did what its friends wanted, which was ‘kill the story’ for as long as possible, which in the event has been over three months, whilst we searched for a journal with enough integrity to publish an article which had already passed four-fold peer-review at the Lancet, and would get yet further examination elsewhere.

As of last Friday the paper is now published in the American Journal of Therapeutics, and you can read it here. More importantly your doctor, or your family’s doctors, can read it too. Take it to them, as many as possible.

So what does this dry-as-dust research paper actually show ?

The starting point was another review article on ivermectin for Covid-19, also in the American Journal of Therapeutics, published on May 1. Take that paper to your doctor too. Dr Pierre Kory and his Front-Line Covid Critical Care alliance (FLCCC) of US-based intensive care doctors had their four-times peer-reviewed paper accepted for a special issue on repurposed drugs for Covid-19, but then revoked, by the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology.

This unprecedented volte face was charted recently in TCW by Dr Michael Yeadon. The same ‘kill the story’ orders delayed publication by over five months.

The FLCCC know what they are doing with Covid-19. Their ‘MATH+’ treatment delivers the world’s best survivals from serious, late-stage, hospitalised  Covid-19. It remains almost unknown in the UK and unused in the NHS. (All Brits should be very angry about this). FLCCC luminary Dr Joseph Varon, mentioned en passant in my coverage of the Oxford RECOVERY trial, has the best track record of them all.

The FLCCC have used several anti-virals in their continuing evolution of the best treatments, but by late autumn realised that one drug, ivermectin, stood out because it worked at all stages of the Covid-19 disease, from prophylaxis through to the intensive care that the FLCCC specialise in. They wrote up the evidence, posting a preprint in mid-November.

They explain the back-story to ivermectin, little-known in Western countries but worldwide one of the most widely-used drugs at 3.8billion doses and counting. Earning the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for its discoverers, it has crushed the hideously disabling infestation of onchocerciasis or ‘river-blindness’ across the tropics. A potent anti-parasitic, it is used for threadworms, scabies and head-lice.

It costs pence per pill. It is a known anti-viral, working across a range of RNA viruses, (and some DNA ones). It may even be an anti-cancer drug, and has prolonged lives in leukaemia. Specifically against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, a team at Monash University in Australia showed that ivermectin killed off the virus in vitro in April 2020.

The usual suspects declared that this meant nothing (which on its own is true), that that you couldn’t get it strong enough in vivo; nevertheless the Monash paper set off a series of clinical trials of ivermectin for Covid-19, usually in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs), or in plain English poor countries.

There is a good reason for this: if you are dirt poor, you need your medicines to be dirt cheap. Nothing else will be any use. What did they find? Ivermectin works for Covid-19, at entirely tolerable doses.

Kory’s paper showed how cases and deaths in Peru came crashing down where ivermectin was freely distributed, and not where it wasn’t. The same phenomenon has been repeated in India more recently; states such as Goa that adopt mass distribution of ivermectin crush their cases; those that refuse it such as Tamil Nadu (Chief Minister M K Stalin) don’t.

Dr Kory’s paper identifies and charts the evidence, but doesn’t do a formal meta-analysis, which is where Dr Tess Lawrie came in. Her Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy does nothing but rigorous systematic reviews, and only for public clients such as the NHS and the WHO. Their objectives are clinical practice guidelines, providing the evidence for decisions on licensing and implementation.

A ‘meta-analysis’ is a synthesis of data from multiple sources – typically clinical trials of a new drug – using recognised statistical methods. A meta-analysis of clinical trials that are themselves ‘randomised’ clinical trials (where patients are allocated at random to receive, or not, the treatment) lies at the summit of the ‘evidence quality’ pyramid, in the doctrines of Evidence-Based Medicine, ruthlessly insisted upon by regulatory authorities.

To rehearse a cliché, the Randomised Controlled Trial or RCT is the ‘gold standard’ of medical evidence. If so, a meta-analysis of RCTs is platinum.

What makes the paper a first is being carried out according to the standards of the Cochrane organisation, requiring a protocol to be observed (i.e. no favouritism), data extraction from primary sources by two researchers independently, and the ‘grading’ of those sources for the quality of the evidence. Indeed the paper began life as a Cochrane Review, and was finished by the end of January.

But to cut short a long story (parts of which are covered elsewhere by the ever-vigilant France Soir ) the Cochrane organisation did not want a systematic review on a topic already approved by a specialised researcher and colleagues whose consultancy does nothing else, and who have contributed nearly 80 such reviews between them.

Sounds familiar? It should do by now: the ‘capture’ of learned journals by powerful interests who will suppress, by fair means or increasingly by foul ones, any knowledge that threatens those interests.

The reason for doing a systematic review is that that is what is required by regulatory authorities such as the FDA (in the US) the European Medicines Agency (for the EU), our own Medical and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the World Health Organisation (WHO). It’s what they require to decide on licensing new drugs (though ivermectin isn’t new at all).

Dr Lawrie didn’t stop at the meta-analysis, but pressed on to a ‘Evidence to Decision’ process, the formal procedure which those regulators are supposed to use in coming to decisions. On February 20, the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) panel voted  that ‘ivermectin should be adopted to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with Covid-19 infection and to prevent Covid-19 infection among those at higher risk.

That was February. The essentials were already clear from Dr Kory’s paper in preprint in November, his testimony to the US Senate in December, Dr Lawrie’s first meta-analysis issued on January 3, and our submission to the Lancet on 5 February (preprint posted March 11). BMC Systematic Reviews were kind enough to post a preprint on March 18 but though they still say it’s ‘under review’ we haven’t heard from them in three months, so it looks like ‘kill the story’ orders apply there too. Our published paper has since been revised and updated.

The paper makes clear that there’s no real doubt that ivermectin is an effective medicine for Covid-19. Multiple clinical trials show it. The Randomised Controlled Trials that our paper analyses are just the tip of the iceberg. Plenty of other trials show it too, but if they were not randomised, according to regulators they don’t count, so our meta-analysis did not include them. Although Risks of Bias are carefully evaluated, disregarding the mountain of evidence from elsewhere, not least the experience and testimony of doctors actually using it, is itself a potent source of bias.

You are throwing away all the data that might force you to think. A critic of our paper wrote: ‘a technical tour-de-force based on ritualised ideas’. He’s right, but let’s not argue: our meta-analysis was upon the Regulators’ terms. We played by their rules. That was the point. You want a strict meta-analysis of RCTs only? Take two dozen.

How many do they need? When governments, or regulatory agencies, want to approve medicines, one will do. Dexamethasone, to huge fanfare, was approved last summer on the evidence of just one RCT, though it helps only ventilated patients in the inflammatory stages of the illness, and on its own, by not very much. The FLCCC doctors had been using a different corticosteroid, methylprednisolone, and at higher equivalent doses, long before.

In our analysis, ivermectin reduces deaths overall by around 62 per cent, and works at all disease stages. As a prophylactic, it prevents 6 out of every 7 infections that would otherwise occur, and stops household transmission in its tracks. Corticosteroids are vital in the inflammatory phase of the illness, but are useless in the purely viral stage or for prophylaxis.

So where does all this leave ivermectin, for those affected by Covid-19, those worried about it, and vulnerable people at risk?

Ivermectin isn’t new. Its safety record, from those billions of doses, is second to none. Its cost is negligible. The WHO, in its BC (Before Covid) era, listed it as an ‘Essential Medicine’ in their catalogue of the ‘minimum medicine needs for a basic health-care system’ (though our ‘envy of the world’ NHS doesn’t have it).

In the USA, ivermectin is licensed by the FDA, albeit not for Covid, so is available to any American doctor to prescribe ‘off-label’ (i.e. not according to the originally licensed ‘advertising label’). However the fact that it isn’t ‘labelled’ for Covid makes it easy to refuse. Patients’ families have had to go to court for injunctions ordering hospitals to give ivermectin. The FLCCC still swims against the tide, though legal barriers are lower than elsewhere, for open-minded doctors.

In the UK, ivermectin has never been licensed by the MHRA. This makes it easy for doctors to refuse, and for those who want to help to be obstructed. My GP refused me ivermectin for prophylaxis, even after I showed him the evidence. Hospital doctors can’t get it except to special order at pharmacies. The bureaucracy won’t allow them to prescribe it.

Listen to Dr Nyjon Eccles  having to bring his own ivermectin for his 84-year-old mother in hospital with Covid-19, dependent on oxygen, and failing every time she came off. She was discharged five days after her first dose.

As for the WHO itself, on March 31, 2021, its ‘Living Guideline’ for Covid treatments was updated, declaring: ‘We recommend not to use ivermectin in patients with Covid-19 except in the context of a clinical trial.’ The cherry-picking of studies that helped give the Right Answer, and rejection of those that didn’t, the cavalier appraisal of risks of bias and evidence certainty, make their analysis a complete travesty, but nevertheless potently influential.

In India, seeing the damage that the WHO had done to their Covid-19 policy, and finding the pile of evidence compiled by the FLCCC and BIRD, the Indian Bar Association served two legal notices upon the chief scientist of the WHO, Dr Soumya Swaminathan (an Indian national). The first (May 25) accuses her of a ‘disinformation campaign against ivermectin’ and the second June 13) ups the ante by joining Dr Tedros (director general of the WHO), and accusing them of ‘contempt of court and aggravated offences against humanity by spreading disinformation’.

If these move to actual litigation, watch this space.

Meanwhile, patients and their families, and even Bar Associations, should not have to go through the courts or to smuggle medicines into hospital to get treatment for sick patients. At some point, officials who obstruct access to safe medicines are going to have to explain the moral difference between their actions and corporate manslaughter.

Will our own MHRA see sense and ‘license’ this WHO Essential Medicine of unparalleled safety record and negligible cost for use in the UK for treatment and prophylaxis of Covid-19? There’s none so deaf as those that will not listen. We have a Government that has lied to us throughout the Covid-19 pandemic and continues to do so.

The oxymoronic Sage, fronted by the Gruesome Twosome, receive no challenges from equally or better qualified scientists, except through volunteer groups like HART or BIRD. The Prime Minister, having ‘landed from another planet and having absolutely no clue of what he is talking about’ appoints a Task Force to have ‘antiviral treatments ready for deployment by autumn 2021’.

This article has been about an anti-viral treatment that is already known, already exists, with an unparalleled safety record, is on the Essential Medicines list of the WHO, costs virtually nothing, and has anti-inflammatory properties to boot. It requires only formal endorsement. Johnson’s Task Force is redundant.

See more here:

Header image: The Conversation

17,503 DEAD, 1.7 Million Injured (50% SERIOUS) Reported in European Union’s Database of Adverse Drug Reactions for COVID-19 Shots

July 3, 2021
by Brian Shilhavy Editor, Health Impact News

The European Union database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, which also tracks reports of injuries and deaths following the experimental COVID-19 “vaccines.”

Health Impact News subscriber from Europe reminded us that this database maintained at EudraVigilance is only for countries in Europe who are part of the European Union (EU), which comprises 27 countries.

The total number of countries in Europe is much higher, almost twice as many, numbering around 50. (There are some differences of opinion as to which countries are technically part of Europe.)

So as high as these numbers are, they do NOT reflect all of Europe. The actual number in Europe who are reported dead or injured due to COVID-19 shots would be much higher than what we are reporting here.

The EudraVigilance database reports that through July 3, 2021 there are 17,503 deaths and 1,687,527 injuries reported following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots:

From the total of injuries recorded, half of them (837,588 ) are serious injuries.

Seriousness provides information on the suspected undesirable effect; it can be classified as ‘serious’ if it corresponds to a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.”

As we reported yesterday, tens of thousands of people in the U.S. now regret getting the COVID-19 shots, and are begging for help, because the medical system has turned its back on them and refuses to treat their injuries. See:

Tens of Thousands of COVID-19 “Vaccine” Injured in the U.S. Begging for Help as the Medical Community Turns Their Back on Them

One subscriber from the UK commented on the article and stated that the same thing was happening there:

It is exactly the same in Scotland and England.

My vaccinated friends are not getting appointments with their family doctors who are avoiding them post vaccination even although there are no patients in the GP surgery waiting rooms when they have tried to get appointments. It is utterly cruel given they talked them into getting the vaccinations and accepted 10 UK pounds from the Scottish and English governments per person vaccinated on their patient list and did not disclose the risk of these vaccinations to the patients.

A friend nearly passed out close to the GP surgery, a kind stranger wheeled her up to the GP surgery and she was not allowed to be seen by her GP because she did not have an appointment. The nurse refused to take bloods because they are not allowed to do so until management confirms they can do this so they cannot even do exploratory bloods to investigate what has gone wrong with these patients post vaccination.

Another friend’s hospital consultant phoned a friend’s GP insisting her family doctor see her given she had had heart procedures and no appointments for 2 years. She told me after first Pfizer shot “it was like acid going into my veins” and the queen did not get the same vaccine asshe did which will be completely true. Her GP treated her with disdain and was not pleased to see her and my friend also tells me that every time she walks now post vaccination her heart races and her son has been unwell post vaccination too.

All my friends who got the vaccination have had severe worsening of their pre-existing medical conditions and some have got heart conditions they did not previously have or chronic obstructive airways disease.

I have noticed most have became irritable and short-tempered as they are becoming unwell not realising the vaccine is harming them and they are lashing out at others for no good reason.

In UK, NHS contributions are deducted from people’s salaries and the retired paid these all their working life and now are getting refused service but they will still take these NHS contributions regardless. It is wicked and cruel. Though it is the governments who are instructing the GP and hospital management to treat the patients in this abysmal manner.

I am quite sure this will be happening in most if not all countries.

God be with us all.

Health Impact News subscriber in Europe ran the reports for each of the four COVID-19 shots we are including here. This subscriber has volunteered to do this, and it is a lot of work to tabulate each reaction with injuries and fatalities, since there is no place on the EudraVigilance system we have found that tabulates all the results.

Since we have started publishing this, others from Europe have also calculated the numbers and confirmed the totals.*

Here is the summary data through July 3, 2021.

Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccine Tozinameran (code BNT162b2,Comirnaty) from BioNTechPfizer: 8,426 deathand 632,623 injuries to 03/07/2021

  • 17,754   Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 99 deaths
  • 14,858   Cardiac disorders incl. 1,165 deaths
  • 126        Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 12 deaths
  • 7,951     Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 5 deaths
  • 324        Endocrine disorders incl. 2 deaths
  • 9,319     Eye disorders incl. 19 deaths
  • 57,599   Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 388 deaths
  • 173,572 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 2,510 deaths
  • 558        Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 33 deaths
  • 6,948     Immune system disorders incl. 42 deaths
  • 19,780   Infections and infestations incl. 834 deaths
  • 7,204     Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 124 deaths
  • 15,281   Investigations incl. 296 deaths
  • 4,721     Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 164 deaths
  • 88,638   Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 103 deaths
  • 386        Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl. cysts and polyps) incl. 26 deaths
  • 114,125 Nervous system disorders incl. 902 deaths
  • 478        Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 18 deaths
  • 124        Product issues
  • 11,148   Psychiatric disorders incl. 117 deaths
  • 2,005     Renal and urinary disorders incl. 132 deaths
  • 3,597     Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 2 deaths
  • 27,121   Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 989 deaths
  • 30,404   Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 79 deaths
  • 979        Social circumstances incl. 12 deaths
  • 392        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 21 deaths
  • 17,231   Vascular disorders incl. 332 deaths

Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273(CX-024414) from Moderna: 4,605 deathand 157,802 injuries to 03/07/2021

  • 2,890     Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 35 deaths
  • 4,491     Cardiac disorders incl. 503 deaths
  • 66           Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 4 deaths
  • 1,972     Ear and labyrinth disorders
  • 110        Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
  • 2,498     Eye disorders incl. 9 deaths
  • 13,626   Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 161 deaths
  • 42,716   General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1,928 deaths
  • 269        Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 17 deaths
  • 1,349     Immune system disorders incl. 5 deaths
  • 4,793     Infections and infestations incl. 259 deaths
  • 3,378     Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 92 deaths
  • 3,359     Investigations incl. 93 deaths
  • 1,616     Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 94 deaths
  • 19,416   Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 88 deaths
  • 175        Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl. cysts and polyps) incl. 18 deaths
  • 28,239   Nervous system disorders incl. 465 deaths
  • 338        Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 2 deaths
  • 24           Product issues
  • 3,193     Psychiatric disorders incl. 75 deaths
  • 1,061     Renal and urinary disorders incl. 66 deaths
  • 723        Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 2 death
  • 7,268     Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 438 deaths
  • 8,400     Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 32 deaths
  • 690        Social circumstances incl. 16 deaths
  • 540        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 42 deaths
  • 4,602     Vascular disorders incl. 160 deaths

Total reactions for the experimental vaccine AZD1222/VAXZEVRIA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) from Oxford/AstraZeneca3,871 deathand 852,616 injuries to 03/07/2021

  • 9,950     Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 160 deaths
  • 13,336   Cardiac disorders incl. 454 deaths
  • 115        Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 3 deaths
  • 9,712     Ear and labyrinth disorders
  • 355        Endocrine disorders incl. 3 deaths
  • 14,641   Eye disorders incl. 15 deaths
  • 86,515   Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 184 deaths
  • 227,408 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1,009 deaths
  • 607        Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 32 deaths
  • 3,359     Immune system disorders incl. 14 deaths
  • 19,508   Infections and infestations incl. 247 deaths
  • 8,912     Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 94 deaths
  • 18,352   Investigations incl. 88 deaths
  • 10,315   Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 50 deaths
  • 131,547 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 50 deaths
  • 379        Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl. cysts and polyps) incl. 9 deaths
  • 180,575 Nervous system disorders incl. 612 deaths
  • 279        Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 5 deaths
  • 117        Product issues
  • 16,000   Psychiatric disorders incl. 33 deaths
  • 3,045     Renal and urinary disorders incl. 33 deaths
  • 8,593     Reproductive system and breast disorders
  • 28,994   Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 447 deaths
  • 39,173   Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 25 deaths
  • 866        Social circumstances incl. 5 deaths
  • 754        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 16 deaths
  • 19,209   Vascular disorders incl. 283 deaths

Total reactions for the experimental COVID-19 vaccine JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) from Johnson & Johnson601 deaths and 44,486 injuries to 03/07/2021

  • 405        Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 18 deaths
  • 659        Cardiac disorders incl. 73 deaths
  • 16           Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
  • 250        Ear and labyrinth disorders
  • 10           Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
  • 518        Eye disorders incl. 3 deaths
  • 4,283     Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 25 deaths
  • 11,832   General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 150 deaths
  • 58           Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 4 deaths
  • 161        Immune system disorders incl. 1 death
  • 598        Infections and infestations incl. 16 deaths
  • 413        Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 8 deaths
  • 2,420     Investigations incl. 39 deaths
  • 225        Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 11 deaths
  • 7,687     Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 17 deaths
  • 18           Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl. cysts and polyps)
  • 9,547     Nervous system disorders incl. 76 deaths
  • 15           Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 1 death
  • 11           Product issues
  • 459        Psychiatric disorders incl. 5 deaths
  • 150        Renal and urinary disorders incl. 8 deaths
  • 166        Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 1 death
  • 1,453     Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 47 deaths
  • 1,125     Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 2 deaths
  • 91           Social circumstances incl. 3 deaths
  • 393        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 27 deaths
  • 1,523     Vascular disorders incl. 65 deaths

*These totals are estimates based on reports submitted to EudraVigilance. Totals may be much higher based on percentage of adverse reactions that are reported. Some of these reports may also be reported to the individual country’s adverse reaction databases, such as the U.S. VAERS database and the UK Yellow Card system. The fatalities are grouped by symptoms, and some fatalities may have resulted from multiple symptoms.

Source: Health Impact News

Install Apple Magic Trackpad with Windows Precision drivers (AS GOOD AS MacOS!)

Dead simple thanks to J-Tech Workshop

Just in case the video disappears, you can download the drivers here, unzip, right click on AmtPtpDevice.inf and install. That’s all, now you can do a quick search for touchpad and adjust your settings in Windows control panel.

Enjoy 🙂

Drivers thanks to
Win 10 settings

%d bloggers like this: