Monthly Archives: March, 2022

The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan – The Genocide of the Peoples of Europe

Mass immigration is a phenomenon, the causes of which are still cleverly concealed by the system, and the multicultural propaganda is trying to falsely portray it as inevitable. With this article we intend to prove once and for all, that this is not a spontaneous phenomenon. What they want to present as an inevitable outcome of modern life, is actually a plan conceived around a table and prepared for decades, to completely destroy the face of the continent.

Republished from Namaste Publishing UK, 4 December 2021
Originally published on Identità in Italian on 11 December 2012
(Links in the text below are our own)

The Pan-Europe

Few people know that one of the main initiators of the process of European integration, was also the man who designed the genocide plan of the Peoples of Europe. It is a dark person, whose existence is unknown to the masses, but the elite considers him as the founder of the European Union. His name is Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi. His father was an Austrian diplomat named Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi (with connections to the Byzantine family of the Kallergis) and his mother the Japanese Mitsu Aoyama. Kalergi, thanks to his close contacts with all European aristocrats and politicians, due to the relationships of his nobleman-diplomat father, and by moving behind the scenes, away from the glare of publicity, he managed to attract the most important heads of state to his plan, making them supporters and collaborators for the “project of European integration”.

 In 1922 he founded the “Pan-European” movement in Vienna, which aimed to create a New World Order, based on a federation of nations led by the United States. European integration would be the first step in creating a world government. Among the first supporters, including Czech politicians Tomáš Masaryk and Edvard Beneš and the banker Max Warburg, who invested the first 60,000 marks. The Austrian Chancellor Ignaz Seipel and the next president of Austria, Karl Renner, took the responsibility for leading the “Pan-European” movement. Later, French politicians, such as Léon Bloum, Aristide Briand, Alcide De Gasperi, etc will offer their help.

With the rise of Fascism in Europe, the project was abandoned and the “Pan-European” movement was forced to dissolve, but after the Second World War, Kalergi, thanks to frantic and tireless activity and the support of Winston Churchill, the Jewish Masonic Lodge B’nai B’rith and major newspapers like the New York Times, the plan manages to be accepted by the United States Government. The CIA later undertakes the completion of the project.

The essence of the Kalergi plan

In his book ‘Praktischer Idealismus’, Kalergi indicates that the residents of the future “United States of Europe” will not be the People of the Old Continent, but a kind of sub-humans, products of miscegenation. He clearly states that the peoples of Europe should interbreed with Asians and coloured races, thus creating a multinational flock with no quality and easily controlled by the ruling elite.

(Rough translation German – English of Praktischer Idealismus – Practical Idealism HERE.)

Kalergi proclaims the abolition of the right of self-determination and then the elimination of nations with the use of ethnic separatist movements and mass migration. In order for Europe to be controlled by an elite, he wants to turn people into one homogeneous mixed breed of Blacks, Whites and Asians. Who is this elite however? Kalergi is particularly illuminating on this: 

The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals. Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It’s not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats. This happened when the European feudal aristocracy crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews [due to the actions taken by the French Revolution]

Although no textbook mentions Kalergi, his ideas are the guiding principles of the European Union. The belief that the peoples of Europe should be mixed with Africans and Asians, to destroy our identity and create a single mestizo race, is the basis of all community policies that aim to protect minorities. Not for humanitarian reasons, but because of the directives issued by the ruthless Regime that machinates the greatest genocide in history. The Coudenhove-Kalergi European Prize is awarded every two years to Europeans who have excelled in promoting this criminal plan. Among those awarded with such a prize are Angela Merkel and Herman Van Rompuy.

The incitement to genocide, is also the basis of the constant appeals of the United Nations, that demands we accept millions of immigrants to help with the low birth rates of the EU. According to a report published in January 2000 in Population division Review of the United Nations in New York, under the title “Immigration replacement: A solution to declining and aging population,” Europe will need by 2025 159,000,000 migrants.

One could wonder how there can be such accuracy on the estimates of immigration, although it was not a premeditated plan. It is certain that the low birth rate could easily be reversed with appropriate measures to support families. It is just as clear that it is the contribution of foreign genes do not protect our genetic heritage, but that it enables their disappearance. The sole purpose of these measures is to completely distort our people, to turn them into a group of people without national, historical and cultural cohesion. In short, the policies of the Kalergi plan was, and still is, the basis of official government policies aimed at genocide of the Peoples of Europe, through mass immigration.

G. Brock Chisholm, former director of the World Health Organization (OMS), proves that he has learned the lesson of Kalergi well when he says: “What people in all places have to do is to limit of birth rates and promote mixed marriages (between different races), this aims to create a single race in a world which will be directed by a central authority.”


If we look around us, the Kalergi plan seems to be fully realised. We face Europe’s fusion with the Third World. The plague of interracial marriage produces each year thousands of young people of mixed race: “The children of Kalergi.” Under the dual pressures of misinformation and humanitarian stupefaction, promoted by the MSM, the Europeans are being taught to renounce their origin, to renounce their national identity.

The servants of globalisation are trying to convince us that to deny our identity, is a progressive and humanitarian act, that “racism” is wrong, because they want us all to be blind consumers. It is necessary, now more than ever, to counter the lies of the System, to awaken the revolutionary spirit of the Europeans. Everyone must see this truth, that European Integration amounts to genocide. We have no other option; the alternative is national suicide.

Translator’s note: Although the reasons due to which Kalergi made the choices he made are of no particular interest to us, we will try to answer a question that will surely our readers have already asked: Why a European aristocrat with Flemish, Polish, Greek-Byzantine roots and even with some samurai blood in his veins (from his mother) was such body plans and organ in the hands of dark forces? The reasons, in our opinion, are multiple, idiosyncratic, psychological and … women.

We therefore observe a personality with strong snobbish attitudes, arrogance, and, allow me the term, “degenerate elitism.” Also, the fact that his mother was Asian, perhaps created internal conflicts and frustrations, something that can happen to people with such temperament. But the most decisive factor must have been the “proper teenager”, which incidentally of course, was beside him, and became his first woman (at age 13): The Jewess Ida Roland, who would later become a famous actress.

European Council

On November 16th 2012, the President of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, was awarded the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize, during a special conference in Vienna, to celebrate the 90 years of the pan-European movement. The prize is awarded every two years to leading personalities for their outstanding contribution to the process of European integration.

A decisive factor that helped him win the prize was the balanced way in which President Van Rompuy executed his duties in the new position of President of the European Council, which was established by the Treaty of Lisbon. He handled this particularly sensitive leading and coordinating role with a spirit of determination and reconciliation, while emphasis was also given to his skilful arbitration on European affairs and unfailing commitment to European moral values.

During his speech, Mr Van Rompuy described the unification of Europe as a peace project. This idea, which was also the objective of the work of Coudenhove-Kalergi, after 90 years is still important. The award bears the name of Count Richard Nicolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894-1972), philosopher, diplomat, publisher and founder of the Pan-European Movement (1923). Coudenhove-Kalergi was the pioneer of European integration and popularized the idea of ​​a federal Europe with his work.

Among the winners of the award, the Federal Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel (2010) and the President of Latvia Vaira Vike-Freiberga (2006), are included.

Additional information: The Slyness of the Kalergi Plan: The Genocide of the Peoples of Europe

I’m an Englishman

Below is a moving speech by a man called Laurence Bright played by Marc Warren from an excerpt from BBC’s 2001 television series NCS: Manhunt.

“My gripe is that we were never asked. My gripe is that we were told, not asked, and every day we are told again and again how we are to be and how our country is to be. We are told by them, and we know who they are, they’re English too. They are the class that has always set themselves apart, they are the class that has always taken what they wanted for themselves, and now they are the class that is giving England away. They have never asked us, and they never will.”’m An Englishman, NCS Manhunt, BBC (7 mins)

Featured picture: Want to fight climate change? Have fewer children (2017) and Refugee influx helps halt decline in Germany’s population (2016), The Guardian

The Exposé is censored by Google,
Facebook, Twitter, & even PayPal.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…

Unlike the mainstream media, we
are not funded by the Government to
publish lies & propaganda on their behalf.
Instead we rely solely on your support,
so please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism.

It’s secure, quick, and easy…

Hope in Orwell’s 1984 and What it Means in the Modern World


‘If there is hope,’ writes Winston Smith in his illicit diary, ‘it lies in the proles’. Readers familiar with Orwell’s esteemed dystopia, 1984, will know that Smith – the novel’s doomed hero – is contemplating the overthrow of the seemingly invincible Party and its totalitarian regime. And it doesn’t take long for him to reason, ‘Until [the proles] become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious.’ This paradox comes to haunt one of literature’s most renowned dissidents – Winston Smith’s fancy that the proles may provide humanity’s salvation is repeatedly undermined, so that a lower-class insurrection is both a ‘mystical truth and a palpable absurdity’. Yet until his arrest Winston clings to the notion as a ‘faith’, and one that is apparently upheld by what he believes to be the underground resistance’s subversive literature.

Hope and The Proles

The Brotherhood’s legendary ‘Book’ appears to be leading to the conclusion that a prole uprising will someday defeat the Party. If Winston is arrested before he can finish reading the treatise, readers of Orwell’s actual novel understand that any such revolutionary idealism is cheerlessly exposed by the limited third person narration, which depicts the masses in a state of unconscious hopelessness. The proles were born, grew up in the gutters, worked from childhood, had crushing physical jobs, married young and died way before their time. Their horizons or reasons for ‘remaining alive’ were limited to their sprawling, messy families, football, films, beer and gambling, including the fixed Lottery. Indeed, this culturally-unstimulated class developed a ‘primitive patriotism’ though not ‘strong political feelings’ and ‘the larger evils invariably escaped their notice’.

The author of this article, Randal Eliot, has a fabulous ebook out now!

Inhabiting crime-ridden areas and lacking education, the proles are regarded by the Party as natural inferiors, and for that reason they are prohibited from graduating into its ranks. Consequently, it is a policy of the Thought Police to root out and annihilate the most gifted of the common people. The Inner Party member, interrogator and torturer, O’Brien, can attest with some confidence that the proles (and slaves) will never rebel: the people who make up the largest section of society are as helpless as animals.

1984 – arguably the most successful political novel of the twentieth-century – constructs an image of humanity that appears, at face value, to be devoid of hope. Is its sole purpose to critique the rise of Stalinist systems of oppression? Or does the novel contain a subtler, more positive message?


Although the three super-states – Oceania, Eastasia and Eurasia – have agreed a truce preventing further nuclear warfare (Colchester is one victim of an atomic catastrophe), self-propelled missiles frequently devastate London, which is no longer England’s capital, but a conurbation of Airstrip One, a province of Oceania.# The city is characterised by slum housing, bomb sites and imposing government buildings, while machine gun nests, omnipresent police patrols and the Thought Police control the population (though little is done to fight crime in the prole areas). In this environment of perpetual warfare, oppression, rations and grubby poverty, propaganda is omnipresent – Orwell’s readers can never be totally sure that the text is stable or reliable. This is especially true when the narration focalises through Winston Smith, a man who, like the majority of Oceania’s citizens, has been systematically misled by the authorities.

Work from Literary Fragments’ Facebook page. Find us on Facebook & Twitter.

Political posters intimidatingly declare that Big Brother is always watching, and for once the regime is telling the truth: Party members are under the constant surveillance of telescreens, a technology advanced enough to detect a heart beat changing pace. The dire upshot is that Ingsoc’s ideology, slogans and political rituals must be adhered to at all times. The Two Minute Hate and Hate Week virulently attack alleged traitors, prisoners-of-war and opposing states (either Eastasia or Eurasia, depending on who is currently an ally or an enemy) – any Party member who isn’t seen to participate passionately will most certainly be accused of Thought Crime, punishable by torture, indoctrination and vaporisation.

After death, most ‘Thought Criminals’ are painstakingly removed from every record, as if they never existed. Meanwhile, the Party disseminate the lie that a ‘new, happy life’ has been created. Should the consequences of independent thought not be fatal, no one would be capable of disagreeing – a point of comparison between eras cannot be found because all records are doctored for political purposes. The dictatorship’s iron, cruel grip on life and reality even destabilises mathematical certainties – O’Brien’s torture of Winston demonstrates that two plus two might make three or five whenever the Party has a nefarious reason to make such claims.

Unsurprisingly, hope perishes in a society where war, fear and persecution are the chief driving forces. And that’s before we consider Room 101, the torture chamber where the worst thing in the world (subjective to every victim) is to be endured. Inner Party members like O’Brien are intellectual, lunatic fanatics who believe in indoctrination and torture, boldly, madly professing that their abuse of others cures insanity. The treacherous concept of doublethink – the ability to accept fundamental contradictions in order to submit to the Party’s line – facilitates their inhumanity.

More from our Facebook page.

The Party’s thirst for ‘pure power’ has developed methods of torture from which no martyrs emerge. The former non-conformists who have suffered in the Ministry of Love are also publicly humiliated, and these broken shadows of humanity genuinely love the figurehead of oligarchy, Big Brother, before they are murdered. Humanity’s desperate plight is encapsulated by O’Brien’s menacing, infamous line, ‘If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.’

Human Relationships and Love

In such a fearful, paranoid milieu it is impossible to know anything about other human beings except that they have the potential to report you to the ruthless authorities. Winston originally suspects Julia – a woman he comes to love – of being an amateur spy serving the Thought Police. The irony doubles because he is drawn to one of his eventual tormentors in the Ministry of Love, O’Brien, even if Winston cannot figure out whether the Inner Party man is a friend or a foe.

Coupled with the all-encompassing promotion of war, hatred and general suspicion of ‘comrades’, Winston Smith is deeply, violently disturbed by the suppression of human emotions and physical needs (the Party never permits people who are attracted to one another to marry and sex is legal only for purposes of reproduction). In a flash of vicious imagination, 1984’s hero envisages himself smashing in Julia’s skull before he knows anything about her. In another instance he regrets not murdering his estranged wife when the opportunity presented itself years past. Not only has the regime generated psychotic misogyny (through the above-mentioned regulations and the sickening preaching and purity of the Junior Anti-Sex League), it has vehemently shredded family ties – youth groups successfully encourage children to report their parents’ ‘suspicious’ behaviour. After allegedly shouting ‘Down with Big Brother!’ in his sleep, Parsons briefly shares a cell with his former neighbour, Winston. The blubbering family man, Parsons, reported by his young daughter, hopes that he will be rewarded for his conscientious Party work, reasoning that he’ll be sent to a labour-camp rather than be shot. A certain type of hope springs eternal?

Readers learn the Party is striving to eliminate orgasms. The all-out war on sex aims to divert the energy of sexual frustration in ways that advance the establishment’s hateful political ends. And yet even in this tyrannical culture where love and lust must be hidden, Orwell’s text raises a sliver of hope only to gradually, excruciatingly crush it. Winston’s devotion to Julia initially inspires a glowing desire to stay alive, but the couple finally betray their vows to remain true when faced with Room 101’s horrors. In the most terrible torture chamber Winston and Julia wish their ordeals on one another when they realise unfaithfulness is their sole means of escape. Only love for Big Brother is permitted, and after the Party destroy Winston’s spirit, he comes to love the regime’s figurehead and all that it symbolises.

The Past and History

Early in the novel, Winston sought to deconstruct the Party’s narrative and ideology, a process that involved trying to find out if people enjoyed better living conditions in the past. As far as he can ascertain, the poverty and injustices alluded to in official history books could be accurate and legitimate accounts or politicised, wild fabrications. When Winston ignores Party orders and strays into a forbidden zone his discussion with an inarticulate, unfocused, aged prole suggests that the workers were severely impoverished under the system of capitalism. Historically aware readers will confirm that dreadful conditions existed in pre-WWII England for many working people, nevertheless, the regime’s historical perspective isn’t authenticated: for example, the Party lies that the period of capitalism did not oversee the erection of any great buildings, placing impressive architecture in the medieval period or claiming that grand constructions are post-revolution achievements.

Unable to prove or disprove his doubts about the Party’s presentation of history, Winston is fully aware of the systematic manipulation of more recent events – his work in the Ministry of Truth concerns altering records to guarantee that the Party’s line is flawlessly impervious. In essence, ‘The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became the truth’.

The Book and the Brotherhood

The ‘Book’ (supposedly authored by the arch dissenter, Goldstein, and published by the proscribed Brotherhood) seems to concur with Winston’s memories: Smith recalls that the original revolutionaries were dubiously tried, shamed and executed and The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism relates that socialism’s original principles were betrayed and twisted out of all recognition by the Party. Paranoid uncertainty soon reasserts itself, however – the Party interrogator and torturer, O’Brien, avers that he and other Inner Party members wrote the legendary subversive text (O’Brien certainly set-up Winston so that he was caught with it in his possession). While O’Brien opines that The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism provides an accurate historical context, the unscrupulous apparatchik also maintains that the text purposely misleads its readers towards a groundless conclusion. Namely, that the proles are the source of hope. We have already seen that Orwell’s text supports O’Brien’s negative appraisal of the likelihood of a successful prole insurgency.

Winston speculates that Emmanuel Goldstein – Public Enemy Number One and a regular target of the Two Minute Hate – is the ‘sole guardian of truth and sanity in a world of lies.’ That this great protector and his organisation, the Brotherhood, might actually be creations of the Party’s propaganda (as Big Brother likely is) mocks the suggestion of even the faintest revival in humankind’s fortunes.

Rather than enlighten Winston, the section of the ‘Book’ he manages to study articulates much of what he already sensed. If O’Brien and other Party members are responsible for the tome and expounded an accurate historical and sociological account, then we encounter a vile boast; namely that societies have always been hierarchical and that the Party have developed the most formidable oligarchy ever. According to the Book, the regime’s power is rooted in the endless war: the conflict ensures that the

Don’t forget to check out Randal Eliot’s fabulous novel, What Goes and Comes Around.

general population never benefits from their endeavours, that is, the masses do not become comfortable (because the war consumes all production) and therefore do not go on to gain an education (which a more comfortable life would afford them). The motive for this economic duplicity is simple: a mass of educated people would dismantle an oppressive hierarchical society.

The chances of widespread education (as opposed to universal indoctrination) are ever more negated by policies such as the ongoing translation of literature into Newspeak. These new editions strip canonised works of their art and their thought-provoking human interest, while maintaining an illusion of cultural prestige. 1984’s commentary on books and the control of their potential influence is perhaps best illustrated by Winston’s thoughts on his diary: he knows he is condemned to death the exact moment he even considered clandestinely keeping his own record of life.


The Party expect Newspeak to replace the English language in just over six decades. The regime’s language planning is typically about domination – Newspeak is designed to limit thought and expression: Thought Crime and the ability to rebel and hope for change will be eradicated by linguistic constraints.

I984’s final, sad scenes show broken Winston reflecting on his final meeting with Julia after their release. Knowing that they betrayed their love the couple can barely stand the sight of each other. Crushingly, Big Brother is the focus of Winston’s affections, no matter that the Party will seal his fate with a bullet. It is an utterly bleak denouement in an utterly bleak world. But what is its purpose? Does it actually enable close readers to take something positive from the novel?

1984’s critique of Stalinist regimes attests that a violent revolution will be succeeded by a more virulent counter-revolution that mercilessly kills the original insurrectionists and trounces their ideals. In contextualising Oceania’s society, Orwell’s text alludes to the declining fortunes of the democratic British Labour Party due to the revolutionaries’ ascent, subtly, inversely making the point that democratic reform is the sole means to justice and change? Such a reading certainly accords with Orwell’s well-documented support for democratic socialism, and 1984 was conceived at the time the UK’s post-war leftist government was founding the National Health Service and establishing a progressive Welfare State to tackle social evils.

Do we currently live under a threat posed by violent revolutionaries? We certainly inhabit an increasingly 1984 type-world as far as government surveillance is concerned (just consider the UK’s proposed Snoopers’ Charter), and war in some shape or form is continual (the latter is frequently used to justify the former). Perhaps our societies have undergone some far-reaching changes without many of us entirely appreciating their highly-dangerous consequences. 1984 is a grave warning, not a guidebook to help nefarious politicians and powerful groups to accomplish their agendas.

Randal Eliot

#Oceania comprises the Americas, the British Isles, Iceland, Australia, New Zealand, southern Africa and other disputed, fought-over zones.

Randal Eliot’s great debut novel is out now!

Ukraine destroying evidence of US-funded bioweapons program

Russia’s Defense Ministry says Kiev ordered scientists to destroy samples of plague, anthrax, and other lethal pathogens

Russia claims Ukraine destroying evidence of US-funded bioweapons program

FILE PHOTO:The biohazard symbol is seen at a bacteriological laboratory at the Lvov Regional Laboratory Centre in Lvov, Ukraine, November 9, 2020 © Getty Images / Markiian Lyseiko

As Russian troops entered Ukraine, the government in Kiev ordered the “emergency destruction” of pathogens including plague and anthrax at US-funded laboratories near the Russian border, the Ministry of Defense in Moscow claimed on Sunday. Earlier rumors that the Russian military was targeting US-run biolabs were written off as conspiracy theories, but the ministry has promised to back up its claims with documents.

“We have received documentation from employees of Ukrainian biolaboratories on the emergency destruction on February 24 of especially dangerous pathogens of plague, anthrax, tularemia, cholera and other deadly diseases,” read a statement from the ministry.

The statement accused the “Kiev regime” of conducting an “emergency cleansing” to hide evidence of the supposed biological weapons program, which the ministry claimed was funded by the US, and involved the production of “biological weapons components” at at least two laboratories in the cities of Poltava and Kharkov, both of which have seen intense fighting between Russian and Ukrainian forces in recent days.

The documents published by the ministry purportedly include an order from the Ukrainian Ministry of Health to destroy the pathogens, and lists of the germs in question.

RT can not independently verify the authenticity of these documents. Russia’s Defense Ministry said that they are currently being analyzed by radiation, chemical and biological protection specialists. 

“In the near future we will present the results of the analysis,” the ministry said, adding that it believes the documents will prove that Ukraine and the US were violating Article 1 of the UN Biological Weapons Convention. The US, Ukraine and Russia are among more than 180 parties to this treaty, and under Article 1 of the agreement, all parties agree “never under any circumstances to develop, produce, stockpile, acquire, or retain” biological weapons.

As of the moment of this article’s publication, Washington has not commented on the ministry’s claims, and neither has Kiev.

In the initial days of Russia’s military offensive last month, claims circulated online that Russia was targeting western-funded biolabs with missile strikes. These allegations were never verified and were derided by western sources as conspiracy theories, although the Pentagon has publicly stated that it works with the Ukrainian government to “consolidate and secure pathogens and toxins of security concern in Ukrainian government facilities,” for “peaceful research and vaccine development,” according to the US embassy in Kiev.

Source :

%d bloggers like this: