Category Archives: Child Abuse

The Complete Breakdown Of Every Hillary And Bill Clinton Speech, And Fee, Since 2013

So due to popular demand, we appended to the 2013 speech detail first released last week the full breakdown of Hillary’s and Bill’s 2014 and 2015 speeches which had been provided previously as part of her mandatory disclosure in May of this year.

As Politico cautions, the disclosure omits an unknown number of speeches that the Clintons delivered while directing the payment or honoraria to the Clinton Foundation, despite instructions on the and guidance from the U.S. Office of Government Ethics, saying that honoraria directed to a charity should be reported.

Still, as readers will note, even the “modest” data that Hillary chose to share is quite stunning.

We hope it will surprise nobody that the bulk of speeches were bought and paid for by Wall Street and affiliated “financial entities” because that’s what hollow populist pandering is all about – pretending to be an “everyday American” while getting paid tens of millions by Wall Street and America’s biggest corporations.

How many millions?

Since 2013 Bill Clinton has been paid $26.6 million for 94 speeches; Hillary’s grand total is slightly less: $21.7 million for 92 private appearances.

Below we present the full breakdown of every publicly disclosed speech event by Hillary Clinton, together with the associated fee.

And likewise for Bill Clinton:

And a visual way of showing the above data.

Hillary:

Bill:

Source: Hillaryclinton.con and Politco

Bonus footage: sometime in addition to hundreds of thousands of dollars for speeking for 50 minutes, Hillary would also get a shoe as an added bonus:

Advertisements

Zoe Konstantopoulou’s speech in the Greek Parliament on 22 July 2015: The complete subordination of a democratic country to the will and demands of other governments is not an agreement

Admittedly the politically and personally painful moments which we have experienced in parliament during this term are multiplying.

In my capacity as Speaker of the House, I sent a letter to the President of the Republic, Mr. Prokopis Pavlopoulos and to Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras (see in French :http://cadtm.org/Lettre-de-Zoe-Konstantopoulou-Le), noting that it is my institutional responsibility to emphasize and underline that the conditions this bill is being introduced under allow no guarantees of compliance with the constitution, no protection of the democratic process or the exercise of legislative power of parliament, nor a conscientious vote by members of parliament (see post-scriptum in http://cadtm.org/Greece-The-Consequences-of-the). Those conditions are blatant blackmail by foreign governments of European Union member States on this government and on the members of parliament. The legal measures are introduced without any possibility of amendment by the parliament as was acknowledged by the Justice Minister, whom I honor and respect deeply, as he knows; their implementation would result in a major intervention in the functioning of justice and the exercise of the fundamental rights of the citizens, tearing down both the functioning of Greek democracy as a social state under the rule of law in which there is a separation of powers according to the Constitution, as well as the preservation of the principle of fair trial.

Ministers are being coerced into introducing legal measures whose contents they do not agree with, but which they are directly opposed to, in this respect the statement by the Justice Minister was telling, and members of parliament are being coerced into voting them, while they too are opposed to their contents, and in this respect every statement by members of parliament in the two parliamentary groups which make up the parliamentary majority was also telling.

All this is happening under the direct threat of a disorderly default and reveal that, in truth, this bill which foreign governments and not the Greek government have chosen as a prerequisite, is an attempt at the completion of a dissolution, since this bill contains a major intervention into the third independent function, which is justice. This bill attempts to undermine the functioning of justice and is lifting basic guarantees to a fair trial and basic and fundamental rights of citizens.

I consider it my institutional duty to react as Speaker of the House as well and to ask my counterparts in all the parliaments of the member States of the European Union, as I have done in the past and as I did in my letter to the President of the European Parliament (see http://cadtm.org/Letter-Addressed-to-President-of ), to react and to take a stand against this dissolution.

Likewise in my letter to the President and the Prime Minister, which I am going to enter in the minutes, I have asked them to formally inform their counterparts of the coercive and forceful conditions under which this vote has occurred.

Minister, I am addressing you in my capacity of the previous parliamentary term. I have addressed you before in this capacity, when I congratulated you for the bills you introduced and especially for your pioneering legislation on the prison system. I am addressing you from the capacity with which I was honored by the parliamentary group of SYRIZA and the current Prime Minister, then opposition leader Mr. Alexis Tsipras, the capacity of the head of the SYRIZA parliamentary group for transparency, justice and human rights and from this capacity I tell you that it is evident that no one in the parliamentary group of SYRIZA endorses the provisions of this bill because the parliamentary group of SYRIZA during the previous period as well, had expressly objected to and strongly opposed this same law, which ironically, is being introduced in an identical form, as it had been introduced by your predecessor Mr Athanassiou, and is being accelerated in a shocking way by the creditors in order to put the nail in the coffin of one more expression of democracy.

Because just like they have attempted to turn the NO of the Greek people into a YES in both the communiqué of the Euro Summit as well as in the previous law introduced here again through emergency procedures last Wednesday, so they are attempting to convert the 93.12% NO of lawyers as recorded in a nationwide referendum for the first time in early December 2014, into a YES.

These deprecating moves against democratic expression are entirely symbolic on the level of a referendum of lawyers and on the level of a nationwide referendum of citizens so that there is no doubt that the message which is being sent by the creditors is that democratic processes are futile, that direct democracy as expressed by citizens or professionals (lawyers, in this case), is irrelevant.
This is a poisonous message for European societies, it is a message that the left and SYRIZA must not allow to be either sent or circulated.

It is clear that what is being attempted is the obliteration of both the government and the parliamentary groups that support it, through blackmail. It is clear that what is being directly questioned is democracy in our country. What is asked of us, what is asked of me, Minister, by the creditors is, in reality, to issue, if I could, a seal that would say, “Greek Parliament” and hand it over to them in order to validate their diktats.

It is not acceptable that after SYRIZA and the committee for justice, rights and transparency struggled so fiercely against the undemocratic manipulation of the 800 pages in the article that was the measures of November 2012, the government be forced by blackmail and humiliation (that is the intention) to now introduce 977 pages, in two articles, one of which contains 1008 articles of the Civil Procedure code and the other 130 articles incorporating a European directive, many of which are 2 and 3 pages long. The government of the left cannot be forced to introduce such abbreviated and condensed, urgent articles, with suffocating deadlines, articles it has consistently denounced in the past.

Minister, I know that by addressing you I am knocking on an open door, because you have consistently fought against such regulations, you have consistently expressed and thoroughly analyzed
all the reasons why this code should have been withdrawn in 2014, and indeed was withdrawn, and that was a great victory not only for the lawyers who put up a struggle in defense of citizens but it was also a huge victory for the citizens’ movements, for all those bodies which were mobilized and it certainly was a huge victory for the main opposition party of the previous period and the opposition as a whole.

This is the victory they want to turn into defeat and destruction in order to once again send the message that we must legislate through fear. Mr Juncker said it today, shamelessly: “fear,” he said, “has led to the agreement”; and is it ever possible for this to be accepted and tolerated in a European Union, which has as its statutory principle the welfare of peoples and societies, the protection of rights and the shielding of democracy?

Minister, the NO of the lawyers on the 2nd and 3d December 2014 meant and still means NO to fast-track foreclosures, NO to auctions and forced expulsions, NO to mock trials on paper to prevent the hearing from proceeding, NO to the further degradation of justice, which is a pillar of democracy, it means NO to a further undermining of the constitutional rights of citizens.

When in the summer of 2014 Mr. Hardouvelis brazenly undertook the obligation to compensate for any consequences of judicial rulings which would annul memorandum provisions, the then opposition, the justice committee and the department of justice of SYRIZA were the first to step forward and say this could not be tolerated. Yet it is that very same bill that is being forced through with blackmail. So it would be good for my colleagues and comrades, whom I honor without exception, not to forget their own commitments and speak of an agreement. Coercion is not an agreement, blackmail is not an agreement, the aim to force the complete subordination of a democratic country to the will and demands of other governments and other countries, is not an agreement.

And we must not forget our commitments because at some point we might forget everything and we might begin referring to the content of this bill as if it was our own. It is not our own, it is not the wish and the will of the government. This is also made evident, Minister, by the fact that you have set up a special committee to examine another draft code of Civil Procedure.

And it is not even the wish of members of parliament, who will vote in favor and belong to parliamentary groups supporting the government. It is not their wish to apply these inhumane measures, which leave citizens (borrowers especially) completely defenceless in front of the banks (see post-scriptum in http://cadtm.org/Greece-The-Consequences-of-the ).

Minister, you know it, but perhaps citizens do not know this well, that the head of the committee that drafted this code was Mr Chamilothoris, who was responsible for the monstrous memorandum law 4055 of 2012, which has been collectively denounced not only by bodies but also by lawyers and representatives of the judiciary and which SYRIZA has pledged to repeal but also, that members of the drafting committee of this legislation which is now being accelerated are legal advisors of the banks. That is who the members of the legislative drafting committee that was formed by the memorandum governments are and there should be no doubt that the objective served is precisely, once more, to hand over of the property of the citizens to the banks, that is the servicing of the banks and the bankers at the expense of citizens.

We must not open the door to allow this objective to be implemented, an objective promoted by the adoption today of this Code of Civil Procedure and here I would ask you specifically and my colleagues who are lawyers, to speak frankly; passing legislation is not a trivial thing, it is not a temporary thing and not a joke. This framework is becoming State law for the first time and indeed, in the form of a code. It is becoming State law that the Greek State is giving way to the banks and ranks after the banks in auction procedures. It is becoming State law that workers give way to the banks and rank after the banks at auctions. It is not enough to say that we vote now and will make sure they will not be applied. When we attempt to stop them from being applied, they will tell us, “but you voted for it”; moreover we know that we ourselves will not be in office permanently, whatever our present position.

This is a piece of legislation that goes into force on 01/01/2016. That proves both that there is no urgency and that it can be discussed under normal conditions but also it raises major concerns in relation to the future aspirations and achievements of those who seek to overthrow this government and to humiliate the political forces that support it, and to prevent them (us) from standing tall in the minds of citizens and of society.

Colleagues, as a member of parliament for SYRIZA I could never vote for this bill; as one formerly in charge of the committee for the control of parliamentary work in issues of justice, transparency and human rights of the Parliamentary Group of SYRIZA, from which position I fought for three years to stop the memoranda attack on justice and civil rights but also the memoranda orgy of corruption and vested interests, I could never vote for this bill; as a lawyer, I could never vote for this bill and as Speaker of the House, I could never legalize procedures which will make Parliament merely decorative, which waive the guarantee function of Parliament, circumventing the conscience of parliamentarians and ultimately discarding democracy. Thank you.

Translated by Zoe Mavroudi and CADTM.

Source: Cadtm.org
25 July by Zoe Konstantopoulou

Author

Zoe Konstantopoulou Greek human rights lawyer and politician of the Coalition of the Radical Left (Syriza). On 27 January 2015 she was nominated Speaker of the Hellenic Parliament. She was elected to the post on 6 February 2015 with the record number of 235 out of 300 votes

Other articles in English by Zoe Konstantopoulou (6)

Continue reading →

Greek debt audit – Definition of terms

Cephas Lumina

The mandate of the Truth Committee on Public Debt is to examine the nature and extent of the country’s public debt, as well as the processes relating to the contracting and/or accumulation of the debt and the impact of the cuts or changes in the provision of public services, programmes and benefits by the Government on the human rights and well-being of all people living in Greece, in order to identify what share of the debt can be considered as illegitimate, illegal, odious or unsustainable and thus unpayable. In this context, it was important that the Committee should have a shared understanding of these terms. To this end, the Committee created a small working group to propose definitions of the terms which would inform its work.

The working group reviewed the various definitions of the terms as used by various scholars, debt relief campaigners and others and proposed some definitions which were subsequently discussed and adopted by the Committee. These definitions, which provided the framework for the assessment of the debt undertaken by the Committee over the last month or so, are the following:

“Illegitimate debt”

Debt that the borrower cannot be required to repay because the loan, security or guarantee, or the terms and conditions attached to that loan, security or guarantee infringed the law (both national and international) or public policy, or because such terms or conditions were grossly unfair, unreasonable, unconscionable or otherwise objectionable, or because the conditions attached to the loan, security or guarantee included policy prescriptions that violate national laws or human rights standards, or because the loan, security or guarantee was not used for the benefit of the population or the debt was converted from private (commercial) to public debt under pressure to bailout creditors.

“Illegal debt”

Debt in respect of which proper legal procedures (including those relating to authority to sign loans or approval of loans, securities or guarantees by the representative branch or branches of Government of the borrower State) were not followed, or which involved clear misconduct by the lender (including bribery, coercion and undue influence), as well as debt contracted in violation of domestic and international law or had conditions attached thereto that contravened the law or public policy..

“Odious debt”

Debt, which the lender knew or ought to have known, was incurred in violation of democratic principles (including consent, participation, transparency and accountability), and used against the best interests of the population of the borrower State, or is unconscionable and whose effect is to deny people their fundamental civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights.

“Unsustainable debt”

Debt that cannot be serviced without seriously impairing the ability or capacity of the Government of the borrower State to fulfil its basic human rights obligations, such as those relating to healthcare, education, water and sanitation and adequate housing, or to invest in public infrastructure and programmes necessary for economic and social development, or without harmful consequences for the population of the borrower State (including a deterioration in the living standards). Such debt is payable but its payment ought to be suspended in order to allow the state to fulfil its human rights commitments.


In closing, I would like to underscore three points:

First, there are historical precedents for invocation of one or more of these principles to relieve a country of the burden of repaying debts incurred in questionable circumstances. For example, after the Spanish-American War of 1898, the United States contended that neither Cuba nor the United States should be held responsible for the debt incurred by the Spanish colonial government in Cuba if it had been contracted without the consent of the Cuban people and had been not been used for their benefit. Although Spain never accepted this argument, it assumed responsibility for the Cuban debt under the Treaty of Paris signed between the United States and Spain on 10 December 1898. In the Tinoco Arbitration of 1923, the arbitrator (United States Supreme Court Chief Justice William Taft) ruled that credits knowingly extended to a country for a dictator who used the money for his personal purposes should not be recoverable. More recently, the odious debt doctrine has been invoked to support calls for debt cancellation in Rwanda, Iraq and Nigeria.


Second, the need to uphold social and economic justice is central
to all of these definitions. In this regard, it should be recalled that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaims that “[e]veryone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment … or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control” (Article 25) and that “[e]veryone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in (the) Declaration can be fully realized” (Article 28). In my view, the lack of transparency and accountability in lending and borrowing decisions makes it difficult for States to establish the conditions within which these ideals can be fully realized.


Third, the definitions employed by the Committee should be seen as an essential element of the quest for an equitable and enduring solution to the debt problem
that is consistent with the broadly accepted principle of the shared responsibility of creditors and debtors for preventing and resolving unsustainable debt situations.

Continue reading →

Socialist Economist Dimitris Kazakis: Syriza Has No Plan B

Wednesday, 20 May 2015  By Joshua Tartakovsky, Truthout

16 September, 2012: Syriza leader Alexis Tsipras (C) press conference of 77th International Fair in the northern port city of Thessaloniki in Thessaloniki, Greece. (Photo via Shutterstock)

Syriza leader Alexis Tsipras at a press conference during the 77th International Fair in Thessaloniki, Greece. (Photo: Ververidis Vasilis / Shutterstock.com)

We live in times when national sovereignty is being eroded in favor of global capital. Syriza plans to continue with austerity and has made no serious plan B. All actions taken so far reveal that Syriza intends to continue with the austerity program and in the summer Greece will probably sign a new contract of continued austerity.

The question remains whether the people will rise against the loss of sovereignty. This interview was conducted on April 1, 2015, with Dimitris Kazakis, leader of the United Popular Front (E.PA.M). The party opposes austerity and was founded in 2011 by people who participated in anti-memorandum demonstrations in Greece. Kazakis is a socialist economist who worked in the private sector in the past.

The interview has been amended and shortened.

Joshua Tartakovsky: Do you think that the current government has some kind of plan B in mind or are they just trying their best?

Dimitris Kazakis: I don’t think they even have a plan A. In the first week after the elections, they tried some general idea, like the European Convention on debt issues. The European Union rejected it so they [the Greek government] abandoned the whole idea.

On the second level, they tried to negotiate some kind of elimination of debt, but nobody wanted it, and they did not want to go into a confrontation with the lenders, so they lost ground. Since the agreement of February 20, the Greek government abided by the rules of the loan agreement.

The agreement of February 20 had contradictions in it. It was obvious from the beginning that Greece could not satisfy both the troika and the people. Still, the fact that [Prime Minister Alexis] Tsipras brought the issue of reparations from Germany for the World War II occupation seemed to suggest that he is trying to mobilize the people.

If you see the declarations, you will find out that according to Tsipras and his government, the German reparations are not a legal issue between Germany and Greece, but an ethnical issue. The way Tsipras is pushing the German reparations issue is to close it.

But why would he bring up the question of reparations in the first place? Is Prime Minister Tsipras not seeking to effect some kind of confrontation?

Because of the people. The Greek people expected too much from the new government. And they have to put up a theater performance for the Greek people. So that the average Greek citizen can say, “Let’s wait for three or four months to see what is going on with the government,” because the government and the media say they should wait for three or four months because then people will see that there will be a confrontation in midsummer. I don’t think there will be a confrontation. In midsummer, we will see the signing of a new agreement. We are going for the worse.

Mr. Tsipras has been complaining that the Eurogroup is holding him to higher standards, not even to the standards of the new Eurogroup agreement, but to standards of the memorandum of understanding from the time of [Antonis] Samaras …

Yes. He says that. But give me an example of the propositions that the Greek government gave to the Eurogroup that are outside of the commitments that were already signed in April 2014 in the last memorandum.

What they are trying to do is to convince the people that by doing that, by fulfilling the commitments of the last policy, they are changing policy. That is nonsense.

Still, the government must know that if it continues in the same path of austerity, its political future is finished. So why would it commit suicide like that?

They will create a new government [and break up with the left flank of Syriza, JT], a national coalition government, with To Potomi, with parts of Pasok and New Democracy and with Golden Dawn, saying that there is no other way.

But Syriza must know that they won’t be voted in again if they continue with the same austerity.

Yes, but I think that they might create a special situation here in Greece in order for the people to be frightened and probably they will form a national unity or interim government like the Papademos government we had in 2012.

The actions Mr. [Yanis] Varoufakis seems to be taking in favor of remaining in the euro do not match what he describes in his book, The Global Minotaur, on the failure of capitalism. How do you explain this?

Mr. Varoufakis has a position that didn’t alter since 2011. The main position is that you can forget about Greece, because either you can have a European solution or no solution. So whatever you say or whatever you analyze, when it comes to choosing which way to go, actually he will chose – because he believes it – the European way. And there is no way inside the eurozone to find a solution, especially for Greece.

Greece could get finances through Russia or China or even the US …

Well, yes. We have more than a 324 billion euro public debt and we are paying each year around 30 billion in monetization of that debt. Who is going to give us the money? Nobody. Why would they?

“You have to start from repudiating the debt. Saying that ‘you know, you made us less than a colony.'”

For example, if you get rid of the debt and say goodbye to the euro, you can go to Russia or China and say, “Can you supplement our currency deposits for our exterior balance?” They will probably say, “OK, let’s discuss. I can give you the money; what can you give me?” But inside the eurozone, Russia and China know that they cannot provide directly to the government itself. They must negotiate through Berlin or Brussels.

How much support do you think Tsipras has within Syriza if he were to sign a new austerity memorandum?

In my opinion, Tsipras has control of around 55 percent of his own MPs.

Would they agree to the next memorandum?

That’s why they don’t want the agreement of February 20 to go through parliament. They are frightened of their own MPs voting against it.

What do you see as a possible solution to the current crisis?

In my opinion, you have to get rid of the euro and declare the repudiation of debt. You have to start from repudiating the debt. Saying that “you know, you made us less than a colony.”

But what would you do to prevent speculation against the drachma? Capital flight?

First of all, we have to implement capital controls. It’s not a big deal; in Cyprus you see how even the European Bank put in capital controls, of course in favor of the big capital in Cyprus. We can do it in favor of the Greek economy and of course in favor of the majority of the Greek people. At the same time, there will be no speculations because we need around six to eight months to import the new national currency and for the first six to eight months we will have the euro. Who is going to speculate against the euro?

But the day the drachma comes in, there will be speculation.

To speculate against the national currency, you have to find it first freely in the foreign markets. Give me one reason, for the new government and the state’s central bank, to place the new currency in the foreign markets? We are not going to support foreign speculation by selling our new national currency. We can say that after two years, there will be a meeting for stabilization and development of the Greek economy and then we will make our national currency available for purchase only by those who want to buy our currency for more than 4 billion euros.

“We can have higher wages every year when we invest in the productivity of labor, not in the price of the labor.”

That’s the good thing about implementing or having a new national currency, the freedom to choose what to do with it. That’s also the big mistake Argentina made. Repudiating 70 percent of the public debt was good. But what they didn’t think about was the currency. Change the currency. Say that you can provide your economy with a new peso. Like for example, Chavez did with the new [Venezuelan] bolivar, and stop the speculation for some time in order for your own economy to stand on its feet and develop.

In the scenario you put fourth, how would you revive the economy? What would be the engine for growth? Tourism? New infrastructure?

You can have special production spheres. We need to have around 30 to 35 percent of GDP in industry and agriculture. Right now, both are less than 16 percent of the GDP. Through industry and agriculture we can have the best performance for the benefit of our economy. We can provide the people with stable employment and growing wages. We can have higher wages every year when we invest in the productivity of labor, not in the price of the labor. The two are very different. You can have a competitive economy without having to perform austerity measures against the working people.

Can the Greek industries compete globally? Also, if Greece defaults, it would not be able to trade its agricultural products with Europe because there would probably be sanctions.

Right now, more than 60 percent of the agricultural production of Greece is traded outside the European Union. We are losing every year about 5 to 10 percent from commerce inside the eurozone. So actually, right now we don’t care about losing trade in the eurozone.

The motivation and the main force of our economic proposal is to improve the wages of the working people. If they have enough money, they can buy what they want and provide for the development of the economy. At the same time, the economy will provide them with more leisure time through the development of productivity. By giving leisure time, people can get involved in political activism and get involved in running the country.

Do you think that there will be a popular uprising in June or July?

We are working on a particular side of action, that’s all I can say.

No one knows the future, but with the way things are going now, what do you see developing this year?

Either we will lose our statehood and become the first state under international law and in the international community that gave up its statehood, or a revolution. No middle ground.

Would you say that capitalism is in crisis globally and that it may have a few more decades to go, perhaps even less, or would you say that what we are seeing around the world are local problems?

No. It’s a world situation. We have what economists call the absolute surplus of capital that cannot go into the economy so they are searching in a destructive mode to provide for more profit. And that’s why the whole system is becoming more barbaric. What we have today is a capitalistic feudalism, and instead of the old lord, we have the lord of money, the banker.

We are seeing more and more Western democracies turning into police states in various places.

Not even a police state, because a police state needs to be first of all a state, an organized state. That is the opposite of what the capitalist elite want. If you have an organized country, it’s bad for them, because they cannot take over easily. So they want to destroy the state and its sovereignty.

But it seems that the world is definitely moving in that direction of barbarism and feudalism you describe, so is there any way to fight that?

The Greek people have to make the first move. And that is to decide to fight for their own country. And of course, you start from the basics. The global system denies even the natural rights of the French Enlightenment. We do not see bourgeois forces fighting alongside the people, because the middle class actually is dissolving under the regime of the bankers.

“The best solidarity one can have with the Greek people is to fight against your own government.”

Now people can have a new type of state based on democracy that all the philosophers discussed. It’s something that is quite practical and it’s something that can be implemented in a record time, because of the technology and the possibilities of communication we have. That’s why the most important action to take now is to fight for national sovereignty and democracy.

What’s the role of international solidarity in the case of Greece? Does it even make a difference?

The best solidarity one can have with the Greek people is to fight against your own government. Because every time we have a popular movement gaining something against the global system and the local oligarchy, it’s a very big help even for the Greek people. Then the average Greek citizen can say, “If they can do it, I can do it too and even better.”

Copyright, Truthout. May not be reprinted without permission.

Joshua Tartakovsky

Joshua Tartakovsky is an Israeli-American independent journalist and a graduate of Brown University and LSE.

Continue reading →

#Establishment #PaedoScandal #FilthyBritain will forever be a source of national shame

Filthy Britain is the term The Coleman Experience has been using to expose VIP paedophilia. I grouped all posts here, for they do include satanic secrets.

From an avid online activist:

“Our government is one that has not only failed to address the problem of an establishment paedophile network, it has been and remains the heart of the problem. The only hope of justice for the victims and a cleansing of our system therefore lies in the hands of the people, in public demonstration and outcry to shed light on the darkest corners of our nation that we have too long neglected.”  http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/01/03/if-british-citizens-do-not-rest-the-control-of-the-establishment-paedophile-scandal-from-the-government-it-will-forever-be-a-source-of-national-shame/

A letter was brought to light by an earlier police investigation in which Napier bragged of being able to send obscene pictures back to the UK in diplomatic bags, and of how easy it was to gain access to young boys in Cairo, where he was working for the British Council.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/11/19/386597/uk-official-guilty-of-pedophilia/

A search on Google Canada under British Paedophilia brings up a lot of North American media talking about the UK institutionalised paedophilia. You might find the newspapers who published amenable to a story to counter what was said in the British press.

#FilthyBritain: #Satanic Secrets, Wall of Shame, Malevolent Masons, Pervs in Parliament, Links to Mossad

15 04 06 ColemanFor the ‘non-believers’ in the existence of Satanic cults, here are list of posts on the excellent Coleman Experience. The blogger has a military background, a very fine and individual style of writing and chose a WordPress theme most suitable for his many photos.Filthy Britain – in chronological order:

  1. The New SS: Filthy Britain’s child-snatchers and the forced adoption scandal – February 2014
  2. Filthy Britain’s Sickest Secret – March 2014
  3. Mossad’s Links to Filthy Britain – April 2014
  4. Filthy Britain’s Pervs in Parliament – April 2014
  5. Filthy Britain’s Satanic Secrets – June 2014
  6. Filthy Britain’s Wall of Shame – June 2014
  7. Filthy Britain’s Malevolent Masons – August 2014
  8. Welcome to Filthy Britain – August 2014
  9. Filthy Britain’s Wall of Shame – September 2014
  10. Filthy Britain and the Wrath of God – October 2014
  11. Filthy Britain’s Satanic Secrets – November 2014

Complementary Satanic posts:

And the sad effect of suffering children – as reported by the Whistleblower Kids:

  • institutionally snatched – with the aid of Police
  • legitimised in secret family (i.e. civil) courts
  • adopted without the parents’ consent
  • sexually abused in foster homes, foster care and rituals
  • sacrificed and murdered in Satanic rituals:
  1. Who wants to silence Britain’s child-abuse victims forever? – November 2014
  2. The disturbing disappearance of Vishal Mehru and the Elm Guest House connection – November 2014
  3. Suffer the little children of Britain – October 2014
  4. Margaret Hodge, stolen children, corrupt social workers and the VIP paedophile connection – September 2014
  5. Prince Philip’s dirty little secrets – July 2014
  6. Suffer the little children of Britain – May 2014
  7. Queenie, the missing children, an International arrest warrant and the Commonwealth Summit no-show – May 2013
  8. Queenie, the missign children, an International arrest warrant and the mysterious non-stop trots – March 2013

Ebola ~ Terror Or Bogey Man

Dr Graham Downing             drugthebug.com

If you follow the main stream media, there appears to be one crisis after another all seemingly random and each more deadly than the next. The latest being the events from Africa as they unfold across the World’s media: Ebola is on the forefront of everyone’s mind. Are those events random or, as many more researchers, doctors and members of the public suspect, there is a hand behind them. Geopolitical expert Ian R. Crane and Neil Saunders a UK expert in Mind Control after many years of research are of the conclusion that the constant use of fear is a significant weapon used against modern society and allows better control of the masses by such a so-called “Elite”. REF1a REF 1b

I was asked on a UK radio interview what is going on with the Ebola outbreak and what that means in terms of a government response eg mass vaccination.REF 2

I started off by saying that Ebola is the bogey man of the viruses; it strikes fear into us because we have been led to believe that there is no cure and it is an efficient killing machine. The latest revelations in the news are hyping that up and the transportation of infected Americans from Africa back to the US adds to the fear of an uncontrollable plague affecting western civilisation. REF 3

During the interview I suggested we needed to look at this with a clear head and step back from the hysteria, especially if this is another psy-op to keep us off balance and controllable. I looked at the research and went through many Ebola cases to see for myself just how dangerous is this virus. What I found surprised and shocked me.

The Ebola virus is within our own genome, our DNA—Yes, we have it already in us, a part of us. Our ancestors have obviously encountered and dealt with this virus in the past and the remnants of the virus’ DNA have been incorporated into our DNA. Researchers have uncovered that it has probably been around for a very long time maybe many millions of years. As a scientist and clinician what I found most strange and unique about this virus is that it doesn’t really mutate like other viruses; it remains pretty much the same: it is incredibly genetically stable. REF 4

I posed a question: is the high mortality rate of Ebola due to solely to it being a deadly virus or to the lack of proper medical care in Africa in the “field”. When I looked at the research, I was shocked to see that, contrary to its public perception, survival rates in the correct medical setting where far higher than we are being led to believe. REF 5

One example was the treatment of eight Ebola infected patients that received relatively good care compared to that of other unfortunate souls. They received adequate nutrition, nursing, blood transfusion and appropriate meds for things like secondary infection and significant inflammation. Of those eight treated only one died; the rest walked out of hospital after two weeks. Similarly, in Europe there was a case of an infected woman transported to Switzerland from Africa. She was isolated and treated with the full compliment that the best of modern medicine could offer. No one else was infected and after two weeks she walked out of hospital to resume her life. REF 5, REF 6

The other concern is that it can easily be “caught” and will spread rapidly through communities. If that were the case that would have happened by now, and it hasn’t. As it stands, you physically have to touch an infected person to contract Ebola and as long as proper infection control is implemented the risk of “catching” this virus is low. REF 7

The natural reservoir (where the virus lives) is thought to be Fruit Bats and although many animals have been demonstrated to be infected by Ebola; humans and primates seem to be particularly susceptible to infection. From a pathophysiological view that is extremely interesting because they all have one thing in common: they don’t make vitamin C. Couple that with the clinical picture of Ebola—high temperature and bleeding—and the simple thought of scurvy comes to mind.

Therefore, treatment with therapeutic doses of vitamin C would be mandatory in my view. Others share my view: Dr Cathart MD and Dr Levy MD. REF 8, REF 9

Regarding vaccination to prevent an epidemic of Ebola virus. History has demonstrated that the much lauded success of vaccination programs in preventing infection is not justified. Data demonstrate that infectious diseases in large part were well over 90% reduced before the advent of vaccination and that proper hygiene, good food and water supply and better living standards were responsible for the decrease. REF 10

Regarding the “success” of vaccination programs, in many cases, recent research from well-respected institutions demonstrates quite the opposite eg regarding the mass flu immunisation across the World every year: those receiving vaccination are twice as likely to get the flu and more likely to get a severe case of flu, and outbreaks of infectious disease occur in well vaccinated populations. In other words: vaccination doesn’t seem to work and more alarmingly may precipitate an outbreak of infectious disease. REF 11, REF 12, REF 13, REF 14

For those reasons, I am extremely worried at the prospect of mass vaccination programs for Ebola. In my opinion, the evidence strongly suggests that such programs may cause the very epidemic they are meant to prevent.

But is that what they want.

There are those that believe there is a hand behind the recent Ebola events and that mass vaccination programs will be brought in alongside loss of civil liberties, and that will lead to increased infection and a significant reduction the World’s population “heralding” in the New World Order. Reports of a bioweapons facility near the Ebola outbreak involved somehow with Ebola research and an arrest of a nurse warning people in a nearby town that “they” are deliberately infecting Africans with Ebola are also surfacing. It is alleged that George Soros’ and Bill gates’ foundations fund the lab. Both of whom are implicated with the New World Order. Also an Ebola vaccine has been tested since January this year and, as was suggested with the Swine Flu “epidemic” of 2009, is the causative agent in the recent epidemic. Other dots are being connected, including the tragic loss of Glenn Thomas, the WHO publicity officer who, it is suggested, was in the middle of this conspiracy and “knew too much”. He died as a passenger of the plane brought down over Ukraine. REF 15, REF 16, REF 17

I cannot confirm or deny the above points; only time will tell.

As I said in the Radio interview: what’s needed here is a clear head. There is no doubt that Ebola is potentially very dangerous but handled correctly it need not be. Our greatest enemy, regardless of how this outbreak came about is not the Bogey man of the viruses—Ebola—but the Bogey man of our minds. Treat that and hopefully rational minds will prevail: pushes for mass vaccination will be defeated and life will continue as normal. Fail to do that and, psy-op or no psy-op, we will have a problem, the magnitude of which, no-one dare think about.

REFERENCES

1a. http://ianrcrane.com/

1b. http://www.neilsandersmindcontrol.com/

2. http://www.drugthebug.com/ebola

3. http://q13fox.com/2014/07/28/health-officials-fear-possible-spread-of-ebola-virus-beyond-west- africa/

4. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/virus-genes-human-genome/

5. http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/179/Supplement_1/S18.full#ref-11

6. http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/179/Supplement_1/S48.full

7. http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/196/Supplement_2/S142.full

8. http://vitamincfoundation.org/www.orthomed.com/ebola.htm

9. Levy, T. Vitamin C, Infectious Disease, & Toxins (2002) Xlibris pp107-110.

10. http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/graphs/

11. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21880755

12. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20614424

13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1646939/

14. http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/51/9/1017.full

15. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/ebola-conspiracy-theories-spreading-fast-3929922

16. http://betweentwopines.wordpress.com/2014/08/02/george-soros-his-ebola-bioweapons-lab-and-the-death-of-who-spokesperson-glenn-thomas-in-the-ukraine/

17. http://birdflu666.wordpress.com/2014/07/08/us-bioweapons-lab-in-sierra-leone-at-the-epicentre-of-ebola-outbreak/

Why the bloody hell is Fiona Woolf heading the CSA Inquiry?

By thecolemanexperience, September 5, 2014

Fiona WoolfSlapper MayNaughty Leon BrittanWoolf and CameronFalconer and MandelsonLord DervairdCity of London Mayor WoolfElm Guest House Daily MailHodge filthy cowJason SwiftGreville JannerTony Blair Lord LevyWeirdo Malcolm RifkindDannytheFink and Greville JannerTop Tory FilthNick Ross CrimewatchNeubergerJill graveJustice WoolfEsther NSPCC

If you thought for one minute that Theresa May and David Cameron are serious about investigating VIP child-abuse in this country it’s time to think again.

The announcement today that Lord Mayor Fiona Woolf will be replacing Elizabeth Butler-Sloss as head of the CSA inquiry is all the proof we need that a major establishment  cover-up is on the cards.

http://aanirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/fiona-woolf-and-child-sex.html

Fiona Woolf is a top-ranking lawyer and close ally of the money-laundering bankers who operate from the City of London financial quarter.

She is allegedly related to Baron Harry Woolf, the former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales.

Harry Woolf was instrumental in denying a right of appeal for Barry George who was falsely imprisoned for 8 years for the murder of Crimewatch presenter, Jill Dando.

His Wikipedia entry contains some most interesting facts:

” Woolf was born in Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England, on 2 May 1933, to Alexander Susman Woolf and his wife Leah (née Cussins). His grandfather Harry was a naturalised Briton of Polish or Russian Jewish origins.”

”  He  went to Fettes College, an Edinburgh public school, where he mostly enjoyed his time and had supportive friends; however, being the only Jewish pupil he was teased and occasionally bullied”

” Woolf, an Ashkenazi Jew, first met his wife Marguerite Sassoon, a Sephardi Jew, at a social event which was organised by a mutual friend at the National Liberal Club. “

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Woolf,_Baron_Woolf

By a strange coincidence, Mossad rent-boy, Tony Blair also attended Fettes, along with his very close chum Charlie Falconer:

” According to the Aangirfan website, Tony Blair attended a private boarding school called Fettes, in Edinburgh.

One of his teachers, Knox Cunningham, was involved in a high-level paedophile ring.

Blair, who liked to call himself Miranda, absolutely adored Cunningham.

By a strange coincidence, the Fettesgate Scandal of the early 90′s uncovered a “magic circle” of corruption and rent-boys allegations going to the very top of the Scottish Legal system.

” A group of gay judges and lawyers were conspiring to ensure soft treatment for homosexual criminals, or so went the rumour that spread through Edinburgh legal circles in the late 1980s.

The talk was of a “magic circle” reaching the highest levels of the Scottish legal system and the potential blackmail of judges by “rent boys”.

http://aanirfan.blogspot.co.uk/

Tony Blair went to school with political weirdo Charlie Falconer, who lives in Islington:

” The friendship between Tony Blair and Charles Falconer goes back 30 years to when they were both at school in Scotland. But they have always made a curious pair.”

”  He and Blair first met as teenagers, in the latter’s room at Fettes”.

” Falconer’s Islington home was the venue for campaign meetings during Blair’s drive to become Labour leader, and shortly before the election.”

” Falconer is one of the least known members of the Blair circle. But his appointment to 14 ministerial committees last week as “the eyes and ears of the Prime Minister”, as one member of the Government put it, confirmed what everyone suspected. Lord Falconer, known affectionately at the Cabinet Office as “the man with his shirt hanging out”, is one of the most powerful and important men in Britain.”

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/05/09/tony-blairs-dirty-little-secrets/

In a curious twist, Fiona Woolf sits on a board of trustees with Charles Falconer:

http://companycheck.co.uk/company/03059479/RALEIGH-INTERNATIONAL-TRUST/directors-secretaries

Falconer also acts as a shady Mr Fix-It in the House of Lords along with Rothschild bumboy, Peter Mandelson.

It’s highly likely they know all about the VIP abuse ring which has been operating within the UK for decades and may have lots of important information for investigating officers.

Mandelson, Blair and Falconer were all neighbours of Margaret Oppenheimer Hodge who was implicated in the Islington care-home abuse rings.

Hodge knows all about covering up for her political chums sick predilections.

She is also personally responsible for bringing in disgusting changes to the Children’s Act which strengthened the power of social workers to steal children from loving families and throw them into abusive council-run homes.

By a bizarre coincidence, her nephew Philip Edmonds, was holidaying at the same resort with Madeleine McCann just before she disappeared:

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/03/22/greville-janner-tony-blair-madeline-mccann-margaret-hodge-and-the-vip-child-abuse-connection/

Former top-tory, Leon Brittan, has long been suspected of being involved in the Elm Guest House boy-brothel scandal.

Despite this fact he has never been hauled in for questioning by the Met.

His cousin is Malcolm Rifkind who controls all British Intel agencies and works for Israel on the sly.

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/07/02/leon-brittan-nick-clegg-malcolm-rifkind-william-hague-dolphin-square-missing-dossiers-and-the-vip-child-abuse-connection/

Quite incredibly, it has now emerged that Brittan and his wife are close work colleagues and personal friends of Fiona Woolf.

Talk about a bloody conflict of interests- it’s more like a full-scale war.

http://aanirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/fiona-woolf-in-bed-with-leon-brittan.html

Another dubious peer is child-raping scum, Greville Janner.

Janner, who has a penchant for sodomising young lads in care homes, has conveniently developed dementia and can’t be quizzed about his crimes.

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/07/11/why-has-paedophile-greville-janner-been-allowed-to-escape-justice/

Harry Woolf once wrote a book with Janner called ‘ I Am Jewish’:

Janner was  nominated for his knighthood by Tony Blair and is absolutely adored by Times editor Danny Finkelstein.

The brother of Finkelstein runs the Jill Dando UCL Crime Institute along with her former co-presenter Nick Ross.

Nick Ross pretended to grieve for Jill but was actually party to the conspiracy to kill her because she was about to blow the lid on the paedophile-rings.

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/07/20/jill-dando-and-the-vip-paedophile-ring/

Ross recently said he’d watch child-porn given half the chance.

He is married to the cousin of Esther Rantzen and is involved with both Crimestoppers and Childline which are front organisations used to filter out victims of VIP abuse and silence them.

In a macabre twist, the former editor of Crimewatch is Angela Neuberger.

http://www.angelaholdsworth.com/angela-neuberger/

Her husband, Lord Neubereger, is the highest judge in the land and used to work for the Rothschilds.

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/05/03/max-clifford-and-the-vip-child-abuse-connection/

He recently claimed that social media is out of control and Twitter should be sanctioned.

On of his closest friends within the judiciary is none other than Baron Harry Woolf.

http://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-121128.pdf

So you see is it any wonder Theresa and Dave want Fiona to head the CSA inquiry?

In their eyes she’s the ultimate establishment cover-up queen.

But a word of warning to the treacherous filth who rule this country from behind the scenes.

If you think the appointment of your tainted pal Fiona Woolf is going to prevent the whole truth about Britain’s dirty secrets being revealed you’re even more f*****g deluded than we thought.

Get it straight you scumbags.

It’s way too late for your pathetic charade now.

The clock is ticking…it’s only a matter of time.

Tick-tock..

http://google-law.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/woolf-in-sheeps-clothing-to-head.html

 

 

The Cancer Treatment Protection Racket

How the Cancer Act 1939 maintains ineffective cancer treatments
John Smith – 04/2012
The Cancer Act 1939 and similar legislation around the world gives orthodox cancer treatment an undeserved monopoly, ensuring that ineffective but profitable treatments like chemotherapy and radiotherapy can never be challenged by more effective alternative treatments.

THE TOTNES CANCER HEALTHCARE CONFERENCE (TCHCC) took place on Saturday 24th March 2012 at Eden Rise retreat ten minutes drive from the little town of Totnes in sleepy Devonshire, England. It might not have happened at all because it was almost cancelled by the local Trading Standards, which had been egged on by local MP Dr. Sarah Woolaston and the usual mob of campaigning UK skeptics who argued that the conference was promoting cancer treatments Continue reading →

10 George Orwell Quotes That Predicted Life In 2014 America

By Tyler Durden on 08/25/2014

Submitted by Justin King (of The Anti-Media) via The Burning Platform blog,

onlinegames

George Orwell ranks among the most profound social critics of the modern era. Some of his quotations, more than a half a century old, show the depth of understanding an enlightened mind can have about the future.

 

1)  “In our age there is no such thing as ‘keeping out of politics.’ All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and schizophrenia.”

Though many in the modern age have the will to bury their head in the sand when it comes to political matters, nobody can only concern themselves with the proverbial pebble in their shoe. If one is successful in avoiding politics, at some point the effects of the political decisions they abstained from participating in will reach their front door. More often than not, by that time the person has already whatever whisper of a voice the government has allowed them.

 

2)  “All the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting.”

Examining the nightly news in the run up to almost any military intervention will find scores of talking heads crying for blood to flow in the streets of some city the name of which they just learned to pronounce. Once the bullets start flying, those that clamored for war will still be safely on set bringing you up-to-the-minute coverage of the carnage while their stock in Raytheon climbs.

toldyouso

 

3)  “War against a foreign country only happens when the moneyed classes think they are going to profit from it.”

It’s pretty self-explanatory and while it may be hard to swallow, it’s certainly true. All it takes is a quick look at who benefited from the recent wars waged by the United States to see Orwell’s quip take life.

 

4)  “The very concept of objective truth is fading out of the world. Lies will pass into history.”

My most prized books are a collection of history books from around the world. I have an Iraqi book that recounts the glory of Saddam Hussein’s victory over the United States in 1991. I have books from three different nations claiming that one of their citizens was the first to fly. As some of the most powerful nations in the world agree to let certain facts be “forgotten,” the trend will only get worse. History is written by the victor, and the victor will never be asked if he told the truth.

Huffington Post journalist detained by military police in Ferguson, Missouri

 

5)  “In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”

Even without commentary, the reader is probably picturing Edward Snowden or Chelsea Manning. The revolutions of the future will not be fought with bullets and explosives, but with little bits of data traveling around the world destroying the false narratives with which governments shackle their citizens.

 

6)  “Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.

Make no mistake about it; if an article does not anger someone, it is nothing more than a piece. Most of what passes for news today is little more than an official sounding advertisement for a product, service, or belief.

ryangrim

 

7)  “In real life it is always the anvil that breaks the hammer…

In every conflict, it is not the side that can inflict the most damage, but the side that can sustain the most damage that ultimately prevails. History is full of situations in which a military “won the battles but lost the war.

 

8)  “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.”

Haditha. Panjwai. Maywand District. Mahmudiyah. These names probably don’t ring a bell, but it is almost a certainty that the reader is aware of the brutality that occurred in Benghazi. The main difference is that in the first four incidents, those committing the acts of brutality were wearing an American flag on their shoulder.

(Answer: D)

 

9)  “Threats to freedom of speech, writing and action, though often trivial in isolation, are cumulative in their effect and, unless checked, lead to a general disrespect for the rights of the citizen.”

Everyday there is a new form of censorship or a new method of forcing people into self-censorship, and the people shrug it off because it only relates to a small minority. By the time the people realize their ability to express disapproval has been completely restricted, it may be too late. That brings us to Orwell’s most haunting quote.

bootface

 

10)  “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—forever.”

Once the people are indoctrinated with nationalistic beliefs, and the infrastructure to protect them from some constantly-changing and ever-expanding definition of an enemy is in place, there is no ability for the people to regain liberty. By the time all of the pieces are in place, not only is opportunity to regain freedom, but the will to achieve freedom has also evaporated. The reader will truly love Big Brother.10 George Orwell Quotes That Predicted Life In 2014 America

British Library Publishes 1917 Letter Calling for Creation of Jewish State in Saudi Arabia

By: Joshua Levitt

The letter from Britain's Ambassador to France, Lord Francis Bertie, turning down a proposal from Dr. M L Rothstein for a Jewish state in today's Saudi Arabia. Photo: Screenshot / British Library.

The letter from Britain’s Ambassador to France, Lord Francis Bertie, turning down a proposal from Dr. M L Rothstein for a Jewish state in today’s Saudi Arabia. Photo: Screenshot / British Library.

Weeks before the November 3, 1917, Balfour Declaration, in which Britain promised to help create a Jewish homeland in Continue reading →

HERE IS A LIST OF 100 PAEDOPHILE COUNCILLORS OR UK POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATED MEMBERS THEY ARE AMONG THE PEOPLE WHO HELP RUN OUR COUNTRY !

WHAT SORT OF PEOPLE ARE REPRESENTING YOU?WASHINGTON-TIMES-homosexuality-CHILD-ABUSE

Study: Politicians share personality traits with serial killers
Kouri notes that these criminals are psychologically capable of committing their dirty deeds free of any concern for social, moral or legal consequences and with absolutely no remorse.
“This allows them to do what they want, whenever they want,” he wrote. “Ironically, these same traits exist in men and women who are drawn to high-profile and powerful positions in society including political officeholders.”

http://current.com/community/93332432_study-politicians-share-personality-traits-with-serial-killers.htm

THIS SORT OF SCUM OF SOCIETY IS VERY EASY TO BLACKMAIL
http://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/uk-government-blackmailed-into-war-blair-covers-mps-paedophile-ring-and-the-dunblane-massacre/

http://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2012/03/14/representative-governments-are-just-terrorists-drug-dealers-murders-paedophileswar-criminalsthieves-psychopaths-traitors-and-liars-with-a-couple-of-useful-idiots-thrown-in-for-window-dressi/

http://cuthulan.wordpress.com/2013/01/17/all-wars-are-bankers-wars-politions-are-just-thier-cheerleaders/

BECAUSE OF THIS
CENTRALISED GOVERNMET IS HUMANITIES BIGGEST KILLER
Another scientific fact is DEMOCIDE .Death by government ,its humanities biggest killer!
Democide is a term revived and redefined by the political scientist R. J. Rummel as “the murder of any Continue reading →

%d bloggers like this: