One aspect of the horrifically disturbing Coronavirus Bill (UK) is the changes being made to the registration of deaths. Here’s how it’s explained in the Introduction. The Bill will (our emphasis):
– Expand the list of people who can register a death to include funeral directors acting on behalf of the family
– Enable electronic transmission of documents that currently have to be physically presented in order to certify the registration of a death
– Remove the need for a second confirmatory medical certificate in order for a cremation to take place
– Remove the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 requirement that any inquest into a COVID-19 death must be held with a jury. Other notifiable diseases will still require an inquest with a jury
How do these changes help in the containment of a pathogen, which is the alleged purpose of this bill?
Let’s take a look.
* * *
“Enable electronic transmission of documents that currently have to be physically presented in order to certify the registration of a death”
Well, in an imagined scenario in which no one can leave the house for anything (except visiting the Job Centre apparently), then sending documents might have to be done electronically. But even so, the absence of hard copy in the records is obviously worrying. Electronic copies are much easier to fake or alter. The safeguards are reduced.
But, let’s be generous and accept this.
* * *
Remove the need for a second confirmatory medical certificate in order for a cremation to take place
Is this about hastily managing the mass of corpses the most hysterical projections have been claiming are imminent?
Well, ok, let’s assume they are panicking and this is the plan.
* * *
Expand the list of people who can register a death to include funeral directors acting on behalf of the family
Now, how is this a precautionary or time-saving move?
The current UK requirement about who can register a death is very specific. The registrant must either be: (our emphasis)
a relative who was present at the death
a relative present during the person’s last illness
a relative living in the district where the death took place
anyone else present at the death
an owner or occupier of the building where the death took place and who was aware of the death
the person arranging the funeral (but not the funeral director).
It’s not hard to see the rationale for this. Once you remove all these requirements and start allowing people in the commercial business of death, who will have no connection whatsoever to the deceased or their family, the capacity for malpractice of various kinds to enter the process increases considerably. What good is served by increasing that risk? And what benefit accrues?
* * *
Remove the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 requirement that any inquest into a COVID-19 death must be held with a jury. Other notifiable diseases will still require an inquest with a jury
Why do inquests into alleged Covid-19 deaths need to be held without a jury, when all other ‘notifiable’ disease inquests will continue to have juries present?
Are they assuming an inquest on a potential Covid-19 victim will be more likely to bring the pathogen into the courtroom than an inquest on anyone else?
Could they not find another way of getting round this perceived risk that didn’t involve dismissing the jury?
I’m inclined to think they probably could.
* * *
What do all these new specifications add up to?
With this new bill in place it will be possible for a funeral director (a profession that requires no specific training or certification) to register deaths of people he has never seen and knows nothing about, and to then perform their cremation based on nothing but the original death certificate, signed by a solitary MD, who will not, of course, be required to make any statement to anyone about any part of this, unless there happens to be an inquest.
And if there is an inquest, an alleged involvement of the ‘novel’ coronavirus is enough grounds exclude the jury, comprised of members of the public with the right to ask questions, and make the case directly to the Coroner, who is , of course, a government official.
So, is this about ‘containment’ of the virus and expediting the process? Or about removing safeguards and public scrutiny? Is it quicker to call a funeral director (who is likely busy) and ask them to register your loved one’s death, or to simply go online and do it yourself?
How happy are you with this particular development?
The abolition of Britain is illegal under the British Constitution, and the criminal acts of the Queen and her Ministers have included the worst acts of treason in history. They secretly repealed the treason laws in 1998 (hidden in s36.3 of the Crime and Disorder Act) to save their own necks. The criminality of our ministers and parliament won’t save us – the EU’s Constitution will automatically abolish the British one, and they will have got away with the greatest crime in a thousand years.
List of Traitors to Scotland the United Kingdom
Since 1972 five European Union treaties have been signed abolishing our nation. As this is illegal under the British Constitution, our nation needed to be undermined with the methods listed below. The EU is succeeding exclusively through subversion by British traitors from inside the UK.
The EU has the laws of a police state, and a constitution that hands absolute power to unelected dictators; it specifically hands all military power (and that includes the nuclear weapons of Britain and France,) to these dictators. It is the Soviet system, and creates a sham EU parliament with no power; it will abolish the nations of Great Britain and England.
The list of traitors according to the severity of their crime:
Traitor number 1. HM the Queen. Has committed five acts of treason signing EU treaties that abolish our nation. She is the only monarch to have broken her Coronation oath. Failed as the ultimate check and balance, failed to insist on a national ballot for the abolition of our nation.
Traitor number 2. Edward Heath. Committed an act of treason by passing the 1972 EU Communities Act, which is the enabling act to abolish our nation. He then lied in his White Paper and in his speeches this Act would not abolish our sovereignty. He started the entire illegal EU process. The fact he was a lifelong member of the Deutsche VersicherungsDienst intelligence department was not discovered until his death. http://www.worldreports.org/news/6_brussels_accounts_ar
Its very important to understand the legal basis for treason. Firstly it has always been the most serious crime on the statute book, worse than murder. Treason has long been the only crime punished by “hanging by the neck until dead.” Murderers only get life. The definition of treason is “a crime that undermines one’s government” or “the offence of acting to overthrow one’s government.” Philby, Maclean, Blunt,
Burgess committed treason, by selling secrets to the Russians, and would have got perhaps 15 years if they had returned. What Heath did was the ultimate act oftreason, not just undermining our nation, but abolishing it. If a court case had been brought, he would have got the ultimate penalty.
3. Tony Blair Committed three acts of treason, with three EU treaties. He is also an enthusiastic implementer of EU laws disguised as British laws, the latest being ID cards; he’s an enforcer of crippling EU regulations. Blair is the chief manufacturer of the EU police state in Britain (Scottish rite 33rd degree mason of Studholme lodge 1591 ).
4. John Major committed Treason with the Maastricht treaty; he also sold our main military and nuclear port, Devonport Dockyard, to Dick Cheney’s Haliburton Corporation for peanuts, his bribe was to be European MD of the Bush family’s Carlyle Weapons group, and $1 million pa for life, so he is definitely on the other side.
5. Margaret Thatcher committed Treason with the Single European Act. She is the only Prime minister who now regrets signing it. She’s still guilty – a murderer who apologises only has a mitigating circumstance. She’ll remain a traitor until her death. Like many top people on our side, she’s developed heart problems and is too ill to help.
The above four people have all committed treason, and prosecutions were pending. Tony Blair’s risk was the full force of the law for signing the Amsterdam Treaty amongst others. But in a stunning abuse of power, Tony Blair secretly repealed the treason laws, hidden in the Crime and Disorder Act, and the Queen signed it in 1998, saving both their necks. There can be no worse criminal abuse of the law than this. …….To get off your own execution as a Prime Minister by repealing the law you are charged under. The media missed it entirely.
6. John Prescott, John Reid, Peter Mandleson, Alan Johnson, about a dozen, now cabinet ministers. Communists who’s allegiance in the 1960’s was to the Soviet Union, switched their loyalty to the European Union in the 1970’s; they’ve implemented the EU’s Frankfurt school subversion, and the 111,000 EU regulations that are criminalising us all. Took control of the Labour party away from patriotic traditionalists.
7. Ken Clarke, Douglas Hurd, Michael Hesletine, Geoffrey Howe, Chris Patten, Francis Maude, David Cameron etc. Pro-Europeans who have seized control of the Conservative leadership, imposing their own agenda, ignoring the wishes of Conservative voters; they sabotaged representative democracy. A vote for the Conservatives has been a vote for the EUdictatorship for 34 years, these are the traitors responsible.
The leaders of our three political parties get their orders from the European Union, not the British electorate, whom they neither serve nor care for. They’ve created a one party state: the three parties have almost identical policies, and all agree on the abolition of Britain by the EU.
8. Julia Middleton, Managing Director of the Common Purpose government agency. Trained 19,500 local government, quango and NHS “leaders” for what they chillingly call the “Post democratic era.” Close to destroying the NHS, and local democracy, by
transferring power from councillors to the council executives, in preparation for the abolition of councillors with the EU regionalisation plan.
Common Purpose is the number one subversive body outside Parliament. Its graduates include Janet Paraskeva, head of the law society and Cressida Dick, the senior police officer who, with the backing of EU corpus juris, single handedly threw away our right to life and common law with her shoot to kill policy, which is still in force today. She was responsible for the killing of Jean de Menezes in Stockwell tube amongst others, and, although she’s a nobody and might be considered a murderer outside the police force, is getting breathtaking promotion, presumably to be appointed Chief of Police in this EU police state.
9. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM). In charge of the handover of power to the EU, controls Common Purpose. Has put a “Monitoring Officer” into every council in the land; they suspend councillors who speak out for the truth.
10. The Law Society, which I would prefer to call the Fraudulent Lawyers Protection Society on a local level, and the Constitutional Law Breaking Society on the national level. Top lawyers have refused to uphold the British Constitution or enforce our laws where the EU is concerned; the Law Society is a home for traitors. The very fact they had Janet Paraskewa, a Common Purpose leader at their head, shows how rotten they are.
11. Baroness Warnock, and a couple of hundred other dedicated senior subversives. Ruthless implementors of the German Frankfurt School’s subversion on behalf of
the EU. Over the last 40 years our churches and families have been undermined, with single parent and same sex parents encouraged, teachers have had their authority removed, sex and homosexual education is forced on many under 13s, and decades of political correctness have dumbed down our ability to speak out. The results fill our newspapers every day.
12. Our slovenly press and media. It is stunning that the press has missed all this, the biggest story in a thousand years. Truly the quality of our journalists is abysmal. No wonder the art of investigative journalism is dead. In the BBC’s case it’s simple
sabotage, with hundreds of Common Purpose people in positions of power.
Only 25,000 traitors versus 60 million. In total there are about 25,000 dedicated subversives at all levels of society in Britain, helped by 100,000 useful idiots. To oppose them are 60 million British people. So why are they winning?
Because the subversion these traitors have so carefully implemented over the last 50 years has worked: The young have no interest in politics; churches are empty; people have stopped speaking out; the public now just accepts every control, regulation, indignity, injustice and rule without complaint.
To defeat the EU you must expose these traitors in their constituencies, at their places of work, in the press, and tell as many people as you can what is happening. Refuse to comply at every opportunity.
Over the last year, an average of more than 14,000 people have searched for her name every month.
There are at least ten different Facebook groups dedicated to her.
And at a recent court appearance by Tommy Robinson, it was her name that was being chanted by supporters.
But who exactly is Melanie Shaw, why is she in prison – and what are her supporters calling for?
The simple answer is that Melanie was one of the very first people to make allegations of sexual abuse at Beechwood children’s home in Nottingham.
But have a quick browse of the internet and you will find a host of further answers involving buried bodies, secret court hearings, and Westminster paedophile rings.
We have therefore attempted to tell Melanie’s story below, as best as we can. It won’t answer all of the questions about her, but it will hopefully provide some detail which might not be immediately available to everyone.
Melanie was born in October 1970, and was placed in foster care at a young age.
She grew up in Kirkby-in-Ashfield, and from 1981 to 1987 she was at Ashfield Comprehensive School in the town.
When she was 16 she was sent to Beechwood children’s home in Mapperley. She stayed there for around a year.
When she left, she overcame drug problems, started doing voluntary work.
In an interview broadcast in 2015, she described how she was a full-time mother for 24 years before she decided to speak out about what had happened at the children’s home.
In 2010 she went to the police to report what had happened to her at Beechwood, and was one of the first people to do so.
In more recent years she has lived in Sherwood and Sneinton.
What does Melanie say happened to her in Beechwood?
Melanie said that she was raped in the basement of the Lindens unit at Beechwood in Mapperley, and was physically and sexually abused.
She has spoken about one particular member of staff who she said had threatened to kill her ‘like the others’ if she spoke out over abuse. She said he told her that he had already murdered and buried two children in the grounds of Beechwood.
And she also said that, while she had never been abused by a politician, she was aware of young boys from Beechwood being taken by minibus down to London to be abused by ‘the rich and elite’.
No charges have been brought against anyone who she alleged had assaulted her at Beechwood. And she has said she has a fear that she is going to be found dead.
Why is she in prison?
As far as Nottinghamshire Live is aware, Melanie has been either convicted of or found to have carried out offences on five different occasions since 2014.
In December 2014 at Nottingham Crown Court, she was convicted of arson being reckless as to whether life was endangered, and damaging property. She was given a community order for three years and a five-year restraining order.
In February 2016 at Nottingham Crown Court, she was given three restraining orders, fined £200, and handed a three-month prison sentence for displaying threatening, abusive, insulting words or behaviour or disorderly behaviour to cause another harassment, alarm, or distress; and two counts of pursuing a course of conduct which amounted to harassment.
In January 2017 at Nottingham Crown Court, she was given two years in prison; six months for breach of a suspended sentence order, nine months for breach of a restraining order, and nine months for breach of a separate restraining order.
In March 2017 at Derby Crown Court she was given eight months in prison; eight months in prison for making a threat to kill; three months(concurrent) for common assault, and one month (concurrent) for damaging property.
And in October 2018 at Leeds Crown Court, a jury found that Melanie – who was deemed unfit to stand trial – had committed three counts of arson being reckless as to whether property was damaged or destroyed. She will sentenced for this on January 14.
The Ministry of Justice does not give out information on release dates for individual prisoners.
Obviously, even in the event that Melanie served the full term of her two-year sentence from January 11, 2017, she would be due for release in January 2019.
However, she has been remanded in custody in connection with the arson offences which she is being sentenced for on January 14.
You can see a list of Melanie’s court appearances at the bottom of this story.
Where has she been held?
Melanie has been held in a number of different prisons. These include, but are not necessarily limited to, HMP Peterborough, HMP Foston Hall in Derby, HMP New Hall in Flockton near Wakefield, HMP Eastwood Park in Gloucestershire, and HMP Styal in Cheshire.
There have been a number of rumours online about Melanie being moved to Rampton in north Nottinghamshire. But her supporters sent her Christmas cards to HMP Styal.
What do the authorities say?
In terms of the allegations made by Melanie, Nottinghamshire Police said: “Nottinghamshire Police investigated all of the allegations thoroughly. Where the threshold was met, the CPS considered the evidence.
“Unfortunately, it was determined that the evidential test was not passed and, as such, no prosecutions brought.
“Our enquiries have also not identified any unaccounted-for people at Beechwood Children’s Home.
“Searches were carried out at Beechwood in February 2012.
“The work was undertaken by us in conjunction with national search advisors and searches were made of the grounds and building. It included the use of search dogs and radar following concerns reported by a member of the public.
“Nothing was identified at the time that supported the reports.”
Nottingham East MP Chris Leslie said: “Melanie Shaw first contacted me several years ago, since when I have offered support as I would to any constituent in her circumstances. I have continued to enquire after Melanie’s welfare, including with the prison.
“It would be inappropriate and not responsible of me to discuss the details of these highly sensitive matters with anyone other than Melanie or her legal representatives, who are always welcome to contact me at any time.
“However, over many years now there have been stories circulating about Melanie’s case, and most of the posts circulating on social media are wildly inaccurate.”
Paddy Tipping, Nottinghamshire’s Police and Crime Commissioner, said: “I’ve known Melanie for many years and we have talked about the difficulties she has faced.
“It’s disappointing that she is in prison while she waits for sentencing later this month, but we are doing what we can to help her and we are regularly in touch with the professional people who support her.
“However, in the short term this is a matter for the Crown Court.”
The two legal firms in Nottingham which represent Melanie for civil and criminal matters said they could not comment without explicit permission from their client, which has not yet been obtained.
The Ministry of Justice said they do not comment on individual cases.
What do her supporters want?
Although the various groups come from slightly different angles – with some focusing more on the what happened at Beechwood and others on the London/Westminster allegations – they all want Melanie out of prison.
A member of the Justice for Melanie Shaw group, which has been running since 2014, said that, taking into the account the time Melanie had spent on remand, she should have been released from prison in June 2018 following the completion of her two-year sentence.
She said: “I think she is being persecuted, and I can’t help thinking it’s a set-up. They wanted her in prison, and they’ve got her in prison.
“I’m not going to pretend Melanie is an angel. She can be a bit of a handful. Even if you think she’s all right, you still have to be a bit wary of how she can react, which is because of what she’s been through.
“But what is happening to her now is disproportionate to what she is supposed to have done. Prisoners set fire to their cells every day of the week.
“If it isn’t a conspiracy, why are they making it look like one?”
She added: “We’ve always believed that the police weren’t trying their hardest to investigate the fate of children who had allegedly died at Beechwood – allegations I believe there is truth in.
“I’m prepared to believe that when Melanie went to the police she produced quite a bit of evidence about what she was saying.
“Melanie said she gave evidence to the police and it disappeared. I can’t prove that’s true, but that’s what she said.
“I think it’s accepted that the authorities didn’t know how many children were in care – and what happened to those who disappeared.”
Melanie’s court appearances
Nottinghamshire Live contacted eight courts – Nottingham Crown Court, Nottingham Magistrates’ Court, Derby Crown Court, Derby Magistrates’ Court, Peterborough Crown Court, Peterborough Magistrates’ Court, Cambridge Crown Court and Leeds Crown Court – in order to try and get a full picture of Melanie’s court appearances.
Nottingham Magistrates’ Court declined to provide information about Melanie’s court appearances. However, some information about her appearances at Nottingham Magistrates’ Court was provided by another court.
It remains a slightly confusing picture, with different parts of the criminal justice system giving – at times – conflicting information about her court history.
But as far as we can best establish, these are Melanie’s court appearances since 2014. Not all will necessarily have been appearances in person, as some may have been by videolink.
Melanie Shaw’s court appearances
December 11, 2014 (Nottingham Crown Court)
Found guilty of arson being reckless as to whether life was endangered at an address in Bonnington Crescent, Sherwood on February 1, 2014; and damaging property at the same address on June 26, 2014.
She was given a community order for three years with supervision from the probation service. She was also given a five-year restraining order banning her from contacting the victims of the arson attack or going to their home.
August 26, 2015 (Peterborough Magistrates’ Court)
Pleaded not guilty to a charge that between June 22, 2015 and July 13, 2015 at Peterborough she pursued a course of conduct which amounted to the harassment of [a named person] and which she knew or ought to have known amounted to the harassment of her in that sending flowers, gifts and card to HMP Peterborough, telephoning and camping outside HMP Peterborough, harassing members of staff on their way in and out of work, contrary to section 2(1) and (2) of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.
Remanded on bail for trial at Peterborough Magistrates’ Court on Nov 11, 2015.
November 11, 2015 (Peterborough Magistrates’ Court)
Pleaded guilty to the charge above. Remitted to Nottingham Magistrates’ Court on conditional bail for sentence on December 4, 2015.
December 4, 2015 (Nottingham Magistrates’ Court)
Appearance for sentencing over the above charge. Remitted to Nottingham Magistrates’ Court to Jan 20, 2016. Remanded on bail.
January 20, 2016 (Nottingham Magistrates’ Court)
Appearance for sentencing over the above charge, sent to Nottingham Crown for sentence on February 10, 2016.
February 17, 2016 (Nottingham Crown Court)
Given three restraining orders, as well as other penalties, after being convicted on three counts.
(1) Pleaded guilty to displaying threatening, abusive, insulting words or behaviour or disorderly behaviour to cause another harassment, alarm, or distress on July 21, 2015 in Nottingham. She was also fined £200 for this offence.
(2) Pursuing a course of conduct which amounted to harassment from June 21 to July 6 in Nottingham. She was also given and a three-month prison sentence (suspended for two years) for this offence.
(3) Pursuing a course of conduct which amounted to harassment from June 26 to July 13 in Nottingham. She was also given and a three-month prison sentence (suspended for two years) for this offence, concurrent.
June 3, 2016 (Peterborough Magistrates’ Court)
Appeared charged with attending HMP Peterborough on June 1, 2016 – which she was prohibited from doing by the restraining order imposed by Nottingham Crown Court on February 17, 2016. Case sent for trial at Peterborough Crown Court on July 1, 2016.
September 16, 2016 (Peterborough Crown Court)
The above matter was transferred to Nottingham, as the restraining order was issued at Nottingham.
January 11, 2017 (Nottingham Crown Court)
Sentenced to a total of two years in prison.
(1) Six months in prison for a breach of a suspended sentence order in relation to the indictment of February 2016;
(2) Nine months in prison (consecutive) for breach of the restraining order in relation to the indictment of February 2016;
(3) Nine months in prison (consecutive) for the breach of the restraining order dated June 1 at HMP Peterborough.
February 8, 2017 (Derby Magistrates’ Court)
Appeared charged with one count of criminal damage on August 25, 2016, one count of making a threat to kill on August 20, 2016, and one charge of assault by beating on September 24, 2016. All sent to Derby Crown Court for March 8, 2017.
(Also, one charge of assault occasioning ABH in February 2016 was withdrawn; and one charge of threatening to destroy and damage property in August 2016 was withdrawn.)
March 8, 2017 (Derby Crown Court)
Given a total of eight months in prison for the offences listed above. This was:
(1) Eight months in prison for making a threat to kill on August 20, 2016;
(2) Three months in prison (concurrent) for common assault on September 24, 2016;
(3) One month in prison (concurrent) for damaging property on August 25, 2016.
January 10, 2018 (Derby Magistrates’ Court)
Appeared charged with two counts of arson on February 8 and February 10, 2017, and one count of sexual assault on February 15, 2017; all sent for trial at Derby Crown Court on Feb 7, 2018.
March 16, 2018 (Derby Crown Court)
The arson cases above were transferred to Leeds Crown Court.
July 21, 2018 (Derby Magistrates’ Court)
Three charges of criminal damage and one count of sexual assault dating from February 2017 were all withdrawn.
October 16, 2018 (Leeds Crown Court)
A jury found that Melanie – who was deemed unfit to stand trial – had committed three counts of arson being reckless as to whether property was damaged or destroyed.
She committed the offences on February 8 and February 10, 2017, at HMP Foston Hall, Derby; and on June 21 at New Hall prison in Wakefield, West Yorkshire. She is being sentenced on Jan 14.
A social conspiracy to pervert the course of justice underlies the refusal to come to terms with ritual abuse.
This is a serious charge. I will illustrate what I mean by reference to the Humberside case, where the police still maintain that they failed to uncover any corroborating evidence. This is curious beccause in the police files there is a document written by the child whom I call Boy 2. That piece of paper was found by the boy’s mother in her son’s bag. She discharged her civic duty by handing it to police.
The evidence came to light because Boy 2 was preparing to run away from home. He had reached a crisis, and he felt that the only way out was to abscond – a tragic solution that is adopted daily by children throughout the nation. Youngsters suddenly disappear without trace, leaving distraught parents to live out their worst fears.
Boy 2, however, was not to be left to his own devices in the wicked metropolis; he had “uncles” to make sure of that. There was a plan; one that, in this particular case, was thwarted just in time, when his mother found his sports bag stuffed with the clothes he was planning to take with him.
Boy 2 even had a “passport” to a new life: it lay crumpled on the top of his clothes. It was the scrap of paper on which he had scrawled the information that was essential to provide him with the food and lodgings he needed in London.
The paper contained the following details: the boy’s age, his name, and the number “444”. That number, we have seen, was his unique identification tag: and it was given to him when he was initiated into a satanic sex ring.
But there was another word on the piece of paper, one that meant nothing to Boy 2’s mother; at the time, when she asked me about it, I knew nothing about the significance of the word either. The word “Scorpio” was scrawled by the number 444. As a result of my enquiries, I was able to establish that Boy 2 had been about to step into a nationwide satanic conspiracy. Boy 2 unwitingly provided us with our first insights into that criminal structure.
This is how the organisation worked.
When the boys earned money from prostitution, part of the proceeds were retained by men who placed the cash in what the boys said was “the London fund”. The boys were assured that they would not go to gaol, if the police started snooping around, for the money they had stashed away would finance their swift departure to London. There – they were told – they would be found work in showbiz.
The truth, I now know, is more sinister.
Boy 2 was hooked into an network of paedophiles who seek boys for prostitution. Sometimes, boys die.
Mark Tildesley, a 7-year-old who was kidnapped from a fairground in Reading, Berkshire, on June 1 1984, was one victim of that conspiracy. That was the year that Christopher Laverack was kidnapped, sexually assaulted, and murdered.
In 1985, Barry Lewis, aged 6, was snatched from his home in South London and murdered. One man was convicted for that killing.
Jason Swift, aged 14, also fell prey to the perverts who stalk our streets. Four men were gaoled for a total of 62 years for his death.
But the list of unsolved child murders is a long one. Operation Orchid is the code name for a major police operation that has its incident room in an East London police station. The detectives led by Chief Superintendent Roger Stoodley are searching for clues to the fate of eight or nine boys who have met their fatal end at the hands of just one paedophile gang.
Operation Orchid received tip-offs that there was a satanic connection to their investigation, but the detectives could find no corroborative evidence. “We progressed as far as we could, but we could not prove it” says Roger Stoodley. “We were busy on other things and it fell by the wayside.”
I suspect that one day police will uncover evidence that will substantiate the claims that satanists are a feature of that paedophile network.
The cult behind the paedophile sex ring is called Scorpio. That name is the common denominator: it is being disclosed by children throughout the country.
The significance of that clue has been overlooked by parents who have been told by their children that they are “scorpios”. In one case, involving two small London children, the mother laughed when her son and daughter both insisted on identifying themselves by that name. She told them they had got their birth signs mixed up, and she informed them that they were born under different signs. She did not know that the two children were struggling to find words to reveal to their mother that they had been initiated into a black magic coven by their father.
That mother carries a heavy feeling of guilt, but she is not to blame. No-one had alerted her to the evil that is preying on children in our society. It as not until she had been placed in contact with other parents whose children had fallen foul of Scorpio that she realised that on the lips of her two children was the clue to a living nightmare.
Unwittingly, that particular mother may possess vital clues to the identities and locations of East London members of Scorpio. Her husband, before being locked up for assaulting her, asked his wife to hide an atlas of Britain and a street map of London. When she examined the maps, she found that they contained marks that identified names and streets which had no significance to the family. Now, she believes that the marks identify members of Scorpio.
The mother fled from London in 1989, after her children had disclosed what had happened to them in public parks in the dead of night. A year later, London detectives tried to track her down, to obtain those maps. She has refused to hand them over. She is reluctant to co-operate with the police because, in the past, every time she sought the help of detectives, she was made to feel guilty for her children’s disclosures.
I find myself in a similar situation, having fallen foul of the legal system. This now inhibits me from disclosing all the facts known to me about the London fund. The police have asked to interview me, but if I were to discuss everything I know, I would be liable to go to gaol.
But I can say that the police are on the right track. Scorpio is a paedophile-based network. A sophisticated organisation exists to handle money that is being gathered from boys around the country and placed in bank accounts. The network can tap those funds to pay for the boys’ upkeep when they are whisked away to London.
I fear that the police will fail to solve all the child murders until they begin to explore the satanic tentacles of the sex rings that are behind the disappearance of boys from their homes.
But it would be wrong if public attention were to be directed exclusively at those children who succeed in boarding trains bound for London’s King’s Cross or Paddington Stations. I would like to pause, for a moment, to emphasise that other children are also being “lost” to us even while they remain with their families. That tragedy is a by-product of the social conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.
Extract from Chasing Satan: An investigation into Satanic crimes against children, by Dianne Core, founder of Childwatch
It is widely known that before prohibition was enacted cannabis was available from pharmacies for medicinal purposes. Tinctures and other products were prescribed to treat various ailments. This period roughly occurred between 1840 and the early 1900’s until prohibition begun to be enforced.
Lesser known is that the Limerick born doctor Sir. William Brooke O’Shaughnessy helped introduced cannabis into Western medicine. Although now largely forgotten by history it was O’Shuaghnessy who undertook research in India and subsequently stimulated medical cannabis use and research throughout the West.
O’Shaughnessy also made significant contributions to various other fields of scientific study with many of his innovations still in use. He also played a role in cementing British rule in India by establishing its expansive telegraph communications network and he was later knighted for this work.
William Brooke O’Shaughnessy was born in Limerick in 1809 and it is suggested that from a young age he showed the potential he would later fulfill. He first studied medicine at Trinity in Dublin before transferring to the University of Edinburgh in Scotland from where he graduated in 1829.
The University of Edinburgh was considered one of the best medical schools in the world and it was quite an achievement for O’Shaughnessy, who was barely 18 years old, to be accepted into it. At the university he studied an array of topics like medicine, chemistry, forensic toxicology and anatomy.
Some of cadavers O’Shaughnessy used when studying anatomy under Professor Robert Knox were likely supplied by the infamous grave robbers Burke and Hare.
After his graduation O’Shaughnessy moved to London and established his own forensic toxicology laboratory after he was unable to find work. His laboratory provided chemical analyses of urine, blood, and tissue for doctors, hospitals, and the courts. During this period he also researched possible treatments for cholera and ways of detecting poison.
In 1833 O’Shaughnessy took a job with the East India Company to work in Calcutta as an assistant surgeon. This began his lifetime interest in India. The notorious East India Company effectively ruled India with its private armies between 1757 and 1858.
Like many individuals O’Shaughnessy was part of the ‘brain drain’ from England and Ireland which saw huge numbers seek work in India during this period. One estimate suggests that by 1860 around 30% of Trinity’s engineering graduates had emigrated to India for work.
O’Shaughnessy spent two periods of his life in India. The first was between 1833 and 1841 and the second between 1852 and 1860. It was during his first trip that he researched the medicinal properties of a range of indigenous plants, including opium and cannabis. During his second trip he conducted the work that saw him knighted by Queen Victoria.
In India the therapeutic effects of cannabis became known to O’Shaughnessy from his interactions with indigenous people. Cannabis and other plants had been used medicinally and recreationally in the region for thousands of years.
O’Shaughnessy looked at the contemporary medical literature in the West and found little about the medical properties of cannabis. The only references available primarily focused on its intoxicating effects and O’Shaughnessy even found this information was limited.
By contrast the materials in the region had more information on the medicinal properties. In 1969 Dr. Tod Mikuriya wrote that “In India the use of hemp preparations as a remedy was described before 1000 B.C. In Persia, cannabis was known several centuries before Christ. In Assyria, about 650 B.C., its intoxicating properties were noted.”
O’Shaughnessy also detailed some of the preparations used by indigenous people for cannabis drinks and edibles. He even provides the recipes for some of these in his work. O’Shaughnessy also provides some interesting social commentary and observations about the use of cannabis by locals.
In 1839 O’Shaughnessy noted that “All classes of persons, including the lower Portuguese, or ‘Kala Feringhees,’ and especially their females, consume the drug; that it is a most fascinating in its effects, producing extatic (ecstatic) happiness, a persuasion of high rank, a sensation of flying, voracious appetite, and intense aphrodisiac desire.”
Eager to test the claims made by locals about cannabis O’Shaughnessy undertook a range of experiments. He started his research on animals such as mice, rabbits, and rats. He moved onto human subjects after noting how safe cannabis was. During his initial research O’Shaughnessy noticed that not all species of animals were affected the same by cannabis.
He wrote that carnivorous animals and fish, dogs, cats, swine, vultures and crows “invariably and speedily exhibited the intoxicating influence of the drug”. However graminivorous (grazing) animals such as horses, cows, sheep, goats and monkeys “only experienced trivial effects from any dose that was administered.”
O’Shaughnessy first presented his research to a group of students and scholars at the Medical and Physical Society of Calcutta in 1839. His presentation featured case studies of patients suffering from ailments such as: Cholera, rheumatism, hydrophobia, tetanus, rabies and a 40 day old baby with convulsions.
O’Shaughnessy also released his findings in a publication called: ‘On the preparations of the Indian hemp, or gunjah (Cannabis Indica), their effects on the animal system in health, and their utility in the treatment of tetanus 6 and other convulsive disorders.’
O’Shaughnessy revealed that he had only limited success in treating rheumatism but that noticeable pain relief was provided by the cannabis.
O’Shaughnessy also had little success in treating hydrophobia or cholera with cannabis, but again noted the beneficial calming and pain relief effects from cannabis.
O’Shaughnessy believed that even if cannabis was not a cure for such ailments it would be beneficial as part of a treatment.
O’Shaughnessy was successful in quelling the muscle spasms associated with conditions like tetanus and rabies. We know that many modern medical cannabis patients use cannabis for easing spasticity (spasms and stiffness) associated with conditions like multiple sclerosis, dystonia and motor neuron disease.
The patient with rabies O’Shaughnessy treated sadly died from the condition. However, O’Shaughnessy states that cannabis helped ease their suffering. He wrote that “. .the awful malady (disease) was stripped of its horrors; if not less fatal than before, it was reduced to less than the scale of suffering which precedes death from most ordinary diseases.”
O’Shaughnessy was also able to stop the infant convulsions (febrile seizures) that a 40 day old infant was suffering from. This led O’Shaughnessy to declare that “the profession has gained an anti-convulsive remedy of the greatest value”.
In recent years cannabis has become an accepted medicine to treat conditions like epilepsy which often feature potentially fatal convulsions. Many of the these patients are in fact children, with many families relocating to cannabis friendly locations such as Colorado to avail of such treatment.
O’Shaughnessy also believed that cannabis could potentially be used as an anesthetic and for providing significant pain relief. Much of his research focused on these areas as during the mid-1800’s many doctors and dentists were seeking anesthesia and pain relief medications. In fact many of the advancements in those fields were occurring at the same time as O’Shaughnessy’s research.
O’Shaughnessy also noted the risks associated with cannabis for some patients he treated. He suggested that a peculiar form of delirium “may be occasioned by continual hemp inebriation”. For this reason O’Shaughnessy cautioned fellow doctor’s to start with low doses when administrating cannabis to their patients.
O’Shaughnessy had a unique way of treating patients who had consumed too much cannabis. Patients were administered strong purgatives and an emetic (to cause vomiting) was administered via a blister to the neck. Leeches were also applied to patient’s temples.
His methods were drastic by modern standards to say the least. It also shows that even the greatest minds often still operate by the (now) questionable standards of the times whilst also being innovators in those fields.
O’Shaughnessy continued his research and after returning to England produced two works featuring some of India’s indigenous plants. He released The Bengal Dispensatory in 1842 and The Bengal Pharmacopoeia in 1844. Both publications lead to increased interest into the medicinal properties of certain plants, including cannabis.
When O’Shaughnessy published The Bengal Pharmacopoeia in 1844 the section on cannabis extended to 25 pages. This work has been described by James Mills in the Cannabis Britannica as “the most comprehensive assessment of the properties of cannabis” undertaken at the time.
O’Shaughnessy’s research was subsequently republished in British and European medical journals which lead to an increase in cannabis research. Soon others across Europe and the globe were undertaking research into the plant and producing their own findings and products.
O’Shaughnessy returned to England in 1841 and brought back not only his research but also quantities of cannabis specimens and seeds. Cannabis was provided to groups like the Royal Pharmaceutical Societyfor research purposes.
One of the people O’Shaughnessy met on his return to London was the pharmacist Peter Squire. It was Peter Squire, working in tandem with O’Shaughnessy, who made cannabis tinctures which were available at local pharmacies.
Sir. Russell Reynolds, the personal physician to Queen Victoria, was among those who promoted cannabis’s medical use after reading O’Shaughnessy’s research. It is claimed that Sir. Russel Reynolds subsequently prescribed cannabis to Queen Victoria for menstrual pains.
It should be noted that others were also researching the medicinal properties of cannabis around the same time as O’Shaughnessy. However, O’Shaughnessy’s research had a greater impact on the field and thus he is often wrongly perceived as the only ‘Westerner’ researching cannabis at the time.
O’Shaughnessy’s impact on cannabis research is evident by the fact that between 1840 and 1900 over 100 articles appeared in scientific journals describing the medical properties of cannabis. A stark contrast to the period before that. As noted by Dr. Tod Mikuriya in his 1969 article ‘Marijuana in Medicine’ there was a “paucity of references to hemp’s intoxicating properties in the lay and medical literature of Europe before the 1800s”.
In fact O’Shaughnessy is still impacting on cannabis research to this day. It is suggested that when Dr. Tod Mikuriya reprinted O’Shaughnessy’s paper as the lead article in Marijuana: Medical Papers 1839–1972 (published in 1973) it helped reinvigorated the modern day medical interest in cannabis.
Dr. Tod Mikuriya’s publication, and the interest it caused, lead to more research into cannabis in the last century. This lead to some activists calling Dr. Mikuriya the grandfather of medical cannabis movement in the US’.
Perhaps by this logic we can call O’Shaughnessy the grandfather of all medical cannabis research.
It is testament to O’Shaughnessy’s ability as a scientist that he had such a profound impact on cannabis research. James Mills, the author of the Cannabis Britannica, wrote he wasn’t surprised that O’Shaughnessy was perhaps the first doctor “to find out for himself exactly what the impact of cannabis substances was rather than to rely on hearsay or on recycled versions of other writers’ compilations”.
A Lancet review in 1840 of O’Shaughnessy’s work on cannabis is also testament of his character and ability. It stated that “The labours of Dr O’Shaughnessy, as a scientific chemist, are already known in the most favourable manner to our readers; but unlike the greater number of chemists, he combines practice with theory and directs his scientific discoveries to the advancement of medicine as a healing art.”
Alongside his work with cannabis O’Shaughnessy should also be remembered for other amazing feats.
Some commentators have argued his medical cannabis work while significant is only a minor accomplishment in a lifetime of diverse work and achievements.
So it is worth looking at some of his other feats.
O’Shaughnessy conducted research into telegraph communications and even built his own network in 1837 to show the technology worked. In 1852 he was appointed the Director-General of Telegraphs in India. Within six months of undertaking work the telegraph network stretched for 800 miles. The network would eventually stretch to over 11000 miles. In 1856 O’Shaughnessy was knighted by Queen Victoria for this work.
The network later proved key to British rule in India and was a significant factor in suppressing the Indian uprising which occurred between May 1857 and July 1859.
O’Shaughnessy was also a professor of chemistry and professor of natural philosophy at the medical college in Calcutta for a period. He also climbed the medical ranks in India to become a surgeon major in 1861.
During his life O’Shaughnessy undertook research into areas such as pharmacology, chemistry, toxicology, drug clinical trials, science education, and underwater engineering. His cholera research led to some of the first experiments in treatments by intravenous injection, a precursor to the modern day IV drips.
O’Shaughnessy researched the refinement of gold and this lead to him briefly working for the Indian Mint. He was in charge of attempts to unify India’s dozens of different currencies with standard coinage. However his attempts appear to have largely failed.
His broad scientific work, and much more, contribute to the claims that O’Shaugnessy was one of the greatest minds of his generation.
While O’Shaughnessy has largely been forgotten, his impact on scientific research and advancements lives on almost 130 years after his death.
Little is known about the final two decades of O’Shaughnessy’s life. We know he returned to Britain in 1860 and retired the following year. But little more is known beyond that up until his death in 1889.
In 1861 he legally changed his name to William O’Shaughnessy Brooke. It is suggested this change was to benefit from some family inheritance. However, this variation of his name is not always seen in the literature about him, much like the use of Sir before his name.
When O’Shaughnessy died in 1889 he left behind an inspiring legacy. His contributions to medical cannabis and other scientific fields cannot be downplayed. Yet like many of great minds that have existed he is largely unknown.
In recent years the emergence of the internet and online communities has lead to more learning about O’Shaughnessy’s various accomplishments. Limerick comedians Rubber Bandits are among his modern day admirers.
Almost 180 years after his groundbreaking research perhaps the best tribute we could pay O’Shaughnessy would be the regulation of cannabis. Not only could individuals access cannabis products for medicinal purposes but it would also open up and encourage more cannabis research.
Perhaps by taking a scientific approach like O’Shaughnessy did in the 1800s we can unlock even more medical potentials for cannabis.
Thanks for reading and be sure to visit us at 167 Capel Street in Dublin.
Brian Houlihan is the curator of the Dublin Hemp Museum and regularly writes about hemp. Follow him on Twitter at @dubhempmuseum and @houlihanbrian. You can also find us on Facebook.
Alfie was born healthy and on time. We were so happy to have him with us going home, our beautiful boy. He grew and fed well, but was exceptionally sleepy and didn’t meet milestones. After a couple of weeks we noticed Alfie wasn’t doing things he should be, like lifting his head up, grabbing his dummy, eating his hands, etc. We also noticed he was doing a jerking movement with his hands, arms and legs, and his eyes would roll up. Alfie often had his hands clenched into a fist. We took him to doctors three times, who said he was lazy and a late developer.
Months went by and Alfie went backward instead of forwards. He started making more jerking movements and wasn’t himself at all. Finally Alfie became agitated, crying inconsolably. Then Alfie got a chest infection and landed in the hospital. The infection led him to have a myoclonic jerking spasm, and Alfie struggled to breathe. This is when he was first put on life support, the worst nights of our lives. They told us in January 2016 that Alfie wasn’t going to make it, so we had him christened. We thought we were going to lose our son and our hearts were desperate.
But Alfie had other ideas, he managed to beat the infection and start breathing on his own again. He was moving and trying to open his eyes. Unfortunately, Alfie caught another infection and went back on the ventilator.
Time and time again, despite not being diagnosed or treated for any suspected underlying disease, his seizures being somewhat controlled by a heavy cocktail of sedating drugs, Alfie has come back over and over from every infection and challenge. The hospital claims that Alfie is “insensate” and unaware of any stimulus or irritation, which is proven wrong in hundreds of videos, against the odds of a heavy cocktail of anti-seizure drugs with sedative effect. Daily, Alfie moves, stretches, yawns, responding to tickling and noise and cuddling.
And yet even with all this, with loving parents (we are only 20 years old) who persevere through great strain and leave no stone unturned for Alfie, with support around the world, Alder Hey wants to turn his life support off. We have found another European hospital willing to help Alfie move forward, get a tracheostomy and PEG tube and get off heavy sedation, and to try to diagnose and treat him. We’ve been told several times by outside doctors that Alfie can even eventually be able to go home with a tracheostomy and direct stomach tube (PEG).
Yet Alder Hey keeps moving the goalposts. They have gone from telling us they would allow transfer if a hospital was found, and putting us through a long process of proving our option was viable, to admitting they would not allow any such transfer. The pressure by the doctors to end Alfie’s life has been unrelenting. Now they have resorted to legal force, to remove parental rights and end Alfie’s life, going to court behind our backs when we were still willing to go through mediation to find a positive solution.
Death Sentence by Alder Hey Hospital and The Supreme Court of the UK
Life support was withdrawn, Alfie Evans’ father said his son was still supporting his own life more than an hour after treatment was stopped, but that he was in need of oxygen. Earlier in the evening, Mr Justice Hayden said doctors at Alder Hey children’s hospital in Liverpool could stop providing life support.
The child’s parents, Tom Evans and Kate James, who are both in their early 20s and from Liverpool, had asked for a delay to give them time to mount a further challenge after the Italian government had agreed to grant their son citizenship. They wanted to take him to a hospital in Rome for further treatment.
Sophia Roper, who represents Alfie and takes instructions from a court-appointed guardian, agreed, saying any granting of Italian citizenship seemed designed to “frustrate” orders made in domestic courts.
On Friday, three supreme court justices agreed with Alfie’s doctors, saying: “There is no hope of him getting better”. They said there was no reason for further delay to withdrawing life support, adding: “The hospital must be free to do what has been determined to be in Alfie’s best interests.
Italy Offers and Paves the Way for Medical Treatment in Rome
Bambino Gesu’s boss has said it is ready and fully prepared to take Alfie from the UK for further treatment in Rome.The hospital has arranged the logistical aspects with the Italian embassy and Palazzo Chigi, the official residence of Italian Prime Minister Paolo Gentiloni.
“We are ready. The plane is at Rome Ciampino Airport with the doctors on board.
“The Italian Embassy in England is also looking for an ambulance to take the boy from the hospital to the airport.
“We are waiting for a response from the English justice system because even the British government cannot intervene.
“Now I’m in Italy. We arranged all the logistical aspects with the embassy and Palazzo Chigi.“Until the moment they tell me everything is over, I will continue to hope but while I hope, at the same time I think we will not make it because they do not want to.”On Monday, Alfie’s parents had expressed hope their son could be transferred to Rome for specialist treatment after to toddler was granted Italian citizenship earlier in the day.
But that evening Mr Justice Hayden dismissed their eleventh-hour bid and gave doctors at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital in Italy the go-ahead to turn off Alfie’s life support.
Alfie Evans’ Dad Tom says ‘Alfie is coping’ – Day 2
Prominent Pediatrician Says Alfie Not Dying and Should Be Released
As the parents of Alfie Evans await a meeting today with hospital staff to find out if they would be able to bring him home, a prominent doctor who has studied Alfie says he is not dying and is not brain-dead and says the hospital needs to quit holding him as if he were in a prison.
Alfie supposedly has a degenerative neurological condition but that diagnosis is being challenged now that Alfie is breathing on his own without life support.
Dr Izabela Pałgan, a paediatrician and children’s oncologist from Bydgoszcz in Poland, claims to have diagnosed the 23-month-old toddler on his parent’s request.
She said: “The doctors at the hospital in Liverpool have approached the High Court for permission to unplug the child from his life support machinery, claiming it will be in his best interests.
“But the child is not a dying child. On the Paediatric Glasgow Coma Scale the child ranks at about eight to nine points, so this is not a case of brain death.“The child reacts to his father’s voice and periodically opens his eyes. Periodically the boy also clenches his mouth when given a dummy, therefore he shows reactions.“The parents have absolutely stated the child communicates with them when they speak to him – they feel the child somehow feels their emotions and can emotionally connect with them.“Certainly this is not a dying child. In Poland and I think in other European countries as well, children like this are simply taken care of with palliative care or home care.”According to Dr Pałgan, the expert was called in to review Alfie’s case after family supporters sought out medical experts who could give a second opinion on Alfie’s conditions.
Alfie’s father Tom Evans agrees his son has been misdiagnosed. Speaking to Nick Ferrari on LBC, Alfie’s father Tom said: “For the third day now, there’s been not one single problem with him. The nurses come in and said ‘wow.’”
“Today, we’re going to have a meeting with the doctors at Alder Hey and we’ll now start asking to go home. Alfie doesn’t need intensive care anymore.”
In the new interview, Evans said, “Alfie does not need intensive care – Alfie is lying on the bed with one litre of oxygen going to his lungs and the rest is him. Some people say it’s a miracle – it’s not a miracle its a misdiagnosis.”
Evans indicated that Alfie is not in any pain and hardly taking any drugs — and he disputed the claim that Alfie should not be able to travel to Italy because of potential seizures, saying that Alfie has not having any seizures and is not on any anti-seizure medication because there was no problem at this time.
Previously, Evans indicated he was very concerned about Alfie’s lack of food — saying then that it has been almost 24 hours since he has had anything to eat and he is just receiving water and fluids. He was worried that hospital staff are attempting to starve Alfie to death in an attempt to prove their contention that Alfie was going to die very quickly after his removal from life support. Eventually, Alfie received food.
After a decision by Italy, Alfie was granted Italian citizenship which qualified him for being able to leave the country, but courts ruled otherwise.
And Italy’s Healthcare Chief has slammed the decisions by UK courts to treat Alfie the way that they have. The President of the Italian National Institute of Health lambasted the UK High Court’s decision yesterday on Alfie Evans’ that resulted it the children’s hospital being allowed to remove life support over Alfie’s parents’ objections.
Pope Francis has repeatedly spoken on Alfie’s behalf and urged that Alfie’s parents be allowed to bring him to Italy.
Alfie Evans Died April 28, 2018
Whistleblower Against Alder Hey Hospital
Dr. Edwin Jesudason, an associate professor and award-winning paediatric surgeon, the authorities turned a blind eye after he and a colleague called for a review of ‘unnecessary’ fatalities among children who had undergone surgery at the hospital.
He not only claims that Alder Hey tried to stop him making his concerns public, but also now fears he has been blacklisted as a troublemaking whistleblower — and that he will never work again for the NHS.
The Liverpool Care Pathway in 2012
Norman Lamb, the care minister, asked officials at the Department of Health to look into how and why financial rewards are being linked to targets for the use of the Liverpool Care Pathway.
The majority of acute trusts in England have been receiving payments, totaling millions of pounds, for meeting goals linked to their use of the LCP.
Details released under the Freedom of Information Act suggest that three quarters of trusts use the technique, which involves reducing invasive treatment – potentially including food and fluids – given to people in the final days and hours of their lives. The returns suggest that between £20 million and £30 million has been paid out in the last two to three years to trusts which have hit targets linked to the use of the LCP. Mr Lamb said that the payments, which are made by local NHS bodies rather than the Government.
A nurse gave Alfie Evans four unidentified drugs just two hours before his death To silence the press, the hospital promised Tom Evans more oxygen and more vital support.Two hours before dying the oxygen saturation was about 98 and Alfie’s beats were about 160, so much so that Thomas was convinced that they would let him go home soon (as the hospital administration told him on Friday afternoon) .Before dying, while Tom had gone out for a moment, leaving Kate half-awake and another family member in the room, a nurse entered and explained that he would give the baby four drugs (no one knows what) to treat him.After about 30 minutes the saturation dropped to 15. Two hours later Alfie was dead. The scientific director of the Bambin Gesù Hospital, Bruno Dalla Dallapiccola, is quoted as saying he thinks the lack of food and water during the first day after Alfie’s life support was removed contributed to his death as well as the lack of proper oxygen. A report also indicates that Alfie immediately contracted “a lung infection” after life support was removed and that Alfie’s father requested but was denied antibiotics to combat that. It also alleges that the breathing tubes were yanked in a way that caused damage or stress to Alfie’s body.After removing his life support without permission, officials at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital waited 28 hours before finally feeding the 23-month old boy.
British prime minister Theresa May defended the hospital. She argued that medical experts ought to be the ones to make decisions in such cases as opposed to parents and family.
A member of the European Parliament wants the case of Alfie Evans to be the last in which parents’ wishes for their child’s medical care are smacked down by the state.“Alfie’s Law,” introduced by Steven Woolfe, a member of the European Union’s legislative body for North West England, would provide parents of children with terminal diseases more say in their child’s care and treatment instead of leaving those decisions up to hospitals and courts.
Pope Francis Pope Francis, who had publicly supported Evans and James’ campaign, wrote a condolence that was posted on Twitter Saturday.“I am deeply moved by the death of little Alfie,” Francis said. “Today I pray especially for his parents, as God the Father receives him in his tender embrace.”
Sixteen Democratic U.S. Senators Are Questioned on Socialized Healthcare After Alfie Evans and Go Completely Silent The evils of socialized medicine were on full display during the few days the world watched Alfie Evans suffer to death at the hands of the British government’s National Healthcare System (NHS). After his death, the Daily Signal decided to get the comments of the 15 Democratic senators currently co-sponsoring the “Medicare for All Act of 2017,” spearheaded by Democratic Socialist Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). According to the Daily Signal, what they got in return was an eerie silence from the Democrats who apparently decided to go dark after the world watched their beloved system of choice fail so spectacularly. The Daily Signal emailed the Senate offices of Sanders and co-sponsors Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, Kamala Harris of California, Martin Heinrich of New Mexico, Mazie Hirono of Hawaii, Patrick Leahy of Vermont, Edward Markey of Massachusetts, Jeff Merkley of Oregon, Brian Schatz of Hawaii, Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, Tom Udall of New Mexico, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, and Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island.In emails sent to the 16 senators Monday and Tuesday, The Daily Signal noted that they have advocated government-run health care and asked what they thought of the Alfie Evans case and how a similar case should be handled in the United States. None had responded as of publication deadline Tuesday evening.
It is fair to say that most Americans don’t know exactly what to make of our ally Turkey these days, as it endures a prolonged political crisis that challenges its long-term stability. The U.S. media is doing a bang-up job of reporting the Erdoğan government’s crackdown on dissidents, but it’s not putting it into perspective.
We must begin with understanding that Turkey is vital to U.S. interests. Turkey is really our strongest ally against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), as well as a source of stability in the region. It provides badly needed cooperation with U.S. military operations. But the Obama administration is keeping Erdoğan’s government at arm’s length — an unwise policy that threatens our long-standing alliance.The primary bone of contention between the U.S. and Turkey is Fethullah Gülen, a shady Islamic mullah residing in Pennsylvania whom former President Clinton once called his “friend” in a well circulated video.
Gülen portrays himself as a moderate, but he is in fact a radical Islamist. He has publicly boasted about his “soldiers” waiting for his orders to do whatever he directs them to do. If he were in reality a moderate, he would not be in exile, nor would he excite the animus of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and his government.
For those of us who have closely studied the careers of Seyed Qutb and Hasan al Bana, the founders and followers of the Muslim Brotherhood, Gülen’s words and activities are very familiar.
The late Seyed Qutb in particular was very much in the Gülen mold. The author of 24 books on education and the arts, he assembled an inner circle of intellectuals and influential politicians. But contrary to this well-masked façade, Qutb’s writings provided the inspiration for terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda. Qutb was hanged in 1966 in Egypt for instigating rebellion.
Likewise, Hasan al Bana, an Egyptian who died in 1949, defined the first phase of pre-emptive jihad as a long and quiet process that can take as long as a quarter of a century, to prepare the forces for a decisive strike. Al Bana famously declared that the only acceptable form of law is Sharia.
To professionals in the intelligence community, the stamp of terror is all over Mullah Gülen’s statements in the tradition of Qutb and al Bana. Gülen’s vast global network has all the right markings to fit the description of a dangerous sleeper terror network. From Turkey’s point of view, Washington is harboring Turkey’s Osama bin Laden.
Washington’s silence on this explosive topic speaks volumes when we hear the incredulous claim that the democratically elected president of Turkey staged a military coup, bombed his own parliament and undermined the confidence in Turkey’s strong economy, just so that he could purge his political opponents.
This baseless claim is a dark reminder of the vicious rumors spread by our enemies that 9/11 was an inside job by the American intelligence apparatus as an excuse to invade Muslim lands to grab their oil!
To add insult to injury, American taxpayers are helping finance Gülen’s 160 charter schools in the United States. These schools have been granted more H1-B visas than Google. It is inconceivable that our visa officers have approved thousands of visas for English teachers whose English is incomprehensible. A CBS “60 Minutes” program documented a conversation with one such imported English teacher from Turkey. Several lawsuits, including some in Ohio and Texas, point to irregularities in the operation of these schools.
However, funding seems to be no problem for Gülen’s network. Hired attorneys work to keep the lucrative government source of income for Gülen and his network going. Influential charities such as Cosmos Foundation continue their support for Gulen’s charter schools.
The American public is being lulled into believing that Gülen is a Sufi scholar who promotes the teachings of Rumi, the Persian poet, works to expand interfaith dialogue and does a great job of providing American youth high-quality education in math and science as well as English.
Voices of concern about this shady character are quickly muffled by his vast network of public relations and legal professionals. He has established a false façade that he is a moderate at odds with Turkey’s autocratic leader.
He claimed to be a man of God who wanted to topple a dictator and return the power to the people. Washington believed him. Sadly, shortly after his rise to power through the Iranian revolution, we watched in horror as our diplomats were taken hostage for 444 days in what was once one of our strongest allies in the Middle East.
The world has never been the same since that irreversible mistake. Ayatollah Khomeini, the quiet man of God under the apple tree, created the world’s top sponsor of terror. His revolutionary guards created Hezbollah, the famous Lebanon-based terror organization.
The Ayatollah’s terrorists have killed American servicemen and slaughtered Iraqi Sunnis by the thousands, and his brutal Quds Force killed innocent Sunni civilians in Syria. Ultimately, ISIS became the radical Sunni’s response to the mayhem caused by our friendly mullah under the apple tree.
History repeats itself when people repeat the mistakes of the past. It is time we take a fresh look at the importance of Turkey and place our priorities in proper perspective. It is unconscionable to militate against Turkey, our NATO ally, as Washington is hoodwinked by this masked source of terror and instability nestled comfortably in our own backyard in Pennsylvania.
We need to adjust our foreign policy to recognize Turkey as a priority. We need to see the world from Turkey’s perspective. What would we have done if right after 9/11 we heard the news that Osama bin Laden lives in a nice villa at a Turkish resort while running 160 charter schools funded by the Turkish taxpayers?
The forces of radical Islam derive their ideology from radical clerics like Gülen, who is running a scam. We should not provide him safe haven. In this crisis, it is imperative that we remember who our real friends are.
Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn (ret.) is the former director of Defense Intelligence Agency and the author of New York Times Bestseller “The Field of Fight.”
Editor’s Note: On March 8, 2017, four months after this article was published, General Flynn filed documents with the Federal government indicating that he earned $530,000 last fall for consulting work that might have aided the government of Turkey. In the filings, Flynn disclosed that he had received payments from Inovo BV, a Dutch company owned by a Turkish businessman with ties to Turkey’s president and that Inovo reviewed the draft before it was submitted to The Hill. Neither General Flynn nor his representatives disclosed this information when the essay was submitted.
BY LT. GEN. MICHAEL T. FLYNN (R), CONTRIBUTOR – Nov/08/16 Source: The Hill
Rather than view with alarm Turkey’s announcement that it is building at least three military bases abroad, the United States and NATO have welcomed Ankara’s move as a contribution to stability. Nothing could be further from the truth. Turkey’s duplicitous fingerprints are all over support for terrorist groups like the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), Jabhat al-Nusra, and Al-Qaeda in Syria and Iraq, Ansar al-Sharia in Libya, and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and Tunisia.
The plans by the Adolf Hitler-praising Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to build military bases in Qatar, Somalia, the Republic of Georgia, and Azerbaijan are in keeping with Turkey’s more aggressive and neo-Ottoman foreign and military policies. Turkey is also building its first aircraft carrier that will extend Turkey’s naval presence into the Red Sea and Indian Ocean.
The announcement that Turkey is building a base in the Republic of Georgia comes after the Turks announced plans for a military base in Qatar, where 3000 Turkish Continue reading →
Editor’s note, January 2016: With the fate of the children at the centre of the Hampstead child abuse case to be decided in the coming days, it is important to reflect on the evidence. In this July 2015 article, researcher Sonya van Gelder explores the extent of organised pedophilia and child-trafficking networks, in the UK and worldwide, involving top-level government, church and charitable institutions…
In an earlier article, Suppressed Pedophilia Allegations Reveal Culture of Satanic Ritual Abuse, I discussed the story of the Hampstead child-abuse whistleblowers, 9 year old Hampstead girl Alisa and her 8 year old brother Gabriel, whose testimony of alleged abuse at the hands of their father, Ricky Dearman, and a satanic cult had just been leaked into alternative media. The alleged abuses involve a network of pedophiles in positions of public trust, including school teachers (from 8 different schools), priests, social workers, health care workers, child protection agencies and police officers, and medical examination of the children revealed physical trauma consistent with long-term sexual abuse.
However, adding to the complexity of this situation, the more evidence that comes to light surrounding the modus operandi of child molestation and trafficking networks, the more it appears that those people at the top of our society’s most influential social and legal are actively working to protect organized pedophilia and child-trafficking networks, rather than to dismantle them and bring the perpetrators to justice. So while Ricky Dearman has since been cleared of wrong-doing by the High Court in the UK, unanswered questions remain as to whether justice has indeed been served in this case.
The Hampstead Case
Following the initial allegations, the children were examined by a Police Medical Officer. Medical reports cited physical injuries consistent with blunt force trauma that correlated with allegations of physical and sexual abuse. The children gave names and also provided details of perpetrators’ anatomies, characteristics and birth marks etc. However the UK legal establishment failed to begin formal investigations into these allegations, instead appearing to close ranks around the individuals and institutions implicated. Only after the children’s recorded confessions were made public did authorities pursue legal action — against the children’s mother, Ella Draper.
Showing little sensitivity to the nature of these allegations, the children were taken from Draper’s custody by UK authorities and entrusted to a network of social workers, health care workers, child protection agencies and police — part of the same institutional networks that the children alleged to have been involved in facilitating their abuse.
According to Ms. Draper, the children were later asked by Police to retract their statements in police interviews conducted after the children had already spent 6 days in two separate foster care accommodations. Notably, the children’s initial statements correlated with each other while also being extremely detailed, however their later retractions (issued after almost a week in institutional placement) were entirely dissimilar.
Perceiving there to be holes in the official narrative of this case, many citizens and activists around the world have been mobilized and, since February, much more research has been done by those whose priority is to defend the rights of these children — and indeed, children everywhere — from the potential of systemic, self-protecting abuse networks. Their efforts have helped to create a bigger-picture understanding of this complex situation, lifting the veil on the organized and institutionalized molestation, abduction, trafficking, sale, rape, torture and murder of children involving governments, media, churches and charities.
With unanswered questions mounting, activists working to uncover the truth of this situation have become increasingly disconcerted by the apparent inaction of high-level authorities in this and countless other matters of child abuse. Volumes of recent and historical evidence indicates that global pedophilia and child-trafficking networks are not only operating within the ranks of our society’s most influential governing bodies and institutions, but are also being protected from legal recourse by those same institutions. Implicated by this evidence are countless well-known politicians and officials, educators, entertainers, media heads, and public and religious figures, many of whom are claimed to enjoy the calculated protections of conspirators within the political, media, religious and justice systems — the systems that are meant to protect our children’s interests, not their abusers.
Let’s examine the evidence.
Pedophiles in Politics
Allegations of pedophilia and satanic ritual abuse, child stealing and child trafficking are dangerously common amongst the highest ranking members of our society. The recurrence and consistence of allegations involving the powerful elite at the highest levels, coupled with the demonstrably routine suppression of evidence relating to those allegations, raises some difficult yet critical questions. Have the institutions we trust to serve the public’s best interests (including government, technology and media giants) in fact become corrupted, systemically serving more sinister, undisclosed ends?
As you’ll see in the short video below, British MP John Mann delivered a passionate speech to the British Parliament on 23th May 2015, outlining just how extensively pedophilia, child abuse and slavery networks are within the British Government.
There are already over 1,400 suspects involved in just one alleged British pedophile ring alone, with many more cases coming to light in Australia following recent investigations of the Royal Commission Into Child Abuse into the activity of the nation’s institutional bodies.
According to Mann:
“My constituency is no worse, no different to anywhere else in the country. This is nationwide, it’s every aspect of society… I’m expecting other people with other names coming forward from other parts of the country in the near future, others have already done so.
“The scandal of historic child abuse in this country is going to be one of the defining issues of the next five years… It is going to corrode everything over this Parliament because it is so large, it is so huge, it involves so many people… and this Parliament is going to have to deal with it.”
Getting Up to Speed…
The following broadcast from the The Kev Baker Show on Truth Frequency Radio features a 2 hour interview with researcher, author and broadcaster Chris Everard who presents a detailed and up-to-date report of the situation in the UK. If you don’t have the time to view all the links connected to this article, this one is the one to watch.
As shocking as the notion of pedophilia is, the information that actually reaches mainstream media and therefore the common perception of what pedophilia actually is – what it involves, and who – barely scratches the surface of the reality.
Our society is controlled by a Satanic ruling class. They are criminals, hiding behind the ‘respectable’ upper hierarchies of our society. It is difficult to believe such atrocities are occurring in the ‘civilized’ West in the 21st Century, but the evidence has become so overwhelming that we can no longer claim ignorance. We (myself included) have no choice but to put our fears aside and find the courage to seriously examine this cesspit of humanity, and to act on what we find. Ongoing investigations are uncovering unimaginable atrocities and, heart-broken, many of us would rather not pursue the truth any further. It can seem like too much to bear, so we would often rather dismiss it because we cannot endure nor comprehend it, much less believe we can do something about it. Too often, our spontaneous response is one of cognitive dissonance.
Ultimately, the truth cannot be ignored. Our conscience must not let us ignore the facts. This horror is all very real. It is very calculated, and it is happening globally. Innocent children are being raped and murdered on a daily basis, victims of organized abduction and satanic ritual. With so many identical cases worldwide, all avenues of research constantly and consistently lead to the same conclusion. This goes way beyond our common comprehension of child abuse and pedophilia: the culture of ritual abuse is so heavily embedded in our most influential institutions and ‘protective’ agencies, that information is routinely suppressed and censored, protecting their networks, themselves and each other — the perpetrators.
(For example, the videos and research links embedded in my previous article had to be constantly replaced and updated, as they were routinely removed from circulation by supposedly impartial technology providers. This is still a work in progress… )
In my research, I recently came across a 5 part video series that provides similar details of satanic pedophile rings allegedly operating in France and Germany. Outlining a series of horrors endured and witnessed at the hands of satanic cultists, the children speaking here claim to have been subjected to and witnessed acts of slavery, rape, murder, torture, trafficking, as well as rituals involving masks and costumes, injections, underground tunnel systems, blood drinking, cannibalism, and ‘snuff movies’ — films of abuse victims’ deaths, which are said to sell for up to $20,000 Euros a piece.
Further Evidence of Institutional Abuse
There is extensive evidence that human baby and fetus trafficking networks extend into Central America and Asia, reportedly for the purposes of ‘black magic’ ritual. In one case in China reported in January, authorities rescued 37 babies and a toddler from an abandoned factory in the southwestern province of Shandong. The children were in poor physical condition and many were suffering from HIV/AIDS and malnutrition. Human traffickers were found to be recruiting pregnant women to sell their babies and hiding them in the factory until they gave birth. Once the women gave birth, they handed their newborns over to the traffickers and left. The babies were then drugged and smuggled inside handbags and luggage to a hospital morgue where they were kept until buyers arrived.
Another recent case uncovered a “baby making factory” in Nigeria, where young girls were used to “breed” babies, which are then taken and sold on the black market to traffickers for supply to networks of Satanic ritualists and pedophiles. According to reports, an unsuspecting women’s and children’s hospital provides the cover of a humanitarian outfit for the inhumane trade and sale of babies and children. This shocking 4 minute video leaves us with no doubt this crime against humanity is all too real, and by no means restricted to Nigeria alone.
Notably, this kind of cover operation is also in keeping with Satanic principles. In Satanism, war is peace, restriction is freedom, black is white. This is how they operate. Posing as the protectors of children simultaneously enables their access to victims and provides them a cover of respectability.
An extensive report containing an interview with a former undercover Interpol agent (Bannon) further reveals just how trafficking networks are set up. Bannon puts those who sexually exploit children into two categories: consumer-traders and producers:
“The consumer-trader is the guy or woman you’ve heard about – maybe the local teacher – who’s abusing children and buying images and selling images of those abuses online… The producer is the one who actually buys and sells the children across international lines, running a multi-billion-dollar business that truly has a global network that has connections all the way to terrorist cells.”
While child trafficking is condemned globally, many countries with laws against trafficking and molestation fail to enforce them. Moreover, such abuses are actually legal in some countries, such as Thailand and Pakistan. In Thailand, selling children is not only legal, it’s big business, contributing an estimated $1 billion to the Thai economy. This level of institutionalization makes rescuing victims from the system of abuse extremely difficult.
Agent Bannon continues:
“We were able to rescue these [Caucasian] children, but all of the Thai children we had to leave chained to their beds, padlocked behind steels doors… These six children – when we told them, ‘Follow us,’ it broke our hearts to see how quickly they obeyed. No matter what we said, they obeyed silently and effortlessly. And to see young children so broken that any adult telling them what to do they immediately obey is perhaps the most heart-rending aspect of this terrible work.”
“Those images will stay with me. You can’t erase them from your mind.”
Providing further evidence, award winning independent film director, Bill Maloney, released a landmark documentary in 2008 entitled Sun Sea & Satan. The film detailed Maloney’s visits to Jersey in the Channel Islands (between France and the UK) and the ongoing investigations into allegations of abuse at Jersey’s children’s care home Haut de la Garenne.
While these examples are shocking, they are really just scratching the surface of what many understand to be a much wider network operating all around the world, especially given how frequent and consistent these kinds of allegations (and apparent cover-ups) occur.
As MP John Mann told the British Parliament in May, “My constituency is no worse, no different to anywhere else… it’s every aspect of society.”
It is realistic to expect that such a well-organized criminal network would, like any other criminal network, utilize whatever influential conspirators or disinformation tactics they had at their disposal to discredit their accusers, suppress evidence and cover their tracks. The only difference between criminals who are protected by institutional veils and those who are not, is the extent of their influence, not their underlying psycho-pathology.
If we truly want to protect our children, we need to put aside our preconceptions of pedophiles, public figures and the agenda of the press, and genuinely try to understand what is happening. Pedophilia IS happening. We cannot continue to assume – as convicted pedophiles have always suggested – that children who accuse seemingly “upstanding” members of our society must be lying to serve some devious end. The facts at hand prove that is simply not true.
A Hampstead Coverup?
Not surprisingly, allegations of deviousness were leveled against Ella Draper following the release of her 9 year old daughter Alisa and 8 year old son Gabriel’s testimony of abuse that implicated the children’s father, actor Ricky Dearman, and an alleged network of Satanic abusers. However, when we consider the extensive evidence surrounding this case in totality and context, the official narrative portrayed by mainstream media of a scorned ex-wife and her two devious children appears to fail numerous tests of evidentiary scrutiny.
Firstly, a forensic linguistics analysis of the children’s leaked testimony provides a professional’s view as to the validity of the children’s statements. Forensic linguistics (or legal linguistics) is the application of linguistic knowledge, methods and insights to the forensic context of law, language, crime investigation, trial, and judicial procedure. Taking into detailed consideration the linguistic evidence provided by the children’s testimony, expert analysis (performed anonymously, for the protection of his or her identity) did not support claims of conspiracy in the children’s testimony, nor therefore of coercion or duress on the part Ms. Draper.
Furthermore, initial Police medical examinations of both children showed clear evidence of physical and sexual abuse. The children’s testimony includes explicit details of violent and sexual satanic ritual, and the children described identifying physical markers on the bodies of their alleged abusers. The children’s recollections also bore similarity to countless other cases of abuse reported around the world (which, as MP John Mann reminds us, is only the small fraction of victims who come forward to tell their stories compared to those who stay silent or are no longer here to speak at all.)
We must also remember that media silence tells a story of its own. Although it thrives on scandal (particularly in the UK), mainstream and even tabloid media did not cover these developments when the story initially broke in alternative media in early February 2015, instead maintaining an inexplicable silence on the matter. That was, until the High Court ruled in late March that Ella Draper (the children’s mother) and not Ricky Dearman (the father and alleged abuser) had mistreated the children. Raising many questions in the wider community, it was only after Mr. Dearman received the protection of a High Court ruling that the mainstream media reported any details of this complex story, publishing a string of headlines that were all staunchly sympathetic to Mr. Dearman:
Mother who tortured her two children to lie about satanic child sex cult… [20th March 2015]
The yummy mummy, a ‘satanic sex cult’ and the smears that terrorised a very swish London suburb… [23rd March 2015]
Police hunting runaway mother who tortured her two children into inventing fantasy claims about a satanic sex cult… [27th March 2015]
Father falsely accused by his own children of sexually abusing them [reveals]… his horrific ordeal [21st April 2015] (*this article also included photographs of the actor crying to camera.)
The degree to which any such case is covered by the mainstream media, and seemingly covered over by government agencies, inevitably leads one to wonder — just how deeply embedded is the culture of abuse within the hierarchies of our these institutions?
Historically, posing as the protectors of children while hiding behind celebrity, formality and (apparently) corrupted legal and media institutions, simultaneously has enabled pedophiles access to victims while providing them an effective cover story. Convicted pedophile Jimmy Savile is a perfect example of this; renowned as a flamboyant former presenter of the UK’s Top Of The Pops, Savile posed as a philanthropist, working with children and young people and visiting schools and hospital wards, which enabled him access to vulnerable children and a cover of institutional respectability.
In a disturbing irony, Savile played the role of the ‘Child Catcher’ in the 1968 movie, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, catching children for the town’s elite.
”Can it really be the case that no one knew what he was doing? Did some turn a blind eye to criminality?… Did some prefer not to follow up their suspicions because of this criminal’s popularity and place in the schedules? Were reports of criminality put aside or buried?”
George Entwistle, the former director-general, was told by one manager that he was “queasy” about the “real truth” of Savile’s past… Danny Cohen, the Controller of BBC One, and a third executive were given a further warning, which went unheeded…
When an ITV documentary exposed Savile’s paedophilia, the BBC was accused of a cover-up because of its decision to drop the Newsnight film…
[Investigator, Mr Nick] Pollard, a former head of Sky News, said… that senior people within the BBC knew about “the unsavoury side of Savile’s character” at the time…
On Dec 2, at an awards lunch, Ms [Helen] Boaden [BBC’s Head Of News] says she told Mr Entwistle that “Newsnight were doing an investigation into JS [Savile] … it is probable I did mention it was about sex abuse.” Mr Entwistle’s reply was: “Thanks – keep me posted.”…
The report recommends that the BBC’s news and editorial management is reviewed, and questions whether the director-general should also be editor-in-chief.
According to Pollard’s 185-page report, The BBC’s decision to abort the Savile investigation:
“… started a chain of events that was to prove disastrous for the BBC… one of the worst management crises in the BBC’s history”.
At the heart of Savile’s story are two interlinked forms of violation – the abuse of children and the abuse of power. The victims were betrayed not only by the BBC hierarchy but also by the Surrey police, who failed to prosecute; by the DJ’s colleagues, who never spoke out; and by all those in awe of a star whose fame and bogus virtue shielded him from scrutiny until (no thanks to the BBC) his secrets emerged and the current wave of horror broke…
Jimmy Savile was given the glory, the freedom and the immunity to do as he wished.
So, with clear conflicts of interest embedded within its editorial and managerial structures, is the failure of the media to expose the truth of Savile an act of negligence, or an institutional cover-up of the highest order? This is a question that must be answered.
Here we will explore further evidence of institutional involvement in organized pedophilia networks, to shed some light on this dark and complex issue.
Child Trafficking, The United Nations and The Global ‘Peacekeepers’ Force
This is clearly an epidemic of staggering proportions; one we can no longer shrink from or pretend does not exist. And given the robust intensity of U.S. internal, military, informational and border securities, and the nation’s world-record incarcerated rate, this statistic is completely incomprehensible.
That is, until we begin to look internally for the root cause.
To account for such widespread childhood disappearances, which (for some context) outnumber cancer deaths in the United States by one third, we must fully comprehend this epidemic is both well organised and orchestrated. It is therefore no stretch of the imagination to acknowledge that the many thousands of young children whose faces have peered out from ‘missing’ posters and milk cartons across the United States, over many decades, may in fact have fallen victim to a global child-trafficking and slavery trade.
While child trafficking and abuse networks tend to be concentrated most highly in relatively peaceful areas with large foreign business and military interests, this problem does not appear to be isolated to western nations. Even larger, unknown numbers of children in Third World countries are disappearing each year, without a trace, with countless reports from around the world indicating children are being routinely sold by their families to make ‘ends meet’, sold by orphanages, and kidnapped by gangs who make their living by supplying ‘stock’ for the child trafficking trade. Some reports suggest these gangs including highly organized militia and private “security” companies, and networks operating under the facade of human rights workers funded by Governments and the United Nations.
“Human trafficking is a form of serious exploitation and abuse that is increasingly present in the UN peacekeeping environments. Trafficking exploits human beings for revenue through sex, forced labour and human organs. For peacekeeping (UN and other) there is a crisis of perception in relation to trafficking and the linked issue of sexual exploitation and abuse, which sees peacekeepers branded as more part of the problem than the solution, along with criticisms that the issue is not taken seriously by peacekeeping institutions.”
Today, the “crisis” outlined by the DPKO has not been formally addressed, and yet many would still rather believe that all of this is just another crazy ‘conspiracy theory’. In reality, the dismissal of such theories is at best a moral failure of our children to act on their behalf, and at worst, a conspiracy of global proportions.
Mounting evidence suggests that government-sponsored military contractors have utilized ‘peacekeeping’ positions (which provide both access and trust) to facilitate systemic abuses, and all under the legal impunity afforded to peacekeepers who operate these systems of abuse under the guise of freedom, liberty and philanthropy.
Well known examples include the 2003 Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse case (pictured left) in which U.S. military officers subjected prisoners of war to extreme acts of abuse and humiliation, taking ‘happy snap’ photographs as they did so. The systemic corruption of so-called “peacekeeping” forces was further demonstrated by a leaked video of Blackwater military employees who proudly videotaped themselves helicoptering around Iraq, shooting civilians for target practice and their own personal amusement. You can learn more here.
“For rural women, hunger, lack of shelter, baby care items, medication and household items were frequently cited as the ‘triggering need,’” the report said, adding that UN workers coaxed women and girls into sexual activities with “church shoes, cell phones, laptops and perfume, as well as money… In cases of non-payment, some women withheld the badges of peacekeepers and threatened to reveal their infidelity via social media,” the report said.
Unfortunately, this is not the first time that UN workers have been accused of these types of atrocities. Following the entry of UN “peacekeepers” into Cambodia, Mozambique, Bosnia, Sudan and Kosovo, authorities in each region reported sharp increases in allegations of sex trafficking and abuse. Meanwhile, earlier this year, the United Nations was caught trying to suppress details of their aide workers raping starving and homeless boys in the Central African Republic.
Notably, this kind of behavior (and cover-up) of so-called peacekeepers is not unique to the modern “War On Terror”. In the late ‘90s, military contractor DynCorp was hired by the U.S. State Department to provide “peacekeepers” for the United Nations police force in Bosnia, just as in Haiti now. Subsequently, two well-respected employees, Ben Johnston, a former DynCorp aircraft mechanic, and Kathryn Bolkovac, a U.N. International Police Force monitor, independently alleged that UN officials and employees of Dyncorp were engaging in perverse, illegal and inhumane behavior, including the purchase of women, illegal weapons, forged passports, and other criminal and immoral activities.
[Kathryn Bolkovac] signed up with DynCorp, the private contractor providing American personnel for the UN mission in Bosnia.
The first of several nasty shocks came before she’d even left: among the recruits at DynCorp’s training week in Texas was a man from Mississippi. He’d been to Bosnia before and, and he told them all how scenic it was, adding, “and I know where you can get really nice 12- to 15-year-olds”. Bolkovac was baffled, believing she’d misheard…
[While running] a pilot project on violence against women… She found stacks of American dollars and foreign passports in a safe and, behind a locked door, seven girls. ‘Sheer terror,’ says Bolkovac of the looks on the girls’ faces. ‘It was exactly as you see in the film: ‘they’re huddled, they’re holding each other, they’re on these bare, stained mattresses’…
“They didn’t expect [the police] to help them,” says Bolkovac.
In her role as U.N. Police Force Monitor, Bolkovac also claims to have observed numerous individuals in the Bosnian and U.N. police forces who were not only using trafficked prostitutes but were also on the “traffickers’ pay-roll”. According to Bolkovac, members of the peacekeeping forces were routinely paid to give warnings on raids, and to return children who escaped from their abusers so they could be ‘recycled’ back into the system.
The more Bolkovac investigated, the more her U.N. colleagues turned against her, she says. Notably, four days after her claims were formally raised, Bolkovac was demoted, and a few months later fired by DynCorp outright. However, adding further weight to the validity of her claims, Bolkovac filed a lawsuit for unlawful dismissal against DynCorp in Great Britain following her dismissal — and won. The tribunal that heard her case maintained that, by whistleblowing, Bolkovac had made a ‘protected disclosure’ and should therefore have been protected, not persecuted, for her actions. (You can learn more here.) In closing comments, the tribunal remarked of DynCorp:
‘It is hard to imagine a case in which a firm has behaved in a more callous manner.’
Similarly, Ben Johnston, a former DynCorp aircraft mechanic, is another employee who claims that he witnessed his supervisors and fellow employees buying and selling minors as sex slaves, abusing them and/or selling them to gangs involved in child prostitution, slavery and pedophile rings.
It is obvious when it comes to the UN that corruption is ingrained. The UN was created much like the IMF, World Bank, etc (at around the same time) as a facility of globalist expansion and this is its underlying goal, not the other empty phrases that swirl around its “mission.”
Within hours of the [Bolkovac] ruling DynCorp settled a second whistleblowing case against it, offering an undisclosed sum to an aircraft mechanic from Texas called Ben Johnston, who had evidence of UN personnel buying and selling girls elsewhere in Bosnia. Johnston signed a gagging order.
‘It was very disappointing,’ says Bolkovac with a sigh.
Although disappointing, Johnston’s decision is understandable. A report from CorpWatch.org, US DynCorp Disgrace, explains the circumstances around Johnston’s apparent concession:
According to the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) lawsuit filed in Texas on behalf of the former DynCorp aircraft mechanic, “in the latter part of 1999 Johnston learned that employees and supervisors from DynCorp were engaging in perverse, illegal and inhumane behavior [and] were purchasing illegal weapons, women, forged passports and [participating in other immoral acts. Johnston witnessed coworkers and supervisors literally buying and selling women for their own personal enjoyment, and employees would brag about the various ages and talents of the individual slaves they had purchased.”
Rather than acknowledge and reward Johnston‘s effort to get this behavior stopped, DynCorp fired him, forcing him into protective custody by the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division (CID) until the investigators could get him safely out of Kosovo and returned to the United States. That departure from the war-torn country was a far cry from what Johnston imagined a year earlier when he arrived in Bosnia to begin a three-year U.S. Air Force contract with DynCorp as an aircraft-maintenance technician for Apache and Blackhawk helicopters.
Clearly, Johnston’s treatment and the final issuing of a gag order is contradictory to the fundamental principles of truth and freedom these so-called “peacekeeping” bodies claim to represent. While it is disappointing that Johnston ultimately submitted to the non-disclosure terms of the gag order, the fact that such terms were offered or even contemplated by authorities reveals a great deal about the level of knowledge and intent operating behind those institutional walls.
Moreover, the allegations against DynCorp are not isolated, and Johnston wasn’t the only DynCorp employee disturbed by what he saw during his tenure. Along with Johnston, another employee Tom Oliver also lodged similar claims with Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID), once Johnston had decided to take formal action outside of the DynCorp chain of command. (You can learn more here.)
These examples aside, the DynCorp company has a history of allegations relating to systemic corruption, including claims of waste mismanagement, fraud, human trafficking and drug-running whilst working under a United States Government contract to train Police Forces in Afghanistan, Haiti and Iraq. In 2010 The Guardian in the UK reported that DynCorp had been accused of providing Afghan police with drugs and child prostitutes.
“A scandal involving foreign contractors employed to train Afghan policemen who took drugs and paid for young “dancing boys” to entertain them in northern Afghanistan caused such panic that the interior minister begged the US embassy to try and “quash” the story, according to one of the US embassy cables released by WikiLeaks.”
There are many other cases and eyewitness accounts that raise questions over the legitimacy and agenda of the DynCorp operation, some of which can be followed here and here. Yet, it is evident that both corporate and government institutions prefer to ‘close ranks’ around such allegations, obscuring the chance of accountability, and in the process, raising further questions about the extent of corruption within these peacekeeping forces.
With mounting evidence of organized pedophilia and child-trafficking networks implicating high-level government, church and charitable institutions, many members of the community are left wondering: Are the world’s taxpayers unwittingly be used to fund organized crime? The kind of crimes that taxpayer-funded ‘War On…’ campaigns purport to combat? How do we bring criminals to justice if the criminals themselves control our justice and information systems?
As one of the top three U.S. Defense Force contractors receiving money from the United States Government, it is unfathomable that, for the most part, this story was ignored by the mainstream media in the U.S. With evidence and allegations mounting in relation to pedophilia, as well as drug- and slave-trafficking, the United States Government has a moral and legal responsibility not just to the U.S. people but to the people of the world — in whose backyards they wage their wars — to investigate DynCorp, and indeed their own internal regulatory systems. After all, this is the mechanism through which police, military and U.N peacekeeping forces are trained in countries around the globe.
This situation did not go unnoticed within the U.S. Congress. In 2005 U.S. Congresswoman, Cynthia McKinney questioned then-Secretary Of Defense Donald Rumsfeld over the Dyncorp scandals:
“I watched President Bush deliver a moving speech at the United Nations in September 2003, in which he mentioned the crisis of the sex trade. The President called for the punishment of those involved in this horrible business. But at the very moment of that speech, DynCorp was exposed for having been involved in the buying and selling of young women and children. While all of this was going on, DynCorp kept the Pentagon contract to administer the smallpox and anthrax vaccines, and is now working on a plague vaccine through the Joint Vaccine Acquisition Program. Mr. Secretary, is it [the] policy of the U.S. Government to reward companies that traffic in women and little girls?”
Following Congresswoman McKinney’s statement, Rumsfeld admitted on the record that the allegations were credible, but wrote them off as the actions of a “few bad apples”, refusing to investigate the potential that such abuses are in fact institutionalized, and as evidence suggests, not merely the actions of a few “rogue” employees. Today, 9 years on, DynCorp remains unaccountable to these accusations.
You can watch Ms. McKinney’s exchange with Mr. Rumsfeld here.
This all begs the question:
Is the U.S. Government’s apparent willingness to overlook allegations of misconduct against its contractors simply because the conduct of DynCorp’s employees is exactly as it was contracted?
While this situation seems to be of little interest to the United States Government, notably, it is of no interest to other international legal and regulatory agencies. Protected by international law, ‘Peacekeepers’ and ‘Humanitarian Aid Workers’ are indemnified against criminal charges whilst working in foreign lands on behalf of Government Military or the United Nations. This loophole creates undisputable opportunity for such positions to be abused for criminal means, and in the context of child abuse and trafficking allegations, provides a ‘safe’ mechanism through which global operations can flourish.
Therefore it is a sad reality that none of the accused in these cases are ever likely to face criminal charges under the current systems of governance.
The ‘Supreme Master’ Ching Hai and The ‘Papa Dearman’ Connection
In considering the breadth of evidence at hand, the extent of corruption evidenced by continually emerging child-trafficking and abuse cases goes well beyond what we typically perceive of “corruption”. Such abuses do not just reflect corruption of process or power, but corruption of the human spirit.
The testimonies provided by the children in the Hampstead case, and so many other cases the world over, detail stories of babies been trafficked for the purposes of Satanic ritual. To summarize this portion of the allegations made in the children’s video testimony:
Babies are supplied to the UK from all over the world, including the United States, South Africa, Portugal, Spain, Gayana, China, India and Hawaii.
Babies are either purchased, drugged and transported by international courier service, or the parents (cult members) bring them from other parts of the world.
A high-level member of the network – a real estate agent – provides empty properties for ritual and sexual abuse of children to take place.
The rituals they described involve child rape, sodomy, orgies, torture, cannibalism and human sacrifices. These activities were also filmed and sold.
Central to the children’s testimony was the involvement of their father, actor Ricky Dearman, who has known connections to the self-professed spiritual leader, the ‘Supreme Master’, Ching Hai. The children went on to assert that they worship the ‘Supreme Master’. Notably, the Satanic Bible also states that ‘Satan’s ministers will obey all commands of the ‘Supreme Master‘. While such an association is not on its own conclusive, these claims cannot objectively be overlooked, particularly as keeping up a charade of decency and respectability is vital to abusers, and in keeping with documented Satanic philosophy.
So then, who are Ricky Dearman and Ching Hai?
Ricky Dearman is involved in the film industry as an actor and has affiliations with ‘Supreme Master Television’, a television station airing from 14 satellite platforms and reaching hundreds of millions of households around the world. The beneficiary and focal point of this self-created spiritual hierarchy, Ching Hai is worshipped by followers the world over. Actively involved with child orphanages and schools in third world countries, she also has elite connections, including well-documented links to the Clintons (who themselves are alleged to have been involved in high level criminal activity).
In the research community, there have long been suspicions that Ching Hai works for the CIA. Supreme Master Ching Hai is also connected with the United Nations and, under the impunity afforded to ‘Peacekeepers’, is involved in many of the same activities as DynCorp’s contractors — in particular, crisis and disaster intervention, a role that places her among the world’s most vulnerable children.
Former members of the sect say involvement with Ching Hai has proven to be disturbing and dangerous, while insider allegations against the sect include institutionalize child rape, child pornography, child trafficking, prostitution, mind control, ritual torture and murder involving children and animals. (source.)
When we objectively examine this evidence, it cannot reasonably be argued that further investigation is unwarranted. Therefore, the apparent unwillingness of authorities to act on behalf of the victims or to examine documented issues of fact is increasingly suggestive of a systemic cover-up involving extremely influential, high-ranking, members of the institutions implicated.
Famous for its secret handshakes, Freemasonry has long been suspected of having members who work in the criminal justice system – notably the judiciary and the police…
Secret networks of Freemasons have been used by organised crime gangs to corrupt the criminal justice system… Operation Tiberius, written [by Metropolitan Police] in 2002, found underworld syndicates used their contacts in the controversial brotherhood to “recruit corrupted officers” inside Scotland Yard, and concluded it was one of “the most difficult aspects of organised crime corruption to proof against”.
So, with implications of complicity reaching far beyond the doors of our most powerful institutions, what of the grassroots movement attempting to find justice for these children?
The Information War: Disinformation and Infiltration
It has been alleged by many researchers and activists following the release of the Hampstead tapes that disinformation agents have been strategically placed within circles working to validate Ms. Draper’s allegations, in a campaign of confusion and chaos designed to protect the guilty. I am not alone in suspecting this tactic was employed at recent public protests held outside the Hampstead Church, which resulted in two arrests. Where confusion and chaos inevitably reigns, so too does disinformation. This tactic is not new; it has been used against truth-seekers by governments, media and intelligence agencies for the past half-century or more.
The disturbing reality is that institutionalized pedophilia and child-trafficking networks are among the most organized and comprehensive abuses upon humanity. It hides in powerful shadows, inflicts horror on the innocent, and demonizes their protectors. So, when it comes to fighting organized crime in the 21st Century, we truly are fighting an information war. If you think the notion of a deliberate “information war” is paranoid or conspiratorial, please understand that is the same term used by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2011, when defending her department’s proposed increase to propaganda funding before a U.S. Congressional Committee.
“We are in an information war and we are losing that war… and unfortunately we are paying a big price for it.”
The information war, she added, is being won by information channels that offer “real news”, adding that the U.S. should get back “in the game” and do “what we do best.”
Broadly speaking, infiltrating, opposing or discrediting movements serves a number of purposes in an information/credibility war. Besides gaining inside information, disinformation agents may deliberately leak information, create division, and steer the ‘group thinking’ and activity of support networks away from achieving real outcomes. Controlled opposition also satisfies the casual concerned observer that “someone is doing something”. Such infiltration also serves to ‘media tarnish’ the reputation of the those asking questions of the official narrative, portraying the extremist Satanic Panic lunatic archetype that the media loves and the public loathes, and therefore steering public perception and undermining any factual evidence they stand for. In this way, the guilty can be made to look like victims and the victims to look guilty, sabotaging the clear passage of truth. Historically, this simple kind of manipulation has been extremely effective, if we are blind to it, and this is something that activists need to fully understand and remember in all our dealings, if we are ever to make a dent in uncovering the truth in cases where key evidence is apparently disregarded by the official narrative.
In an information war,government disinformation agents work on all sides. By allowing ourselves to be infiltrated, influenced and manipulated, we make it easy for them to subjugate, infiltrate, divide and conquer, chalking up another win for the perpetrators of abuse.
And when it comes to cases in which high-level institutional corruption is already suspected, it would be naive to assume the work of disinformation agents does not extend as far as government-led inquiries and judicial process.
Notable Names “Steering The Ship”
In the public discussion of the Hampstead case, and of organized pedophilia in general, there are some notable names steering the ship. However many researchers and truth-seekers are beginning to suspect the ship has been steered in the wrong direction.
The kind of cover-up tactics activist believe are being employed in the Hampstead case also appear to have been employed in Canada after claims of Satanic ritual abuse and murder of indigenous people were lodged with the Canadian Courts. Kevin Annett, a former minister of the United Church of Canada, founded the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) in 2010 to support and bring justice to the victims of institutional abuse. According to the itccs.org mandate:
Our Mandate: (1) To lawfully prosecute those people and institutions responsible for the exploitation, trafficking, torture and murder of children, past and present, and (2) To stop these and other criminal actions by church and state, including by disestablishing those same institutions.
By the evidence, it appears the ITCCS is a fabrication. Some investigators think Kevin Annett is a globalist operative. In that case the ITCCS is a globalist fabrication to displace, scatter and retard community and self-sovereign restoration of authentic society. Our working hypothesis is that one of the functions of ITCCS is to displace and discredit any genuine [efforts]…
In the course of following through on due diligence we have been attacked and distorted by Annett and followers… [We have] yet to receive verification that ITCCS Brussels personnel or the court exists…
“These things happen regularly… They are definitely tied into, not just Roman festivals, but also Satanic calendars. There are certain days of the year that seem to have more significance in terms of human sacrifice. New moons apparently often tie in to those times of the month as well. But the Roman festivals are significant because they seem to be guiding the actions of these cults that operate within or around the Catholic Church.”
Incidentally, child welfare groups agree with the observations Annett now claims to dispute. Given his sudden divergence from well-established facts, many activists and researchers now believe the “false stories and labels” are in fact Annett’s.
Concerns have also been raised within activist networks about the role of influential activist Belinda McKenzie, founder of McKenzie Friends. McKenzie is closely associated with Kevin Annett, having publicly supported him throughout 2010 and 2011 while he travelled to the UK to appear at a series of rallies. Rumoured to be an MI-5 agent with links to money laundering and ‘independent’ think tanks, questions about McKenzie’s agenda have been further compounded by her recent call for an ‘amnesty’ for pedophiles — essentially, advocating increasing legal protection for the perpetrators not the victims of child abuse.
Now, with questions still unanswered about both Annett and McKenzie’s agenda, it is notable that the organisations they front (ITCCS and McKenzie Friends respectively) were founded within months of each other, and perhaps more notably, both organisations bear a very similar logo – a detail that has not gone unnoticed within activist circles.
Given the historical prevalence of disinformation tactics in “information wars”, many truth-seekers are asking: Have these individuals been strategically placed at the front of the awareness campaign? Are they here only to keep their fingers on the pulse, while steering genuine activists away from the truth, and justice? And what of online awareness campaigns?
As every truth-seeker well knows, the infiltration of organized action groups also extends to the online world, where paid disinformation shills work diligently to distort facts and defame the individuals who oppose the hidden complicity of authorities.
Since January, there have been extensive online efforts to discredit the testimony of the two children involved in the Hampstead allegations, and in particular, the integrity of their mother who first reported the allegations to authorities. These counter-efforts appear to be coordinated from within London, while technical data suggests the efforts of activists are being monitored closely by members of the Westminster Methodist Hall. It is also worthy to note, the Methodist Church has long-standing connections to the United Nations, providing Westminster Methodist Hall as the venue for the very first United Nations meeting held in 1946.
One particular website appears to have been created specifically to undermine any and all evidence relating to the Hampstead case. Calling themselves Hoaxtead Research and bearing remarkable resemblance to the Hampstead Research website, the Hoaxtead Research site works primarily to denounce the testimony of the children in this case and to attack any research that hints at wrong-doing on the part of anyone but the children and their mother. The tactics employed by Hoaxstead Research are reported by many activists to involve only character assassinations of those involved without credible or objective research. This development has led many in the community to believe this site was created only to enact the tried-and-tested tactic of the guilty — to discredit credible testimony with emotion, chaos and confrontation.
Among the hoax theories that are circulating online, the most commonly believed is that the children’s mother, Ella Draper, concocted this story and coached her children to repeat it, in order to gain legal custody of her children. However, 3 minutes of research reveals the simple flaw in this hoax theory: Ella Draper was already the children’s primary care giver, and so had no need to make false claims in order to secure custody of her children. In 2011, a residence order issued by the court assigned legal residence to Ms. Draper, and subsequent claims of disputed access to the children arose after claims of abuse came to light, not before.
You can read the chronology of events as outlined by Ms. Draper HERE, which details allegations of violence against Ricky Dearman as well as the events that led Ms. Draper to take action on behalf of her children.
Delivering her judgement at the High Court, Mrs Justice Pauffley said the children had been forced to concoct accounts of horrific events and that their stories were a result of relentless emotional and psychological pressure and significant physical abuse by their mother’s new partner in collaboration with their mother.
However, the claims of psychological and emotion abuse at the hands of Ms. Draper and her partner did not correlate to the physical evidence of sexual abuse provided by the initial police investigation, which revealed scar tissue on the children’s genitals and other evidence of physical trauma directly related to long-term sexual assault.
While these facts may have been obscured in the media to the casual observer, many activists believe this in an act of desperation, itself providing further evidence of just how far up the social and political ladder the corruption that protects pedophiles from justice actually reaches.
Be Part Of The Solution
For the sake of our children, and their children, we need to accept the facts; where there is smoke, and lots of it, there is fire. As informed and conscientious human beings, we have a moral responsibility to hear these witness accounts, and take the time to analyse and discern the scope of problem we are being confronted with — no matter how overwhelming it may seem. Yet, to the majority of the public this kind of information is so horrendous and unthinkable that it is beyond the capacity of many people to believe this could be true, much less contemplate the details. The result is cognitive-dissonance, which inevitably leads to inaction.
But our ignorance of this matter is no longer an excuse! Given the weight of evidence at hand, it is no longer acceptable nor is it even logical to write-off each accusation of organized and ritualized abuse that arises as an isolated fiction. There is certainly reason to suspect that many of the 8 million children who ‘disappear’ each year are falling victim to coordinated pedophile networks. A culture built on Satanic ritual, they have the motives, the power and the means to traffic children around the globe, under the guises of “upstanding citizens” and “peace keepers” and “good Samaritans”, with the necessary influence to suppress the truth through corruption of the so-called justice system.
So, how do we bring criminals to justice if the criminals themselves control the justice system?
Firstly, we must stop accepting the calculated excuses of the perpetrators of organized crime, and finally take steps to confront and dismantle it.
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men (and women-Ed.) to do nothing.” ~ Edmund Burke
As responsible adults in a world seemingly gone mad, who else but us – you and me, here and now – can speak and act for these abused children? Our failure to make a stand in whatever way we can, whatever the cost, would mean a failure of our most basic human ‘duty of care’ to our youngest and most vulnerable. Our children are precious, and they have the right to be children; they are our most valuable investment in humanity’s future. To fail them would be a failure of our society.
It is the therefore obligation of the adult world to defend the rights and safety of our precious youth, and hold accountable those who sadistically and methodically seek to harm them. We must call pedophiles out as the organized, institutionally-protected ‘monsters in suits’ they are, and carry out our ‘duty of care’ with all the diligence we can muster.
With so much information, misinformation (non-deliberate) and disinformation (deliberate) surrounding this case, and pedophile networks in general, it is essential that we as responsible members of the community exercise critical discernment of all information, sources and motivations. As history has begun to prove, with information and awareness on our side we can oust these Satanic predators from the institutional veils they hide behind, no matter what their role or rank may be.
In the words of freelance scholar and author John Lash:
“It’s a horrible crime. But like any other crime, it can be overturned by the proof of the evidence. The only way to maintain that crime is to hide … and suppress the evidence that contradicts the official narrative… It’s my view that the people who have attempted to do that are losing control. They’re losing control of the narrative…
“If you want to see … a life of pleasure and mutual aid on this planet, never perfect… and if you recognize the narrative that is preventing that from happening, you must also recognize that it is not enough to defeat and overcome that narrative. There must be another narrative to replace it.”
So, on behalf of the world’s children and parents alike, I plead with those employed within government, religious, military, media, and peacekeeping institutions — particularly those in positions of power and authority — to do your job. Blow the whistle. Speak the truth, and stand up courageously for the rights of children everywhere. If you still have a common love of humanity, but until now have been too afraid of potential consequences to come forward, now is the time. While the general public remains uninformed about the true nature of the ‘elite’ and their abuses, the political narrative surrounding these cases will remain the same. But with your help, the momentum of the current public awareness campaign will soon reach ‘critical mass’.
Please add your name to the petition to Justice Anna Pauffley. We are requesting that she:
Honour the residence order put in place in 2011 which assigned legal residence of the two Hampstead children, Alisa and Gabriel, to their mother.
Order a thorough and comprehensive investigation of the children’s original disclosures, and the handling of the inquiry by the institutional powers implicated, including the circumstances that led to the children revoking their allegations after 6 days in institutional care.
Research. Discern. Inform others.
We are the victims’ only voices, and together we will be heard.
We’re watching you Westminster!
Please take a moment to watch this powerful and heartfelt speech by Russell Burton at the anti-child abuse rally “Victims & Survivors Unite – Breaking The Cycle Of Abuse” held at Westminster on 27th June 2015.
“WHAT WE ALLOW WILL CONTINUE. We must be the generation that puts an end to this evil because I fear for the sanity of future generations if this filth is allowed to retain its control over us.”
Further information can be found in the following detailed articles and videos:
Sonya van Gelder is an independent researcher, author and truth-seeker. Growing up in Africa, New Zealand and Australia, Sonya gained a keen interest in the varied cultures of the indigenous peoples worldwide, and has since undertaken over 20 years of personal research into ancient mysteries and esoteric teachings.
Sonya’s continuing research has led her to many of Australia’s significant sacred areas and to working closely with Aboriginal elders. Feeling a deep connection to and a mutual respect for the aboriginal elders and their stories, Sonya feels it is of vital importance to take a look at ancient aboriginal lore and explore its multi-level significance both locally and globally.
Sonya is currently writing a book that will explore the similarities in the symbolism and mythologies within our ancient mysteries worldwide, connecting many dots and helping to bring humanity to a greater awareness of significant truths to who we really are, and of the esoteric wisdom and spirituality that was once a global understanding.
While Sonya’s work as a children’s rights activist is a departure from her focus on ancient mysteries, she is a passionate advocate of children’s rights who feels driven to use her skills as a researcher and writer to help break down the walls of institutionalized abuses, and bring justice and security to our society’s most vulnerable.
This article (‘Five Current Mass Media Thought-Control Strategies’) is original copyrighted material belonging to Global Freedom Movement and may only be re-posted on your site in FULL, with proper (clickable) attribution, with all hyperlinks, author bio, and this copyright statement intact at top. Be integrity.
By Brendan D. Murphy, co-founder Global Freedom Movement, author The Grand Illusion: A Synthesis of Science and Spirituality
Many people are still utterly oblivious to the sad reality that the mass media is primarily engaged in one task above all others: misleading the public in accordance with the State’s (read: Deep State’s) needs.
Various media tactics play to our already established biases and logical blind spots. It is child’s play to add another layer of disinformation on top of firmly set foundational assumptions that are supportive of it. Nothing is easier for the Cabal/Deep State and its proxy governments than to feed us more of the bullshit we have long since been manipulated into accepting.
We have entered the post-fact era of news reporting, according to some observers, but it appears to me that we’ve been in that era for quite some time now, and only now that public distrust of government and media is at record-high levels is the establishment operating at record-high levels of damage control, busily dubbing all non-State-approved media sources as “fake news,” and struggling harder than ever to keep the people in their conceptual prisons.
Many unwitting folks welcome this activity gladly, failing to realise that the mass media is, in combination with mainstream education, the primary tool used to control the behaviour of the populace in ways that serve the Control System which undermines our freedoms and cripples our minds in a downward spiral of deceit and exploitation.
Below we break down our five current mass media thought-control strategies employed by these “dinosaur outlets “so that we might be somewhat less susceptible to them here on out. You may want to share this with friends who aren’t quite up to speed yet.
Warning: What you are about to read is not government-approved and may result in mind expansion, enhanced cynicism, and sharpening of critical thinking faculties.
5 Primary Strategies for Thought-Control
1. Fake News in the Post-Fact Era: Lie and Fabricate to Suit Your Purposes
As a mass media (State-approved) outlet, you’re free to falsify and confabulate information or make false claims with impunity and make no attempt to appeal to legitimate evidence. This is such a fundamental mainstream media strategy that it saturates us on a daily basis. Whatever the Establishment (the “Cabal”) decrees is repeated ad nauseum as gospel in the mass media.
If you believe I am being unjustly harsh, then please consider the words of Dr. Udo Ulfkatte (from the video above), the late veteran German journalist who not long ago outed mainstream media for its complicity in the global fraud against humanity:
“I was educated to lie, to betray, and not to tell the truth to the public…It is not right what I have done in the past – to manipulate people, to make propaganda against Russia…and it is not right what my colleagues do and what they have done in the past, because they are bribed to betray the people…all over Europe…I am fed up with this propaganda.”
Dr. Ulfkatte added that in his pro-American days of writing, he was “supported by the Central Intelligence Agency,” and repeated that he was “fed up with it” and didn’t want to do it anymore. Not long after publishing his explosive book Bought Journalists / Journalists for Hire: How the CIA Buys the News, Ulfkatte was found dead, allegedly of “heart failure.” Ponder on that for a moment in the knowledge that in black projects there is electromagnetic weaponry that can remotely simulate or trigger “heart failure” as well as other physiological breakdowns.
Ulfkatte had said that most corporate media journalists in the United States and Europe are “so-called non-official cover,” meaning that they work for an intelligence agency. “I think it is especially the case with British journalists, because they have a much closer relationship. It is especially the case with Israeli journalists. Of course with French journalists…It is the case for Australians, [with] journalists from New Zealand, from Taiwan, well, there is many countries,” he said.
Consider all of this next time you hear any pronouncements made by the media on the subjects of politics, health, medicine, war, terrorism, etc.
Among the bogus stories Ulfkatte says he was ordered by the CIA to plant in his paper was the false claim that Libyan President Moammar Gaddafi was building poison gas factories in 2011.
“The German and American media tries to bring war to the people in Europe, to bring war to Russia,” he told RT.
Ulfkatte’s words are a plain confession of guilt and complicity. There is no theory here, it is all conspiracy fact. And lest you think the activities of the alphabet agencies are restricted to TV media, think on the following.
“[T]he tycoons told General Butler the American people would accept the new government because they controlled all the newspapers.“1 (emphasis added)
This was decades ago, and we know that concentration of the media into the hands of fewer and fewer owners has intensified ever since. The situation is such now that mainstream media outlets are to be avoided across the board by any thinking individual.
Former Washington Post publisher Philip Graham “believing that the function of the press was more often than not to mobilize consent for the policies of the government, was one of the architects of what became a widespread practice: the use and manipulation of journalists by the CIA”. This scandal was known by its code name Operation MOCKINGBIRD. Former Washington Post reporter Carl Bernstein cites a former CIA deputy director as saying, “It was widely known that Phil Graham was someone you could get help from”.2
There are countless examples of fraudulent MSM news that could be cited. Iraq’s “weapons of mass destruction” was a pretext for invading Iraq – a pretext that was known by intel. agencies and the US government to be false at the time. It is even openly acknowledged in the mass media now that it was a fraudulent claim – not that it’s any consolation to the tens of thousands of Iraqis who died as a result of the USA’s invasion. The fact is the WMD notion was made up; pure fiction concocted to serve a violent and predatory agenda under the guise of “liberation.”
Let’s not forget the infamous CNN Charles Jaco clip (above) wherein he appears to be giving a fake news report from a stage set while the subtitle states he is in Saudi Arabia during the Desert Storm operation (Jan 17 – Feb 28, 1991). There is something (everything!) exceedingly “off” about this clip and I encourage you to watch it carefully and decide whether this is a classic example of blatantly false news reporting or not (Jaco sent some menacing letters around to websites featuring this video, threatening legal action, so I’m choosing my words carefully here).3
There are many Youtube videos in which apparently fake news reports by mainstream outlets (CNN is a star) have been compiled together for easy viewing. I encourage you to do some exploring if you haven’t already seen the depths these media whores will sink to. It is clear that mainstream outlets are not above using a green screen to create the illusion of being “on the ground” at the scene of the action in order to get the “scoop” on other outlets, or, more to the point, to promote the false narratives designed by the Establishment for our consumption.
The Honourable Mention Goes to…
Crisis actors are known to be employed by media outlets and intel. agencies to participate in staged events with the aim of making their fake news appear authentic. This is something of an open secret of the industry now, and Youtube is your friend on this one too. Youtube compilations and video analyses make it very convenient for us to show that fake news is standard practice for CIA-controlled mass media. Crisis actors, stage sets, props, bogus scripts, sellout journalists: it’s all par for the course for the dying mass media.
2. Denounce Alternative Views as Conspiracy Theories
In 1967 the CIA seeded the term “conspiracy theories/theorists” into the public consciousness with one goal in mind: to discourage free and independent investigation, analysis and open discussion of facts. What sparked this initiative was increasing criticism of the Warren Commision’s report into the assassination of JFK – cracks were starting to appear and be noticed. The CIA was anxious that the public was not being sufficiently thought-controlled and that counter-arguments to the Establishment’s narrative needed to be more effectively dealt with.
The memo, which was marked “psych” (psychological operations), according to zerohedge.com, outlined a number of strategies for shaping and controlling public opinion, all of which are clearly still employed throughout the mass media today. Part 3 (b) of the memo is worth reproducing in full:
To employ propaganda assets to answer and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose. The unclassified attachments to this guidance should provide useful background material for passage to assets. Our ploy should point out, as applicable, that the critics are (I) wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in, (II) politically interested, (III) financially interested, (IV) hasty and inaccurate in their research, or (V) infatuated with their own theories.4
The CIA strategy involved a self-referencing closed network of assets and allies all endorsing each other and referring the public to each other’s material in an attempt to create the illusion of Establishment credibility, and a “consensus” viewpoint, while simultaneously tarring all other perspectives as mere “conspiracy theories.” It was a neat (read: dirty) trick which has worked wonders for these liars ever since.
Summarising the CIA memo’s guidance, the other pieces of advice for information management included:
claim the conspiracy would be too vast for so many people to keep quiet about it
dismiss eyewitness testimony as unreliable
claim no new evidence has emerged that the authorities have not already considered
do not initiate new discussion around “conspiracy theories,” but only address those discussions already taking place (so, ignore the problem wherever possible and don’t draw attention to it)
claim it is destructive/unhelpful, or irresponsible to speculate
These strategies are all still visible today in the media’s activities, the same tired old memes and techniques being endlessly repeated to the point of catatonia.
My years of study have shown me one thing very clearly about conspiracies: conspiracies are how the world runs. Obama’s very own Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Cass Sunstein has written:
Of course some conspiracy theories…have turned out to be true. The Watergate hotel room used by Democratic National Committee was, in fact, bugged by Republican officials, operating at the behest of the White House. In the 1950s, the Central Intelligence Agency did, in fact, administer LSD and related drugs under Project MKULTRA, in an effort to investigate the possibility of “mind control.” Operation Northwoods, a rumored plan by the Department of Defense to simulate acts of terrorism and to blame them on Cuba, really was proposed by high-level officials…5
On and on it goes.
3. Blame the Russians (or any of the other invented Establishment bogeymen)
The “Commies” are a tried and true bugaboo that is still used by establishment media to distract us from wherever we should be placing our attention. A recent blatant example is the notion that Russia is somehow responsible for Hillary’s Clinton’s defeat by Trump in the US Presidential elections. The Cabal media will try just about anything to de-legitimise the crushing the defeat their chosen puppet (Hillary Clinton) suffered. Casting aspersions on the outcome was only the natural thing (for them) to do.
The “Red Menace” is not as the Establishment would have us believe, however, that doesn’t stop the US government and media from blaming “the Russians” for supposedly “hacking” the US election and corrupting the outcome. There was no credible evidence provided for their insinuation, of course.
Evidence has not traditionally been the strong suit of the mainstream media.
In fact, a recent Wikileak has revealed that intelligence agencies like the CIA can simulate Russian (or other) hacks by creating a “cyber fingerprint” that incriminates whoever the Establishment wants to scapegoat or demonise, so it is utterly meaningless for the US media (or any other Cabal media outlets) to point fingers at Russia or anyone else for “hacking” their systems in light of the foregoing information. “Russia hacked us” should be read as “we hacked ourselves and tried to pin it on Russia.”
Along with the new (March 2017) data-dump of CIA material, WikiLeaks issued this:
“The CIA’s Remote Devices Branch’s UMBRAGE group collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques ‘stolen’ from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation. With UMBRAGE and related projects the CIA cannot only increase its total number of attack types but also misdirect attribution by leaving behind the ‘fingerprints’ of the groups that the attack techniques were stolen from.”6
It’s about misdirection and/or creating a cover story for executing a plan or agenda that you would never publicly admit to, akin to blaming Bin Laden and his lackeys for 9-11 when it was in fact Mossad and key elements within the US government and defense structure. Giving the public a scapegoat also satisfies a “primal” emotional need for focusing attention on a “guilty party,” someone to loathe and fear, and plan and enact retribution against.
The latter is also part of the “problem, reaction, solution” strategy designed to preempt the public into demanding the Establishent’s pre-ordained “solution” to a crisis or disaster that the Establishment itself has engineered but made to look like some other culprit is responsible (see Operation Northwoods for one example that, fortunately, never got off the ground, or 9-11 for an example that unfortunately did).
4. The Hegelian Dialectic and the False Dichotomy:
For the mass media’s purposes, you’re either “pro” or “anti,” “left” or “right,” “liberal” or “conservative,” and there are no other options.
The purpose of the false dichotomy is to restrict thought to two polar opposites that are diametrically opposed, in accordance with the modern bastardized form of the Hegelian dialectic. Hegel’s premise was that the human mind can’t understand anything unless it can be split into two polar opposites, thus his formula was: thesis + antithesis > synthesis. The Hegelian dialectic was meant to be a way for two parties in disagreement to eventually reach understanding (synthesis) through logical argument.
The idea as this concept is applied today by the media is to keep people at loggerheads in an unresolvable stalemate in which the only visible option to each party is to dig heels in even deeper, and attack the other side ever more vigorously. The current equation has omitted the part about logical argument, because that is how the situation has been deliberately engineered to stifle progress.
If you are asking “what is the point of that?” or “who in their right mind would want to have a system like that?” then understand that the international banksters and intelligence agencies (Deep State) – or from a lower level, giant transnational corporations – run the show and have ruled over Western “democracy” for a long time, socially engineering the populace through mass media and deliberately dumbed-down mainstream “education.” This is not a “theory,” but a well documented reality.
The last President of America to challenge the banksters’ hegemony was JFK and we know how that turned out for him when he tried to do the right thing by the people. The globalist oligarchs would have none of it. The slaves must not be allowed to leave the plantation. Ever since JFK, the “right” and the “left” have been controlled by a “para-governmental” force known as the Fed. The Fed, of course, is very much connected to Big Pharma – we’re talking about the same network of elitist sociopaths that dominate the world’s major industries (and run the international pedophile rings), essentially.
The point of the false dichotomy is primarily to foster tunnel vision in the public and prevent intelligent, flexible thinking, instead conducing to simplistic dogmatism and meaningless polemic. Prevention of learning is arguably the primary goal of the false dichotomy, because new information, and more sophisticated thought patterns and paradigms would be the death knell for Big Pharma’s stranglehold over the collective human psyche.
The most topical real world example of how this false dichotomy situation can play out is the “debate” around vaccination.
The media’s job is to present what I call an “absolute ontology” (and to promote “asymmetrical epistemology”) wherein the deck is stacked in favour of the Deep State, the corporations, and their proxy governments.
In essence: one point of view (The Establishment’s) is deemed as intrinsically more valid than all others. How can you topple such a sacred cow? It’s like trying to show a fundamentalist Christian that the Bible is fallible and riddled with self-contradiction – doomed to failure.
Vaccines are simply “safe and effective” – end of story. If you’re not blindly and completely “pro-vax,” then, the only other location you can occupy in this moronic polemic is “anti-vax,” and in the false world crafted by Big Pharma and the media, everyone who is “anti-vax” is a crackpot lunatic worthy of only disdain and ridicule. The question “what if their statements or claims actually have some merit?” is NEVER entertained – it cannot be, for then new information and awareness might develop, and we can’t have that if thought-control is to be maintained.
Crucially, nothing is said about the issues that the “pro” and “anti” representatives appearing in the media are not directly addressing. Attention is fixed on and restricted to whatever is deemed appropriate (how “wonderful” vaccines are), while the most important data is deliberately suppressed.
For example, have you ever seen anyone appear on mainstream TV to discuss vaccination (or fluoride, for that matter) within the context of covert softkill depopulation? I haven’t. What about vaccines and nagalase? No, of course not. The discussion is restricted to a biased narrative about how vaccines “don’t cause autism.” The wider array of biological harm – and evidence supporting it – is not discussed. The hundreds of scientific papers demonstrating the danger of vaccines are verboten.
The “debate” on this subject is farcical at best, but designed to limit opinions to slogans, buzz words, and catchphrases, stifling any actual critical thinking. Absolutely anyone who parrots the party line of “safe and effective and the best thing since sliced bread” is given all of the airtime and praise in the world, while anyone raising serious questions or issues on the subject is marginalised and diminished from the outset by the rigged (government/corporatocracy) narrative.
Keeping discussion reduced to a simple “pro” or “anti” stance means that there is no room for compromise, no middle ground, no room to evolve one’s viewpoint in the light of incoming information and discovery – and more to the point, because those tarred as “anti-vaxxers” are so thoroughly demonised and persecuted, there is little incentive for anyone to depart from the status quo and challenge the herd mentality with independent analysis. Thus, the sheep keep themselves in the pen.
Once the ego has firmly identified with a paradigm it stops listening, stops thinking, stops questioning, and – above all else – stops learning. Perhaps that is why Robert Anton Wilson said that “belief is the death of intelligence.” Stalemate is inevitable with this being the prevailing psychological dynamic, but then again, the purpose of the false dichotomy is not to facilitate real progress, but stifle it.
5. Tell People Exactly What to Think Instead of Presenting the Facts
The idea that the media is a benign force whose mission is to offer balanced perspective and multiple viewpoints such that the public can make their own informed decision is profoundly naive in light of intelligence agency involvement behind the scenes in determining programming content. The idea is to engineer in the public those viewpoints that serve vested interests. Period. Aside from that, most other media content is generally mindless distraction fuel, meaningless fluff for the stupefied masses to titillate themselves with (celebrity gossip, sporting coverage, “feel good” pieces, weather forecasts, etc.). Two real life examples follow.
Example 1: MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski (below) recently made a startling admission of sorts during an exchange with Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough about President Trump possibly “trying to undermine the media.”
She said: “And it could be that while unemployment and the economy worsens, [Trump] could have undermined the messaging so much that he can actually control exactly what people think. And that, that is our job.”
There you have it, folks, straight from the horse’s as…, er, mouth. It’s “our job” to “control what people think.” It’s there in black and white, in plain English.
Example 2: I have a recent example from more local sources. A friend of mine whose name I won’t mention was recently involved in organising events for a visiting speaker from overseas who has had the Medical Mafia (and Media Mafia) in Australia frothing at the mouth. My friend was speaking to a “journalist” from the Northern Star who offered to “cover” one of the events:
“I said ‘no thank you, you guys haven’t been overly truthful when covering us so far.’
His verbatim response: ‘It’s not our job to be truthful or helpful.’”8
Enough said. What more do you need?
MSNBC and these other media whores around the world are operating from the same playbook that Cabal stooge George W. Bush was on Nov. 10, 2001, when he exhorted the world, “Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories,” thus demonstrating the asymmetrical epistemology that was already so well entrenched during his terro…, er, tenure.
As incompetent and foolish as Shrub came to be perceived by so many millions, many of those same people still unconsciously follow his advice by not tolerating “outrageous [read: any] conspiracy theories.” The CIA/Deep State has done its work well. Credit where it’s due.
Mainstream media control is so centralized now that the only option for the thinking man or woman is to turn to the unregulated information purveyors on the web, where, yes, anything at all can be posted, including suppressed truth, which is a radically different situation to the MSM (fake news), where anything BUT the truth is allowed.
Co-founder of Global Freedom Movement and host of GFM Media, Brendan D. Murphy is a leading Australian author, researcher, activist, and musician. His acclaimed non-fiction epic The Grand Illusion: A Synthesis of Science & Spirituality – Book 1 is available here. “Brendan is the Chomsky of the Spiritual movement.” – Alistair Larmour, medical intuitive
“Every person in the field of ‘paranormal’ psychology or related topics should have this book as a major reference.” – Dr. Buryl Payne
“A masterpiece…The Grand Illusion is mind-blowing.” – Sol Luckman, author of Potentiate Your DNA.
“You’ve written the best synthesis of modern science and esoteric science that I’ve seen in 40 years…Brilliant!” – Michael K. Wade
“In fact, I point out that all the conspiracies in history - especially during the last 5000 years - are actually different aspects of the same conspiracy. Some people fixed on one aspect of the conspiracy, and say this is the problem, others say another thing, but the thing is all the conspirators work together. All the conspirators are part of the same operation. And this is what people find very reluctant.”
1000s of IMPORTANT and free eBooks Download and share
"In fact, I point out that all the conspiracies in history - especially during the last 5000 years - are actually different aspects of the same conspiracy. Some people fixed on one aspect of the conspiracy, and say this is the problem, others say another thing, but the thing is all the conspirators work together. All the conspirators are part of the same operation. And this is what people find very reluctant."
- Eustace Mullins (2000)