Category Archives: Freedom is Not Free

BREAKING – 30,305 people died within 21 days of having a Covid-19 Vaccine in England during the first 6 months of 2021 according to ONS data


Official Office for National Statistics data has inadvertently revealed that 30,305 people have died within twenty-one days of having a Covid-19 vaccine in England during the first 6 months of 2021.

Dozens of freedom of information requests have been made to Public Health England (PHE) over the past few months requesting to know how many people have died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine, but each and every time PHE have claimed they do “not hold the information requested”.


It is extremely strange to find that PHE do not hold the information considering their counterpart in Scotland has been able to publish the data on deaths within 28 days of a Covid-19 vaccination.

Continue reading →

Reiner Fuellmich & Dr Mike Yeadon: Be Afraid Of Government… PCR Test, Midazolam Murders In UK And Much More…


Midazolam is used for executions in USA.

Reiner Fuellmich and Dr Mike Yeadon discuss the PCR test – which is being used to simulate the pandemic, and the ‘end of life’ drug Midazolam – three years’ supply was dispensed in the ‘UK’ (asymmetric national devolution) in the early stages of the ‘pandemic’, under the watch of Matt Hancock.

Just what are all these deaths ‘with’ covid really about?

What about death spikes coinciding with jabs?

The roles of Christian Drosten, the WHO, national governments and others are examined in this exceptional interview.

Be afraid of your government. Be afraid of the ‘opposition’ parties – who back the agenda. Be afraid of advisors to your government – like Chris Whitty, England’s Chief Medical Advisor, the ‘UK’ Parliament Chief Scientific Advisor, Patrick Vallance (apparently he’s a ‘Sir’, but not from where we’re standing) – and bodies like SAGE. Be afraid of the World Economic Forum and the United Nations.

Something has gone terribly wrong with the way we are governed over the last three decades or so.

Our governments have now turned to murder.

This is a must-watch for all truth seekers.

Source: Covid True Facts Blog



Posted By: Rodney Atkinson on: October 27, 2020

Rarely can the word evil apply so incontrovertibly to a politician than to the truly obnoxious, murderous, far left Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Ardern who has just passed the most extreme abortion law in the world. It is part of an inhuman pattern of abuse of the people by supranational far left corporatism which, as in the 1930s, is leading to disaster.

Overt murder of children (ie born alive babies) will now be legal. Abortion will be legal up to birth for any reason. The killing of a foetus will be justified for disabilities including a cleft lip or club foot. There will be no legal requirement that pain relief be given to babies being aborted between 20 weeks and birth – an amendment to prevent this was specifically voted down by New Zealand MPs.

Continue reading →

Government to get special swine flu vaccine

TheLocal 18 October 2009

What is in there?

Just a week after it emerged that the German armed forces was getting a different kind of A/H1N1 vaccine to the general population, Der Spiegel magazine reports that the government will also get special treatment.

The general population will be offered the GlaxoSmithKline vaccine, called Pandemrix, which contains a new booster element, or adjuvant, as well as a preservative containing mercury.

Controversy has grown around the rapid licensing of the GSK vaccine – and a similar one being made by Novartis. Critics said not enough testing had been conducted before European licensing authorities rushed an approval.

Continue reading →

Coronavirus traced to the British Crown

Source:; January 20, 2020;

The Pirbright Institute (UK) has been awarded 11 U.S. Patents, including Coronavirus U.S. Pat. No. 10,130,701

Pirbright Institute is controlled by the Queen’s Golden Share

Pirbright’s controllers track back to British SERCO & Sir Geoffrey E. Pattie, Chairman Marconi and the British Intellectual Property Institute

Outrageously, British SERCO—today runs the U.S. Patent Office (proof below), U.S. FEMA and , websites for U.S.

e.g. “IBM Eclipse Foundation” or “racketeering”


SERCO used its control of the U.S. Patent Office to issue its British bio company a patent on the Coronavirus in record time—that’s pure fraud

Fig. 1—The Queen’s company The Pirbright Institute holds U.S. Patent No. 10,130,701 on CORONAVIRUS. Pirbright tracks back to SERCO, which has the contract with the U.S. Patent Office to award its own patent application! This “inequitable conduct” in patent legal terms is fraud and invalidates the claim while the world fights this British- American Pilgrims Society-inspired emerging pandemic, in our opinion. See THE PIRBRIGHT INSTITUTE, Co. No. 00559784. (Jan. 07, 1956). Certificate of Incorporation and related records. Companies House (UK).

Continue reading →

20,525 DEAD 1.9 Million Injured (50% SERIOUS) Reported in European Union’s Database of Adverse Drug Reactions for COVID-19 Shots

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The European Union database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, and they are now reporting 20,595 fatalities, and 1,960,607 injuries, following COVID-19 injections.

Health Impact News subscriber from Europe reminded us that this database maintained at EudraVigilance is only for countries in Europe who are part of the European Union (EU), which comprises 27 countries.

Continue reading →

A Letter to the Unvaccinated

OCLA researcher Dr. Denis Rancourt and several fellow Canadian academics penned an open letter to support those who have decided not to accept the COVID-19 vaccine.

The group emphasizes the voluntary nature of this medical treatment as well as the need for informed consent and individual risk-benefit assessment. They reject the pressure exerted by public health officials, the news and social media, and fellow citizens.

Control over our bodily integrity may well be the ultimate frontier of the fight to protect civil liberties. Read the letter below or as a PDF here.

Open Letter to the Unvaccinated

You are not alone! As of 28 July 2021, 29% of Canadians have not received a COVID-19 vaccine, and an additional 14% have received one shot. In the US and in the European Union, less than half the population is fully vaccinated, and even in Israel, the “world’s lab” according to Pfizer, one third of people remain completely unvaccinated. Politicians and the media have taken a uniform view, scapegoating the unvaccinated for the troubles that have ensued after eighteen months of fearmongering and lockdowns. It’s time to set the record straight.

It is entirely reasonable and legitimate to say ‘no’ to insufficiently tested vaccines for which there is no reliable science. You have a right to assert guardianship of your body and to refuse medical treatments if you see fit. You are right to say ‘no’ to a violation of your dignity, your integrity and your bodily autonomy. It is your body, and you have the right to choose. You are right to fight for your children against their mass vaccination in school.

You are right to question whether free and informed consent is at all possible under present circumstances. Long-term effects are unknown. Transgenerational effects are unknown. Vaccine-induced deregulation of natural immunity is unknown. Potential harm is unknown as the adverse event reporting is delayed, incomplete and inconsistent between jurisdictions.

You are being targeted by mainstream media, government social engineering campaigns, unjust rules and policies, collaborating employers, and the social-media mob. You are being told that you are now the problem and that the world cannot get back to normal unless you get vaccinated. You are being viciously scapegoated by propaganda and pressured by others around you. Remember; there is nothing wrong with you.

You are inaccurately accused of being a factory for new SARS-CoV-2 variants, when in fact, according to leading scientists, your natural immune system generates immunity to multiple components of the virus. This will promote your protection against a vast range of viral variants and abrogates further spread to anyone else.

You are justified in demanding independent peer-reviewed studies, not funded by multinational pharmaceutical companies. All the peer-reviewed studies of short-term safety and short-term efficacy have been funded, organized, coordinated, and supported by these for-profit corporations; and none of the study data have been made public or available to researchers who don’t work for these companies.

You are right to question the preliminary vaccine trial results. The claimed high values of relative efficacy rely on small numbers of tenuously determined “infections.”  The studies were also not blind, where people giving the injections admittedly knew or could deduce whether they were injecting the experimental vaccine or the placebo. This is not acceptable scientific methodology for vaccine trials.

You are correct in your calls for a diversity of scientific opinions. Like in nature, we need a polyculture of information and its interpretations. And we don’t have that right now. Choosing not to take the vaccine is holding space for reason, transparency and accountability to emerge. You are right to ask, ‘What comes next when we give away authority over our own bodies?’

Do not be intimidated. You are showing resilience, integrity and grit. You are coming together in your communities, making plans to help one another and standing for scientific accountability and free speech, which are required for society to thrive. We are among many who stand with you.

Angela Durante, PhD
Denis Rancourt, PhD
Claus Rinner, PhD
Laurent Leduc, PhD
Donald Welsh, PhD
John Zwaagstra, PhD
Jan Vrbik, PhD
Valentina Capurri, PhD

The smear campaign against the Great Barrington Declaration

Dominic Cummings, scientists and the media successfully demonised anyone who questioned the lockdown.


2nd August 2021

In his recent book, Spike, Jeremy Farrar – a SAGE member and director of the Wellcome Trust – has provided a helpful hint: the political strategist and the prime minister’s chief adviser, Dominic Cummings, planned a propaganda campaign against the Great Barrington Declaration. Farrar’s exact words are that Cummings ‘wanted to run an aggressive press campaign against those behind the Great Barrington Declaration and others opposed to blanket Covid-19 restrictions’. Cummings and Farrar preferred a blanket lockdown strategy, believing it would avoid a winter Covid wave. We do not know what transpired behind closed doors, but Farrar’s admission raises two interesting questions.

First, who would you expect to prevail in a political battle over which pandemic strategy to implement? Would it be (a) the campaigning mastermind who has won multiple elections and referendums, or (b) three public-health scientists with scant media and political experience? Secondly, whose proposal would better control the pandemic, minimise Covid deaths and avoid other non-Covid health harms? Would it be (a) the campaign led by an individual with little knowledge of epidemiology and public health? Or (b) the one authored by three epidemiologists with extensive experience and knowledge of infectious disease and public health?

As we all now know, Cummings and Farrar got their way in the UK. We Great Barrington Declaration authors failed to sway any politicians, except Florida governor Ron DeSantis. Governments worldwide re-imposed lockdowns in the autumn and winter of 2020. The lockdowns’ failure to control Covid’s spread was catastrophic. And they resulted in devastating collateral harms, especially to children, the working class in rich nations and the very poorest people in the developing world.

Whether directed by Cummings or not, there was certainly an aggressive media campaign against the Great Barrington Declaration. The propaganda campaign included multiple distortions, misinformation, ad hominem attacks and outright slander. Many of these slurs are still making the rounds in mainstream media. Journalists who, by all appearances, had not even read the Declaration, confidently asserted falsehoods about it and us in print, on radio, on TV and online. Here are some of the lies and distortions:

Prominent politicians like Matt Hancock, the media and health officials in the WHO and the UK government rebranded focused protection – policies designed to protect the most vulnerable from Covid infection – as a ‘let-it-rip strategy’ that would ‘let the virus continue unchecked’. The Great Barrington Declaration called for the very opposite of a let-it-rip strategy. Ironically, lockdown is actually a slow-motion let-it-rip strategy – it only delays the spread of Covid, as we have regrettably learned these past 18 months.

Hancock, Anthony Fauci, Jeremy Farrar and prominent journalists also mischaracterised the Great Barrington Declaration as a ‘herd-immunity strategy’, even though any strategy will lead to herd immunity sooner or later. Yes, the Declaration discussed herd immunity. It would be irresponsible to ignore such a basic biological fact. But to characterise the Great Barrington Declaration as a ‘herd-immunity strategy’ is like describing a pilot’s plan to land a plane as a ‘gravity strategy’. The goal of a pilot is to land the plane safely while managing the force of gravity. The goal of any Covid pandemic plan should be to minimise disease mortality and the collateral harms from the plan itself, while managing the build-up of immunity in the population. Shockingly, some politicians, journalists and even scientists denied the very existence of herd immunity. Some even questioned the existence of natural immunity from Covid, which is a bit like denying gravity.

Hancock and various scientists dismissed the notion of focused protection. Some falsely claimed that it was impossible to protect the high-risk elderly specifically. Others claimed that we had not offered any specific proposals for doing so. In truth, we made some suggestions on the one-page Declaration, and we provided a long list of well-tested public-health measures in an accompanying FAQ on the website. We also wrote numerous newspaper articles, in which we elaborated on these ideas. It is understandable that a politician like Matt Hancock, with his limited knowledge of public health, could not come up with ideas for protecting the elderly. But we had hoped that the Great Barrington Declaration would generate vigorous engagement and creative thinking about how we might do this, rather than just a propaganda counterattack.

As well as misrepresenting our ideas, our critics also misrepresent us as people. Some journalists tried to paint us as right-wing libertarians with links to the Koch brothers. These were blatant lies and ad hominem smears reminiscent of the McCarthy era. They are also ironic since one of the Koch-funded foundations provided grant support to pro-lockdown scientist Neil Ferguson and his team at Imperial College. The truth is that the three of us co-authored the Great Barrington Declaration without any prior sponsorship.

The propaganda aim was to distract the public from the fact that, unlike lockdowns, the Great Barrington Declaration was founded on long-standing and basic principles of public health. Unfortunately, the UK carried on with its lockdown strategy, locking down last autumn and winter. As we all now know, the lockdown failed to protect the vulnerable, instead exposing them to the virus and causing many unnecessary deaths. Up to now, the UK has reported nearly 130,000 Covid deaths – almost 90,000 of whom died after we wrote the Declaration calling for a different approach.

To save face, Cummings and others have made the ridiculous, evidence-free claim that if only England had gone into lockdown a tad earlier, many of these deaths could have been avoided. But we know that Wales implemented a ‘circuit-breaker’ (a euphemism for lockdown) in October 2020 – two weeks before England went into total lockdown for November. The result? In the short run, Wales came out of lockdown with more daily Covid cases than when it started and with more cases per capita than in England. In the long run? From the beginning of the epidemic to the day we signed the Great Barrington Declaration, on 4 October 2020, England’s Covid deaths per capita were 29 per cent higher than those in Wales. But from October to the end of July 2021, England’s Covid deaths per capita were only nine per cent higher than Wales’. In other words, there is no prima facie evidence in these numbers that an earlier lockdown saved any lives in Wales.

If we look across the pond at the US, we can compare each state’s response to the pandemic. The age-adjusted per-capita Covid mortality of the US as a whole is 38 per cent higher than that in Florida, which adopted a focused-protection approach. Assuming we could have achieved the same percentage reduction in deaths in the UK, we might have had around 49,000 fewer Covid deaths. The actual number could be larger or smaller, of course. But again, there is no prima facie evidence that lockdowns reduced Covid deaths over the long run.

As well as failing to protect us from Covid, the lockdowns have caused enormous collateral public-health damage. In the UK, this includes missed cancer screening and treatmentdelayed surgery, untreated heart disease and diabetes, widespread and devastating mental-health problems, and the disruption of children’s education. We will have to reckon with, live with and die with these consequences for many years to come. In assessing which strategy works best – lockdowns vs focused protection – we should not only count deaths from Covid, but also the substantial deaths and disruption caused by lockdowns.

There is no doubt that a properly implemented focused-protection strategy could have saved thousands of lives in the UK. The likes of Cummings and Farrar naively believed that lockdowns were already protecting higher-risk elderly people. They demonised anyone who said otherwise. And so Boris Johnson’s government ignored the focused-protection measures that we proposed for the elderly. Farrar accuses us of causing unnecessary deaths. This is rather strange. His accusation makes much more sense when applied to those whose advice was actually acted upon: ‘Frankly we think their views and the credence given to them by Johnson were responsible for a number of unnecessary deaths.’

Much of this tragedy stems from Cummings’ political approach to the pandemic. The UK punched way above its weight during the Second World War because of its people’s bravery, ingenuity and persistence in the face of danger. But there was one other key factor. During strategy sessions, Winston Churchill surrounded himself with people of different experiences and views. They debated each other vigorously so that all voices could be heard and assumptions could be thoroughly vetted before important decisions were taken. This is the opposite of what works in an election campaign, where the single-minded focus on winning means dismissing those with opposing views. Open discussion and debate about how to manage the pandemic would have better served the British people. The debate could have involved more prominent infectious-disease epidemiologists and experts on all aspects of public health. It is a great pity that Cummings was unable to switch from the combative approach of his campaigning to the inquisitive and multi-faceted approach that we needed during a national emergency. It is a relief that he is no longer in No10.

Martin Kulldorff is professor of medicine at Harvard University.

Jay Bhattacharya is professor of medicine at Stanford University.


Globalists Want Everyone Vaccinated Because Unvaxxed Serve As Evidence of Their Crimes

JUL 29, 2021 OPINION

The stage is being set for a mass infertility event and covid will be blamed in place of the experimental jabs.

Millions of unvaccinated people represent an undeniable control group. If the vaccinated group becomes ill or dies from specific conditions and the control group does not have those same conditions, then that is a sign the vaccine or drug is poison.

I don’t think I am the only person that has noticed it – There has been a sudden deluge of covid vaccination propaganda and vaccine passport propaganda in the past month, more so than I think we have seen since the beginning of this year.

I am speaking of the US in particular, but it is important to point out that in the US the establishment is still desperately clamoring for a much higher vaccination rate. In places like Europe, the UK and Australia vaccinations rates are higher and governments have moved on to the vaccine passport phase of their agenda.

Some people may be confused by the obvious lockstep that most nations are moving in as far as covid mandates and restrictions are concerned. How is it possible that almost all the governments on the planet are in agreement on medical totalitarianism? Well, it’s rather easy to understand when you realize the majority of them are linked together through globalist institutions like the World Economic Forum, which has repeatedly called the pandemic a “perfect opportunity” to push through their plans for a “Great Reset”.

The “Great Reset” is a long term ideological usurpation of what’s left of individual freedom and free market economies, and it’s goal is the imposition of a global socialist/communist dictatorship. Globalists wrap these objectives in pretty sounding words and humanitarian sounding aspirations, but at bottom the “Reset” is about an end to liberty as we know it. This is not an exaggeration, this is reality; this is what these people desire above all else. But how to achieve such a goal?

Well, interestingly enough the WEF and the Bill And Melinda Gates Foundation described exactly how they planned to do it during a “simulation” they held in October of 2019 called “Event 201”. During the event, they imagined a massive coronavirus pandemic, spread supposedly from animals to humans, which would facilitate the need for pervasive restrictions on individual liberties, national economies as well as the internet and social media. I’m sure it’s all a coincidence, but the exact same scenario the globalists at the WEF played out during Event 201 happened in the real world only two months later.

In any case, the pandemic itself has been a boon for the globalists. We have not seen a far reaching government power and corporate power grab since the rise of the National Socialists in Europe and the spread of communism in Russia and China almost a century ago. In fact, I would say that what humanity as a whole is facing today is much worse than what those wretched empires ever could have produced.

There is no doubt; globalist institutions and their government “partners” are the greatest beneficiaries of the covid crisis. They stand to gain ultimate social and political power if their agenda to exploit the pandemic succeeds.

That said, there a few hangups in their plan, and this is why I believe we are seeing an aggressive propaganda push in recent weeks. For example, as I outlined with extensive evidence in my article ‘Biden’s Vaccine Strike Force Plan Stinks Of Desperation’, it appears that the vaccination rate, especially in the US, is nowhere near as high as the elites would like.

While the Biden Administration and the CDC claims an overall vaccination rate of 67%, numerous other stats including the Mayo Clinics state map numbers indicate that only four states in the US actually have a vaccination rate over 65% (for one dose or more), and the majority of states have rates around 50% or less. Even large population blue states like California and New York are not above the 65% mark, and frankly, those numbers are going nowhere as vaccinations are dropping off a cliff.

If someone has not submitted by now with zero wait times and ample doses everywhere, then they are unlikely to ever be vaccinated.

Contradictory stats suggest to me that Biden and the CDC are inflating their vaccination numbers to create the illusion that a larger majority of Americans support the jab. And if this is the case, it explains why Biden, Fauci and the mainstream media are force feeding the public with pro-vaccine hype that consistently contradicts the real science. They are not getting the fear and public compliance that they had hoped for.

But why do they want 100% vaccination? Why are they so desperate for every single person in the world to get the mRNA jab?

After all, the average (IFR) death rate of covid is a mere 0.26% of those infected (this is a stat that the media consistently and deliberately refuses to mention to the public). This means that 99.7% of the public is in NO danger from covid whether they are vaccinated or not.

Do the vaccines ensure better odds? Well, according to recent statistics from Massachusetts, not necessarily, as they report over 5100 infections and 80 deaths of fully vaccinated patients. The media keeps telling us that only the unvaccinated are dying, but this is a lie, like so many other lies they have been peddling when it comes to covid. So, what’s the point of taking an experimental vaccine if the death rate of the virus is so low and the jab doesn’t necessarily protect you anyway?

There is no point. The science and the stats do not support it. The vaccines can’t even be credited with the decline in infections and deaths this year; the numbers plunged in January – Only 5% of the population was vaccinated by February. The only explanation for this is that the population hit herd immunity many months ago. Remember when governments said that they needed 70% herd immunity or vaccination to stop the lockdowns and mandates? The goalposts have been moves several times and the government “science” changes monthly. Now they claim herd immunity doesn’t matter and demand 100% vaccination.

We must ask the question again – Why the relentless government push for total vaccine saturation? It’s not saving lives, and the mandates remain regardless, so why?

I can only posit theories based on the evidence at hand, but I think it’s clear to most of us that the vaccines are NOT about public health nor are they about saving lives. They are obviously about something else…

As numerous virology and vaccine experts have warned over the past year, there is a great risk of harmful health side effects when it comes to experimental mRNA technology. Even one of the creators of mRNA vaccines has suggested that there are dangers in rolling out these gene manipulation cocktails without more testing. Of note are concerns about longer term disorders such as autoimmune disorders and infertility.

The mainstream media and the globalists will argue that there is “no evidence” that the mRNA vaccines will cause deadly side effects or infertility. I would argue back that there is NO EVIDENCE that they are safe. Most vaccines are tested over the course of 10-15 years before they are released to the public for use. The covid vaccines were unleashed on the public within months. Honestly, I have no intention of acting as a guinea pig for an untested vaccine.

But what if the elites know exactly what the side effects will be? What if the vaccines are a pivotal part of their “Great Reset?”

The infertility question in particular is drawing the most fire from the establishment, and I would point out a particularly insidious narrative being implanted in the media. Whenever people question the chance of sterility caused by the vaccines, bureaucrats and media talking heads go on the attack, and then say “There’s no evidence that the vaccines cause infertility, but Covid-19 might cause it…” Just watch this recent speech by the governor of Arkansas where he and his medical flunky were almost run from the podium by an angry audience for peddling the same propaganda:

And there you have it. The stage is being set, in my view, for a mass infertility event, and covid will be blamed in place of the experimental vaccines. This is why the establishment needs a 100% vaccination rate; unvaccinated people would stand as evidence of their crime. Let me explain…

My concern is that Klaus Schwab’s reset agenda is impossible to enforce in a permanent way unless the human population is greatly reduced over a short period of time (a generation or two). Globalists are constantly talking about population control and reduction. Elites like Bill Gates are famous for it. Is it any wonder that they would devise a plan to institute it?

What if, as many experts have suggested, the vaccine side effects create this condition of a diminishing population? What if they are meant to? We will not know for certain for a couple of years at least as autoimmune disorders and infertility take time to become visible in a population. The average timeline for actually diagnosing an autoimmune disorder is 4.5 years. Infertility can take six months to a year to diagnose.

If a large population of millions of people remain unvaccinated after the next couple of years, then they will represent a sizable and undeniable control group. A control group is a group of subjects that act as a pure sample untouched by a drug or vaccine experiment. If the vaccinated group becomes ill or dies from specific conditions and the control group does not have those same conditions, then that is a pretty good sign that your vaccine or drug is poison.

The 50% of Americans and smaller percentages in other nations are a control group for the experimental vaccines. If something goes wrong with the vaccines, then we will be the proof. I suspect this is what the elites are really afraid of.

They have to force us to be vaccinated as well – ALL of us, so that there is no control group and thus no proof os what they have done. They could simply blame mass health disorders on covid itself, or some other false culprit.

If the vaccines are a Trojan horse that causes widespread illness or infertility, and the globalists get caught because a control group exists, then it will mean outright rebellion along with ropes and lampposts for them. Their “Great Reset” will fall apart.

To be sure, this might happen anyway. Vaccine passports are the line in the sand for most people. We are even seeing extensive protests and riots in places like Italy, France, UK and Australia over the draconian passport scheme. The US, though, is where the biggest fight will take place, in my opinion. We have an armed population, millions upon millions of trained combat veterans and civilians, a military with around 70% conservatives and independents and a historical understanding of asymmetric warfare. As we have seen in places like Afghanistan, tanks, jets, missiles and drones are no guarantee if victory against a guerrilla force.

Vaccine passports are not going to happen here. We simply won’t allow it.

The globalists have set in motion an end game – It could be an end game for us, but it also could be an end game for them. They are on a strict timeline. They must get near 100% vaccination rates in the next couple of years or sooner. They must get their vaccine passports in place in the next couple of years or sooner. And, they must instill permanent lockdown conditions in the near term to stifle growing dissent. We are now in a kind of race in which the globalists must implement their agenda as fast as possible while we must hold out and hold them back until the truth becomes obvious to the masses; the truth that the lockdowns, mandates and vaccines were never about safety and were always about control – from social control to population control.


The Zelenko protocol

If you are in a hurry

Given the extensive amount of information of this website, a quick way to get started is as follows:

  1. Read the Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment prepared by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, and watch Dr. McCullough’s brief video presentation.
  2. Read the treatment protocol and prophylaxis protocol documents by Dr. Zelenko.
  3. Read Dr. Zelenko’s statement to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security

For a more technical briefing:

  1. Watch the interviews of Dr. ZelenkoDr. Risch, and Dr. Marik.
  2. Read the papers by Dr. ZelenkoDr. RischDr. McCullough, and Dr. Marik.

For early outpatient care: Read this article by Dr. Vliet, and try the telemd program organized by Dr. Jerome Corsi or the telemd program by Dr. Stella Immanuel, or the telemd program by Dr. Ben Marble. You can also make a telemd appointment with Dr. Zelenko himself. A doctor directory and other information has been put together by and AAPS. Immune support nutraceutical supplements are available from Dr. Zelenko and Dr. Immanuel.

In the local RGV region, doctors that support early treatment protocols include, but are not limited to, Dr. Hiram GarciaDr. Allison Garza, and Dr. April Lopez.

On general public health policy concerns, absolute must watch is Dr. McCulough’s interview on early outpatient treatment and this news report. Kathy Dopp has also made an excellent website with covid-related resources.

To understand the disinformation campaign against early treatment, read this article.


This webpage curates content related to the early outpatient treatment protocol that has been proposed by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko for the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Dr. Zelenko originally risk-stratified patients and treated high-risk patients with hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin. He has since evolved his protocols to include a quercetin protocol for low-risk patients as well as guidelines for prophylaxis. Dr. Zelenko shared the details of his protocol on March and April 2020 in open letters to the medical community and also shared updated treatment and prophylaxis protocols on August 2020. He has also published his first research paper on his treatment protocol. See the press release. Dr. Zelenko’s paper establishes, with statistical significance, that his early outpatient protocol reduces hospitalizations by 84%. Dr. Zelenko’s statement to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Secutity indicates no deaths from amongst the group of patients that initiated treatment during the first 4 days, and took medications for at least 5 days. Dr. Zelenko is now investigating the use of nebulized hydroxychloroquine, which could very well prove to be the final nail in the coffin for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. If you are interested in the inside story of how Dr. Zelenko discovered the Zelenko protocol, it is best told in his interview with Dr. Breggin [backup]. Dr. Zelenko has been banned from twitter, but you can keep up with him on Telegram.

The Eastern Virginia Medical School maintains an interesting website with current information for medical practitioners. They recommend the I-MASK+ and MATH+ treatment protocols for hospitalized patients. They are currently strongly advocating in favor of ivermectin instead of hydroxychloroquine, and they also recommend using quercetin combined with vitamin C as a zinc ionophore.

Papers from Dr. Zelenko and Dr. McCullough

Documents from Dr. Zelenko

  1. 03/23/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s open letter to the medical professional community.
    [pdf] || [original link] || [tinyurl]
  2. 04/28/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s second open letter to the medical professional community.
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored) || [tinyurl] (censored)
  3. 06/14/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s letter to the Israeli government
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored) || [tinyurl] (censored)
  4. 07/15/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s open letter to the White House
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored)
  5. 08/23/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s updated treatment protocol.
    [pdf] || [original link] || [tinyurl] || (presentation: ) || (another presentation: [bitchute link])
  6. 08/23/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s prophylactic protocol. (updated 02/08/2021)
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored) || [tinyurl] (censored)
  7. 10/27/2020: Press Release: Data Based On Zelenko Protocol Passes Peer Review
    [pdf] || [original link]
  8. 11/22/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s Protocol Plus chart.
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored)
  9. 11/26/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s updated treatment protocol. (2nd update); (3rd update: 02/08/2021)
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored) || [tinyurl] (censored)
  10. 11/23/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s second open letter to the White House
    [pdf] || [original link]
  11. 12/02/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s statement to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security
    [pdf] || [original link]
  12. 12/23/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s third open letter to the White House
    [pdf] || [original link]
  13. 01/20/2021: Choose Truth and Choose Life
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored)
  14. 01/22/2021: Nebulized Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 Treatment: 80x Improvement in Breathing
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored) || [alt link]
  15. 02/23/2021: Plan to Reopen Israel
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored)
  16. 02/23/2021: Dr. Zelenko’s updated treatment protocol.
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored) || [new link]
  17. 02/23/2021: Dr. Zelenko’s prophylactic protocol.
    [pdf] || [original link] (censored) || [new link]
  18. 04/20/2021: A Plan to Reopen an American State
    [pdf] || [original link]
  19. 05/27/2021: Advice to Medical Professionals
    [pdf] || [original link]
  20. 06/03/2021: Zinc Ionophores: Optimism for the Immune System
    [pdf] || [original link]
  21. 06/15/2021: Death Sentence
    [pdf] || [original link] || [vid excerpt]

Immune support nutraceutical supplements

Research databases

The following websites have dynamically updated databases on the current research studies on several therapeutic options

  1. Research studies on hydroxychloroquine
  2. Research studies on Ivermectin
  3. Research studies on Vitsmin D
  4. Research studies on Zinc
  5. Research studies on REGN-COV2
  6. Research studies on LY-COV
  7. Research studies on Remdesivir

Senate Hearing on Early Outpatient Treatment

November 19, 2020 hearing by the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs on Early Outpatient Treatments

  1. Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of a COVID-19 Solution, U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs
  2. CSPAN: Senate Hearing on COVID-19 Outpatient Treatment
  3. Download Full Senate Hearing
  4. Backup of Senate Hearing on Bitchute
  5. Senate Hearing about Early Outpatient Treatment: Highlights
     || [bitchute]
  6. Refuting Dr. Ashish Jha’s “Dangerous” and Deceptive Testimony
  7. The Assault Against Early Treatment for COVID-19: How One Congressional Hearing Speaks Volumes about America’s Failed Response to the Pandemic
  8. Dr. Zelenko’s statement to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security

December 08, 2020 hearing by the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs on Early Outpatient Treatments

  1. Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of a COVID-19 Solution, Part II
  2. Backup of Senate Hearing on Bitchute

Testimony submitted to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs on Early Outpatient Treatments

  1. Peter A. McCullough, M.D., M.P.H., Vice Chief of Internal Medicine, Baylor University Medical Center
    [pdf] || [original link]
  2. Harvey Risch, M.D., PH.D., Professor of Epidemiology, Yale University
    [pdf] || [original link]
  3. George C. Fareed, M.D., Medical Director and Family Medicine Specialist, Pioneers Medical Center
    [pdf] || [original link]
  4. Ashish K. Jha, M.D., M.P.H., Dean of the School of Public Health, Brown University
    [pdf] || [original link]
  5. Ramin Oskoui, M.D., Vice President of Medica Staff, Sibley Memorial Hospital and Chief Executive Officer, Foxhall Cardiology
    [pdf] || [original link]
  6. Jean-Jacques Rajter, M.D., Pulmonologist, Broward Health Medical Center
    [pdf] || [original link]
  7. Pierre Kory, M.D., Associate Professor of Medicine, St. Luke’s Aurora Medical Center
    [pdf] || [original link]
  8. Armand Balboni, M.D., PH.D., Chief Executive Officer, Appili Therapeutics Inc.
    [pdf] || [original link]
  9. Jane M. Orient, M.D., Executive Director, Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
    [pdf] || [original link]
  10. Jayanta Bhattacharya, M.D., PH.D., Professor of Medicine Stanford University and Senior Fellow Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University
    [pdf] || [original link]

Also see the expert testimony in the Adamson Skelly vs ROA case in Canada.

On April 24, 2021, Senator Ron Johnson gave an imterview on early treatment and vaccine passports thst was censored by Youtube. For this reason, it is linked below:

  1. Senator Ron Johnson’s interview on early treatment and vaccine passports

June 12, 2021 update on censorship and early treatment from US Senators.

On June 28 2021, Senator Ron Johnson hosted a news conference where fellow Americans that have been injured by the experimental mRNA injections had a chance to tell the world what happened to them. Social media has censored the event.

Texas Senate hearing testimony on early treatments

Testimony submitted to the Texas State Senate Health and Human Services Committee on March 10, 2021 by Dr. Peter McCulough and Dr. Richardo Urso:

Also interesting are the following follow-up interviews of Dr. Peter McCullough with The Whistleblower Newsroom:

  • 04/09/2021: Dr. Peter McCullough says highly effective early treatment for covid has been censored
     || [bitchute]
  • 04/16/2021: Dr. Peter McCullough rebuts AFP “factchecker” Remi Banet’s assertion that he made false claims
     || [bitchute]

Other selected research publications on HCQ protocol

Other selected research publications

Dynamic white papers by the anonymous CovidAnalysis group

The CovidAnalysis group maintain the website They also have prepared the following dynamically updated white papers:

  1. CovidAnalysis group, “Early treatment with hydroxychloroquine: a country-based analysis”, initial release on August 5, 2020
  2. CovidAnalysis group, “HCQ is effective for COVID-19 when used early: analysis of 121 studies”, initial release on October 20, 2020
  3. CovidAnalysis group, “The estimated number of human lives lost from incorrect HCQ advice”, initial release on November 3, 2020
  4. CovidAnalysis group, “Ivermectin is effective for COVID-19: meta analysis of 26 studies”, initial release on November 26, 2020
  5. CovidAnalysis group, “Vitamin D is effective for COVID-19: meta analysis of 35 studies”, initial release on December 17, 2020

White Papers and other documents

  1. J.M Todaro, J. Krug, M.E. Praver, and V. Zelenko, “A two-step strategy to reopen America”, April 2020, white paper
    [pdf] || [original link]
  2. S. Gold, “White Paper on Hydroxychloroquine”, July 2020, white paper
    [pdf] || [original link]
  3. The Economic Standard, “Hydroxychloroquine and the burden of proof: An Urgent Call to Depoliticize Medicine in the COVID-19 Pandemic”, September 2020, white paper
    [pdf] || [original link] || [IHU link]
  4. Open letter to authors of COVID-19 trials, medical journals and scientific community
    [pdf] || [original link]
  5. Lee D. Merritt, “The Treatment of Viral Diseases: Has the Truth Been Suppressed For Decades?”, Journal of the American Physicians and Surgeons 25 (3) (2020), 79-82
    [original link]
  6. America’s Frontline Doctors, “White Paper On COVID-19 Experimental Vaccines”, December 2020, white paper
    [pdf] || [original link] || [petition]
  7. COVID-19: Restoring Public Trust During A Global Health Crisis, February 2021
    [original link] || [original pdf] || [backup pdf]
  8. Open Letter by U.S. Doctors: JAMA Ivermectin Study Is Fatally Flawed, April 2021
    [original link]
  9. Open letter by Dr Charles D. Hoffe, April 2021
  10. Steven Hatfill, “How a Single Point Failure Destroyed the National Pandemic Plan”, April 2021
    [pdf] || [original link]
  11. CHD, “Citizen Petition from Scientific Advisory Board on behalf of Children’s Health Defense”, May 16, 2021
    [original link]
  12. Indian Bar Association, Legal notice to Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, the Chief Scientist, WHO, May 2021
    [pdf] || [original link]
  13. Aaron Siri, Petition for administrative action regarding further data to be submitted to the FDA before approval of any COVID-19 vaccine, May 2021
    [original link] || [pdf]
  14. Linda Wastila, Citizen petition on vaccine BLA approvsl, June 2021
    [original link] || [pdf]
  15. Andrew Bostom, “Why Collegiate Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates Are Lysenkoist Anti-Science”, June 2021
    [pdf] || [original link]
  16. Penelope Sullivan, “Myocarditis and COVID Vaccine: A Risk Benefit Analysis”, June 2021
    [original link]
  17. Peter A. McCullough, “9 Reasons to Drop Support or Mandates for Investigational COVID-19 Vaccines”, July 2021
    [linkedin] (censored) || [backup] || [kathy dopp site]
  18. R. Lazarus and M. Klompas, “Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System”, Grant Final Report, Grant ID: R18 HS 017045, 2011
  19. [pdf] || [original link]

Other links and organizations

  1. Truth for Health Foundation
  2. Dr. Corsi’s telemd program
  3. Dr. Stella Immanuel’s telemd program
  4. American Association of Physicians and Surgeons
  5. Eastern Virginia Medical School.Covid Care protocol
  6. Frontline Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance.
  7. American Frontline Doctors — first website — second website
  8. The Internet Protocol
  9. Alliance for Natural Health
  10. The Complete Guide To Health website
  11. Coronavirus Resource Center, by Peter R. Breggin M.D.
  12. Articles by Paul E. Alexander
  13. PANDA Pandemics ~ Data & Analytics
  14. Health Freedom Advocacy Center
  15. Informed Consent Action Network
  16. Zelenko Protocol Telegram channel
  17. America’s Frontline Doctors Telegram channel
  18. Google Scholar: Peter A McCullough, MD, MPH
  19. Google Scholar: Harvey A. Risch, MD, PhD‬
  20. The Covid Blog
  21. Jennifer Margulis — Censorship-Free Zone
  22. Dr. Peter Breggin brighteon channel
  23. Doctor Talks Series
  24. Hydroxychloroquine Studies Confirming The Therapeutic Efficiency In Treating Covid-19
  25. National Vaccine Information Center VAERS search engine
  26. NVIC Advocacy Portal
  27. Texans for Vaccine Choice
  28. The Healthy American
  29. Adrew Saul’s Doctor yourself website
  30. Comment from J. Patrick Whelan MD PhD, submitted to FDA
  31. Statistical data on covid 19 pandemic
  32. Mortality in the United States, 2018
  33. Risk for COVID-19 Infection, Hospitalization, and Death By Age Group
  34. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network (COVID-NET)
  35. Predict Hospitalization Risk for COVID-19 Positive
  36. NIH Guidelines

Quercetin protocol

Quercetin is an over-the-counter alternative zinc ionophore to the prescription drug hydroxychloroquine, that has been recommended by Dr. Seheult, from, as part of a prophylactic regimen. For more information see the video below.

  • 04/21/2020: Coronavirus Pandemic Update 59: Dr. Seheult’s Daily Regimen (Vitamin D, C, Zinc, Quercetin, NAC)

A similar Quercetin protocol has also been recommended by the Eastern Virginia Medical School. Also see the research paper by Dr. Marik posted above for more details about quercetin, the importance of combining it with Vitamin C, and its safety profile. Dr. Zelenko has also recommended a quercetin protocol for low-risk patients and for high-risk patients while hydroxychloroquine is unavailable. Although quercetin is available over-the-counter, you should consult with a doctor about drug interactions with your prescription medications.

Video updates from Dr. Vladimir Zelenko with Rabbi Katzin

Dr. Zelenko provides video updates on the Rabbi Aryeh Katzin youtube channel. As a precaution against social media censorship, the video updates have been backed up on bitchute, an alternate video platform that supports freedom of speech. Videos labeled (censored by YouTube) were deleted/censored by YouTube. Videos labeled (censored) were set to private mode by Rabbi Katzin, as a result of the chilling effect of social media censorship, to prevent deletion of his youtube channel.

  1. 04/19/2020: Dr. Zelenko on the latest statistical clinical outcomes of his treatment.
     (censored) ||[bitchute]
  2. 04/30/2020: Dr. Zelenko responds to the VA study and his plans to publish his data in observational peer-reviewed research papers.
     (censored) ||[bitchute]
  3. 05/03/2020: Updates on the adoption of Dr. Zelenko’s treatment protocol by Honduras, Brazil, Ukraine, Israel, Italy, Turkey, Iran, as well as ongoing current research efforts. He also.explains the mechanism of action underlying his treatment regimen.
  4. 05/12/2020: Update focuses on policy recommendations for dealing with a likely second wave of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
     (censored) ||[bitchute]
  5. 05/17/2020: Update on the efficacy of adding zinc to the hydroxychloroquine treatment. Dr. Zelenko explains his prophylactic protocol using hydroxychloroquine and zinc at a reduced dosage. Also some autobiographical notes about the importance of thinking outside the box when facing an unusual challenge.
     (censored) ||  ||[bitchute — part 1]||[bitchute — part 2]
  6. 05/24/2020: Latest updates on collaboration with Brazil, comments on Lancet study,, opening the economy safely, availability of medications, quercetin, dosage of elemental zinc, and the clinical trial at St. Francis hospital.
     (censored) ||[bitchute]
  7. 05/28/2020: Latest updates on research publication, the politics of censorship, and the meaning of life.
     (censored) ||[bitchute]
  8. 06/09/2020: Dr. Zelenko on the Lancet, NEJM Retracted Studies on the hydroxychloroquine treatment protocol. Also other updates and commentary.
     (censored) ||[bitchute]
  9. 06/21/2020: Dr. Zelenko comments on the revocation of the Emergency Use Authorization of hydroxychloroquine by the FDA. Announces that his research paper has been submitted for publication and a preprint will be published soon. Also some very interesting comments on the spititual basis of what motivates him.
     (censored) ||[bitchute]
  10. 07/03/2020: Dr. Zelenko shares the good news that his first paper is now publicly available in preptint form.
     (censored) || [bitchute]
  11. 07/10/2020: Dr. Zelenko communicates some optimism amongst all the fearmongering. World leaders are aware of his research paper. Dr. Zelenko announces his website and encourages that we reach out to our political leaders.
     (censored) || [bitchute]
  12. 07/10/2020: This video has no new medical information but is still very interesting. Defeating this pandemic now comes down to making moral choices: service to self vs service to others.
     || [bitchute]
  13. 07/21/2020: Dr. Zelenko speaks about the purpose of life while in anticipation of open heart surgery. This is a very heartfelt and deep video about both the current pandemic, and more broadly about living on a razor’s edge between chaos and order.
     || [bitchute]
  14. 08/06/2020: Dr. Zelenko gives his latest update about the FDA rules on EUA, research studies on HCQ, and social media censorship.
     (censored) || [bitchute]
  15. 08/09/2020: Dr. Zelenko updates us on his White House petition, gives the dosage recommendation for prophylactic and treatment quercetin protocols, and suggests possible RCT studies to determine whether his HCQ protocol can be used against the influenza virus.
     (censored) || [bitchute]
  16. 08/10/2020: Dr. Zelenko updates us about several topics, including the current political situation with HCQ, the quercetin protocol, his use of ivermectin and anti-coagulants as adds-on to the Zelenko protocol, the socond SARS-CoV-2 wave, vaccine safety and effectiveness, and the telemed program by Dr. Jerome Corsi.
     (censored by YouTube) || [bitchute]
  17. 08/12/2020: Dr. Zelenko comments on the FDA decision to deny the Henry Ford Health System request to use hydroxychloroquine
     || [bitchute]
  18. 08/16/2020: Dr. Zelenko presents his updated treatment protocol, incorporating the quercetin protocol for low-risk patients, and additional medications to the baseline Zelenko protocol for select patients.
     (censored) || [bitchute]
  19. 08/19/2020: Dr. Zelenko updates us on a possible EUA process violation by the FDA and on his updated treatment protocol
     || [bitchute]
  20. 08/19/2020: Dr. Zelenko shares his thoughts about death and the meaning of life.
     || [bitchute]
  21. 08/26/2020: Dr. Zelenko comments on the new Italian study that reported 30% reduction of mortality. Also makes some political comments on the suppression of the Zelenko protocol that seem to have prompted YouTube to censor the video.
     (censored by YouTube) || [bitchute]
  22. 08/26/2020: Dr. Zelenko: Communism vs Capitalism. What is definition of success?
     || [bitchute]
  23. 09/03/2020: Latest updates on how to respond to the second wave, the importance of beginning treatment immediately, reinfections, youtube censorship, freedom vs tyranny, the safety profile of remdesivir and hydroxychloroquine.
  24. 09/03/2020: Dr. Zelenko makes interesting comments on the Rosh Hashanah and spirituality. Not medically related, but very interesting nonetheless.
  25. 09/11/2020: Dr. Zelenko comments on prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 and facemasks. He notes that mortality rates have decreased not necessarily because the virus has weakened, but because people seek early treatment and because some doctors prescribe the appropriate therapeutics. Also mentions receiving an email from a village in Pakistan where the Zelenko protocol is being used. Finally comments on the anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attack, and the underlying philosophical conflicting worldviews.
     || [bitchute]
  26. 09/29/2020: Dr. Vladimir Zelenko Shared His Concerns About People Still Getting COVID-19 Symptoms
     || [bitchute]
  27. 10/06/2020: Discussion of censorship of both Rabbi Katzin’s YouTube channel and Dr. Zelenko’s twitter account and how it should be addressed. Comments on the treatment protocol used by POTUS. Also discussion of how to protect yourself from the virus (considerations include prophylaxis, immunity, facemask, vaccine safety and efficacy, standard of care).
     || [bitchute]
  28. 10/16/2020: Dr. Zelenko updates us about his upcoming invited oped to the Jerusalem Post. Also comments on the latest study concerning remdesivir. Finally comments on the Zelenko protocol, the art of medicine, and how to custom-tailor treatment for each patient.
     || [bitchute]
  29. 10/30/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s research paper published on 26 October 2020 in the The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. Fight the second wave of SARS-CoV-2 by being prepared.
     || [bitchute]
  30. 10/30/2020: Faith or Knowledge? Finding strength in the midst of adversity.
     || [bitchute]
  31. 11/15/2020: Dr. Zelenko provides an update on the current political situation and also on an upcoming Senate hearing by Senator Ron Johnson on early treatment. Also comments on the necessary general public health policy, mask mandates, antibofy and t-cell immunity testing, quarantine policies, the importance of adapting treatment protocols to individual patients, and the vaccine. This is a must-watch interview.
     || [bitchute]
  32. 12/30/2020: Dr. Zelenko announces his new website, in response to censorship by twitter. Also comments on the vaccine, reinfections, and the new mutation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and t-cell immunity. Note that the youtube version is abbreviated, to avoid censorship.
     ||  || [bitchute]
  33. 01/24/2021: Say No to Covid-19 Anxiety.
     || [bitchute]
  34. 02/01/2021: Dr. Zelenko’s brief statement on the covid vaccines
     || [bitchute]
  35. 02/01/2021: Dr. Zelenko’s statement on the Israeli vaccine policy
     || [bitchute]

Other video updates from Dr. Zelenko

  1. 03/28/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s first bombshell interview with Rudy Giuliani.
     || [bitchute]
  2. 07/01/2020: Dr. Zelenko’s second interview with Rudy Giuliani.
  3. 07/11/2020: Highwire – interview with Dr. Vladimir Zelenko
  4. 08/04/2020: Dr. Zelenko interviewed by Debbie Aldrich on the war against hydroxychloroquine.
     || [bitchute]
  5. 08/14/2020: A Case for HCQ: Doctors Harvey Risch, Vladimir Zelenko, Li Meng Yan
  6. 09/03/2020: Dr. Zelenko Discusses COVID-19 Outpatient Management with Dr. Been
     || [bitchute]
  7. 09/30/2020: Dr. Zelenko interview by Simone Smith of the Toronto Carribean News.
    [brighteon] || [bitchute] || Brighteon is blocked by social media. Share this article to bypass censorship
  8. 10/11/2020: Barry Shaw of “The View from Israel” interviews Professor Harvey Risch and Dr. Vladimir Zelenko who challenge the assumptions of health officials with science, facts, and evidence of fraud.
     || [bitchute]
  9. 11/03/2020: Dr. Vladimir Zelenko talks with John Mappin about his success with Hydroxychloroquine
     || [bitchute]
  10. 11/17/2020: The Zelenko Early Treatment Study, the Role of Zinc, the Therapeutic Approach to COVID-19 in Germany
    [covexit] ||  || [bitchute]
  11. 12/09/2020: Dr. Zelenko curing Covid19 patients without fanfare! (interview by Dr. Carole Lieberman)
  12. 12/09/2020: Explosive Interview with Dr Zelenko A WARRIOR BRINGING THE LIGHT
  13. 12/14/2020: Dr. Zelenko interview by Patriot Transition
     || [bitchute]
  14. 12/16/2020: Dr. Zelenko interview by Patriots in Tune
     (censored) || [bitchute]
  15. 12/16/2020: Dr. Zelenko interview by Del Bigtree
  16. 12/16/2020: Dr. Zelenko interview by John Mappin
     || [bitchute]
  17. 12/23/2020: Red Dawn News interview w/ Dr. Zelenko Pt 1 of 2
     || [rumble] || [bitchute]
  18. 12/25/2020: Talkline With Zev Brenner Interviews Dr. Zev Zelenko
  19. 12/26/2020: Dr. Zev Zelenko on Covid-19 Vaccination Tyranny and Dangers
  20. 12/27/2020: Red Dawn News interview w/ Dr. Zelenko Pt 2 of 2
     || [bitchute]
  21. 01/04/2021: New Book of Daniel #52: Some don’t want us to know about safe pre-hospital treatments for Covid
  22. 01/08/2021: Dr. Zelenko: Steps can be taken to reduce deadliness of COVID-19
  23. 01/08/2021: Dr. Zelenko 2nd interview with the TCN TV Network
  24. 01/28/2021: Dr. Zelenko: Interview with Dr. Peter Breggin. This is a very profound interview and should be watched more than once.
     || [bitchute] || [newtube]
  25. 02/06/2021: Dr. Zelenko’s interview with Laura Eisenhower
  26. 02/26/2021: ASIA PACIFIC TODAY. Early treatment of Covid-19 saves lives with Dr Vladimir Zelenko.
  27. 03/04/2021: Dr. Zelenko with Dr. Peter Breggin: Physical and Spiritual Survival During COVID-19
     || [bitchute]
  28. 03/10/2021: Dr. Zelenko Successfully Treated 1,000 High Risk COVID Patients
  29. 04/22/2021: Dr. Zev Zelenko speaks with Rabbi Avi Schwartz about Covid, the Vaccines, and the Great Reset
  30. 04/23/2021: Dr. Vladimir “Zev” Zelenko, MD Recovering from COVID-19
     || [bitchute]
  31. 04/29/2021: Exclusive – Dr. Zelenko Live on Lindell TV
  32. 05/10/2021: Interview with Dr. Zelenko and his protocol for curing corona patients that was silenced
     || [bitchute]
  33. 05/13/2021: Freedom, Great Reset and Democracy. Interview with Rabbi Avi Schwartz
     (censored by Youtube) || [bitchute]
  34. 06/03/2021: Dr. Zev Zelenko: “What is called ‘gain-of-function’ is a very deliberate term to mislead the public”
     || [bitchute]
  35. 06/09/2021: Dr. Vladimir Zelenko & Steve Kirsch Discuss COVID-19 on Ask Dr. Drew
     || [bitchute]
  36. 06/16/2021: Dr. Zev Zelenko: Jab Death Count, Death by Government Tyranny, Censored Real Solutions (1of2)
    [bitchute] || [rumble]
  37. 06/16/2021: Dr. Zev Zelenko: Jab Death Count, Death by Government Tyranny, Censored Real Solutions (2of2)
    [bitchute] || [rumble]
  38. 06/30/2021: Dr. Zev Zelenko – Full Interview | The Awakening 3
  39. 07/07/2021: LifeSite’s Claire Chretien interviews Dr. Vladimir Zelenko
  40. 07/07/2021: Dr. Vladimir Zelenko Interview with John Leake
  41. 07/13/2021: R&B Monthly Seminar: “Medical War Crimes” (Episode 2) with Rabbi C. Weissman & Dr. Vladimir Zelenko

Other interesting interviews

  1. 04/25/2020: Dr. Dave Janda speaks with Michigan Rep. Karen Whitsett about her recent experiences with surviving the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
     || [bitchute]
  2. 08/18/2020: Covid. “Better illegally alive than legally dead!” Barry Shaw (IISS) speaks to a doctor and a patient who tell of their harrowing experiences with Covid. Also included. Mark Levin interviews Professor Harvey Risch.
     || [bitchute]
  3. 08/23/2020: Mark Levin Interviews Dr. Harvey A. Risch about HCQ, FDA, and Dr. Fauci.
     || [bitchute]
  4. 08/23/2020: See the Dr. Scott Atlas interview censored by youtube.
    (censored by YouTube) || [] || [bitchute]
  5. 09/15/2020: COVID-19 Management With Dr. Paul Marik – Author Of MATH+ Protocol
     || [bitchute]
  6. 09/15/2020: Dr. Stella Immanuel interview by Simone Smith of the Toronto Carribean News.
    [brighteon] || Brighteon is blocked by social media. Share this article to bypass censorship
  7. 08/17/2020: SARS-CoV2 and the Rise of Medical Technocracy. Lee Merritt, M.D.
  8. 10/11/2020: 20min presentation: Ambulatory Treatment of COVID-19. Peter McCullough, MD
     || [bitchute] || [rumble]
  9. 10/14/2020: Interview with Dr George Fareed, MD Part I
     || [link] || [minds] || [bitchute]
  10. 10/16/2020: Interview with Dr George Fareed, MD Part II
    (censored on YouTube) || [link] || [minds] || [bitchute]
  11. 11/15/2020: Dr. Stella Immanuel interview by Candance Owens.
     || [bitchute]
  12. 11/28/2021: Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet with Dr. Peter Breggin: Treating Covid-19 @ Home with Elizabeth Lee Vliet, MD
  13. 12/04/2020: The FLCCC Alliance press conference from Houston, Texas
  14. 12/10/2020: Dr. Peter McCullough interview with Dr. Peter Breggin: Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH–Save Yourself, Your Family, the World From COVID-19
     || [bitchute]
  15. 12/22/2020: Dr. Peter McCullough interview with Dr. Peter Breggin
     || [bitchute]
  16. 01/16/2021: Dr. Lee Merrit Interview on SARS-CoV-2<
     || [bitchute]
  17. 02/03/2021: Panel of medical doctors and researchers discuss Covid-19 protection, treatments, cures, and the vaccines.
    [rumble] || [bitchute]
  18. 02/11/2021: Dr. Simone Gold interview on experimental mRNA vaccines and their safety
  19. 02/13/2021: ASIA PACIFIC TODAY. Early treatment for Covid-19 reduces deaths with Dr Peter Mccullough
  20. 02/25/2021: An amazing interview with Leah Wilson by Dr. Peter Breggin: Finding the Courage to be True to Yourself and America
     || [bitchute]
  21. 04/01/2021: Dr. Lee Merritt On The Virus, The Jab, and the Data
    [original link] || [rumble]
  22. 04/08/2021: Presentation – Awaken, by Dr. Gold
    [original link]
  23. 04/27/2021: COVID Shot Killing Large Numbers, Warns Top COVID Doc Peter McCullough
  24. 05/04/2021: Dr. Lee Merritt interviewed by the Health Ranger
  25. 05/08/2021: Latest COVID-19 Science News. Peter McCullough, MD, MPH interviewed by Dr. Peter Breggin
     || [bitchute]
  26. 05/08/2021: Tucker Carlson interviews Peter McCullough, MD, MPH
  27. 05/14/2021: Dr Stella Immanuel interview with Mike Adams
  28. 05/18/2021: COVID Vaccine Shedding Hurting Unvaxed? Dr. Lee Merritt Explains
  29. 05/19/2021: Dr. Peter McCullough Interview with John Leake
     || [bitchute] || [brandnewtube]
  30. 05/26/2021: Dr. Peter McCullough | ACWT Interview
     || [bitchute]
  31. 06/01/2021: Real America – Dan W/ Cardiologist, Dr. Peter McCullough
  32. 06/12/2021: Dr. Peter McCullough on with Reiner Fuelmich June 11, 2021
  33. 06/14/2021: Worse than the disease- jab content being delivered to spleen, glands & ovaries
  34. 06/19/2021: Joseph Arthur interviews COVID early treatment expert and advocate Peter McCullough, MD, MPH
  35. 06/25/2021: How and why has early treatment been supressed and censored? Dr. Peter McCullough
  36. 06/26/2021: 3 Leading scientists discuss “rona” & the jab
  37. 06/30/2021: Dr. Peter A. McCullough interviewed by Australian propaganda media
  38. 06/30/2021: Interview of Dr. Harvey Risch with John Leake
     || [bitchute]
  39. 06/30/2021: Dr. Peter A. McCullough interviewed by Mike Adams
  40. 07/01/2021: COVID 19 Treatment and Vaccines – A Discussion with Dr. Peter McCullough on Daystar Television
  41. 07/03/2021: Panel discussion on forcing hospitals to use ivermectin by court orders.
  42. 07/04/2021: EXPOSED – The Persecution of Canadian Physicians by Organized Medicine During the Pandemic

Other news



The information on this website is provided only for educational purposes and to promote scientific research and policy making. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. I STRONGLY SUGGEST THAT YOU SEEK ADVICE FROM A COMPETENT AND QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL REGARDING ISSUES IN ANY PROFESSIONAL FIELD.

This web page is maintained by Eleftherios Gkioulekas, who is solely responsible for the content of this page. Eleftherios Gkioulekas has a Ph.D in Applied Mathematics from University of Washington in 2006. He is not a medical doctor and does not give medical advice. The contents of this page do not represent the opinions or policies of the University of Texas — Rio Grande Valley, but they are presumed to be protected under the principles of Academic Freedom and the 1st Amendmend of the United States Constitution.

Eleftherios Gkioulekas does not make and expressly disclaims all representations and warranties, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, whatsoever, including, but not limited to: (i) warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, suitability, usage, title or noninfringement; (ii) that the contents are free from error; and (iii) that such contents will not infringe third-party rights. The parties shall have no liability for damages of any kind arising out of the use, reference to, or reliance on this page or any of the content contained herein, even if advised of the possibility of such damages. In no event will Eleftherios Gkioulekas be liable to any person or entity for any damages, losses, liabilities, costs or expenses of any kind, whether direct or indirect, consequential, compensatory, incidental, actual, exemplary, punitive or special for the use of, reference to, or reliance on this website or any of the content contained herein, including, without limitation, any loss of business, revenues, profits, data, use, goodwill or other intangible losses.

If anyone backs vaccine for children, tell them to read this compelling scientific rebuttal

By Kathy Gyngell July 14, 2021

THIS week we’ve been making a concerted plea to parents and all adults to resist or counter any suggestion by the Government or schools or any other institutions that children need to be, or should be, vaccinated for Covid. 

On Monday we published a tour de force by Belinda Brown, a researcher, writer and mother, concerned that mothers and families were in ignorance of the facts. She set out the key reasons why child vaccination should not even be mooted.  

Yesterday we featured a film made by doctors who are mothers, explaining why they, with their medical knowledge, would not let their own children be vaccinated. 

Today I want to share with you a report entitled Covid-19 Vaccines and Children: A Scientist’s Guide for Parents. It is authored by Dr Byram Bridle of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance – a group of doctors, scientists and health practitioners committed to providing independent, evidence-based information about Covid.  

Dr Bridle’s paper consists of more than 40 pages with appendices and it is worth reading thoroughly. 

He starts with the key point that ‘authorisation under interim order’ – the basis on which the vaccines have been rushed out – means that ‘additional information is needed on the safety, efficacy, and quality of the vaccine, including in children and adolescents, to support the future full market approval and licensing of the vaccine’.  

This in itself really should be sufficient to dissuade any moral and rational adult from dreaming of imposing a vaccine on a child for an infection from which they are at no risk or negligible risk. 

Dr Bridle goes on to explain that key safety studies appear to have been missed in the clamour to roll out the vaccines and that, as reported in TCW by Neville Hodgkinson, more is being learned about the vaccines every day.  

The most important aspect of this is that the spike protein generated by the vaccine is not just an antigen that is recognised by the immune system as being foreign. In addition, it ‘can interact with receptors throughout the body, called ACE2 receptors, potentially causing undesirable effects such as damage to the heart and cardiovascular system, blood clots, bleeding, and neurological effects’.  

Dr Bridle concludes that ‘the current scientific uncertainties demand that the administration of Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine to children, adolescents, and young adults of child-bearing age be paused until proper scientific studies that focus on the safety and pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of the vaccines and the vaccine encoded spike protein can be conducted’.  

He explains furthermore that there is no safety issue with this course of action, because:  

• The risk of severe and potentially lethal Covid-19 in these specific populations is so low that we need to be very certain that risks associated with mass vaccination are not higher.  

• Asymptomatic members of this population are not a substantial risk for passing Covid-19 to others. 

• There are effective early-treatment strategies for the very few children, adolescents, and young adults of childbearing age who may be at risk of developing severe Covid-19, such as ivermectin, fluvoxamine, and budesonide. 

This is the most authoritative ‘science’ guide I have found. It is what I forward to people who say they trust the Government and who think scientists are agreed.  

This is the document I forward to friends and relations who question young adults for refusing vaccination or add to the pressure on them to do so. Since they make this their business, I make it mine to send them this fully referenced piece of dispassionate scientific analysis! 

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.

Source: The Conservative Woman

Scandal Of The Suppressed Case For Ivermectin

Published on July 2, 2021 Written by

‘We don’t doubt this is an important paper,’ wrote the senior editor of Lancet Respiratory Medicineon March 9 in response to our paper ‘Ivermectin for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, the brainchild of Dr Tess Lawrie and the world’s first Cochrane-standards ‘meta-analysis’ of clinical trials of the long-established anti-parasitic drug ivermectin, for treating, and preventing, Covid-19.

Four expert reviewers were satisfied by revisions already made. ‘The effort of the authors is praiseworthy in this pandemic situation,’ one said. Their critiques had been technical: some of the statistical methods break down when there are no ‘events’ (in this case, deaths) in both ‘arms’ of a clinical trial. Our lead statistician ran more checks; we fixed the criticisms. This is what ‘peer review’ is supposed to do. It’s normal.

One might take such a comment from the senior editor as the preamble to acceptance for publication. But no, this was the editors’ reason for not publishing the paper. This isn’t normal. What was the problem?

We don’t doubt this is an important paper, and would likely be widely taken up.

Hang on, Lancet Respiratory Medicine wants to avoid printing something it recognises as an important paper, that four of their own experts have passed, because it might be ‘widely taken up’? This is what they usually want.

Of course, the Lancet has a lot to live down, having moved into the business of publishing fake news, as with the notorious hydroxychloroquine fraud which I reported on forTCW last year. Not only did the Lancet publish an obvious fake, it did so with hostile editorial commentary and briefing to BBC Radio 4 Today for maximum impact.

So media briefing for planted fake news, but a Lancet specialist title won’t touch an ‘important paper’.

I was told in January, by a senior clinical researcher who knows him personally, that Richard Horton, editor in chief of the Lancet, was ‘very ashamed’ at having let through the fake news. Horton, whose Twitter bio reads ‘welcome to a permanent attack on the present’, wrote in 2015:

Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness . . . Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours . . . Our love of “significance” pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale. We reject important confirmations . . . And individual scientists, including their most senior leaders, do little to alter a research culture that occasionally veers close to misconduct.

Horton was right. The only aspect that the fake news had going for it was the huge sample size: 96,000 patients. Except that the true number was actually zero, since the paper was fake. The Lancet was certainly seduced by a ‘fashionable trend of dubious importance’, namely ‘Big Data’, a flavour-of-the-month set fair to corrupt many other sciences as well as medicine.

The Lancet ‘aided and abetted the worst behaviours’, not just those ‘veering close to misconduct’, but those clearly crossing the line.

Has anything changed? In 2015 Horton bemoaned journals that ‘reject important confirmations’, but in March 2021, ‘after lengthy discussions with the editorial team’, Lancet Respiratory Medicine did it again, rejecting our ‘important confirmation’ (passed by four of their own experts, remember) that yes, ivermectin works for Covid-19.

So there we have it. Horton’s 2015 editorial remains true, but he doesn’t seem to have done anything about it. He’s only the man in charge, after all.

I had feared as much, but we were all keen to give our findings maximum visibility. But Lancet Respiratory Medicine did what its friends wanted, which was ‘kill the story’ for as long as possible, which in the event has been over three months, whilst we searched for a journal with enough integrity to publish an article which had already passed four-fold peer-review at the Lancet, and would get yet further examination elsewhere.

As of last Friday the paper is now published in the American Journal of Therapeutics, and you can read it here. More importantly your doctor, or your family’s doctors, can read it too. Take it to them, as many as possible.

So what does this dry-as-dust research paper actually show ?

The starting point was another review article on ivermectin for Covid-19, also in the American Journal of Therapeutics, published on May 1. Take that paper to your doctor too. Dr Pierre Kory and his Front-Line Covid Critical Care alliance (FLCCC) of US-based intensive care doctors had their four-times peer-reviewed paper accepted for a special issue on repurposed drugs for Covid-19, but then revoked, by the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology.

This unprecedented volte face was charted recently in TCW by Dr Michael Yeadon. The same ‘kill the story’ orders delayed publication by over five months.

The FLCCC know what they are doing with Covid-19. Their ‘MATH+’ treatment delivers the world’s best survivals from serious, late-stage, hospitalised  Covid-19. It remains almost unknown in the UK and unused in the NHS. (All Brits should be very angry about this). FLCCC luminary Dr Joseph Varon, mentioned en passant in my coverage of the Oxford RECOVERY trial, has the best track record of them all.

The FLCCC have used several anti-virals in their continuing evolution of the best treatments, but by late autumn realised that one drug, ivermectin, stood out because it worked at all stages of the Covid-19 disease, from prophylaxis through to the intensive care that the FLCCC specialise in. They wrote up the evidence, posting a preprint in mid-November.

They explain the back-story to ivermectin, little-known in Western countries but worldwide one of the most widely-used drugs at 3.8billion doses and counting. Earning the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for its discoverers, it has crushed the hideously disabling infestation of onchocerciasis or ‘river-blindness’ across the tropics. A potent anti-parasitic, it is used for threadworms, scabies and head-lice.

It costs pence per pill. It is a known anti-viral, working across a range of RNA viruses, (and some DNA ones). It may even be an anti-cancer drug, and has prolonged lives in leukaemia. Specifically against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, a team at Monash University in Australia showed that ivermectin killed off the virus in vitro in April 2020.

The usual suspects declared that this meant nothing (which on its own is true), that that you couldn’t get it strong enough in vivo; nevertheless the Monash paper set off a series of clinical trials of ivermectin for Covid-19, usually in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs), or in plain English poor countries.

There is a good reason for this: if you are dirt poor, you need your medicines to be dirt cheap. Nothing else will be any use. What did they find? Ivermectin works for Covid-19, at entirely tolerable doses.

Kory’s paper showed how cases and deaths in Peru came crashing down where ivermectin was freely distributed, and not where it wasn’t. The same phenomenon has been repeated in India more recently; states such as Goa that adopt mass distribution of ivermectin crush their cases; those that refuse it such as Tamil Nadu (Chief Minister M K Stalin) don’t.

Dr Kory’s paper identifies and charts the evidence, but doesn’t do a formal meta-analysis, which is where Dr Tess Lawrie came in. Her Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy does nothing but rigorous systematic reviews, and only for public clients such as the NHS and the WHO. Their objectives are clinical practice guidelines, providing the evidence for decisions on licensing and implementation.

A ‘meta-analysis’ is a synthesis of data from multiple sources – typically clinical trials of a new drug – using recognised statistical methods. A meta-analysis of clinical trials that are themselves ‘randomised’ clinical trials (where patients are allocated at random to receive, or not, the treatment) lies at the summit of the ‘evidence quality’ pyramid, in the doctrines of Evidence-Based Medicine, ruthlessly insisted upon by regulatory authorities.

To rehearse a cliché, the Randomised Controlled Trial or RCT is the ‘gold standard’ of medical evidence. If so, a meta-analysis of RCTs is platinum.

What makes the paper a first is being carried out according to the standards of the Cochrane organisation, requiring a protocol to be observed (i.e. no favouritism), data extraction from primary sources by two researchers independently, and the ‘grading’ of those sources for the quality of the evidence. Indeed the paper began life as a Cochrane Review, and was finished by the end of January.

But to cut short a long story (parts of which are covered elsewhere by the ever-vigilant France Soir ) the Cochrane organisation did not want a systematic review on a topic already approved by a specialised researcher and colleagues whose consultancy does nothing else, and who have contributed nearly 80 such reviews between them.

Sounds familiar? It should do by now: the ‘capture’ of learned journals by powerful interests who will suppress, by fair means or increasingly by foul ones, any knowledge that threatens those interests.

The reason for doing a systematic review is that that is what is required by regulatory authorities such as the FDA (in the US) the European Medicines Agency (for the EU), our own Medical and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the World Health Organisation (WHO). It’s what they require to decide on licensing new drugs (though ivermectin isn’t new at all).

Dr Lawrie didn’t stop at the meta-analysis, but pressed on to a ‘Evidence to Decision’ process, the formal procedure which those regulators are supposed to use in coming to decisions. On February 20, the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) panel voted  that ‘ivermectin should be adopted to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with Covid-19 infection and to prevent Covid-19 infection among those at higher risk.

That was February. The essentials were already clear from Dr Kory’s paper in preprint in November, his testimony to the US Senate in December, Dr Lawrie’s first meta-analysis issued on January 3, and our submission to the Lancet on 5 February (preprint posted March 11). BMC Systematic Reviews were kind enough to post a preprint on March 18 but though they still say it’s ‘under review’ we haven’t heard from them in three months, so it looks like ‘kill the story’ orders apply there too. Our published paper has since been revised and updated.

The paper makes clear that there’s no real doubt that ivermectin is an effective medicine for Covid-19. Multiple clinical trials show it. The Randomised Controlled Trials that our paper analyses are just the tip of the iceberg. Plenty of other trials show it too, but if they were not randomised, according to regulators they don’t count, so our meta-analysis did not include them. Although Risks of Bias are carefully evaluated, disregarding the mountain of evidence from elsewhere, not least the experience and testimony of doctors actually using it, is itself a potent source of bias.

You are throwing away all the data that might force you to think. A critic of our paper wrote: ‘a technical tour-de-force based on ritualised ideas’. He’s right, but let’s not argue: our meta-analysis was upon the Regulators’ terms. We played by their rules. That was the point. You want a strict meta-analysis of RCTs only? Take two dozen.

How many do they need? When governments, or regulatory agencies, want to approve medicines, one will do. Dexamethasone, to huge fanfare, was approved last summer on the evidence of just one RCT, though it helps only ventilated patients in the inflammatory stages of the illness, and on its own, by not very much. The FLCCC doctors had been using a different corticosteroid, methylprednisolone, and at higher equivalent doses, long before.

In our analysis, ivermectin reduces deaths overall by around 62 per cent, and works at all disease stages. As a prophylactic, it prevents 6 out of every 7 infections that would otherwise occur, and stops household transmission in its tracks. Corticosteroids are vital in the inflammatory phase of the illness, but are useless in the purely viral stage or for prophylaxis.

So where does all this leave ivermectin, for those affected by Covid-19, those worried about it, and vulnerable people at risk?

Ivermectin isn’t new. Its safety record, from those billions of doses, is second to none. Its cost is negligible. The WHO, in its BC (Before Covid) era, listed it as an ‘Essential Medicine’ in their catalogue of the ‘minimum medicine needs for a basic health-care system’ (though our ‘envy of the world’ NHS doesn’t have it).

In the USA, ivermectin is licensed by the FDA, albeit not for Covid, so is available to any American doctor to prescribe ‘off-label’ (i.e. not according to the originally licensed ‘advertising label’). However the fact that it isn’t ‘labelled’ for Covid makes it easy to refuse. Patients’ families have had to go to court for injunctions ordering hospitals to give ivermectin. The FLCCC still swims against the tide, though legal barriers are lower than elsewhere, for open-minded doctors.

In the UK, ivermectin has never been licensed by the MHRA. This makes it easy for doctors to refuse, and for those who want to help to be obstructed. My GP refused me ivermectin for prophylaxis, even after I showed him the evidence. Hospital doctors can’t get it except to special order at pharmacies. The bureaucracy won’t allow them to prescribe it.

Listen to Dr Nyjon Eccles  having to bring his own ivermectin for his 84-year-old mother in hospital with Covid-19, dependent on oxygen, and failing every time she came off. She was discharged five days after her first dose.

As for the WHO itself, on March 31, 2021, its ‘Living Guideline’ for Covid treatments was updated, declaring: ‘We recommend not to use ivermectin in patients with Covid-19 except in the context of a clinical trial.’ The cherry-picking of studies that helped give the Right Answer, and rejection of those that didn’t, the cavalier appraisal of risks of bias and evidence certainty, make their analysis a complete travesty, but nevertheless potently influential.

In India, seeing the damage that the WHO had done to their Covid-19 policy, and finding the pile of evidence compiled by the FLCCC and BIRD, the Indian Bar Association served two legal notices upon the chief scientist of the WHO, Dr Soumya Swaminathan (an Indian national). The first (May 25) accuses her of a ‘disinformation campaign against ivermectin’ and the second June 13) ups the ante by joining Dr Tedros (director general of the WHO), and accusing them of ‘contempt of court and aggravated offences against humanity by spreading disinformation’.

If these move to actual litigation, watch this space.

Meanwhile, patients and their families, and even Bar Associations, should not have to go through the courts or to smuggle medicines into hospital to get treatment for sick patients. At some point, officials who obstruct access to safe medicines are going to have to explain the moral difference between their actions and corporate manslaughter.

Will our own MHRA see sense and ‘license’ this WHO Essential Medicine of unparalleled safety record and negligible cost for use in the UK for treatment and prophylaxis of Covid-19? There’s none so deaf as those that will not listen. We have a Government that has lied to us throughout the Covid-19 pandemic and continues to do so.

The oxymoronic Sage, fronted by the Gruesome Twosome, receive no challenges from equally or better qualified scientists, except through volunteer groups like HART or BIRD. The Prime Minister, having ‘landed from another planet and having absolutely no clue of what he is talking about’ appoints a Task Force to have ‘antiviral treatments ready for deployment by autumn 2021’.

This article has been about an anti-viral treatment that is already known, already exists, with an unparalleled safety record, is on the Essential Medicines list of the WHO, costs virtually nothing, and has anti-inflammatory properties to boot. It requires only formal endorsement. Johnson’s Task Force is redundant.

See more here:

Header image: The Conversation

%d bloggers like this: