Monthly Archives: July, 2020

Italy Finally Starts Mass Treatment with Hydroxychloroquine

Doctors in Italy have finally began widely prescribing hydroxychloroquine in certain combinations in Rome and the wider region of Lazio with a population of around six million.

According to Corriere della Sera, a well known Italian daily newspaper, Dr. Pier Luigi Bartoletti, Deputy National Secretary of the Italian Federation of General Practitioners, explains that every single person with Covid-19 that has early signs, like a cough or a fever for example, is now being treated with the anti-malaria drug.

The drug “is already giving good results,” Bartoletti says while Malaysia reveals they have been using it since the very beginning. Bartoletti further adds that the drug:

“Must be used with all the necessary precautions, it must be evaluated patient by patient. It can have side effects. But those that take it are responding really well.

We have just understood that the virus has an evolution in two phases and that it is during the second phase, after a few days (about a week), that the situation can suddenly, in 24 or 48 hours, worsen and leads to respiratory failure requiring intensive care.

The results that we are starting to accumulate suggest that hydroxychloroquine administered early, gives the possibility of avoiding this evolution in a majority of patients and is also helping us to prevent hospitals from filling up.”

Incredible. What is more incredible are the statements of Professor Christian Perronne, Head of the Infectious Diseases Department at the Garches University Hospital, made in an interview with a French weekly magazine.

Referring to the European Discovery trial in which UK is taking part with only 800 patients, Perronne says:

“I refused to participate because this study provides for a group of severely ill patients who will only be treated symptomatically and will serve as control witnesses against four other groups who will receive antivirals. It is not ethically acceptable to me.

We could perfectly well, in the situation we are in, evaluate these treatments by applying a different protocol. In addition, the hydroxychloroquine group (which was added to this study at the last minute), should be replaced by a hydroxychloroquine group plus azithromycin, the current reference treatment according to the most recent data.

Finally, the protocol model chosen will not provide results for several weeks. Meanwhile, the epidemic is galloping. We are in a hurry, we are at war, we need quick assessments.”

America is to start yet another study which is to take one month even while one thousand people or more are dying worldwide today. In Italy however doctors are finally not waiting anymore with Perronne saying:

“Even though the overwhelming evidence from large randomized studies is still lacking, I am in favor of a broad prescription for the following reasons:

1. We have a large body of evidence showing that in vitro hydroxychloroquine blocks the virus. We also have several clinical results indicating that this product is beneficial if administered early and we have no mention that it harms or is dangerous in this infection (only one study, poorly detailed, Chinese, on 30 patients with control group, did not observe any benefits but also no harmful effects). What is the risk of administering chloroquine straight away: nothing!

2. This drug is very inexpensive 3. It is well tolerated in long-term treatment. Personally, I have successfully used it clinically in the chronic form of Lyme disease for 30 years at a dose of 200 mg or even 400 mg/day.

I and hundreds of other doctors are able to judge its excellent tolerance in humans. The main contraindications are severe retinal and unbalanced heart disease.

Cardiovascular events remain exceptional if care is taken: to proscribe self-medication – to check with the elderly taking a lot of drugs that there are no drug interactions (with long-term diuretics in particular) and that the rate of blood potassium is within the norm.

Apart from these precautions, the undesirable effects are minor. They are even more so as the treatment is short, which is the case against Covid-19.

It would therefore be wise to produce hydroxychloroquine in very large quantities without further delay, to make it easily accessible to infected people…

I note that Italy has just authorized the wide distribution of hydroxychloroquine on medical prescription from the start of the infection and that other countries are preparing to do the same. What are we waiting for? To have more dead?”

Incredibly the doctor says in regards to this European study for which we have to wait six weeks (and as a note all these quotes are from a rough translation):

“There will be nothing to hope from this study concerning hydroxychloroquine is administered too late. The protocol indicates that the product can be given only if the oxygen saturation of patients is less than 95%, that is to say patients with a massive oxygen supply or who must be put on artificial ventilation. This is not the right indication.”

As the doctor said above, treatment needs to be given early to stop the second phase from kicking in as that is what is causing hospitalization and in some cases even death.

Quite interestingly, now that they have began treatment, Corriere della Sera has just tweeted: “Contagions in decline in Lombardy.”

So hopefully UK, US and other countries will now learn from Italy and get this early treatment out there before deaths reach Italy levels or even more for USA as they will if people are not treated, but with early treatment this should be contained as in South Korea and many other countries where they have been giving early treatment from nearly the very beginning.


Amid Pandemic, Facebook Stifles Information Showing China’s Cover-up


The Epoch Times recently published a documentary to Facebook, “Tracking Down the Origin of Wuhan Coronavirus.”

The documentary went viral across different channels, including Facebook, generating a lot of healthy discussion and more than 70 million views collectively, at last count.

However, an “independent fact checker” erroneously marked the video as false. Click here to read the justification provided by the fact checker.

The “fact checker” appears to take issue with some of the expert opinions the documentary presents. With the Chinese Communist Party having destroyed evidence and prevented research into the origin of the virus, it’s very difficult to draw any definitive conclusions. It’s not the intent of the film to provide a definitive answer.

Aside from the expert opinions, the film explores purely the known facts surrounding the CCP virus (commonly known as the novel coronavirus) and the global pandemic.

The documentary has had a strong impact, creating interest in potential origins for the virus that challenge the official Chinese Communist Party talking points of its origin at the Huanan Seafood Market.


Following the publication of the documentary, these related articles were published:

  1. Washington Post: State Department cables warned of safety issues at Wuhan lab studying bat coronaviruses
  2. Washington Times: Joint Chiefs chairman: U.S. intel investigating whether coronavirus leaked from Wuhan lab
  3. Fox News: Sources believe coronavirus originated in Wuhan lab as part of China’s efforts to compete with US

Clearly, many took our documentary very seriously. On top of this, there are several issues that render the fact checking performed spurious, notably:

  1. The fact checking is done based on an article published by The New York Post, not our documentary. There may be some overlap with respect to evidence, but a number of points cited have nothing to do with our documentary.
  2. The fact checker, Danielle Anderson, is not independent, as she states: “I will disclose that I am a scientist trained to work in high containment and have collaborative projects with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). I have worked in this exact laboratory at various times for the past 2 years. I can personally attest to the strict control and containment measures implemented while working there. The staff at WIV are incredibly competent, hardworking, and are excellent scientists with superb track records.”
  3. A key fact check claim is actually false: “There is no evidence supporting claims that biosecurity is poor in the Wuhan Institute of Virology or that lab animals are being sold or consumed.” This claim is false based on articles 1 and 3 mentioned above.
  4. The headline for this fact check is “Scientific evidence indicates virus that causes COVID-19 infection is of natural origin, not the result of human engineering.” The highlighted fact check claim at the top of the page is “evidence points to SARS-CoV-2 research being carried out at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” which is marked INCORRECT. This fact check conflates the idea of “lab origin” with “engineering”—a coronavirus (one of many held at these specific labs) could be under research but not a product of bioengineering. And the virus could have spread from the lab to the general population without being engineered.

We call on Facebook to remove its incorrect label and allow more people to see this very timely documentary. At The Epoch Times, we are firm believers in freedom of the press. Especially now, as the global pandemic continues, it is vital for audiences around the world to be provided with independent and accurate information to make informed decisions.

In speaking out for the need for a free press, we are standing with the position taken by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. As he said at Georgetown University in October 2019, “As a principle, in a democracy, I believe people should decide what is credible, not tech companies.”

Source: Epoch Times

Aluminum in Vaccines: What Everyone Needs to Know

Perhaps you were fortunate enough to attend the 2016 Weston A. Price Foundation conference in Alabama where my colleague Laura Hayes gave a presentation. Hayes is an anti-vaccine activist whose twenty-four-year-old son was severely injured by his “routine” childhood vaccinations during his infancy, toddlerhood and early childhood. Hayes began her presentation, “Vaccines: What Is There to Be ‘Pro’ About?” by defining the hallmark of ethical medicine: prior, completely voluntary and fully informed consent. She explained how vaccine mandates, with or without exemptions, violate this hallmark of ethical medicine, which is included in numerous international codes of ethics, all signed by the U.S.

Hayes also spoke about the complete absence of appropriate and properly performed vaccine safety studies. Despite this absence, the U.S. Food and Drug Association (FDA) has wrongly approved scores of vaccines over the course of many decades now, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has also wrongly recommended them. To make matters worse, all fifty states have either vaccine mandates or requirements for school-aged students (although some states offer philosophical or religious exemptions), and often also for daycare participants, based on inept and corrupt approvals by and recommendations of the FDA and CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), and at the unethical bidding of pharmaceutical and medical industry lobbyists.

An example of wrongful vaccine approvals and recommendations by agencies entrusted with public health is the use of aluminum in vaccines. It is used in the majority of today’s vaccines. Hayes explained that the FDA approves the use of aluminum-based adjuvants in vaccines, which are added to increase the body’s immune response to the vaccine, despite the fact that the agency has never clinically tested or approved aluminum, and despite the fact that aluminum is a known and undisputed toxin, neurotoxin and teratogen (an agent or factor that causes malformation of an embryo). As Hayes aptly stated, “Defying common sense and violating basic safety and ethics standards, the FDA approves vaccines that contain never-proven-safe and known-to-be dangerous ingredients.”

If you were to ask the FDA or the CDC which studies they use to determine the safety and recommendation of injectable aluminum, they would refer you to the only study done by an FDA scientist. “Updated Aluminum Pharmacokinetics Following Infant Exposures Through Diet and Vaccination,” by Dr. Robert J. Mitkus was published October 2011 in the journal Vaccine. While the title may sound impressive, this study was heavily flawed. Mitkus tested infused intravenously (rather than injected) aluminum citrate (rather than aluminum hydroxide) into adults (rather than infants). As J.B. Handley, co-founder of Generation Rescue, wrote, “Dr. Mitkus’ study is somewhere between a professional disgrace and a fraudulent disaster. In no other drug on the planet (except for vaccines) would safety standards ever be determined without using the actual product (aluminum hydroxide) administered the proper way (intramuscular injection) into the proper patient population (infants).”

This should give us all pause. How is it possible that aluminum has been used in vaccines for more than seventy years, yet the FDA has never conducted a single legitimate toxicity study proving the safety of injectable aluminum in human beings? To be fair, the FDA does receive studies from outside sources. However, those sources are pharmaceutical companies who manufacture and profit from the sale of vaccines, and permitting them to provide the FDA with their own scientific findings is allowing the fox to guard the hen house.

In 2014, the global vaccine market was worth over thirty-two billion dollars. According to Technavio, one of the leading technology research companies in the world, the vaccine market will be worth sixty-one billion dollars a year by 2020. With over two hundred seventy new “therapeutic” and “preventable” vaccines in the pipeline, companies are in a race to get their vaccines approved.

In addition to the FDA not doing its own studies, this governmental regulatory agency recklessly allows pharmaceutical companies to use another vaccine, an aluminum adjuvant or a combination of both as their “placebo.” This is beyond sloppy science. As a result, there is no credible vaccine safety or efficacy science used by the FDA or CDC when they make their vaccine recommendations.

Furthermore, for years pharmaceutical companies and public health authorities have been well aware of the dangers associated with vaccine adjuvants and preservatives. However, they have chosen to withhold, hide and deny this information, gravely and inexcusably endangering the public. Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD, a pioneer in vaccine safety research at the University of British Columbia, has published extensively on aluminum adjuvants and vaccine adverse reactions.1,2 In 2011, Tomljenovic provided evidence suggesting that health authorities and vaccine manufacturers made (as summarized by the reporter) “continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindication to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates, which they deemed were necessary for ‘herd immunity.’”3 (Herd immunity is a theory that has never been scientifically tested, and the numbers believed needed to be vaccinated to achieve herd protection are a guesstimate, rather than based on science.)

A great example of this type of deception is the story of mercury (thimerosal) in vaccines. As parents became more hesitant and vocal during the late 1990s, the CDC began a highly publicized campaign announcing that they were “phasing out” mercury from U.S. childhood vaccines. By 2001, they declared that the manufacturing of thimerosal-containing vaccines had ceased. In reality, some of these vaccines were changed to “low-mercury.” Because childhood vaccines were deemed “essentially” mercury-free at this point, health officials were quick to assert that autism was not linked to mercury as autism rates continued to increase. What they didn’t tell the public was that during the so-called phase-out period, the CDC began recommending mercury-containing influenza vaccines to pregnant women. They also added four doses of the pneumococcal vaccine (PCV), which has a high aluminum content, to the childhood immunization schedule in 2000, and two doses of the aluminum-containing hepatitis A vaccine in 2005 (Table 1). These increases led to a 25 percent increased uptake of aluminum for babies by 2005. Additionally, in 2001, the CDC began recommending pregnant women receive the aluminum-containing pertussis vaccine (Tdap), despite the fact that studies show that aluminum crosses the placenta and accumulates in fetal tissue.

Perhaps the most shocking recommendation is the influenza vaccine, as the vast majority of these vaccines contain 25 micrograms (mcg) of thimerosal per dose. Unsuspecting parents who take their children to be vaccinated according to schedule will most likely submit their children to nineteen doses of mercury-containing influenza vaccines between six months and eighteen years of age. In other words, today’s children receive nearly as much mercury as prior to 2001 and they receive 25 percent more aluminum. Although the FDA and CDC vehemently deny a correlation, could this be why one in two children in the U.S. is chronically ill, one in six suffers from a neurodevelopmental disorder and one in thirty-six is autistic?

Because of work done by Dr. Boyd Haley, former professor of medicinal chemistry and chairman of the chemistry department at the University of Kentucky, we know that the combination of mercury and aluminum causes synergistic toxicity. In 2005, Dr. Haley published a study in which he investigated combining aluminum hydroxide and thimerosal. “Mercury Toxicity: Genetic Susceptibility and Synergistic Effects” describes Dr. Haley’s findings: Cultured neurons showed a 10 percent cell death six hours after they were exposed to mercury and aluminum separately, as compared to a whopping 60 percent death rate when exposed in combination. This clearly demonstrated the synergistic toxicity of aluminum and mercury.

Adding insult to injury, prior to the dangerously misleading 2011 Mitkus study, the FDA admitted they allowed the use of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines simply because they “assumed” they were safe. The most prominent pro-vaccine, pro-aluminum safety argument you will hear involves the amount of toxic materials in vaccines. According to its website, the FDA claims the amount of aluminum present in vaccines is low, therefore not harmful. They defend the use of aluminum in vaccines, stating that it is one of the most common metals found in nature and we get much more aluminum exposure from our air, food and water than we do from vaccines. Therefore, the amount of aluminum in vaccines is not dangerous. This reasoning however, is far from scientific, because the aluminum found naturally in the earth’s crust is tightly bound to other elements, making it inert and not bioavailable. The different routes of entry are not interchangeable for assessing toxic impacts. Inhaling and ingesting aluminum are not the same as injecting it. Aluminum injected via vaccination bypasses the protective barriers of the gastrointestinal tract and mucous membranes, entering directly into the muscle where it can enter the bloodstream and lymph, thus redistributing and accumulating in the bones, lungs and brain. It is absurd to assume that injected aluminum is safe because it is introduced in lesser quantity than say, ingested aluminum, 99.7 percent of which is not absorbed by the body.

The lack of FDA safety standards is particularly disturbing if you consider that the majority of early childhood vaccines, which are given at birth and mandated for school in every state, contain aluminum adjuvants. If parents follow the current, out-of-control CDC-recommended vaccine schedule, their children will receive seventy doses of sixteen different vaccines by age eighteen, while injecting a potential 4,925 mcg of accumulated aluminum by age eighteen months alone (Table 2). Because the FDA has only studied IV solutions and injectable medications containing aluminum (not vaccines), they cannot possibly be a reliable source to determine safe levels of aluminum in vaccines. This said, the FDA does set limits on aluminum content in parenteral drug products (again, not vaccines) and requires labels on package inserts that state: “WARNING: This product contains aluminum that may be toxic. Aluminum may reach toxic levels with prolonged parenteral administration if kidney function is impaired. Premature neonates are particularly at risk because their kidneys are immature, and they require large amounts of calcium and phosphate solutions, which contain aluminum.” The FDA also states, “Research indicates that patients with impaired kidney function, including premature neonates, who receive injections greater than 4 to 5 mcg per kilogram of body weight per day, accumulate at levels associated with central nervous system and bone toxicity.”

Babies are injected with 1,225 mcg of aluminum instantaneously at 2 months of age and 4,925 mcg of accumulative aluminum by 18 months of age. Source: The vaccine manufacturers’ product inserts and the CDC’s 2016 childhood vaccination schedule. © NZM.

The FDA, however, does not require labels on vaccines warning about the dangers of aluminum toxicity. Do the math, and you’ll find that a twelve-pound baby at two months of age could potentially receive 1,225 mcg of aluminum at their well-baby visit if the commonly used, highest-aluminum brands of vaccines are administered along with the hepatitis B vaccine. As Neil Z. Miller demonstrates in his paper titled: “Aluminum in Childhood Vaccines Is Unsafe,” published November 4, 2016 in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, using the FDA’s own figures, 11-14 mcg of injected aluminum would be toxic to a six-pound baby with impaired kidney function, yet infants are routinely given 250 mcg of aluminum within twelve hours of birth via the hepatitis B vaccine.

Table 2.  Babies are injected with 1,225 mcg of aluminum instantaneously at 2 months of age and 4,925 mcg of accumulative aluminum by 18 months of age. Source: The vaccine manufacturers’ product inserts and the CDC’s 2016 childhood vaccination schedule. © NZM.

Miller also makes the point that “babies are not the only age group exposed to high levels of aluminum in vaccines.” For example, the HPV vaccine (indicated for the prevention of cervical and anal cancers and genital warts associated with some strains of human papillomavirus) is recommended for use in both males and females, nine through twenty-six years of age. According to package inserts, each 0.5-mL dose of Gardasil 9 (HPV vaccine) contains approximately 500 mcg of aluminum and two to three doses are recommended over a six- to twelve-month period based on age.

It’s important to know that Gardasil was fast-tracked through the FDA. Safety trials did not include a true placebo as “control groups” were also injected with aluminum and pharmaceutical researchers masked a cascade of adverse reactions. To date, there have been over fifty-five thousand adverse reactions reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), including four hundred six deaths.

When my producing partners and I set out to reveal the truth about aluminum in our documentary about vaccines, The Greater Good, we visited world-renowned aluminum expert Dr. Christopher Shaw at the University of British Columbia. As the first to test the biological impact of aluminum adjuvants in 2007, Dr. Shaw and fellow researchers took the same aluminum hydroxide used in vaccines and injected it into the muscles of mice to see what would happen when they tried to mimic the vaccine schedule. What they found was rapid behavioral symptoms, including not only behavioral deficits of motor function, but cognitive deficits as well. Later when they sacrificed the animals and looked into their brains and spinal cords, they found massive damage to motor neurons. As Dr. Shaw explained, they “may be creating conditions for Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease, maybe not immediately, but ten, twenty, thirty years down the road.” When we as filmmakers asked the FDA for a response to Dr. Shaw’s study, they said they did “not believe this particular paper brings to light the need for additional research that is not already underway.” My question to the FDA today would be, “where is that research now that a decade has gone by?”

Joining the ranks with Dr. Shaw, many additional independent scientists have made groundbreaking discoveries regarding aluminum adjuvants and potential injury. Some of the most prominent in the field include Dr. Shaw’s colleague, Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD, of the University of British Columbia; Dr. Christopher Exley of Keele University; Drs. Romain Gherardi and Guillemette Crépeaux of Université Paris-Est Créteil; and Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld of Tel Aviv University.

Because of their work, we now know that aluminum adjuvants may result in autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications. We also know that aluminum exposures are connected to autoimmune diseases such as lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, Gulf War syndrome, type 1 diabetes, macrophagic myofasciitis and chronic fatigue syndrome, as well as a spectrum of neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s, ALS and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs).

Perhaps the best library of peer-reviewed, published studies on aluminum can be found at Children’s Medical Safety Research Institute (CMSRI) at In fact, CMSRI, founded by Claire Dwoskin, not only has a comprehensive website featuring the most important studies, they are dedicated to funding independent research in hopes of providing answers to our growing, worldwide epidemic of chronic disease and disability. Recently, two very important aluminum studies were made possible by CMSRI. Funding from Dwoskin’s organization provided Dr. Christopher Exley, researcher and professor at Keele University, and his co-workers the means to examine the effects of aluminum in deceased Alzheimer’s and autism patients.

One of these studies used fluorescence microscopy, which revealed extremely high levels of aluminum in the brains of twelve familial Alzheimer’s disease (AD) victims. “Aluminum in Brain Tissue in Familial Alzheimer’s Disease,” published December 9, 2016 in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, not only confirmed the presence of aluminum in familial AD brain tissue, it also gave rise to two other important conclusions. First, based on their admittedly “striking” results, the authors suggest that genetic predisposition to AD may be accompanied by “a higher propensity to accumulate and retain aluminum in the brain.”

Second and equally important, the authors report that high aluminum concentrations are “highly likely” to contribute not only to early onset and aggressive progress of familial AD but to “all forms of AD under certain conditions.” (Alzheimer’s disease is expected to affect one in two Americans by 2050.)

The November 2017 issue of the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology published another study by Dr. Exley and team titled: “Aluminum in Brain Tissue in Autism.” Researchers examined the brains of five deceased individuals who were diagnosed with ASD and found them to contain among the highest levels of the toxic metal aluminum ever recorded. In fact, they had up to ten times more aluminum in their brains than healthy adults.

Clearly, many recent studies outline concerns over the use of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines. As Handley states, “versus ten years ago, scientists now know that aluminum adjuvant can 1) impair brain development, 2) remain in the brain much longer than thought, 3) is brought into the brain by macrophages that grab the aluminum from the vaccine injection site and recirculate it, 4) may actually be worse when injected in small doses (as happens in vaccination), and 4) there’s remarkably high levels of aluminum in the brains of people diagnosed with autism.” Add Dr. Exley’s findings on aluminum and Alzheimer’s, and the public should be very concerned.

It’s worth mentioning here that research points to a way of helping those burdened with a heavy load of aluminum. Several studies have shown the essential nutrient silica may effectively detoxify and help excrete aluminum. “Silicon-Rich Mineral Water as a Non-Invasive Test of the ‘Aluminum Hypothesis’ in Alzheimer’s Disease,” by Dr. Exley was published in the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 2013. Taurine and curcumin have also been shown to reduce aluminum neurotoxicity as evidenced in a study titled “Therapeutic Affect of Taurine Against Aluminum-Induced Impairment on Learning, Memory and Brain Neurotransmitters in Rats,” published February 4, 2014 in the journal Neurological Sciences. Vitamin E and selenium have also been found to be protective against oxidative stress and injury stimulated by excessive intake of aluminum.

Because scientific evidence published in recent years shows that vaccines have great potential for causing brain and immune system injury, the only responsible actions are what Hayes called for in her WAPF presentation—a complete moratorium on vaccines, the repeal the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (which protects vaccine manufacturers from all product liability lawsuits) and the overturning of the 1905 Jacobson vs. MA decision, which is often cited as justification for vaccine mandates, even though the 1947 Nuremburg Code should have made that decision null and void. Mandates for children are particularly disturbing as studies show children are at far greater risk from aluminum adjuvants because of the combination of rapid growth, an incomplete blood-brain barrier and limited ability to eliminate toxins.

I will go so far as to say, and I know Hayes would agree, it is no longer acceptable for anyone within the medical community who administers vaccines to overlook the serious safety concerns that recent studies raise. While findings of peer-reviewed, published studies receive little coverage in the mainstream media, leading scientists and research institutes worldwide are recognizing the implications and indictments of aluminum and aluminum adjuvants. It is time for health professionals to do the same and to cease giving vaccines until they are proven safe. After all, isn’t “first do no harm” one of the most valued guiding principles of medical care?

As for the FDA, they need to start requiring the same rigorous pre-licensing safety testing for vaccines that they require for other drugs. Likewise, it is not acceptable for the CDC to recommend aluminum-containing vaccines (or any vaccines for that matter, as no vaccines have ever gone through proper safety studies and all have potentially devastating side effects). I believe the actions of these two agencies are nothing less than criminal, and I would be thrilled to see more people stand up like Hayes, who is not afraid to speak the truth, and like Dwoskin, who strives to find unbiased answers though scientific research.

Aluminum may be praised for its vital use in the aerospace industry and for its contributions to the transportation and building industries worldwide; however, it does not have any business being in our vaccines. Additionally, aluminum does not belong in our household products, food (including baby formula), food packaging, cosmetics and skincare products including sunscreen, deodorants and prescription and over-the-counter medicines. Aluminum may be a “natural” substance found in the earth’s crust, air, soil and water, but it does not have any biological function in any living organism, and it presents a danger to all living creatures, including human beings.

As Hayes so poignantly said in her WAPF talk, “Together, we must protect the health of our children, people of all ages, and the future of our country.” We must all be arbitrators of the truth. We must be our own health advocates. We must do our homework and learn the facts about aluminum and all vaccines. After all, our lives and those of our children depend upon it.

1. Tomljenovic L, Shaw CA. Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism? J Inorg Biochem 2011;105(11):1489-1499.
2. Tomljenovic L, Shaw CA. Aluminum vaccine adjuvants: are they safe? Curr Med Chem 2011;18(17):2630-2637.
3. Mihalovic D. Committees on vaccination found to withhold critical data on adverse reactions from both parents and health practitioners. Prevent, Sept. 16, 2013.


This article appeared in Wise Traditions in Food, Farming and the Healing Arts, the quarterly magazine of the Weston A. Price Foundation, Spring 2018.

About Kendall Nelson

Kendall Nelson, is a producer, director and activist who co-produced The Greater Good, an award-winning film that explores the controversy of vaccinations. She serves the Weston A. Price Foundation as a vaccine consultant and activist, generating action alerts and articles on vaccine issues and legislation. She is a proud member of the International Women’s Forum, which works to build better global leadership across careers, continents and cultures by connecting the world’s most preeminent women of significant and diverse achievement.

WATCH: Your Body and Mind Aren’t Enough – They Want Your Soul

It is abundantly clear that the whole coronavirus hoax is being organised and scripted by psychologists who specialise in brainwashing and what are known in military circles as psychological warfare.

The statistics show clearly that the coronavirus is no longer an epidemic. Doctors everywhere admit that there are now very few deaths from the disease. Indeed, many doctors are admitting that there never was an epidemic. The whole thing was a sleight of hand trick; a massive manipulation.

WATCH Dr Vernon Coleman’s banned video here
Your Body And Mind Aren’t Enough – They Want Your Soul

Doctors and nurses have been told that they will be fired, and probably never work again, if they speak to the media at all. A few have spoken out anonymously and have admitted that hospitals have not been busy. There have been very few cases of Covid-19. I’ve been told that the few patients who were found were tested many times – and on each occasion the test was submitted as though it related to a new patient. So each patient who tested positive became 10 or 12 cases of coronavirus. The whole story has been created and we have been tricked, conned and manipulated. In some hospitals, doctors and nurses apparently wore masks only when members of the public were around. Social distancing rules were never obeyed unless there were cameras around recording doctors and nurses dancing and clapping themselves.

In the UK, GPs surgeries have been effectively closed – with patients forced to telephone if they wanted to speak to a doctor. Now accident and emergency departments are going to be open only to patients who have telephoned and made an appointment.

`I shall be breaking my leg next Wednesday afternoon, so could I have an appointment, please? Around 3.30 pm should be the right time. ’

`I think I will be having a stroke on Thursday evening. Could I have an appointment for 10.45 pm please?’

GPs surgeries and hospitals will soon be accessed via the internet only. Face to face medicine will be a thing of the past. Artificial intelligence is taking over. Telemedicine will replace traditional medicine. Operations, when they are essential, will eventually be performed by robots. Doctors and nurses haven’t understand it yet but they will be redundant.

It is no accident that shops are struggling.

Forcing everyone to wear masks and forcing shops to put social distancing tapes on the floor is designed to make shopping such an unpleasant experience that everyone will do their shopping online. Telling shops not to take cash is utter nonsense – it seems designed to put small shops out of business by making the whole experience unbearable for many. The current system seems designed to destroy High Street shops.

Similarly, pubs and restaurants are being destroyed by social distancing rules, by forcing us to wear masks and by insisting that everyone leave all their personal details with the pub or restaurant staff. The psychologists know that although one or two people will visit pubs and restaurants for a while, most will soon tire of the system that has been put into operation.

Advised by the brainwashing specialists, politicians are teasing us and controlling us by giving a little freedom, and then taking it away. We are told that we can take holidays abroad without having to spend two weeks in quarantine when we return. But the rules may change while we are away, in which case we will have to go into isolation for two weeks. And the list of countries which we can visit without quarantine is changing all the time. You’d have to be mad to fix a holiday abroad not knowing what the rules will be while you are away or when you arrive back.

The plan is to disconcert us, to keep us on edge, depressed and fearful. That is what our governments are doing to us – deliberately.

Governments always lie to us. Remember Vietnam? Cuba? The twin towers? The weapons of mass destruction that didn’t exist?

But the lies have been elevated to new levels. They now want to control everything.

We are constantly being told of draconian measures being introduced in other areas. And since the rules change from one area to another, we never quite know what punishments to escape. In one part of America you can be sent to prison for a year if you fail to wear a mask. In another part of America you have to pay a 2,000 dollar fine but there is no prison sentence. In Texas, some people have been told that they should wear masks in their own homes. In one shop, a guard pulled a gun on a man who was not wearing a mask. In California, people have been telephoning the police if they’ve heard a neighbour coughing or sneezing. The snitches and sneaks, eager to please the system, are part of the mass surveillance system.

And yet if you buy a boxful of disposable masks you will probably see, printed on the side of the mask, a warning that the mask does not provide protection against viruses such as the one which causes Covid-19. Of course it doesn’t. The viruses go straight through the mask, like a bluebottle fly through chickenwire.

If you are beginning to feel as though you are being treated like a prisoner of war then you’re beginning to understand the situation.

There has been a global coup, led by the United Nations, the World Health Organisation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and a variety of other billionaires. Their aims are quite straightforward: they want to reorganise the world, they want a world government, they want to destroy everything which we regard as `normal’, they want to destroy our history (they are using the Black Lives Matter campaign to help with that) and they want to force us to use the internet for everything. They want us all vaccinated, regularly, and they want us to carry immunity passports if we want to leave our homes, buy things or obtain medical assistance. They want us tracked and traced every minute of the day. They want us to use self-driving cars because they can be controlled from afar. They want us to have smart meters installed so that they can turn off our electricity supplies if we misbehave. They are creating so-called smart motorways which seem deliberately designed to create more queues. Ever changing speed limits cause more traffic jams and plenty of fines. They want us to use telephone apps for all our purchases and they want us all to be dependent upon the State. They want to eradicate small companies so that large multinationals can satisfy all our needs. And they want to replace people with robots. The future they have planned for us bears very little resemblance to the world to which we are accustomed.

The coronavirus is a key part of the plan. It is the virus which is going to terrify us into obeying their orders without question. And they are using psychological warfare techniques to keep us under control. The only plague around is a plague of corruption. The individuals who are helping with the compulsory testing and tracking are today’s concentration camp guards.

There has been a global coup and our lives are being micromanaged by a group of very evil people and organisations which are determined to take control of the world in order to redesign it to suit their own selfish, commercial and political interests. Our political system has failed us all completely.

They want to get rid of the elderly, the middle classes and schools. They want to get rid of anyone who isn’t deemed to be an asset to the State.

They want children to be educated via the internet and they aren’t terribly interested in how well educated they are at the end of their schooling. Forcing children to follow social distancing rules is completely unnecessary and so cruel it can only be described as evil. It will create emotionally damaged children who are germophobic, suicidal, homicidal, neurotic and psychotic. Many will become psychopathic. And I now believe it has been planned by the numerous teams of psychologists and military mind control specialists in countries everywhere who are helping to mastermind our new global world. I wouldn’t be surprised to see children forced to wear masks.

At first I thought that the social distancing in schools was being imposed through ignorance but I no longer believe that. This is being done to destroy and it is evil almost beyond comprehension. What sort of people deliberately use CIA torture techniques on children? Psychologists, politicians and teachers all around the world are guilty and should be tried at the war crimes court.

They want to reduce the global population. They know that forcing us into isolation, making pubs unbearable and closing nightclubs will help stop boys meeting girls and vice versa. It is no coincidence that the authorities have for the last few years been encouraging homosexuality, transsexuality and gender reassignment. Fewer babies that way.

This is all a question of power, control and money – but not necessary in that order.

Our food supplies are being controlled. They are planning shortages that will lead to panic and mass starvation – particularly in the underdeveloped parts of the world. All around the world farms and food packing and distribution centres are being closed down because employees (usually asymptomatic) are tested and shown to be positive. (Why, you might ask, does it seem that food workers are being targeted for testing?)

Thanks to the climate change nutters, who have been manipulated very successfully, there are going to be massive shortages of energy. There will be no electricity for long periods of time. Heating and cooking will, for many, be nigh on impossible.

The recent Black Lives Matter demonstrations have been manipulated to call for the defunding of the police. The plan is to replace the police with the military and with drones and robots. It is quite remarkable how easily the Black Lives Matter demonstrators were manipulated into helping the coup that will wreck their lives.

They want to control everything.

They want our bodies, our minds and our souls.

And unless we fight back we will soon be nothing but slaves of the system. We are fighting a war of terror – but our enemies are our governments and international organisations such as the United Nations and the World Health Organisation.

We all have to stand up against the system.

Doctors could help protect us all by making it clear to everyone that the so-called pandemic never existed and that it was a trick designed to prepare us for the takeover, the coup.

Once the Covid-19 hoax has been properly exposed for the sham that it is, the whole plan will fall apart. And it will be impossible for the manipulators, the plotters – the enemy – to try the same trick again.

Dr Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc FRSA
Copyright Vernon Coleman July 2020

Vernon Coleman’s book Coming Apocalypse explains how the hoax developed and what our future will be. Coming Apocalypse is available on Amazon as a paperback and an eBook.




The Ugly Racism of Karl Marx

Editor’s note: This commentary contains language, although used in historical context, that may offend some readers.



May Day celebrations were held all across the fruited plain, with leftist radicals and unionists worshipping the ideals of communism.

Communism is an ideology calling for government control over our lives. It was created by Karl Marx, who—along with his collaborator, Friedrich Engels—wrote a pamphlet called “Manifesto of the Communist Party.”

In 1867, Marx wrote the first volume of “Das Kapital.” The second and third volumes were published posthumously, edited by Engels.

Few people who call themselves Marxists have ever even bothered to read “Das Kapital.” If one did read it, he would see that people who call themselves Marxists have little in common with Marx.

For those who see Marx as their hero, there are a few historical tidbits they might find interesting. Nathaniel Weyl, himself a former communist, dug them up for his 1979 book, “Karl Marx: Racist.”

For example, Marx didn’t think much of Mexicans. When the United States annexed California after the Mexican War, Marx sarcastically asked, “Is it a misfortune that magnificent California was seized from the lazy Mexicans who did not know what to do with it?”

Engels shared Marx’s contempt for Mexicans, explaining: “In America we have witnessed the conquest of Mexico and have rejoiced at it. It is to the interest of its own development that Mexico will be placed under the tutelage of the United States.”

Marx had a racial vision that might be interesting to his modern-day black supporters. In a letter to Engels, in reference to his socialist political competitor Ferdinand Lassalle, Marx wrote:

It is now completely clear to me that he, as is proved by his cranial formation and his hair, descends from the Negroes who had joined Moses’ exodus from Egypt, assuming that his mother or grandmother on the paternal side had not interbred with a n—–. Now this union of Judaism and Germanism with a basic Negro substance must produce a peculiar product.

Engels shared Marx’s racial philosophy. In 1887, Paul Lafargue, who was Marx’s son-in-law, was a candidate for a council seat in a Paris district that contained a zoo. Engels claimed that Lafargue had “one-eighth or one-twelfth n—– blood.”

In a letter to Lafargue’s wife, Engels wrote, “Being in his quality as a n—–, a degree nearer to the rest of the animal kingdom than the rest of us, he is undoubtedly the most appropriate representative of that district.”

Marx was also an anti-Semite, as seen in his essay titled “On the Jewish Question,” which was published in 1844. Marx asked:

What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money. … Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist. Money degrades all the gods of man—and turns them into commodities. … The bill of exchange is the real god of the Jew. His god is only an illusory bill of exchange. … The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of the merchant, of the man of money in general.

Despite the fact that in the 20th century alone communism was responsible for more than 100 million murders, much of the support for communism and socialism is among intellectuals.

The reason they do not condemn the barbarism of communism is understandable. Richard Pipes explains:

Intellectuals, by the very nature of their professions, grant enormous attention to words and ideas. And they are attracted by socialist ideas. They find that the ideas of communism are praiseworthy and attractive; that, to them, is more important than the practice of communism. Now, Nazi ideals, on the other hand, were pure barbarism; nothing could be said in favor of them.

That means leftists around the world will continue to celebrate the ideas of communism.


pedovore 7



● Hillary Clinton
● Bill Clinton
● George Nader (Businessman)
● Huma Aberdin
● Laura Silsby
● Rachel Chandler
● Jeffrey Epstein
● Ghislaine Maxwell
● John Podesta
● Michael Podesta
● James Alefantis
● Anthony Wiener
● Leslie Wexner (Limited Inc Chairman)
● Herbert Strauss
● Isidor Strauss
● Martin A. Nowak
● Steven Spielberg
● Edgar Bronfman Sr. (Seagram Chairman)
● Charles Bronfman (Seagram Co)
● Michael Steinhardt (former hedge-fund manager)
● Sara Bronfman
● Clare Bronfman
● Niles Lehman (Professor at Portland State University)
● Seth Roger
● Ruth Ginsberg
● Alison Mack
● Rachel Chandler
● Robert Maxwell
● Wendi Murdoch
● Jonathan Cheban
● Naomi Campbell
● Maximiliam Chow
● Val Kilmer
● Marina Abramovic




● Steven Spielberg
● Michael Jackson
● Kevin Spacey

● Alison Mac
● Marc Collins-Rector (Founder of Den)
● Chad Shackley
● Brock Pierce
● David Geffen
● Tom Hanks
● Dustin Hoffman
● Andrew Kreisberg (American television writer, producer)
● Bryan Singer
● Harvey Weinstein
● Bob Weinstein
● Roman Polanski
● Ruma Hazard
● Charlie Sheen
● Madonna
● Kate Perry
● Miley Cyrus
● Errol Flynn
● Billy Graham
● Walt Disney
● Michael Laney (Former Walt Disney vice president)
● James Gunn (Disney)




● Heidi Fleiss
● Jeffrey Epstein




● Alison Mack
● Stormy Daniels
● Rachel Chandler
● Ghislaine Maxwell




● Ghislaine Maxwell
● Chris Tucker
● Larry Summers
● Lisa Summers
● Bill Murray
● Bill Hammond
● Ehud Barak
● Andrés Pastrana (Former President of Colombia 1998-2002)
● Jean Luc Brunel
● Doug Band
● Ron Burkle
● Woody Allen
● Sarah Kellen
● Ray Barzanna
● Sandy Burger
● Andrea Mitrovitch
● Peter Marino
● Shelley Lewis
● Paul Hala(t) (d) a
● Richardo Legoretta
● Tom Pritzker
● Kelly Spamm
● Tiffany Gramza
● Claire Hazel
● Paula Epstein
● Mark Epstein
● Ralph Elison
● Sophie Biddle
● Audrey Raimbault
● Shelley Harrison
● Melinda Luntz
● Gwendolyn Beck
● Albert Pinto
● Linda Pinto
● Gary Roxburgh
● Mandy Elison
● Jean Michelle Gathy
● Virginia Roberts
● Kristy Rodgers (Kristina Real Rodgers)
● Greg Holbert
● Alyssa Rodgers
● Juliette Bryant
● Heather Mann
● Ed Tuttle
● Glen Dubin
● Ellen Spencer
● Chris Wagner
● Casey Wasserman
● Laura Wasserman
● Paul Mellon
● Oliver Sachs
● Henry Rosovsky
● Lynn Forester (de Rothschild)
● Joe Pagano
● Naomi Campbell
● Nicole Junkermann
● Rodney Slater
● Magali Blachon (Deperrier)
● Svetlana Griaznova
● Emmy Tayler
● Larry Visoski
● Teala Davies
● Juan (Pablo) Molyneux
● Freya Willemoes) Wissing
● Adam Perry Lang
● Fleur Perry Lang
● Caren Casey
● Hank Coller
● Cindy Lopez
● Mark Lloyd
● Alan Dershowitz
● Seth Green
● James Gunn
● Steven Spielberg
● Tom Hanks
● Steven Colbert
● Jimmy Kimmel
● Barack Obama
● Kevin Spacey
● Kathy Griffin
● Oprah Winfrey
● Shawn Carter
● Beyoncé Knowles
● Anthony Kiedis
● John Legend
● Chrissy Tiegen
● Jim Carrey
● Steven Tyler
● Ben Affleck
● Stephen Collins
● Will Ferrell
● Aliaune Damala Badara Thiam (Akon)
● Marshall Matters
● Jeffrey Jones
● Victor Salva
● Mark Collins Rector
● Charlie Sheen
● Tyler Grasham
● Madonna Ciccone
● Katheryn Hudson
● Gwen Stefani
● Stefani Germanotta
● James Franco
● Will Smith
● Justin Roland
● John Cusack
● Anderson Cooper
● Demi Moore
● Brian Affleck
● Meryl Streep
● Wanda Sykes
● Chelsea Handler
● Michelle Wolf
● David Yarovesky
● Pharrell Williams
● Quentin Tarantino
● Courtney Love
● Alec Baldwin
● Robert Downey Jr.
● Disney Corporation (Offering kids “scuba-diving” trips, to the Epstein Island)


Link: the Epstein flight log documents


● Andre Balazs (Owner of the Standard Hotels and connected to the Rockefellers)
● Jay Z
● Beyoncé Knowles
● John Belushi
● Britney Spears
● Errol Flynn
● Dennis Hopper
● Helmut Newton
● Jim Morrison
● James Dean
● Billy Idol
● Victoria Beckham
● Heath Ledger
● Sienna Miller
● Balthazar Getty
● Scarlet Johansen


● Elon Musk

● Mark Zuckerberg

● Lawrence M. Krauss
● Steven Pinker
● Mick Jagger
● Courtney Love
● Joan Rivers (deceased)
● Kevin Spacey
● Chris Rock
● Eli Weisel (Nobel Prize winning Holocaust profiteer)
● Lauren Hutton (Top fashion model)
● Duke & Duchess of York
● Earl Spencer (Late Diana’s brother)
● Richard Bronson (English businessman)
● Tony Blair (Former UK prime minister)
● David Koch (1/2 of a brother team)
● David Rockefeller
● Evelyn de Rothschild
● Eduouard de Rothschild


● Jake Tapper (CNN)
● Jennifer Tapper (wife of Jake Tapper)

● Maple Inc

● Me Over Seas


● Barbara Walters
● Mort Zuckerman
● Eric Margolis
● Rupert Murdock
● Conrad & Barbara Black; Baron Black of Crossharbour


● Bill Clinton (Former president of America)
● Jon & Mary Kaye Huntsman
● Governor Charles Turnbull (US Virgin Islands)
● Henry Kissinger
● Ethel Kennedy
● Bobby & Mary Kennedy
● Senator Edward Kennedy (deceased)
● Ted Kennedy Jr.
● Andrew & Kerry Kennedy Cuomo
● Maria Shriver (Kennedy relative/Schwarznegger’s ex)

(Vacant 1992-2002)

● Keck Family (Standard Oil / Founders of The Standard Hotel)
● Perry Mason
● Bank of California
● JP Morgan – Standard Oil
● Jeffrey Epstein
● Bear Stearns Group
● Standard Holdings
● Colombia Development


(It appears to be an obvious connection between the; STANDARD HOTEL DTLA and the underground military base at the CHINA LAKE NAVAL MILITARY TEST-BASE.)

pedovore 6

pedovore 5

pedovore 4

perovore 3

perovore 2

perovore 1

%d bloggers like this: